Fake doctor from Jharkhand gets 29-month jail term
Rourkela: A local court on Monday sentenced a fake doctor to 29 months of rigorous imprisonment for impersonating a qualified medical practitioner and cheating using forged documents.
Pradmanavan Mukhi Karwa
(54), a Class XII pass-out from Jharkhand, was working at the Rourkela Govt Hospital (RGH) dialysis centre under the false identity of Dr Ramesh Chandra Jha. The convict had secured the position through a Chandigarh-based outsourcing firm, Rahi Care Dialysis.
The fraud came to light when Karwa applied for a personal loan of Rs 16.53 lakh from a private non-banking financial firm. During document verification, it was discovered that he had submitted Jha's certificates with his own photograph.
Following a complaint filed by the finance company on June 26, 2024, Raghunathpalli police arrested Karwa under various sections of the IPC, including forgery and cheating. In a separate case, the outsourcing firm's area manager, Mayur Agarwal, filed a complaint on June 28, revealing that Karwa had been drawing regular salary under the false identity.
Public prosecutor Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, who represented the state during the proceedings, said chief judicial magistrate (first class), Sarmista Padhi, pronounced the verdict after examining 14 witnesses. The sentences under different IPC sections will run concurrently. The judge also imposed a fine of Rs 5,000, with an additional month's imprisonment in case of non-payment.
This isn't Karwa's first offence. He was previously convicted for a similar fraud at Nuagaon PHC, where he worked from 2016 to 2019. In April 2022, he was sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment by JMFC, Sundargarh.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lucknow: Accused kidnapper and rapist of 3-year-old girl killed in encounter
Youth who kidnapped, raped 3-year-old killed in encounter LUCKNOW: A man accused of kidnapping and raping a three-year-old girl in Lucknow was killed in an encounter with police in the early hours of Friday. The accused was identified as Deepak Verma, 24. Police said he was a habitual offender, and several criminal cases were lodged against him at various police stations. Police had announced a reward of Rs 1 lakh for any information leading to his arrest. On Thursday, a complaint was registered at Alambagh police station that a three-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped. The minor sustained multiple injuries to her private parts. Deputy commissioner of police (Central) Ashish Srivastava said, "CCTV footage was scanned, and the accused, who arrived at the spot on a white scooter, was identified through the number plate." Alambagh police were working on the case when, through an informer's tip-off. It was learnt that the Aishbagh resident was trying to flee the city. When the police apprehended him, he fired at the police. Inspector in-charge of Alambagh, Subhash Chandra Saroj, was fired at twice by the accused, but the bulletproof jacket saved his life, police said. "In retaliatory firing, cops shot him, and he was critically injured. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Verma was rushed to Lokbandhu Hospital for treatment, where he succumbed to his injuries. Doctors confirmed his death, and a postmortem is being conducted as per procedure," the DCP said. "The action was taken purely in self-defence. The response was measured and controlled to apprehend the accused alive, but he succumbed to his injuries. The police recovered a country-made pistol and the scooter from the scene," the DCP added. The DCP said that the accused worked as a vendor selling water at railway stations. To recall, the three-year-old girl was kidnapped while she was sleeping next to her parents on the roadside early Thursday morning. The child was found in a severely injured state, abandoned around 500 metres from the spot. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Vijay Mallya—declared a fugitive economic offender—wants to return home. What are his options?
Mumbai/Bengaluru/New Delhi: After nearly a decade of silence, Vijay Mallya, the flashy business tycoon who founded one of India's fanciest airlines that eventually went kaput and resulted in him being declared a fugitive economic offender, has re-emerged to tell his side of the story. The 'King of Good Times' wants to return to India and clear his name if promised a 'fair trial and a dignified existence", he said in a podcast recorded in London, where he has resided since leaving India in 2016. 'We all know how long detentions and trials can last in India," he said. 'That's not justice." But while the former liquor baron has legal remedies available to him to return to India and settle the outstanding cases against him, it won't be a smooth landing, say legal experts. 'If Vijay Mallya steps off a plane in India, the legal chessboard lights up instantly," said Ketan Mukhija, a senior partner at law firm Burgeon Law. Mallya could voluntarily appear before the court and surrender, thereby invoking his right to apply for bail, including anticipatory bail, Mukhija said. Mallya's legal team, however, would have to contest every existing arrest warrant, lookout circular, and non-bailable order, arguing on grounds of procedural irregularities or the absence of fresh incriminating evidence, Mukhija added. Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, including the right to a fair trial, would govern Mallya's request for a 'fair trial', according to Ajay Khatalawala, managing partner at law firm Little & Co. Mallya can also contest the tag of fugitive economic offender. The tag is proclaimed by a court when an individual accused of a serious financial crime, usually involving large sums, either flees the country or refuses to return to face trial. If Mallya decides to return to India and surrender, he can file a petition seeking to have the declaration of fugitive economic offender rescinded. However, the court will only consider such relief if it is satisfied that the return is genuine and made without mala fide intent, Khatalawala said. What Mallya said The podcast called Figuring Out, hosted by Raj Samani, featured Mallya's first public conversation in nine years, during which he claims to have not been given a chance of fair trial by the media. He claimed to be a victim of media sensationalism and political scapegoating. 'I regret one thing, which is that after all my hard work, all the value that I created in so many multiple ways, that effectively, the government of India and, of course, the media made me a zero from a hero. And that's a fact of life that I have had to stomach and live with," he said. At a very young age, Mallya was 'installed in the hot seat" as he became the chairman of the Bengaluru-based United Breweries Group after his father Vittal Mallya's demise in 1983. Helming UB Group, Mallya built Kingfisher beer into a dominant brand with over 50% market share. The eponymous airline that followed in 2005 was his vision to 'produce the best flying experience that India had ever seen". The acquisition of low-cost carrier Air Deccan in 2007 was widely blamed for Kingfisher Airline's downfall. Mallya said the acquisition was a calculated consolidation and not a means to by-pass a rule that required an airline to be operational for five years before it could fly internationally. The downward spiral came after the 2008 global financial crisis. Mallya said he approached the then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee with his plan to downsize his airline. Mukherjee asked him not to downsize and promised the airline would be supported by banks, Mallya claimed. Mukherjee passed away in 2020. With fuel cost rising and the government not allowing foreign investment in the aviation sector further complicated matters for Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya said. It was 'the economy, the circumstances, the government policy then existing all conspired to create a perfect storm through which King Fisher could not survive". 'Paid more than what was due' Mallya claimed in the podcast that while he owed only ₹6,203 crore to various banks, India's ministry of finance has reported a recovery of ₹14,131.6 crore, which is 'multiple times over." 'I am not a chor (thief)," Mallya said, refuting allegations that he fled India in March 2016 to evade authorities following the bankruptcy of Kingfisher Airlines, insisting he had planned a visit to Geneva to attend an international conference. Kingfisher Airlines, which was grounded in October 2012, owed more than ₹7,500 crore to lenders led by State Bank of India. The airline had accumulated losses of ₹16,023.46 crore as of 31 March 2013. He was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) for various economic offences. But on 15 April that year, the ministry of external affairs suspended his passport. On the podcast, Mallya said he responded to a summons by the ED requesting more time to negotiate with his foreign collaborators to sell shares and settle the dues. Asked why he didn't fight harder to get his passport restored and return to India, Mallya said he was overwhelmed by the number of legal battles. 'How many fronts should I open at once? These are expensive and time-consuming battles." Fugitive or fall guy? Refuting allegations that he siphoned off funds from Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya said he infused ₹3,000 crore of United Breweries funds into the airline to keep it afloat. 'Nobody talks about that. If I intended to steal, would I have pledged my own shares and given personal guarantees?" he said. Mallya claimed that banks recovered double the amount he owed them by selling his assets. 'Yet despite 15 formal requests, they haven't given me a statement of account," he said. On the podcast, Mallya apologized for the non-payment of salaries to Kingfisher Airlines's employees. He claimed he made repeated attempts to get the Karnataka High Court to release ₹260 crore that it had frozen so he could pay employee wages. 'I offered settlements multiple times between 2012 and 2015 but they were all rejected," Mallya said. 'I am deeply sorry and I take full responsibility for it." Industrialist Harsh Goenka spoke out in Mallya's defence. While Mallya lived a 'high life" and had defaulted on loans, his dues have reportedly been settled, he said. 'Meanwhile, bigger defaulters walk free with much fatter haircuts from banks," Goenka said on social media platform X. 'If dues remain, the banks should clearly say so. If not, why is he still a political punching bag?" Mallya replied to Goenka on X that the finance ministry had 'confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered ₹14,100 crores from me against a DRT (debt recovery tribunal) judgement debt of ₹6,203 crores". Shriram Subramanian, the managing director of proxy advisory firm Ingovern doubts Mallya will return to India as there is no guarantee on what will happen to him. 'He has been the punching bag for all the large loan defaults by businessmen," said Subramanian. 'The cultivated political connections, lavish parties, and hi-profile public image makes him the ultimate fall guy."
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Custodial torture naked violation of human dignity': Delhi Court cites '97 SC verdict, orders FIR against cops
A Delhi court recently ordered the registration of an FIR against police officers of the Shahbad Dairy police station in a custodial torture case. 'As per the allegations, victim Naveen @ Monu was tortured by the accused police officials for the purpose of committing extortion. In view of the seriousness and gravity of the allegations, a thorough investigation is required to unearth the exact role played by the accused police officials in the commission of the alleged offences,' said Additional Sessions Judge Jagmohan Singh of Rohini Court on May 21. 'Two enquiries conducted by higher police officials into the present allegations found that allegations of custodial torture upon Naveen during police custody could not be ruled out,' the court noted. The court was hearing a revision plea moved by a woman, Meenakshi, against an August 2019 magistrate court order, which had denied lodging and an FIR against the police officials for torturing her husband, Naveen. The Sessions Court also cited a 1997 Supreme Court verdict, which stated that 'custodial torture is a naked violation of human dignity and degradation which destroys, to a very large extent, the individual personality. It is a calculated assault on human dignity, and whenever human dignity is wounded, civilisation takes a step backward.' While setting aside the 2019 order, the Sessions Court directed the SHO to file an FIR against the station's chowki in charge, investigating officer, head constable, and two other persons within a week of the order. As per the original complaint, on April 3, 2018, two groups were involved in a scuffle at Naya bans, Khera Kurd in Delhi. Cross complaints were registered from both sides, and Naveen was allegedly falsely implicated in the cases. The complaint further alleged that three days later, Naveen was picked up by the accused police officials. Meenakshi alleged that her husband was 'physically and mentally tortured' by the accused and that a demand was Rs 5 lakhs was made to release him. '…the CCTV footage (in the case) as well as the call detail record need to be analysed in a government forensic lab, which is beyond the reach of the complainant as well as the victim. It has also to be kept in mind that in the present case, the complainant as well as the victim are ordinary citizens while the accused are all police officials,' ASJ Singh said.
