Recognising Palestinian state would destabilise international law, Starmer told
Malcolm Shaw KC, a leading lawyer, said that the recognition plan 'would create a troublesome precedent and could well challenge and ultimately destabilise an international system founded upon a common understanding of what it is to be a state'.
The fresh legal opinion, seen by The Telegraph, was circulated to the Prime Minister, Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, and dozens of influential Labour MPs.
It was commissioned by Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer, in response to Sir Keir's decision to recognise a State of Palestine in September unless Israel meets certain conditions.
The warning comes after Hamas made it clear it will not disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established.
The militant group took the step of issuing a statement 'in response to media reports quoting US envoy Steve Witkoff, claiming [Hamas] has shown willingness to disarm'. It said: 'We reaffirm that resistance and its arms are a legitimate national and legal right as long as the occupation continues.
'This right is recognised by international laws and norms, and it cannot be relinquished except through the full restoration of our national rights - first and foremost, the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.'
Hamas added that Mr Witkoff's trip on Friday to a Gaza aid distribution site was 'designed to mislead public opinion, polish the image of the occupation, and provide it with political cover for its starvation campaign and continued systematic killing of defenceless children and civilians in the Gaza Strip'.
Mr Shaw's legal opinion says the Prime Minister's plan to recognise the state of Palestine is 'premature and may have unintended consequences' and that it 'confuses and distorts' any attempt at a peaceful two-state solution.
'A prize for precipitating war'
He describes Sir Keir's decision to make statehood dependent on the behaviour of Israel, a 'third country', as 'remarkable'.
'This is exceptional and, frankly, not in keeping with the tenor of the relevant international principles,' he wrote.
'Recognition at the current time will be seen as a prize for precipitating the war on Oct 7 2023 with its attendant rapes and massacres.'
Mr Shaw also argues that the Palestinian territories 'do not currently satisfy' the criteria for a state.
Some 40 peers warned this week that recognising Palestine in the process set out by the Prime Minister would be illegal. They included Lord Pannick KC and Lady Deech, both respected lawyers and patrons of UK Lawyers for Israel, an association of British lawyers who are supportive of Israel.
Lord Hermer is understood to have disagreed with their arguments and dismissed their claim.
But Mr Shaw's opinion could pile further pressure on the Government to reconsider its legal position with regards to recognition.
He further argues that since both Israel and the Palestinian territories are still bound by the Oslo Accords, the agreement that remains the legal framework that governs the relationship between Israel and the Palestinians, proper recognition at this time is not possible.
Mr Shaw, who is the author of a standard legal textbook on international law, is currently representing Israel in its International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against South Africa, which argued that Israeli forces had committed genocidal acts in Gaza.
While Sir Keir has always agreed to the principle of recognising a Palestinian state at some point, he was reluctant to do so until his surprise announcement this week.
The Prime Minister appears to have been influenced by a number of factors, including the worsening starvation crisis in Gaza, pressure from international allies such as Emmanuel Macron, and increasingly vocal calls for immediate recognition from his own MPs.
The setting up of a rival Left-wing political party under Jeremy Corbyn which calls for an independent Palestinian state may have also put pressure on Sir Keir to act.
On Saturday, protesters from the activist group Youth Demand blocked roads in the Holland Park and King's Cross areas of London as they called for an immediate British trade embargo on Israel.
On Thursday, Labour MPs supportive of Israel reportedly clashed with Jonathan Powell, Sir Keir's national security adviser, in a meeting about the recognition announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Sir Bill O'Brien obituary
The life and career of Sir Bill O'Brien, the former Labour MP, who has died aged 96, could easily have been adapted by any self-respecting novelist to provide a snapshot of the characteristic 20th-century working man (and they were always men) who becomes an admired and respected solid citizen, having successfully harnessed decades of gritty industrial experience to elected public office, first in the town hall and then at Westminster. The archetype was further richly fulfilled in O'Brien's case as he was a Yorkshire miner, born into poverty, who learned to have the courage to speak truth to power within his own dying industry – which meant standing up to Arthur Scargill as leader of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) – and always to defend what he believed to be the right course of action, irrespective of political fashion. He was categorised as a moderate, but in reality he was an unapologetic pragmatist. 'I'm not extreme in any way,' he once said. He would also cheerfully acknowledge that sometimes he agreed with the views of Tony Benn – regarded at the time as the arbiter of Labour's left – and sometimes he did not. He first went to work at the coalface of Glasshoughton colliery, near Castleford, West Yorkshire, as a teenager at the end of the second world war and, after 38 years in the industry, was elected to the House of Commons as the MP for Normanton, south-east of Leeds, in 1983. He had already spent 30 years as a councillor, from 1951 as a member of Knottingley urban district council and subsequently, from 1973, on Wakefield metropolitan district council, where he chaired the finance committee and was deputy leader for a decade. His local government experience gave him an authority and an understanding of transport, housing and environmental issues, as well as the economic implications of public spending in those areas. His years down the pit made his voice one that deservedly won an audience during his 22 years in the Commons, a period that coincided with the decades that saw the effective closure of the British coal industry. Throughout his career, he argued for a massive redistribution of funding to Yorkshire and the north of England, asserting that the responsibilities of devolved political power mattered far less than the availability of greater resources, while he also sought investment in 'clean' coal technology. In 2003 he warned the prime minister, Tony Blair, about the findings of a report by the Institution of Civil Engineers predicting that future gas supplies piped to the UK could be sourced from politically unstable countries and thus vulnerable to supply failures, sabotage and terrorism. In O'Brien's maiden speech in July 1983, on the then controversial Thatcher government policy of council house sales, he typically reasoned that some sales of municipal housing were popular, but insisted that sales should only be allowed to go ahead on a voluntary basis. He was appointed to the public accounts committee shortly thereafter and was a diligent member until 1988, also serving on the energy select committee from 1986 until 1988. He was appointed by Neil Kinnock to the opposition frontbench as a member of the environment team in the wake of the 1987 general election, having nearly doubled his majority in what had been a redrawn seat when he won it at the low point in his party's electoral fortunes four years earlier. In 1992, John Smith switched him to the Northern Ireland brief, where his status as a Roman Catholic had resonance. He returned to the backbenches when Blair became leader and, for the remainder of his tenure as an MP, served as a member of the select committee dealing with the environment, transport and local government. After standing down as an MP in 2005 he remained active in local affairs. A magistrate and a school governor, he continued to campaign on political issues in Pontefract, where he lived. He was knighted in the Labour government's retirement honours list in 2010. O'Brien was born into a mining family in the Glasshoughton neighbourhood of Castleford and, after attending St Joseph's Roman Catholic school in the town, joined the workforce at the local colliery along with three of his four brothers. He signed up with the Labour party and the NUM aged 16, and early on discovered an aptitude for organising, which led him into trade union activism, becoming branch secretary at Glasshoughton. He also studied for an extramural degree at Leeds University and was awarded a BEd degree in 1978. His political stance brought him into recurring conflict with Scargill, notably in 1976 when O'Brien supported the Sheffield Star in a court case brought against the newspaper by Scargill. Having nevertheless won his legal case, Scargill subsequently attempted to suspend O'Brien from holding union office. This resulted in further legal action, this time won by O'Brien. During the selection procedure for the Labour candidate for Normanton – after the announced retirement of the sitting MP – O'Brien then successfully defeated the candidate proposed by Scargill. The two also clashed during the subsequent year-long miners' strike of 1984-85, which O'Brien wholeheartedly supported, while rejecting the tactics of the union leadership. In retirement O'Brien researched and published a book on the history of the Prince of Wales colliery in Pontefract, which had once served as the town's largest employer – with 2,200 on the payroll in 1958 – in its 133 years of operation until closure in 2002. In 1978 he married Jean Scofield, who survives him, as does his daughter, Darrel, from an earlier marriage, and her two daughters, Kaye and Diane. Bill (William) O'Brien, miner and politician, born 25 January 1929; died 18 May 2025
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?
Some time ago, an acquaintance sent me a cryptic text message. 'Thought of you after I saw one of your recent articles,' they said. 'Thank you for saying it.' I write columns regularly. Some are about vaginas; some are about the genocide in Gaza. Was this person thanking me for drawing attention to the desperate plight of people on eBay who are prepared to pay five times the original sales price for Gwyneth Paltrow's delisted This Smells Like My Vagina candle? Or were they referencing Gaza? I suspected the latter, but there was no way of immediately knowing – which often feels par for the course when it comes to the conversation around Gaza. The Trump administration has cracked down on pro-Palestinian speech to such a draconian degree that even within a private text message, some people are too terrified about jeopardising their career or immigration status to speak up. Many lawmakers and parts of the media seem to have lost the ability to communicate in plain English when it comes to Palestine. I have seen long articles handwringing about the desperately complicated situation of starving kids which don't mention the word 'Israel' once. I have lost count of the number of articles talking about 'starvation stalking Gaza' that circle endlessly around exactly how this starvation has come about. Gaza is almost completely destroyed. There is now a growing consensus that a genocide is under way, and since a plan for the mass displacement of Palestinians to make space for a 'Gaza riviera' was discussed in the Knesset, more people are beginning to speak up. Nevertheless, Gaza-related atrocity denial is so widespread in the US, and the climate of fear around speaking about Palestine so pervasive, that an influential person voicing an unequivocal criticism of Israel's conduct will still make the news. See, for example, John Oliver. The Last Week Tonight host made headlines this week after he opened his most recent show with a clear-eyed analysis of the human-made famine in Gaza. 'Look, 'Gaza is starving' is a sentence that's objectively true, but it's also slightly misleading because it's too passive,' Oliver said. 'Gaza is being starved by Israel.' I'm glad to see Oliver spelling this out. But it is enraging that it is a late-night host speaking with clarity rather than editorial boards, cable news anchors or politicians – many of whom seem to treat mass starvation as an unfortunate and unintentional consequence of war rather than a deliberate act. One CBS video from last December, for example, is headlined: 'Hunger spreads virtually everywhere in Gaza amid Israel-Hamas war.' As the Al Jazeera Journalism Review argues, many headlines in major US outlets have similarly described the situation as a 'food crisis' rather than an intentional blockade. Meanwhile, the rightwing Free Press – which CBS is reportedly mulling buying for up to $250m partly because of its 'pro-Israel stance', according to the FT – described media reporting around starvation in Gaza as part of 'a highly effective campaign of information warfare' against Israel perpetrated by Hamas. And while experts have been warning about famine risks in Gaza since December 2023, an analysis of US media coverage by the watchdog Fair shows most outlets barely covered the situation until it became undeniably grim. 'The conditions of famine have been out in the open for well over a year, and yet it was considered barely newsworthy in US news media,' it says. Oliver isn't the only late-night host speaking up. Indeed, from the shenanigans of the Trump administration to the starvation of Gaza, late-night hosts (and children's entertainer Ms Rachel) seem to have become the moral voice of the US. The Daily Show's Jon Stewart has also been outspoken about Gaza. 'I have a moral clarity about what I'm seeing,' said Stewart, who is Jewish, in an episode last week where he was speaking to the Jewish Currents editor-at-large, Peter Beinart. 'I feel like a crazy person. I feel as if I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific. And to be told that I have to shut up because I risk the Jewish state by speaking out? I would say the opposite. I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action.' And then there's Stephen Colbert's The Late Show on CBS. Colbert hasn't spoken about Gaza a huge amount, although he did criticise the crackdown on student protests, saying: 'Even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as they are peaceful, students should be allowed to protest. It's their first amendment right.' He has, however, been very outspoken about Trump. Last month, he said Paramount Global (which owns CBS) deciding to pay a large settlement to Trump over content in a CBS show, 60 Minutes, amounted to a 'big fat bribe'. Three days later, his show was cancelled – many suspect because Paramount higher-ups wanted to stay in Trump's good books to get a merger approved. This seems to have worked. Trump has said: 'I absolutely love that Colbert was fired.' I bet he does. Late-night hosts seem to be doing far more than certain other influential voices when it comes to speaking truth to power. None of this is funny – but when comedians become the most vocal truth-tellers, it's possible your country has become a joke. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian US columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Herald Scotland
15 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action
Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. Since the war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech on Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' he said. 'This defence will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.' Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorised facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal covers only the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. 'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the October 7 2023 Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused 11 billion dollars (£8.3 billion) of damage.
