How former teen killer William Izett's Auckland car theft led to a possible life sentence
'No dignity in death'
At 17 years old, Izett was the oldest of three teens who violently targeted 74-year-old Wellington resident Donald Stewart outside a toilet block in Hamilton in June 2010, resulting in his death.
Their motive was to steal his 1989 Peugeot 405, which they took for a joyride before leaving it abandoned in a ditch where they had crashed it.
William Izett appears in Auckland District Court on July 18 for sentencing on charges of heroin supply and possession of an AK-47-style gun, ammunition and explosive gel. Photo / Craig Kapitan
Co-defendant Connor Rewha-Te Wara, who was 14 at the time, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 11 years after pleading guilty to murder. Izett, meanwhile, was sentenced to four years' imprisonment after pleading guilty to manslaughter.
Rewha-Te Wara had been the one who inflicted the fatal blows, Justice Patrick Keane noted when the trio appeared in the High Court at Hamilton to be sentenced together.
The teens had formed a plan to steal the Peugeot after finding it with the lights on but doors locked as the driver used the facilities.
When Stewart refused to hand over the keys after emerging from the toilet block, Rewha-Te Wara knocked him to the ground with a punch to the head. He was then dragged to an alleyway and suffered what the judge referred to as a 'sustained and brutal assault'.
Donald Stewart buys petrol at a Hamilton Gull service station only hours before he was found dead in the central city. Photo / Supplied
The judge acknowledged that Izett didn't participate in the physical attack and wouldn't have anticipated his co-defendant's level of violence. But that doesn't excuse standing by passively – neither stopping the younger teen nor helping the victim.
'You left in his car, leaving him where he lay,' the judge said. 'You afforded him no dignity in death. You stole his personal property and ultimately you were party to destroying it.'
By that point, he had already had a lengthy and violent record, the court noted.
Cannabis stabbing
Two years after the Hamilton sentencing, while Izett was imprisoned in Dunedin, a Corrections officer said the inmate spat in his face.
The officer reported the saliva going into his eyes, causing stinging. He then had to wait six months for blood test results.
Izett, who had been angry because his cell was not unlocked as quickly as he wanted, pleaded guilty to assault.
A decade later, in 2023, he was out of prison and living in emergency accommodation in a Hamilton motel when he was charged with wounding with intent to injure, possession of cannabis for sale and unlawful ammunition possession.
Convicted killer William Izett admitted a decade later to stabbing a man at a Hamilton motel who had asked to buy his cannabis. Image / Google
He was taking freshly cut cannabis plants to his room about 11am that day when the victim approached and asked if he could buy some.
After telling the man to leave, Izett retrieved a hammer and knife from his car and challenged the man to a fight. The scuffle, caught on CCTV, ended with the defendant inflicting two knife wounds to the other man's torso.
'Hooked up'
Five months after the stabbing guilty plea, the Ford Ranger went missing from Murrays Bay on Auckland's North Shore. However, the heist was short-lived. The vehicle had a GPS tracker, which led police to Izett's Dairy Flat home the next morning.
Police found the registration plates in a wheelie bin at the property and the keys on the kitchen table.
Social media messages later recovered by police suggested the vehicle, with plates that phonetically spelt 'hooked up', had been stolen as part of a scheme relating to the Mongols motorcycle gang, Judge Sharp noted.
William Izett appears in Auckland District Court on July 18 for sentencing on charges of heroin supply and possession of an AK-47-style gun, ammunition and explosive gel. Photo / Craig Kapitan
The heroin was found in a suitcase in the living room, divvied into snap-lock bags for distribution.
The military-style, semi-automatic weapon was wrapped in sheets and a blanket nearby. In the same room, investigators found Orica Powergel, a putty-like, high-power explosive.
Receiving such an expensive stolen vehicle carried a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment. But the discovery of the potent drug, found to have 76% purity, meant he faced up to life imprisonment.
Judge Sharp described the heroin scheme as an independent commercial enterprise. There was no evidence that either defendant used the drug, with both instead addicted to methamphetamine – a much more common drug in New Zealand.
'Capable of change'
At a jury trial earlier this year, Izett pleaded guilty to possessing the firearm and explosives, as well as receiving the stolen vehicle, but denied the heroin charge.
Conversely, co-defendant Cherish-Ann Buchanan, 33, pleaded guilty to the heroin charge but denied receiving the vehicle or being in possession of the firearm.
Jurors, however, found both guilty of the charges they denied.
'There's no secret that Mr Izett has stood or sat where he is sitting – he's been before the court before,' defence lawyer Kima Tuialii acknowledged at the start of the hearing this week.
Police examine the scene where Donald Stewart's body was found by a street sweeper in 2010. Photo / Christine Cornege
However, she emphasised her client's letter to the court and asked for a sentence that wouldn't be so crushing that he'd have trouble imagining his eventual reintegration into the community.
'He is somebody that is capable of change,' she said.
Judge Sharp sentenced Izett to seven years and six months' imprisonment, while Buchanan was sentenced to four years and six months.
Both sentences took into account reductions for what the judge described as backgrounds marred by 'tragic personal circumstances'.
'They involved things that should never have happened to them,' he said, declining to elaborate in open court.
Izett's sentence included a three-month uplift for his significant history of prior offences. Buchanan received reductions for her previously clean record and for the hardship her imprisonment will cause for her five children.
Craig Kapitan is an Auckland-based journalist covering courts and justice. He joined the Herald in 2021 and has reported on courts since 2002 in three newsrooms in the US and New Zealand.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
29 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Murder accused had 'loving relationship' with mother
By Kate Green of RNZ Julia DeLuney's defence says there's no evidence of a breakdown in the relationship between her and her mother, Helen Gregory, that would explain a murder. DeLuney is on trial at the High Court in Wellington charged with murdering the 79-year-old at her Khandallah home in January 2024, which she denies. The Crown finished its closing argument on Friday, arguing DeLuney had been stealing cash from her mother and then violently attacked her, leaving her dead or dying, perhaps following a confrontation about money. But defence lawyer Quentin Duff said there was no evidence of a breakdown in the relationship between DeLuney and her mother. There was only evidence, he said, of "an ordinary and loving relationship, albeit with its own problems". He asked the jury not to accept that they were being asked to decide that DeLuney had killed her mother, without knowing why. He argued the police investigation had failed to consider other suspects - by 7 February, it had narrowed down to DeLuney only. "Of course she should have been a suspect," Duff said. "In none of our cross examination have we criticised that." But he said there should have been two others - the first, a mysterious person who knocked on the door of a house further up the street that same night, but left before the homeowner answered. The second was a contractor who had previously worked for Gregory, and who she had suspected had taken money from her in the past. The Crown argued on Friday it was DeLuney who took that money, and she who put the idea of the handyman being the culprit in her mother's head. Duff drew the jury's attention to the "myth" of the attic fall, which had "perpetuated itself right throughout the way of this investigation, through to this trial". He said DeLuney had told them about the fall, but had never claimed that had been the cause of death - rather, the police had latched onto that, and worked to disprove it. "They were hellbent, you might think, on disproving and exposing Ms DeLuney for being a liar." He also accused the police of inserting themselves into the story, to make judgement calls on what DeLuney had done. But he said DeLuney's decisions made sense when you considered what we had heard about the people involved. The court heard that, on a past occasion, Gregory had fallen out of her bed - therefore, it made sense for DeLuney to put her on the floor. It heard her Gregory hated hospitals, and was scared of being put in a home. On top of that, DeLuney was scared of being blamed for letting her mother climb into the attic in the first place - so it made sense that she didn't call an ambulance. And it made sense, Duff said, that DeLuney would leave her mother to fetch her husband, Antonio - if the injury was minor, and all she needed was monitoring overnight, it would be "a load shared" to fetch someone who happened to know CPR, Duff said. "That's common sense." The defence's closing argument continues this afternoon.
NZ Herald
18 hours ago
- NZ Herald
How former teen killer William Izett's Auckland car theft led to a possible life sentence
But a return to prison, he said, was the only realistic option. 'No dignity in death' At 17 years old, Izett was the oldest of three teens who violently targeted 74-year-old Wellington resident Donald Stewart outside a toilet block in Hamilton in June 2010, resulting in his death. Their motive was to steal his 1989 Peugeot 405, which they took for a joyride before leaving it abandoned in a ditch where they had crashed it. William Izett appears in Auckland District Court on July 18 for sentencing on charges of heroin supply and possession of an AK-47-style gun, ammunition and explosive gel. Photo / Craig Kapitan Co-defendant Connor Rewha-Te Wara, who was 14 at the time, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 11 years after pleading guilty to murder. Izett, meanwhile, was sentenced to four years' imprisonment after pleading guilty to manslaughter. Rewha-Te Wara had been the one who inflicted the fatal blows, Justice Patrick Keane noted when the trio appeared in the High Court at Hamilton to be sentenced together. The teens had formed a plan to steal the Peugeot after finding it with the lights on but doors locked as the driver used the facilities. When Stewart refused to hand over the keys after emerging from the toilet block, Rewha-Te Wara knocked him to the ground with a punch to the head. He was then dragged to an alleyway and suffered what the judge referred to as a 'sustained and brutal assault'. Donald Stewart buys petrol at a Hamilton Gull service station only hours before he was found dead in the central city. Photo / Supplied The judge acknowledged that Izett didn't participate in the physical attack and wouldn't have anticipated his co-defendant's level of violence. But that doesn't excuse standing by passively – neither stopping the younger teen nor helping the victim. 'You left in his car, leaving him where he lay,' the judge said. 'You afforded him no dignity in death. You stole his personal property and ultimately you were party to destroying it.' By that point, he had already had a lengthy and violent record, the court noted. Cannabis stabbing Two years after the Hamilton sentencing, while Izett was imprisoned in Dunedin, a Corrections officer said the inmate spat in his face. The officer reported the saliva going into his eyes, causing stinging. He then had to wait six months for blood test results. Izett, who had been angry because his cell was not unlocked as quickly as he wanted, pleaded guilty to assault. A decade later, in 2023, he was out of prison and living in emergency accommodation in a Hamilton motel when he was charged with wounding with intent to injure, possession of cannabis for sale and unlawful ammunition possession. Convicted killer William Izett admitted a decade later to stabbing a man at a Hamilton motel who had asked to buy his cannabis. Image / Google He was taking freshly cut cannabis plants to his room about 11am that day when the victim approached and asked if he could buy some. After telling the man to leave, Izett retrieved a hammer and knife from his car and challenged the man to a fight. The scuffle, caught on CCTV, ended with the defendant inflicting two knife wounds to the other man's torso. 'Hooked up' Five months after the stabbing guilty plea, the Ford Ranger went missing from Murrays Bay on Auckland's North Shore. However, the heist was short-lived. The vehicle had a GPS tracker, which led police to Izett's Dairy Flat home the next morning. Police found the registration plates in a wheelie bin at the property and the keys on the kitchen table. Social media messages later recovered by police suggested the vehicle, with plates that phonetically spelt 'hooked up', had been stolen as part of a scheme relating to the Mongols motorcycle gang, Judge Sharp noted. William Izett appears in Auckland District Court on July 18 for sentencing on charges of heroin supply and possession of an AK-47-style gun, ammunition and explosive gel. Photo / Craig Kapitan The heroin was found in a suitcase in the living room, divvied into snap-lock bags for distribution. The military-style, semi-automatic weapon was wrapped in sheets and a blanket nearby. In the same room, investigators found Orica Powergel, a putty-like, high-power explosive. Receiving such an expensive stolen vehicle carried a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment. But the discovery of the potent drug, found to have 76% purity, meant he faced up to life imprisonment. Judge Sharp described the heroin scheme as an independent commercial enterprise. There was no evidence that either defendant used the drug, with both instead addicted to methamphetamine – a much more common drug in New Zealand. 'Capable of change' At a jury trial earlier this year, Izett pleaded guilty to possessing the firearm and explosives, as well as receiving the stolen vehicle, but denied the heroin charge. Conversely, co-defendant Cherish-Ann Buchanan, 33, pleaded guilty to the heroin charge but denied receiving the vehicle or being in possession of the firearm. Jurors, however, found both guilty of the charges they denied. 'There's no secret that Mr Izett has stood or sat where he is sitting – he's been before the court before,' defence lawyer Kima Tuialii acknowledged at the start of the hearing this week. Police examine the scene where Donald Stewart's body was found by a street sweeper in 2010. Photo / Christine Cornege However, she emphasised her client's letter to the court and asked for a sentence that wouldn't be so crushing that he'd have trouble imagining his eventual reintegration into the community. 'He is somebody that is capable of change,' she said. Judge Sharp sentenced Izett to seven years and six months' imprisonment, while Buchanan was sentenced to four years and six months. Both sentences took into account reductions for what the judge described as backgrounds marred by 'tragic personal circumstances'. 'They involved things that should never have happened to them,' he said, declining to elaborate in open court. Izett's sentence included a three-month uplift for his significant history of prior offences. Buchanan received reductions for her previously clean record and for the hardship her imprisonment will cause for her five children. Craig Kapitan is an Auckland-based journalist covering courts and justice. He joined the Herald in 2021 and has reported on courts since 2002 in three newsrooms in the US and New Zealand. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
ATM heist: Father, daughter say cash gone
A father and daughter who looted almost $200,000 from an ATM claim $159,000 of the cash, which police are still searching for, has been spent. Jessie-Lee Daniela-Ranford and James Lindsay Ranford have said they used the stolen funds on drug debts, rent, vehicles and tangihanga (funeral expenses). Last year's heist was carried out by Daniela-Ranford, a former Armourguard employee, who enlisted the help of Ranford, her now terminally-ill father, to act as her getaway driver. Police have only been able to reclaim about $34,000 of the stolen money. The pair were due to be sentenced in the Hamilton District Court last month and, despite questioning, both denied knowing where the money was. At their sentence indication hearing earlier this year, a police prosecutor believed it may be buried somewhere on Coromandel Peninsula. Judge Glen Marshall adjourned the case to give them time to recall where the money was, suggesting that if they could it would keep them out of prison. This week, they returned to court on their burglary charges and, through affidavits, said they'd spent the money on debts, rent, vehicles and tangihanga. The heist On May 31 last year at 4.16pm, Ranford, 60, and his daughter parked outside Yukedas Party and Gift Store in Hillcrest. The pair had slightly altered the registration plates of their Nissan Tiida by changing one of the numbers. Dressed in all black, 26-year-old Daniela-Ranford, of Te Awamutu, got out of the car with her hood up. She walked into the store and went straight to an ATM. Daniela-Ranford entered two codes, which she had learned during her time with Armourguard, and removed five cash canisters containing $50 and $20 notes, court documents stated. She then got into the back seat of the car and Ranford took off "at high speed", heading east along Clyde St. A short time later, the Nissan was set alight on Holland Rd, Eureka, on the outskirts of Hamilton. The pair was later captured on CCTV at Z petrol station in Hautapu in a Mitsubishi Outlander, registered in Daniela-Radford's name. 'Desperation and irrational thinking' At their sentencing, a police prosecutor said the burglary had caused significant harm to the community. "I do find it quite hard to believe that the money has just evaporated on various debts and things and it would be the police submission that a sentence of imprisonment is appropriate," she said. But Daniela-Ranford's counsel, Jaiden Manera, pushed for 60% in discounts so the end sentence would fall within a range where home detention could be considered. He submitted that his client was the sole caregiver of her two children and if she was sent to prison it was "unclear what the childcare arrangements would be". She also had a clean criminal history, was subjected to childhood deprivation, qualified for a youth discount and was genuinely remorseful. "It is clear that this offending is out of character for Daniela-Ranford and, of course, it has all the hallmarks of desperation and perhaps irrational thinking," he said. "This offending has had a tremendous impact on her personal life ... and has been a real wake-up call for her." She would also agree to pay a maximum of $40,000 in reparation, he said. 'It's been spent' Defence counsel Shelley Gilbert said Ranford, who lives in Hamilton, has terminal stage 4 bladder cancer, but no one was able to give a timeframe as to when he would go into hospice care and he remained on medication. Although a pre-sentence report recommended the pair should be jailed, Gilbert said a clinical psychologist's report stated that prison would be "inappropriate" for Ranford, given his condition. "Ranford would be a model home detention detainee and hoped to spend his remaining time with his grandchildren and daughter," she said. "As to the money? It has been spent. "Is that acceptable? No, and Ranford does not suggest that it is." He had bought $1500 to court as reparation but had earmarked that for his funeral, and Gilbert asked the judge to allow him to keep it for that purpose. "His particular concern is for his daughter. "If he could do anything to take [the offending] back ... if he could bring the money here today, he would have." Judge Marshall accepted what the pair had stated in their affidavits - that at the time, there were tangihanga that the money went towards and "considerable debts" for Ranford's substance abuse. As for Daniela-Ranford, she admitted she'd received $40,000 but said she had spent it on debts and rent. "It still is somewhat puzzling how so much money went so quickly," the judge said. However, given their respective circumstances, he agreed neither should go to jail. He sentenced both to 10 months' home detention and ordered them each to pay a reparation of $20,000 in instalments. Ranford was also disqualified from driving for 12 months. - By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of NZ Herald
