Ex-Olympian hits out after high school track star was disqualified for copying his 'unsportsmanlike' celebration
Former Olympic champion Maurice Greene has called for the high school track star disqualified from a state championship for recreating one of his famous celebrations to be reinstated.
Clara Adams, a runner for North Salinas High School in California, was stripped of her 400m state title at the weekend and disqualified from the meet as a whole after she celebrated in a way the governing body deemed 'disrespectful'.
After finishing second in the preliminary heats, she crossed the line in first to take the gold for her own before running over to her father as he produced a fire extinguisher.
She grabbed the extinguisher from her father and sprayed her shoes with it - as if to say that they were on fire - in a celebration reminiscent of Greene's after he won the 100-meter dash at the 2004 Home Depot Invitational.
Though despite her father claiming it took place away from her competitors and that she 'wasn't disrespecting anyone', the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) decided the celebration was unsportsmanlike and stripped Adams' of her championship before throwing her out of the meet.
And Greene - who won two Olympic gold medals in his own career - believes Clara's disqualification should be overturned if the celebration was performed away from her competitors.
'When I heard, cause it happened, and then people just started calling me 'This girl who just ran the 400 did your celebration' I was like huh? What?' the ex-athlete told KSBW-TV on Monday.
'If it was away from everyone and not interfering with anyone, I would say reinstate her.'
Adams crossed the line with a time of 52.24 seconds, just one-hundredth slower than the state-leading time she achieved the week prior.
After being disqualified, she was prevented from competing in the 200m event later that day.
'I don't know what's going through my mind right now,' Clara told the Monterey Herald.
'I'm disappointed and I feel robbed. I am in shock. They (officials) yelled at me and told me "we're not letting you on the podium." They took my moment away from me.'
David, meanwhile, claimed they were 'on the other side of the wall' from the track while alleging that the decision to disqualify his black daughter was due to her race.
'We have protested the decision, I feel it was racially motivated,' he told the Herald.
Adams' coach, Alan Green, called it 'a very unfortunate event', adding, 'We are all heartbroken. Clara ran an incredible 400 race and is the fastest 400-meter girl in the state.
'She was trying to have some fun at the finish line after the 400. It was interpreted as unsportsmanlike.
'What an incredible season and run. It's unfortunate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M
The attorneys who shepherded the blockbuster antitrust lawsuit to fruition for hundreds of thousands of college athletes will share in just over $475 million in fees, and the figure could rise to more than $725 million over the next 10 years. The request for plaintiff legal fees in the House vs. NCAA case, outlined in a December court filing and approved Friday night, struck experts in class-action litigation as reasonable. Co-lead counsels Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler asked for $475.2 million, or 18.3% of the cash common funds of $2.596 billion. They also asked for an additional $250 million, for a total of $725.2 million, based on a widely accepted estimate of an additional $20 billion in direct benefits to athletes over the 10-year settlement term. That would be 3.2% of what would then be a $22.596 billion settlement. 'Class Counsel have represented classes of student-athletes in multiple litigations challenging NCAA restraints on student-athlete compensation, and they have achieved extraordinary results. Class Counsel's representation of the settlement class members here is no exception,' U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken wrote. University of Buffalo law professor Christine Bartholomew, who researched about 1,300 antitrust class-action settlements from 2005-22 for a book she authored, told The Associated Press the request for attorneys' fees could have been considered a bit low given the difficulty of the case, which dates back five years. She said it is not uncommon for plaintiffs' attorneys to be granted as much as 30% of the common funds. Attorneys' fees generally are calculated by multiplying an hourly rate by the number of hours spent working on a case. In class-action lawsuits, though, plaintiffs' attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they get paid at the end of the case only if the class wins a financial settlement. 'Initially, you look at it and think this is a big number,' Bartholomew said. 'When you look at how contingency litigation works generally, and then you think about how this fits into the class-action landscape, this is not a particularly unusual request.' The original lawsuit was filed in June 2020 and it took until November 2023 for Wilken to grant class certification, meaning she thought the case had enough merit to proceed. Elon University law professor Catherine Dunham said gaining class certification is challenging in any case, but especially a complicated one like this. 'If a law firm takes on a case like this where you have thousands of plaintiffs and how many depositions and documents, what that means is the law firm can't do other work while they're working on the case and they are taking on the risk they won't get paid,' Dunham said. 'If the case doesn't certify as a class, they won't get paid.' In the request for fees, the firm of Hagens Berman said it had dedicated 33,952 staff hours to the case through mid-December 2024. Berman, whose rate is $1,350 per hour, tallied 1,116.5 hours. Kessler, of Winston & Strawn, said he worked 1,624 hours on the case at a rate of $1,980 per hour. The case was exhaustive. Hundreds of thousands of documents totaling millions of pages were produced by the defendants — the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC — as part of the discovery process. Berman and Kessler wrote the 'plaintiffs had to litigate against six well-resourced defendants and their high-powered law firms who fought every battle tooth and nail. To fend off these efforts, counsel conducted extensive written discovery and depositions, and submitted voluminous expert submissions and lengthy briefing. In addition, class counsel also had to bear the risk of perpetual legislative efforts to kill these cases.' Antitrust class-action cases are handled by the federal court system and have been harder to win since 2005, when the U.S. Class Action Fairness Act was passed, according to Bartholomew. 'Defendants bring motion after motion and there's more of a pro-defendant viewpoint in federal court than there had been in state court,' she said. 'As a result, you would not be surprised that courts, when cases do get through to fruition, are pretty supportive of applications for attorneys' fees because there's great risk that comes from bringing these cases fiscally for the firms who, if the case gets tossed early, never gets compensated for the work they've done.' ___
BreakingNews.ie
27 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Cristiano Ronaldo ‘will not be at the Club World Cup' with future still unclear
Cristiano Ronaldo has said he will not play at the upcoming Club World Cup after turning down offers from participating teams. The 40-year-old's contract with Saudi Pro League club Al-Nassr, who have not qualified for the tournament in the United States, expires at the end of June. Advertisement Earlier this year, FIFA president Gianni Infantino raised the prospect of Portugal captain Ronaldo joining one of the sides involved in the competition, which starts next Saturday. But speaking ahead of his country's Nations League final against Spain on Sunday evening in Munich, the forward said: 'I will not be at the Club World Cup. 'Some teams reached out to me. Some made sense and others did not, but you can't try and do everything. You can't catch every ball.' Ronaldo's club future remains unclear. Advertisement Sport A Tottenham Hotspur legend forever – Son Heung-min... Read More He posted 'this chapter is over' on social media following Al-Nassr's final league game of the season in May. However, according to reports, he could agree a new deal to remain with the club he joined from Manchester United in 2023. Five-time Ballon d'Or winner Ronaldo revealed a decision on his future was 'almost final'.
Times
27 minutes ago
- Times
Think UK train tickets are cheaper after 9.30am? Wrong!
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
