Letters: The case for recognising Palestine
Sir: As someone who spent time undertaking research in Israel and Egypt, living for almost a year on Kibbutz Re'im, one of the communities attacked on 7 October 2023, I find myself in agreement with much of the description in your leading article 'State of denial' (26 July) – but not the conclusions. Many of us are aware that Israeli intelligence knew what was being planned for 7 October, but did nothing to prevent it. Why? The horrors that have happened since have played into the hands of Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters as they seek to create a Greater Israel, with no room left for a Palestinian state. Hence the need for recognition now, while there is still some territory left.
Just last year I witnessed first-hand, with my colleagues on the International Development Committee, the 'apartheid' that exists in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. This has left Palestinian communities with less and less land, or indeed rights, as the illegal settlements have been given seemingly free rein to proliferate and expand. The spirit of the Balfour Declaration that protected the rights of both the Jewish and non-Jewish people must be respected and this is why I am in favour of recognition of a state of Palestine now, before it is too late.
Dr Brian Mathew
MP for Melksham and Devizes
Enough is enough
Sir: I have enjoyed reading your magazine for more years than I care to remember. Sadly, however, your leading article this week displays a profound failure to 'read the room'. Along with most of my friends, my initial reaction to the terrible events of 7 October was to support Israel. After 20 months of hard pounding, that support is difficult, if not impossible, to sustain.
You may well be right that it would be a major error to recognise a Palestinian state. You may be right that Hamas uses aid as a weapon to 'reward compliance and punish internal opponents'. Hamas may well regard 'every innocent life lost as another propaganda win'. Nonetheless I cannot condone an article that does not even suggest that enough is enough and that Israel must cease its so-called war on Gaza, which is causing such immense hardship and so many civilian deaths. That is what a true friend of Israel would urge on them.
I think you will find that this is the view of many of your readers and of all people with any heart at all.
Johnny Cameron
Pewsey, Wiltshire
Sold down the river
Sir: It is good to see The Spectator carry a main article on the predatory vulture funds that have ripped the heart out of so many good UK businesses – often turning their equity into debt, greatly to the disbenefit to both shareholders and employees ('Soul suckers', 26 July). At last there appears to be a wider recognition that the City, by welcoming these rip-offs, has let the nation down. We cannot indefinitely pay for our massive imbalance of trade by endlessly flogging our national assets to overseas buyers. These businesses are often basic utilities that our own risk-averse pension funds have regrettably failed to invest in, when they could have been custodians of the national interest. One could weep.
Lord Vinson
Roddam, Northumberland
Brewing storm
Sir: Frinton is not faultless (Diary, 26 July). My great-uncle Ernest played tennis for Bedfordshire but in 1932 he overdid it at Frinton, caught pneumonia and died there. His irascible younger brother took over as chairman of the family brewery in Bedford; it survived Hayward's 20 years, ably managed by yet another brother who for 23 years was also Bedford's MP – and three of whose sons were killed in war service, as was Ernest's.
Despite all that, and provided it can also survive Rachel Reeves, the brewery will celebrate its 150th anniversary in 2026.
Mike Wells
Ickwell, Bedfordshire
Unpopular vote
Sir: Rod Liddle is correct to dismiss the government's decision to extend the franchise to 16- and 17-year-olds as 'gerrymandering of the very worst kind' ('Raise the age of suffrage to 25', 26 July) Most right-minded people agree that this is not justifiable on the grounds that it recognises what individuals in this group 'already contribute to society', as the Prime Minister claims.
Rather, the government's decision is a cynical ploy to increase their vote share by securing the support of an impressionable section of society that they believe is more susceptible to left-wing ideas. Imagine if the next Conservative government were to fiddle the system for their own benefit in a similar way, to allow those of state pension age to cast their vote twice. Like Keir Starmer, they could justify it by stating that this decision is simply to recognise the contribution pensioners have already made to society through their previous political engagement and tax contributions.
Would this argument be accepted by those currently stating that we use societal contribution as a justification for extending the franchise? I think not.
Andrew Almond
Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Fruit of the unions
Sir: Reference to trade union names (Letters, 26 July) brought to mind the fun that Private Eye had with the names of two print unions I was obliged to join at different times when working in Fleet Street in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Firstly, SOGAT (Society of Graphical and Allied Trades), which became SODIT in the Eye, and then NATSOPA (National Society of Operative Printers and Assistants), which the Eye christened alternatively NOTSOBA, or National Association of Trained Strikers and Overpaid Piss Artists.
Jim Gilbert
Southwold, Suffolk
Write to us letters@spectator.co.uk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hamas releases second video of Israeli hostage and says it will not disarm until Palestinian state established
Hamas has reaffirmed that it will not disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established, as the group released its second video in two days of an Israeli hostage. Responding to one of the key Israeli demands to end the war in Gaza, Hamas – which has dominated the territory since 2007 – said it could not yield its right to 'armed resistance' unless an 'independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital' is established. Indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza war and deal for the release of hostages ended last week in deadlock. On Saturday, Hamas released a second video of hostage Evyatar David. In it, David is skeletally thin and is shown digging a hole, which, he says in the video, is for his own grave. Israeli restrictions on the entry of goods and aid into Gaza have led to severe shortages of food and other essentials, stoking international demands for a ceasefire. UN-backed food security experts said this week that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is now playing out in Gaza. Hamas has included this issue in their hostage videos, warning that the hostages are going hungry alongside their captors and that time is running out for a ceasefire. In a statement, the family of David demanded that the aid that is now getting into Gaza thanks to renewed UN convoys and foreign airdrops must also reach their son. 'They are on the absolute brink of death,' his brother Ilay said at a rally in support of the hostages in Tel Aviv, where thousands gathered holding posters of those in captivity and chanted for their immediate release. Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Donald Trump's Middle East envoy on Saturday told families of hostages that he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. Steve Witkoff, who arrived in Israel as Benjamin Netanyahu's government faced global outcry over the devastation in Gaza and the starvation growing among its 2.2 million people, met the prime minister on Thursday. On Friday he visited an aid distribution site run by the Israel and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Global outrage has grown over Israel's restrictions on aid and the deadly unrest surrounding the GHF sites, with daily reports of shootings at all four locations since the group took over aid distribution at the end of May. The UN says 859 Palestinians have been killed during that time in the vicinity of these sites, and more than 500 have been killed along the routes of food convoys. Hospitals in Gaza say Israeli fire killed more than a dozen people on Saturday, eight of them while trying to get food. Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach its population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, airdrops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. UN agencies have said that airdrops of food are insufficient and that Israel must let in far more aid by land and quickly ease the access to it. Seven Palestinians died of malnutrition-related causes over the past 24 hours, including a child, the territory's health ministry said on Saturday. This brings the total deaths among children from causes related to malnutrition in Gaza to 93 since the war began. The German government, traditionally a staunch ally of Israel, joined calls for Israel to deliver more aid on Saturday, saying that the current amount remains 'very insufficient'. France's foreign minister also called for humanitarian aid to be supplied to the people of Gaza in massive quantities, while also denouncing as 'despicable' videos of Israeli hostages held in Gaza posted by Hamas's armed wing. With Reuters and Agence France-Presse
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes
The Chancellor has not had much luck with some of her tax rises. Rachel Reeves was expecting to raise up to £3.2bn each year, or around £12.7bn in this parliament, with the scrapping of non-dom status – a policy announced by her Conservative predecessor Jeremy Hunt and then ramped up by Labour. She is heading for disappointment. With the exodus of more than 10,000 millionaires from the UK last year and an expected 16,000 this year, Reeves has been warned that the move may in fact reduce rather than increase tax receipts. Speculation is thus rife that the measures may be further watered down; there has already been some initial tweaking and softening earlier this year. The imposition of VAT on school fees is likewise now widely expected to raise less than the predicted £1.7bn by 2030, due to more than expected numbers of children transferring to the state sector and becoming a burden on education budgets. The spate of independent school closures – not just as a result of the VAT change but also employer National Insurance rises, the loss of business rate relief for schools with charitable status and the gamut of extra regulation affecting all businesses – will inevitably make this worse. But, ironically, Reeves may have been rather more adept at boosting Treasury revenue with some of the tax measures she did not actually implement. Before last year's Halloween Budget there was much speculation that rates of capital gains tax (CGT) would be brought into line with those for income tax. This would have meant that higher-rate taxpayers earning over £50,270 would have had to pay 40pc instead of 24pc on taxable property gains and 20pc on other assets. Additional rate taxpayers, earning over £125,140, even worried they might be faced with a full 45pc levy on any uplift. The fear that these rates would be aligned was an entirely rational one. The great Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson in his 1988 Budget had done just that – although the medicine that year was very much sweetened by the scrapping of all income tax rates over 40pc at the same time. Labour's manifesto, while pledging not to raise the rates of income tax or employee National Insurance, was silent about CGT. And after winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves never tired of talking up a £22bn 'black hole' the Tories had allegedly left them. This would soon need filling – and Reeves did nothing to dampen down speculation that CGT rises and changes to the pension regime would be how she would achieve at least part of this. In the event, the Chancellor took less drastic action. She raised the rate of CGT for non-property gains from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers and 20pc to 24pc for those on the higher and additional rates. In other words, she aligned the rates for different asset classes to the one already levied on property. But the speculation alone did pay dividends for Reeves. In October last year, the month running up to the Budget, CGT receipts on residential property disposals was £408m – more than double that of most other months in the last tax year. Revenue from CGT is notoriously volatile when compared to other taxes. In the 2023-24 tax year, for example, CGT liabilities were 18pc down from the previous year. But the surge in the run-up to the Budget was vast. The best explanation for the Treasury's October windfall is that residential landlords sold up in advance of a clobbering that did not materialise. As Chris Etherington, of accountants RSM, has noted: 'It is clear that anticipation of CGT changes can distort taxpayer behaviour... the Chancellor benefitted from an inadvertent windfall... Reeves does not necessarily need to increase CGT rates to raise revenues. It's potentially possible to maximise CGT receipts by simply saying very little on the subject.' The Chancellor will insist that she cannot speculate about what moves she will be making in future Budgets – due to such information having an impact on the markets. But that argument does not quite wash. She is more than happy to rule out some fiscal moves, such as raising the rate of income tax. So why not others? Is it too cynical to suggest that Reeves has found her own third way? She can benefit from increased inflows without actually raising taxes. But such tactics are far from victimless – the uncertainty and disruption caused comes at a high price. Additionally, it makes it much more difficult for people to plan for the future and may make them take unnecessary decisions that they will live to regret. In other circumstances, allowing speculation to rip may in fact hurt Treasury coffers. Not closing down current Labour Party debates about a wealth tax will surely mean more wealthy people leaving the UK in anticipation of such a move. This will not only hurt our economy but also mean lower tax yields, resulting in less money for public services.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Recognising Palestinian state would destabilise international law, Starmer told
Sir Keir Starmer has been warned that recognising a Palestinian state would 'destabilise' the international legal order. Malcolm Shaw KC, a leading lawyer, said that the recognition plan 'would create a troublesome precedent and could well challenge and ultimately destabilise an international system founded upon a common understanding of what it is to be a state'. The fresh legal opinion, seen by The Telegraph, was circulated to the Prime Minister, Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, and dozens of influential Labour MPs. It was commissioned by Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer, in response to Sir Keir's decision to recognise a State of Palestine in September unless Israel meets certain conditions. The warning comes after Hamas made it clear it will not disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established. The militant group took the step of issuing a statement 'in response to media reports quoting US envoy Steve Witkoff, claiming [Hamas] has shown willingness to disarm'. It said: 'We reaffirm that resistance and its arms are a legitimate national and legal right as long as the occupation continues. 'This right is recognised by international laws and norms, and it cannot be relinquished except through the full restoration of our national rights - first and foremost, the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.' Hamas added that Mr Witkoff's trip on Friday to a Gaza aid distribution site was 'designed to mislead public opinion, polish the image of the occupation, and provide it with political cover for its starvation campaign and continued systematic killing of defenceless children and civilians in the Gaza Strip'. Mr Shaw's legal opinion says the Prime Minister's plan to recognise the state of Palestine is 'premature and may have unintended consequences' and that it 'confuses and distorts' any attempt at a peaceful two-state solution. 'A prize for precipitating war' He describes Sir Keir's decision to make statehood dependent on the behaviour of Israel, a 'third country', as 'remarkable'. 'This is exceptional and, frankly, not in keeping with the tenor of the relevant international principles,' he wrote. 'Recognition at the current time will be seen as a prize for precipitating the war on Oct 7 2023 with its attendant rapes and massacres.' Mr Shaw also argues that the Palestinian territories 'do not currently satisfy' the criteria for a state. Some 40 peers warned this week that recognising Palestine in the process set out by the Prime Minister would be illegal. They included Lord Pannick KC and Lady Deech, both respected lawyers and patrons of UK Lawyers for Israel, an association of British lawyers who are supportive of Israel. Lord Hermer is understood to have disagreed with their arguments and dismissed their claim. But Mr Shaw's opinion could pile further pressure on the Government to reconsider its legal position with regards to recognition. He further argues that since both Israel and the Palestinian territories are still bound by the Oslo Accords, the agreement that remains the legal framework that governs the relationship between Israel and the Palestinians, proper recognition at this time is not possible. Mr Shaw, who is the author of a standard legal textbook on international law, is currently representing Israel in its International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against South Africa, which argued that Israeli forces had committed genocidal acts in Gaza. While Sir Keir has always agreed to the principle of recognising a Palestinian state at some point, he was reluctant to do so until his surprise announcement this week. The Prime Minister appears to have been influenced by a number of factors, including the worsening starvation crisis in Gaza, pressure from international allies such as Emmanuel Macron, and increasingly vocal calls for immediate recognition from his own MPs. The setting up of a rival Left-wing political party under Jeremy Corbyn which calls for an independent Palestinian state may have also put pressure on Sir Keir to act. On Saturday, protesters from the activist group Youth Demand blocked roads in the Holland Park and King's Cross areas of London as they called for an immediate British trade embargo on Israel. On Thursday, Labour MPs supportive of Israel reportedly clashed with Jonathan Powell, Sir Keir's national security adviser, in a meeting about the recognition announcement.
