logo
Christchurch mayor backs govt-capped rates rise

Christchurch mayor backs govt-capped rates rise

By Tim Brown of RNZ
Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger is backing calls for the government to cap rates rises.
Cabinet will consider options to control rate rises, including capping, later this year.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has complained of councils' wasteful spending, comparing local politicians to kids in a candy store.
"Councils don't always do a great job of spending your money like you would spend it. There are wasteful projects - there is evidence of that," Willis told RNZ's Morning Report programme yesterday.
"We want councils focusing on the things people expect them to do, which is the rubbish, the roads, the pipes, the basics - and not all the fanciful projects."
Mauger told RNZ he could not agree more.
"Everyone campaigns 'ohh, we gotta stick to basics', right? And then the first thing some of us do is go away and not stick to basics," he said.
"We need to be stronger around the council table to say what's basics. Now ... someone's basic might be someone else's must have ... but it's good to have rates caps. I feel it's good. I really do."
Earlier this year, the Taxpayers' Union launched a campaign calling for rates to be capped at inflation levels.
Mauger imagined a cap closer to 5%, saying his council was "very close to what I'd call the rates cap".
He conceded it would not be possible to cap rates at inflation.
"If it's low as that we would struggle with that. I think to get down to 2 percent, if the government put a rates cap at 2 percent on it, I think there's a lot of problems."
Christchurch City Council had approved average rates increases of 6.4%, 9.9% and 6.6% this term, as a result average rates bills had climbed almost 25% in the city this triennium, while inflation had only risen about 8% during that time.
Willis told Morning Report she expected push back from councils "because when you take candy away from kids in a candy store, they don't really like it. But at the same time, we are on the side of ratepayers".
Asked if he was acting like a kid in a candy store, Mauger told RNZ: "No - when it's my own money, it is. But when you're spending other people's money, [rates caps] are good".
"If we had money running out of our ears, you'd spend it on other stuff. We haven't got that at the moment."
He agreed with Willis that councils had engaged in wasteful spending, and when asked for an example he pointed to cycleway spending.
"We've wasted money on how we have designed and built cycleways. Now I'm not against cycleways but we can build them one hell of a lot cheaper - a lot, lot cheaper," Mauger said.
The council had budgeted $210.4 million for new cycleways, improvements, and cycleway and footpath renewals over the next decade in its long-term plan.
However, that only accounted for 3.2% of its budgeted $6.5 billion in capital spending.
With major projects, such as Christchurch's new stadium and new sports complex almost complete, rates pressure would ease in the future.
But Mauger said the council still needed to find other ways to cut its cloth.
"What we've got to look at is our levels of service now.
"Everyone expects when they walk out the door, they expect the footpath to be half-good, they expect the gutter to be falling the right way, they expect the water to be not leaking out of the ground, the grass mowed and rubbish picked up - that's what they expect.
"If we backed off and didn't mow the grass as often or didn't pick up the rubbish as often, that's how we could save some money. I can't say that's how you would, but that's how we can do it quicker and easier."
Rates caps had been panned by Labour leader Chris Hipkins - who said it would make the problem worse not better - and Local Government New Zealand president and Selwyn District mayor Sam Broughton - who said capping rates could be "disastrous for communities".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House
Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House

Chlöe Swarbrick's comments in the House on Tuesday: By Craig McCulloch of RNZ The Speaker has 'named' Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick for refusing to leave the House. The punishment means the MP had to once again leave the House, and will have her pay docked. Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament yesterday after refusing to withdraw and apologise for comments suggesting coalition MPs grow a spine and sanction Israel over the war in Gaza. At the time, Speaker Gerry Brownlee barred Swarbrick for the rest of the week, unless she apologised when the House sat this afternoon. Swarbrick refused to do so and refused to leave. Brownlee then named her - a punishment handed down by the Speaker for a MP whose conduct is disorderly. Swarbrick had previously said she had already received her punishment, and that worse things had been said by other MPs without the Speaker's intervention. Speaking to his ruling, Brownlee said the difference was previous comments had been interjections, while Swarbrick's comment was made inside a speech. "If you think about the comment that was made, 68 members of this House were accused of being spineless. There has never been a time where personal insults like delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House - and I'm not going to start accepting it." Brownlee asked MPs what standard they expected of themselves. "We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament. If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside." Labour leader Chris Hipkins questioned the precedent of the ruling. "There's not a single instance where a member has been asked to withdraw and apologise the following sitting day, and then named for not doing that." New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also questioned the ruling. "My personal view is I don't agree with a thing Chlöe Swarbrick said at all, but this is a robust House where people have a right to express their views as passionate as they may, within certain rules, but I do not think that eviction was warranted." Peters said there had been many instances of language in the House he had disagreed with, including the use of the c-word earlier in the year. Te Pati Maori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to that in her contribution. "There were many of us that were offended by the c-word, but I do want to be able to assure is that spineless is a word, and it looks like the ruling is a political suppression," she said. Ngarewa-Packer repeated the c-word outright. Speaking to RNZ this morning, Swarbrick said the party had received correspondence from legal experts and the public pointing out "far worse" things had been said by other MPs, where the Speaker had chosen not to intervene. "It just doesn't really wash." Swarbrick said she would prefer Parliament's attention was focused on the "real issues of the day" and re-iterated her call for more action against Israel. "New Zealanders want action, and if our House can come together on the point of sanctioning Israel for its war crimes, then that finally would bring us in line with our legacy of standing for human rights and justice." University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis told RNZ it was unusual for Swarbrick to be asked to withdraw and apologise, given many MPs had made similar comments in Parliament before without consequence. He said the standard penalty for challenging the Speaker's authority was to be ordered out of the House for one day. A week-long punishment, Geddis said, was inconsistent with other rulings made by Speakers in recent times. "If the Speaker is starting to almost make up the rules as he goes along, he puts at risk the preparedness of other MPs to accord him his authority. "MPs might start asking, 'well, if the Speaker is just going to do their own thing with no regard to precedence, do we really trust them to have that sort of power?'"

Speaker 'names' Swarbrick for refusing to leave House
Speaker 'names' Swarbrick for refusing to leave House

Otago Daily Times

time2 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Speaker 'names' Swarbrick for refusing to leave House

Chlöe Swarbrick's comments in the House on Tuesday: By Craig McCulloch of RNZ The Speaker has 'named' Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick for refusing to leave the House. Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament yesterday after refusing to withdraw and apologise for comments suggesting coalition MPs grow a spine and sanction Israel over the war in Gaza. At the time, Speaker Gerry Brownlee barred Swarbrick for the rest of the week, unless she apologised when the House sat this afternoon. Swarbrick refused to do so and refused to leave. Brownlee then named her - a punishment handed down by the Speaker for a MP whose conduct is disorderly. Swarbrick had previously said she had already received her punishment and that worse things had been said by other MPs without the Speaker's intervention. Speaking to his ruling, Brownlee said the difference was previous comments had been interjections, while Swarbrick's comment was made inside a speech. "If you think about the comment that was made, 68 members of this House were accused of being spineless. There has never been a time where personal insults like delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House - and I'm not going to start accepting it." He asked MPs what standard they expected of themselves. "We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament. If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside." Labour leader Chris Hipkins questioned the precedent of the ruling. "There's not a single instance where a member has been asked to withdraw and apologise the following sitting day, and then named for not doing that." New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also questioned the ruling. "My personal view is I don't agree with a thing Chlöe Swarbrick said at all, but this is a robust House where people have a right to express their views as passionate as they may, within certain rules, but I do not think that eviction was warranted." Peters said there had been many instances of language in the House he had disagreed with, including the use of the c-word earlier in the year. Te Pati Maori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to that in her contribution. "There were many of us that were offended by the c-word, but I do want to be able to assure is that spineless is a word, and it looks like the ruling is a political suppression," she said. Ngarewa-Packer repeated the c-word outright. Speaking to RNZ this morning, Swarbrick said the party had received correspondence from legal experts and the public pointing out "far worse" things had been said by other MPs, where the Speaker had chosen not to intervene. "It just doesn't really wash." Swarbrick said she would prefer Parliament's attention was focused on the "real issues of the day" and re-iterated her call for more action against Israel. "New Zealanders want action, and if our House can come together on the point of sanctioning Israel for its war crimes, then that finally would bring us in line with our legacy of standing for human rights and justice." University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis told RNZ it was unusual for Swarbrick to be asked to withdraw and apologise, given many MPs had made similar comments in Parliament before without consequence. He said the standard penalty for challenging the Speaker's authority was to be ordered out of the House for one day. A week-long punishment, Geddis said, was inconsistent with other rulings made by Speakers in recent times. "If the Speaker is starting to almost make up the rules as he goes along, he puts at risk the preparedness of other MPs to accord him his authority. "MPs might start asking, 'well, if the Speaker is just going to do their own thing with no regard to precedence, do we really trust them to have that sort of power?'"

Coalition making changes to Crimes Act to tighten human trafficking laws
Coalition making changes to Crimes Act to tighten human trafficking laws

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Coalition making changes to Crimes Act to tighten human trafficking laws

The government is set to make major changes to the Crimes Act 1961. Photo: Unsplash / RNZ composite The coalition is changing the country's trafficking and people smuggling laws out of fears they aren't capturing enough crimminals. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said more than 50 victims of trafficking had been identified since 2009, but only four prosecutions had followed and just two of these prosecutions had led to a conviction. "This doesn't make sense, and our fear is this is just the tip of the iceberg," he said. The government is making the following changes to the Crimes Act 1961: Goldsmith said the changes would strengthen these laws and stop criminals exploiting legal loopholes. "We know these laws are not fit for purpose. Prosecution in trafficking cases is currently far too difficult, and offenders are receiving lighter sentences. "These laws need to be more consistent with international standards, including those in UN conventions." Goldsmith said the changes were part of wider reform the coalition was making to the Crimes Act, and addressed issues raised by submitters on National MP Greg Fleming's members' bill that's currently before the house. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store