logo
How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?

How did John Oliver become the moral compass of the US?

The Guardiana day ago
Some time ago, an acquaintance sent me a cryptic text message. 'Thought of you after I saw one of your recent articles,' they said. 'Thank you for saying it.'
I write columns regularly. Some are about vaginas; some are about the genocide in Gaza. Was this person thanking me for drawing attention to the desperate plight of people on eBay who are prepared to pay five times the original sales price for Gwyneth Paltrow's delisted This Smells Like My Vagina candle? Or were they referencing Gaza?
I suspected the latter, but there was no way of immediately knowing – which often feels par for the course when it comes to the conversation around Gaza. The Trump administration has cracked down on pro-Palestinian speech to such a draconian degree that even within a private text message, some people are too terrified about jeopardising their career or immigration status to speak up. Many lawmakers and parts of the media seem to have lost the ability to communicate in plain English when it comes to Palestine. I have seen long articles handwringing about the desperately complicated situation of starving kids which don't mention the word 'Israel' once. I have lost count of the number of articles talking about 'starvation stalking Gaza' that circle endlessly around exactly how this starvation has come about.
Gaza is almost completely destroyed. There is now a growing consensus that a genocide is under way, and since a plan for the mass displacement of Palestinians to make space for a 'Gaza riviera' was discussed in the Knesset, more people are beginning to speak up. Nevertheless, Gaza-related atrocity denial is so widespread in the US, and the climate of fear around speaking about Palestine so pervasive, that an influential person voicing an unequivocal criticism of Israel's conduct will still make the news.
See, for example, John Oliver. The Last Week Tonight host made headlines this week after he opened his most recent show with a clear-eyed analysis of the human-made famine in Gaza. 'Look, 'Gaza is starving' is a sentence that's objectively true, but it's also slightly misleading because it's too passive,' Oliver said. 'Gaza is being starved by Israel.'
I'm glad to see Oliver spelling this out. But it is enraging that it is a late-night host speaking with clarity rather than editorial boards, cable news anchors or politicians – many of whom seem to treat mass starvation as an unfortunate and unintentional consequence of war rather than a deliberate act. One CBS video from last December, for example, is headlined: 'Hunger spreads virtually everywhere in Gaza amid Israel-Hamas war.' As the Al Jazeera Journalism Review argues, many headlines in major US outlets have similarly described the situation as a 'food crisis' rather than an intentional blockade.
Meanwhile, the rightwing Free Press – which CBS is reportedly mulling buying for up to $250m partly because of its 'pro-Israel stance', according to the FT – described media reporting around starvation in Gaza as part of 'a highly effective campaign of information warfare' against Israel perpetrated by Hamas. And while experts have been warning about famine risks in Gaza since December 2023, an analysis of US media coverage by the watchdog Fair shows most outlets barely covered the situation until it became undeniably grim. 'The conditions of famine have been out in the open for well over a year, and yet it was considered barely newsworthy in US news media,' it says.
Oliver isn't the only late-night host speaking up. Indeed, from the shenanigans of the Trump administration to the starvation of Gaza, late-night hosts (and children's entertainer Ms Rachel) seem to have become the moral voice of the US. The Daily Show's Jon Stewart has also been outspoken about Gaza. 'I have a moral clarity about what I'm seeing,' said Stewart, who is Jewish, in an episode last week where he was speaking to the Jewish Currents editor-at-large, Peter Beinart. 'I feel like a crazy person. I feel as if I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific. And to be told that I have to shut up because I risk the Jewish state by speaking out? I would say the opposite. I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action.'
And then there's Stephen Colbert's The Late Show on CBS. Colbert hasn't spoken about Gaza a huge amount, although he did criticise the crackdown on student protests, saying: 'Even if you don't agree with the subject of their protests, as long as they are peaceful, students should be allowed to protest. It's their first amendment right.' He has, however, been very outspoken about Trump. Last month, he said Paramount Global (which owns CBS) deciding to pay a large settlement to Trump over content in a CBS show, 60 Minutes, amounted to a 'big fat bribe'. Three days later, his show was cancelled – many suspect because Paramount higher-ups wanted to stay in Trump's good books to get a merger approved. This seems to have worked. Trump has said: 'I absolutely love that Colbert was fired.'
I bet he does. Late-night hosts seem to be doing far more than certain other influential voices when it comes to speaking truth to power. None of this is funny – but when comedians become the most vocal truth-tellers, it's possible your country has become a joke.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian US columnist
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

VP Vance meeting to discuss Epstein fallout canceled, source says
VP Vance meeting to discuss Epstein fallout canceled, source says

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

VP Vance meeting to discuss Epstein fallout canceled, source says

WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - A dinner for senior administration officials at Vice President JD Vance's residence to discuss topics including the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case has been canceled after news of it leaked, a source familiar with the matter said. A spokesman for Vance said the dinner, first reported by CNN, had not been planned. Sign up here. "There was never a supposed meeting scheduled at the Vice President's residence to discuss Epstein strategy," said Vance spokesman William Martin. The Trump administration has struggled for weeks to mitigate the political fallout from the Epstein investigation, amid public pressure for more transparency over its handling of files related to the convicted sex offender's case. President Donald Trump had promised to make public files related to the disgraced financier's case if reelected. In July, however, the Justice Department said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters, who have called for additional details to be released.

Trump administration freezes $584m in grants for ‘life-saving research' at UCLA
Trump administration freezes $584m in grants for ‘life-saving research' at UCLA

The Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump administration freezes $584m in grants for ‘life-saving research' at UCLA

The Trump administration has suspended $584m in federal grants for the University of California, Los Angeles, nearly double the amount that was previously thought, the school's chancellor announced on Wednesday. UCLA is the first public university whose federal grants have been targeted by the administration over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action. The Trump administration has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against private colleges. 'If these funds remain suspended, it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation,' Chancellor Julio Frenk said on Wednesday in a statement. The move means 'life-saving research' will be defunded, he said on Friday when the school first received the notice. 'It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' The departments affected rely on funding from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy, Frenk said. The US Department of Education did not immediately respond to an email from the Associated Press requesting comment. The Trump administration recently accused UCLA of violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students'. The announcement came as UCLA reached a $6m settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the university, arguing it violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters in 2024 to block their access to classes and other areas on campus. The university has said that it is committed to campus safety and inclusivity and will continue to implement recommendations. The new UC president, James B Milliken, said in a statement on Wednesday that it has agreed to talks with the administration over the allegations against UCLA. 'These cuts do nothing to address antisemitism,' Milliken said. 'Moreover, the extensive work that UCLA and the entire University of California have taken to combat antisemitism has apparently been ignored.' Milliken said the 'cuts would be a death knell for innovative work that saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security. It is in our country's best interest that funding be restored.' As part of the lawsuit settlement, UCLA said it will contribute $2.3m to eight organizations that combat antisemitism and support the university's Jewish community. It also has created an Office of Campus and Community Safety, instituting new policies to manage protests on campus. Frenk, whose Jewish father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany to Mexico and whose wife is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor, launched an initiative to combat antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias. Last week, Columbia agreed to pay $200m as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into the government's allegations that the school violated federal anti-discrimination laws. The agreement also restores more than $400m in research grants. The Trump administration plans to use its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as an expectation. Dani Anguiano contributed reporting

Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend
Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Palestine Action supporters have boasted that they are the 'moral backbone' of Britain as hundreds prepare to swarm the police this weekend. At least 500 activists are set to join a demonstration at Parliament Square this Saturday, in which they will hold signs saying 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. It has fuelled fears of a 'mass arrest' event, with police and No 10 confirming this week that anyone who supported the newly proscribed terror group would be arrested. But yesterday Tim Crosland, co-founder of Defender Our Juries, which is organising this weekend's protest, said he was 'proud' of those who had signed up to show support for Palestine Action, calling them 'the moral backbone of this country'. He told Times Radio that arresting peaceful protesters was a waste of police time. 'I think the spectacle of police resources, a police service that's under immense pressure, that doesn't answer phone calls for burglaries, that they're dragging retired priests and teachers into police vans for holding up signs,' he said. 'It's an appalling waste of funds.' Last week, Palestine Action won permission to challenge the ban after the High Court ruled it had an arguable case. A judicial review will take place in November. Until then, the ban remains in place. It means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. But Mr Crosland also told an online press conference yesterday afternoon that there would be continued demonstrations in support of the group until the judicial review had concluded. He said he had been 'hearing from thousands of people wanting to take part in this action'. 'It feels like there's huge energy behind it,' he added. 'By November, we hope that this crazy law is struck down and we don't need to campaign against it anymore.' The Met has said the protests had 'the intention of placing a strain on the police' - something organisers have denied. But Mr Crosland claimed the police were in 'disarray' over the ban, with forces from across the country taking differing approaches to protesters, with some not taking action against peaceful demonstrations. There have already been 200 arrests at protests organised by Defend Our Juries since the ban came into force last month. However, Mr Crosland claimed no one had yet been charged, adding that there was 'a sense' that no one would be until the appeal had been heard. The former government lawyer said Defend Our Juries had received legal advice that claims against the police 'for unlawful arrest and for trespass to people's property' could be possible if the High Court rules in Palestine Action's favour. Mr Crosland said Defend Our Juries had written directly to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Met Chief Sir Mark Rowley ahead of this weekend's protests, but had yet to receive a response. However, he said the group had received a 'nice letter' from Lord Hermer last October in relation to their Free Political Prisoners campaign, in which the Attorney General said he 'would love to meet'. 'Unfortunately, it wasn't quite the right time back then, and it seems still not to be quite the right time, but he did send us a nice letter,' Mr Crosland added. Prison bosses have initiated emergency measures for a possible influx of arrested demonstrators this weekend amid concerns that some jails are close to full. A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. 'Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage '.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store