The Samsung S90F OLED just got its first price drop — but you should buy the S90D instead
Which is what set my sights on Samsung's S90F OLED TV, a stellar new offering that sits right below its flagship S95F. While you might want to jump at the brand new offering, I recommend going for its older brother in the Samsung S90D OLED TV, launched in 2024.
The Samsung S90F OLED TV is an enticing new entry, offering 144Hz refresh rate on one of Samsung's best upscaling processers. It also has Tizen OS, which is built with tons of free channels not to mention several cloud gaming services, and a full Gaming Hub for all your settings in one place. The S90F also has tons of AI baked into it, like an AI Sound Pro that boosts audio dramatically. 42" for $1,09748" for $1,29755" for $1,49777" for $2,99783" for $4,497
The S90D is one of Samsung's 2024 OLED TVs. The OLED TV features Samsung's new NQ4 AI Gen2 processor, HDR10+/HLG support, 120Hz refresh rate, four HDMI 2.1 ports, and built-in Alexa. It also offers 4K AI Upscaling to ensure all programs are crisp and sharp. On the audio front, you get Dolby Atmos and Object Tracking Sound Lite for 3D surround sound. 42" for $89748" for $99755" for $99777" for $1,79783" for $2,997
You'll be saving yourself around $600, plus there's still loads on offer with the S90D that makes up for its (relative) old age. I myself use an S90D frequently as my main display when not testing alternative sets, so it's a worthy choice over the 2025 model.
Samsung went big on AI in 2025 for its newest displays, offering picture performance enhancements and audio boosting to improve the overall experience, among other major changes. That's the real meat of what makes the S90F a tad more expensive over its older model.
These OLED TVs still both use a native 120Hz refresh rate, which can be boosted up to 144Hz with VRR for blistering fast gaming. Thus, both TVs are rather equally matched in a lot of categories, like gaming, color, and even brightness.
But even in terms of AI, the S90D still has a lot going for it. One of my favorite features is the Adaptive Sound Pro function, which boosts audio performance by tailoring it to your living space. You'll instantly notice a drastic change in audio performance, cleaning up dialogue and enhancing noisier scenes.
The big reason why I recommend the S90D OLED TV over the S90F right now, beyond the simple price equation, is Samsung's seven year upgrade commitment. This means your 2024 S90D will get retroactive Tizen OS upgrades for the next six years, making it a brand new TV in every update.
As a big fan of the S90D OLED, I can't rave enough about its potential. Don't get me wrong, the S90F OLED is a fantastic TV too, but your money will be much better spent on the older model this Prime Day as the upgrades are minimal here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
3 hours ago
- Digital Trends
I've tried many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases. Here's what they're missing
The new Galaxy Z Fold 7 is impressively thin, and as I found in our Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, this hardware design makes it the best folding phone for most people. Yet, there's one key problem with it: the camera design. Samsung chose to keep the camera in its trademark vertical array on the left rear of the Galaxy Z Fold 7, and it's considerably thicker than the rest of the phone. It's surprisingly not that top-heavy, but an unfortunate side-effect of the design is a wobble when placed on its rear on a phone. A wobble would be an understatement; it wobbles considerably, which can be frustrating if you put your phone rear-first on a table, especially with vibrations enabled. Recommended Videos You may be thinking that a case would solve the problem, but it turns out that most won't. I've found one that will, but it misses the mark in one big way. I've tried many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases, and here's the one thing that's still missing. Most Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases take the same approach Most Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases that I've tried have followed the same approach: protect the back of the phone and the camera primarily, and secondly, add any specific accessories for that case to the bottom half of the case. Samsung's official cases have all followed the same mold. Each one serves a specific, singular purpose, rather than trying to do too much like many of the best third-party options. The silicone case comes with a kickstand attached, but it doesn't solve the wobble issue. The carbon fiber case lacks any other purpose (other than being an ultra-thin and somewhat protective case), so the wobble is considerable with that case attached. The same applies to the clear case. Many of the best third-party cases also fail to solve this wobble problem, with most companies focusing on durability or thickness, or featuring accessories like kickstands. The official clear grip case almost solves the wobble Then there's the clear grip case, and since I first saw this alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 7 at Galaxy Unpacked, I've wondered if this case would solve the wobble. The key difference from the regular clear case is the added adjustable grip strap, and this is nearly identical in thickness to the camera surround. Hurrah, I hear you cry? Unfortunately, not quite: the grip is on the left rear like the camera bump, which means there's nothing counterbalancing it on the right rear side. The net result is that this clear case half-solves the wobble problem, but it feels counterintuitive considering the alternative would have also solved this. The grip case would have been the ideal contender to also solve this problem as the strap is adjustable to one of two positions. At its smaller setting, it's the same thickness as the camera bump (but this makes it quite hard to hold if you have larger hands like me). At the larger size, it's thicker than the camera bump. This is what Samsung should have done instead Despite this, it feels like a missed opportunity to provide a solution for customers. Instead, the solution feels obvious: build cases with the grip on the other side of the phone. Yes, it will impact how comfortable it is – E.g., when using the grip case, it may be too far to be completely comfortable – but this is a trade-off that's likely worth it. There's another possible approach as well: add a few small superfluous items to the case that happen to be in the right position and the right size to help solve the wobble. We've already seen some handy customers modify their Galaxy Z Fold 7 to solve this problem, so it's clear that there's demand for a solution. The real question is which case company will provide that solution. The best Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases so far After trying so many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases, I realized that while I appreciate several cases, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 design is too good to cover it. Yes, I love the kickstand on the Silicon case, and the grip case is wonderful for keeping hold of the phone, but both somewhat take away from the phone's beauty. We're still finalizing our best Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases guide, but so far, I like Spigen's ultra-thin case for the best carbon fiber case, and Samsung's official grip case is the best I've tried for adding grip. If you're looking to add a kickstand, this is where it gets interesting: Samsung offers the best silicon kickstand case, while Thinborne provides protection for both the front and rear of your phone, is ultra-thin, and has a magnetic ring for MagSafe-like charging. As we reported previously, the official Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases come with the anti-reflecting screen protector included, so you'll want to keep this in mind.
Tom's Guide
5 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE review: Not like this
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE has faded into the background compared to the much-upgraded Galaxy Z Flip 7, and the giant step forward for Samsung that was the Galaxy Z Fold 7. But as Samsung's cheapest folding phone to date, it shouldn't be ignored. I've been wanting a cheaper foldable from Samsung for years at this point, and I'm glad one has finally arrived. What I'm less happy about is Samsung's decision to use the Galaxy Z Flip 6 as a base, as that leads to a number of consequences for the quality of the new phone's features, and not all of them good. But with the Galaxy Z Flip 7 still starting at more than $1,000, and the standard Motorola Razr (2025) basically the only other choice at this price, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is still worth considering. It's a way of getting a foldable phone while still spending around the same amount of money as you would for a non-folding flagship phone. Just make sure you read through our testing results and my thoughts on this phone before you make any big decisions. While the Galaxy Z Flip series has never been as expensive as the Galaxy Z Fold, its $1,000 price tag could never really be called approachable. Starting at $899/£849/AU$1,499, the Z Flip 7 FE is on par with a Galaxy S25 or iPhone 16, making your buying decision a little easier. I still wish the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE price had gone lower, though. Samsung could have blown the foldables market wide open with a $600/700 model, making this technology affordable to even more potential users. Instead, the £200/$200/AU$300 difference between this phone and the more premium Flip is kind of small. What's worse is that the gap shrinks to $150/£140/AU$200 if you go for the Z Flip 7 FE's 256GB storage version (costing $959/£909/AU$1,599) to match the Z Flip 7's default capacity. Maybe 128GB is enough for your needs, but for future-proofing purposes, more on-board storage is my preference. Both of Samsung's latest flip foldables use the same combination of 50MP main, 12MP ultrawide and 10MP selfie cameras, identical right down to the sensors, lenses and available formats. But when you compare the photos from these phones side-by-side, there are still some differences. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For instance, this main camera shot of a field and footpath has ended up brighter on the FE for some reason. It's the same in a different image across the Welsh countryside below too. Presumably there's some difference in how the two different chips in the Z Flip 7 and Z Flip 7 FE process their shots. Because with identical camera hardware and software, there's not much else that could cause this disparity. This shot of a bridge over a stream was taken at 50MP on both phones, rather than the default 12MP. Here we see the regular Z Flip 7 pull ahead as it's brighter without losing detail. At 2x zoom, pointing the phones down this path, we see the Z Flip 7 FE's shot is brighter again but loses color as a result. Both are still detailed though, using the 50MP sensor as a substitute for a proper telephoto camera. We now move to the ultrawide camera, the other main sensor on both the Z Flip 7 FE and Z Flip 7. This egg box looks more saturated in color in the Z Flip 7 FE image, which is beneficial given the dark wood the box is made from. It's the first of these images where I think the Z Flip 7 FE outright beats its more expensive sibling. Finally, we have a portrait mode selfie. The Z Flip 7 has given us the more saturated shot, but at the expense of texture detail in my skin and my shirt. The Z Flip 7 FE's portrait effect is much stronger for some reason, but has also blurred part of my glasses by accident. Many of Samsung's latest features are available here on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE since it's running One UI 8, just like Samsung's other new foldables. That includes all the abilities built into Google Gemini, which works alongside Samsung's own Bixby assistant. Together, the two digital helpers are ready to answer questions, provide summaries, adjust your settings or enable Now Bar and Now Brief, available on both the inner and outer Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE screens for quickly referencing your daily schedule. For creative purposes, you can make generative edits and fixes to your images, or try the newly upgraded Audio Eraser to clean up the sound in your videos. Unfortunately, there is no DeX mode available here, despite Samsung having added support to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for the first time. Not everyone cares about having a desktop mode built into their phone, but it can certainly be handy with the right accessories. Like Samsung's other recent flagship phones, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is promised to get seven years of Android updates and security patches. Even though the Z Flip 7 FE's hardware isn't as new as the other two foldables Samsung launched this year, its software will always be on par. And what's more, that's more than twice as long as the three years of support you get with the Razr 2025. Presumably as part of its cost-cutting strategy for the Z Flip 7 FE, Samsung gave its new cheaper foldable an Exynos 2400 chipset. This is a flagship-grade chip from the previous year, and a step behind both Samsung's latest, 3-nanometer Exynos 2500 used in the regular Z Flip 7 and the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip used in the Z Fold 7 and most flagship Android phones this year. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Motorola Razr (2025) Chipset Exynos 2400 Exynos 2500 Dimensity 7400X Geekbench 6 score (single-core / multi-core) 2044 / 6761 2286 / 8079 1089 / 3075 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (score / fps) 3042 / 18.2 4325 / 25.9 1021 / 6.1 Adobe Premiere Rush time to transcode (mins:secs) 1:15 1:04 1:21 The Exynos 2400 does outperform the Motorola Razr's Dimensity 7400X chip on all key fronts, but lags behind the newer Exynos 2500, especially on the GPU front. But outside the lab, the Z Flip 7 FE runs into a problem — heat and performance throttling. There is a massive gap between the Z Flip 7 FE's full potential and what you get after a few minutes of activity. Playing Ex Astris at max graphics settings, the Z Fold 7 FE struggles to keep up at maximum graphics settings. This is a game that runs perfectly on a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, but the Exynos 2400 struggles to keep a high, consistent frame rate. Similar to the chip downgrade, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE uses 8GB of RAM, instead of 12GB like Samsung's other foldables. Its available storage capacities are either 128GB or 256GB, a step down from the 256GB/512GB offered on the Z Flip 7. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE inherits the Galaxy Z Flip 6's oddly-shaped 3.4-inch, 60Hz cover display. The folder-shaped cutout works fine, but it's not as exciting or useful as the full top half of the phone being a 120Hz 4.1-inch display, as it is on the Z Flip 7. Equally, given Samsung is reluctant to give users proper access to apps on the outer screen, you don't miss out on too much compared to the more expensive flip foldable. That said, it's questionable if the extra space on the Z Flip 7 really makes a difference. Both of Samsung's new flip foldables are still focused on using widgets on the cover screen, rather than normal apps like its main rival, the Moto Razr 2025. It means the inner display is still where you'll spend the vast majority of your time, even if you can check notifications or appointments, alter quick settings or even take photos with the phone folded (at least without additional modifying apps downloaded). The whole Z Flip 7 FE feels unfortunately dated, even if it's a brand new phone based on a one-year-old design. Such is the leap Samsung made with the Galaxy Z Flip 7. I didn't notice how the inner screen of the Z Flip 7 FE is a smaller 6.7-inch panel rather than 6.9 inches as you get on the Z Flip 7, but I did notice the bezels being way thicker and more obtrusive on the FE. There is definitely a difference in the depth of the crease in the display too, but not one that spoils the experience on the FE. The most noticeable physical difference is the hinge. The Z Flip 7 FE's mechanism is way stiffer than the Z Flip 7, despite both phones having smooth folding actions, and being capable of holding their position at any point between open and closed. Samsung wasn't kidding about the advancements it made to the Z Fold 7's mechanism, but it's hard to understand without comparing it directly to what the old hinge feels like. On the brighter side, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 FE is actually a touch lighter than the Z Flip 7. The FE also has the same water and dust resistance rating (IP) as the Z Flip 7, the same Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protecting the back and cover display and the same Armor Aluminum frame. None of these will hopefully ever matter to you, but if there's ever an accidental drop or immersion, you'll be grateful for the durability. It's slightly disappointing that you only have black and white colors to choose from on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. The Z Flip 7 comes in black, blue and red (plus an online-exclusive mint green), which give users the option of a more exciting color if they want. Our lab testing of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE's display revealed it has one advantage over its rivals — a higher peak brightness. It's behind on color gamut coverage though, although at least it has similar color accuracy to the regular Z Flip 7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Motorola Razr (2025) Peak brightness (nits) 2105 1989 1916 sRGB color gamut volume (%) 141.3 151.7 207.3 DCI-P3 color gamut volume (%) 100.1 107.4 146.8 Color accuracy (∆E, lower is better) 0.24 0.23 0.34 The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE features the same battery capacity as previous Z Flip models: 4,000 mAh. Meanwhile, you get an upgraded 4,300 mAh cell in the standard Z Flip 7. Between that capacity difference and the power efficiency of the two different chips, it's no surprise that we found a big battery life gap in our testing. In our test, which sets phones to constantly open different sites on a web browser over cellular data until the battery gives out, it took 9 hours and 12 minutes at regular adaptive refresh rate mode for the Z Flip 7 FE to give up, below the average phone's result by more than an hour. The Z Flip 7 managed 12 hours and 24 minutes. And the Razr 2025 does even better, lasting 13 hours and 36 minutes. Charging is again a choice of 25W wired or 15W wireless, something that the regular Galaxy Z Flip 7 doesn't change either. A drained Z Flip 7 FE fills reaches 56% capacity after 30 minutes, at least making it a bit faster to power up than its rivals. The Razr 2025 makes it to 42% on the same charger, and the Z Flip 7 to 55% I fully swapped to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 after I finished testing the FE, and it's confusing to think that both of these phones came out at the same time. The regular Z Flip 7 is a brilliant device, and deservedly sits at the top of our best foldable phones guide. But whether the Z Flip 7 FE deserves similar praise is not so clear. If the Z Flip 7 FE was cheaper, or shared more of the Z Flip 7's upgrades, this would be an easy phone to recommend for foldable-curious users wanting to eke the most out of their phone-buying budget. But the phone we have is lower-powered, a lot less power efficient and uses outdated design elements, while dropping the cost by less than a fifth — not much of a discount considering what you lose out on. The ideal user for the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is someone craving the futuristic and convenient form-factor of a flip foldable, but also, counterintuitively, doesn't mind getting lesser and older hardware in its place. The software and camera experience is on par with the full-fat Galaxy Z Flip 7, so you don't have to worry about missing out on updates or image quality compared to the more expensive Samsung flip phone. But you'll have to accept you could have get more camera, performance and battery life potential for your money by settling for a non-folding flagship phone.
Engadget
5 hours ago
- Engadget
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 is the world's first 500Hz OLED gaming monitor
Previously, if you wanted a monitor for competitive gaming, you had to choose between an IPS or VA panel to get something with a super high refresh rate or opt for a slower OLED display with richer colors and better contrast. But today, Samsung is changing that with the Odyssey OLED G6, which is the first 500Hz OLED gaming monitor in the world. Available for $1,000, the Odyssey OLED G6 (G60SF) only comes in one size (27 inches) and features a QHD resolution (2,560 x 1440) with a 16:9 aspect ratio and critically, that blisteringly speedy 500Hz refresh rate with a .03ms (GTG) response time. Its QD-OLED panel also has a matte anti-reflective coating and support for both AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and NVIDIA G-Sync. And after seeing it in person, it really is a very pretty monitor, as it boasts vibrant colors and deep inky blacks while still being able to satisfy even the most demanding competitive gamers. This is the first OLED monitor to feature a blisteringly fast 500Hz refresh rate. (Sam Rutherford for Engadget) That said, the Odyssey OLED G6 is a rather straightforward product. It doesn't come with any of Samsung's built-in smart features like an included remote or the company's Gaming Hub. And with a typical brightness of just 300 nits, while you do get VESA DisplayHDR TrueBlack 500 certification, it's not the best monitor to put in a sunny room. But that's not exactly a deal-breaker, because from what I've seen, this thing is a purpose-built device that's meant to do one thing really well: display games super fast without sacrificing on image quality. And if for some reason you get tired of playing games, you could do some photo or video editing as the display is Pantone Validated and covers 99 percent of the DCI-P3 spectrum. Aside from the Odyssey OLED G6, today Samsung is also introducing a couple new additions to the Odyssey G7 line as well. The smaller of the two is the 37-inch Odyssey G7 which features more traditional dimensions including a 4K curved 16:9 VA panel with a typical brightness of 350 nits and a 165Hz refresh rate. The Samsung 40-inch Odyssey G7 features a 1000R curved display and ultra-wide 21:9 aspect ratio using a VA panel with 350 nits of brightness. (Sam Rutherford for Engadget) Alternatively, for those who prefer ultra-wide monitors, the 40-inch Odyssey G7 has the same brightness and 1000R curve as its smaller sibling, but with a 21:9 WUHD (5,120 x 2160) resolution and a slightly faster 180Hz refresh rate. Interestingly, despite being the wider of the two, due to its 16:9 aspect ratio, the 37-inch Odyssey G7 looks larger in person. And thanks to their slightly higher brightness, both the 37 and 40-inch Odyssey G7 have VESA Display HDR 600 ratings. All three monitors are on sale today. The Odyssey OLED G6 costs $1,000 while the 37-inch Odyssey G7 is going for $900 or $1,200 for the larger 40-inch Odyssey G7. If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
