logo
Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Palestine Action supporters have boasted that they are the 'moral backbone' of Britain as hundreds prepare to swarm the police this weekend.
At least 500 activists are set to join a demonstration at Parliament Square this Saturday, in which they will hold signs saying 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'.
It has fuelled fears of a 'mass arrest' event, with police and No 10 confirming this week that anyone who supported the newly proscribed terror group would be arrested.
But yesterday Tim Crosland, co-founder of Defender Our Juries, which is organising this weekend's protest, said he was 'proud' of those who had signed up to show support for Palestine Action, calling them 'the moral backbone of this country'.
He told Times Radio that arresting peaceful protesters was a waste of police time.
'I think the spectacle of police resources, a police service that's under immense pressure, that doesn't answer phone calls for burglaries, that they're dragging retired priests and teachers into police vans for holding up signs,' he said. 'It's an appalling waste of funds.'
Last week, Palestine Action won permission to challenge the ban after the High Court ruled it had an arguable case.
A judicial review will take place in November. Until then, the ban remains in place.
It means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
But Mr Crosland also told an online press conference yesterday afternoon that there would be continued demonstrations in support of the group until the judicial review had concluded.
He said he had been 'hearing from thousands of people wanting to take part in this action'.
'It feels like there's huge energy behind it,' he added.
'By November, we hope that this crazy law is struck down and we don't need to campaign against it anymore.'
The Met has said the protests had 'the intention of placing a strain on the police' - something organisers have denied.
But Mr Crosland claimed the police were in 'disarray' over the ban, with forces from across the country taking differing approaches to protesters, with some not taking action against peaceful demonstrations.
There have already been 200 arrests at protests organised by Defend Our Juries since the ban came into force last month.
However, Mr Crosland claimed no one had yet been charged, adding that there was 'a sense' that no one would be until the appeal had been heard.
The former government lawyer said Defend Our Juries had received legal advice that claims against the police 'for unlawful arrest and for trespass to people's property' could be possible if the High Court rules in Palestine Action's favour.
Mr Crosland said Defend Our Juries had written directly to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Met Chief Sir Mark Rowley ahead of this weekend's protests, but had yet to receive a response.
However, he said the group had received a 'nice letter' from Lord Hermer last October in relation to their Free Political Prisoners campaign, in which the Attorney General said he 'would love to meet'.
'Unfortunately, it wasn't quite the right time back then, and it seems still not to be quite the right time, but he did send us a nice letter,' Mr Crosland added.
Prison bosses have initiated emergency measures for a possible influx of arrested demonstrators this weekend amid concerns that some jails are close to full.
A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system.
'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests.
'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality.
'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription.
'Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.'
The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage '.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Jaguar boss defends ‘woke' rebrand after Trump criticism
New Jaguar boss defends ‘woke' rebrand after Trump criticism

Telegraph

time19 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

New Jaguar boss defends ‘woke' rebrand after Trump criticism

The new boss of Jaguar has defended the company's 'woke' rebrand, days after Donald Trump labelled it a 'total disaster'. PB Balaji, who is due to take over as chief executive of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) in November, claimed that the carmaker had seen a positive response to its overhaul. The move has seen it ditch its iconic jumping cat logo, embrace a hot pink aesthetic and debut a car design that has been compared to the Thunderbirds' limousine. He told reporters: 'We have put our plans together, the cars are being revealed, they're getting exciting response from the customers on the ground. Therefore that's what the strategy is.' It comes days after Mr Trump, the US president, claimed Jaguar had been left in 'absolute turmoil' by its rebrand. He wrote on Truth Social: 'Jaguar did a stupid, and seriously WOKE advertisement, THAT IS A TOTAL DISASTER! The CEO just resigned in disgrace, and the company is in absolute turmoil. Who wants to buy a Jaguar after looking at that disgraceful ad.' Mr Balaji, who is currently finance chief of JLR's owner Tata Motors, is set to take over from Adrian Mardell, 64, who has announced his intention to retire later this year. Mr Balaji has been part of the Jaguar Land Rover board since 2017. In November, the British carmaker announced it would ditch its big cat logo and issued an advert containing a bright pink, Mars-like landscape and catwalk models wearing brightly coloured clothing. It later unveiled a concept car in pink. The rebrand was widely mocked on social media, including by Tesla boss Elon Musk and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, who accused Jaguar of going 'absolutely bonkers… showing a bunch of weirdos'. Asked about Mr Trump's criticism, Mr Balaji pointed to difficult times for the whole global car industry. 'You need to compare our numbers vis-à-vis how others are delivering,' he said. JLR profits nearly halved after a drop in sales and a hit from US trade tariffs. The group experienced a 49.4pc plunge in underlying profits, to £351m, in the three months to the end of June. The fall came as sales dropped 9.2pc to £6.6bn. The company temporarily paused its exports to the US after Mr Trump announced punitive tariffs on car imports. Revenues were also hit by ending the sale of Jaguar cars in the UK as the company reinvents itself as an all-electric car maker. JLR said US tariffs had a 'direct and material impact on profitability and cash flow in the period'. But it added the 'US-UK trade deal will significantly reduce the financial impact of US tariffs going forward'.

Why taboo on nuclear weapons is fading, 80 years after Hiroshima
Why taboo on nuclear weapons is fading, 80 years after Hiroshima

Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Times

Why taboo on nuclear weapons is fading, 80 years after Hiroshima

It wasn't finding skeletons that the British government delegation found most harrowing, although, months after the Hiroshima attack, they still stumbled across them. No, worse was where there were none. Roaming the streets, they noted that 'asphalt retained 'shadows' of those who had walked there at the instant of the explosion'. The purpose of the 1945 British mission to Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not to document a holocaust; it was to prevent a repeat. What would happen when such bombs hit other cities, including London? The assumption was they must. Exactly 80 years on, incredibly, they haven't. Why? The easy answer is mad — mutually assured destruction. And that explains why the USSR and Nato never went to war. It doesn't explain why, say, the US didn't recently hit Iran's nuclear bunker with a small thermonuclear device, despite it being in the middle of nowhere. Or why a tactical weapon wasn't used in Korea or Vietnam — when there were no qualms about dropping vast quantities of conventional explosives — or Ukraine today. • Japan offers silent prayers 80 years after devastation of Hiroshima No, as Nina Tannenwald, a US political scientist, argued, there is another, more human, factor. Nuclear weapons became taboo. Taboos are things you just don't do. Cannibalism, for instance. We don't debate whether someone might be more acceptable to eat if, say, they were just run over by a bus. Neither do we look at nuclear attacks on a case by case basis. There may be situations when tactical nuclear weapons could be militarily useful, even proportionate. We don't countenance it. To see the taboo, consider a poll this week by YouGov: 56 per cent of UK respondents thought conventional bombings of cities in the Second World War were justified, yet only 26 per cent thought the nuclear attacks were. Why? Was it more moral to become a human torch during Operation Gomorrah, when at least 34,000 Hamburg civilians died in a literal tornado of fire, than become a shadow on a Nagasaki pavement? • How Times readers debated the morality of the Hiroshima bomb The taboo, though, may be weakening. Oxford researchers found that if you change the questions, you get different answers. Imagine terrorists are planning an atrocity from an isolated bunker. Do you attack conventionally, or with nuclear? With both equally likely to succeed, 12 per cent chose nuclear. If nuclear was twice as likely to succeed, 56 per cent said nuke 'em. Why did the US not do just that in Iran? And yet, there is an oddity about nuclear weapons. In isolation, they can be just another tool. In multiple? They are worse than we ever thought. In 2022 the journal Nature Food analysed the effects of a small nuclear war between India and Pakistan. It would, unsurprisingly, be bad for them: 50 million killed. But here's the more troubling statistic: it would be worse for us. As the soot blocked the sun, around the world one billion would starve. • The Times View: The nuclear attack on Hiroshima reminds us of human folly That there have been no nuclear attacks since 1945 is perhaps the greatest achievement of global diplomacy. But 80 years from now? Those who remember Hiroshima are dying out. The countries seeking nuclear weapons are increasing. Speak to nuclear theorists and the worry is not merely that nuclear weapons are used somewhere and it's horrific. It's that they are used somewhere and, as is perfectly possible, it's not horrific enough. Because then the taboo is gone. And it won't come back.

Met ‘ready to respond' to busy weekend of protests as regional officers drafted
Met ‘ready to respond' to busy weekend of protests as regional officers drafted

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Met ‘ready to respond' to busy weekend of protests as regional officers drafted

A senior officer admitted the scale of the demonstrations – including one protest of more than 500 people supporting the banned Palestine Action on Saturday – would put pressure on the force, but that it would be equipped 'to respond to any eventuality'. It comes after the force announced the first three people had been charged with supporting the group, now designated a terror organisation, in England and Wales on Thursday. Other major events including the Community Shield match between Liverpool and Crystal Palace at Wembley are taking place and will require sizeable police resources. Two marches organised by the Palestine Coalition and pro-Israeli group Stop the Hate respectively will also be held on consecutive days in central London. A number of local protests in Tower Hamlets, Putney and Westminster opposing the continued Israeli military action in Gaza will be policed on Friday evening, while officers will also be deployed in the vicinity of hotels housing asylum seekers in Islington and in Canary Wharf. Demonstrators let off flares and tried to 'breach the fencing and access' the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf at a previous protest on Sunday, while nine arrests were made outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in Islington two days earlier. On Saturday, more than 500 people are expected to hold up placards supporting the banned Palestine Action in Parliament Square, after organisers Defend Our Juries announced earlier this week the event would go ahead. Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, also 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, have all been charged with displaying an article in a public place, arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organisation after their attendance at a previous demonstration last month. More than 200 people were arrested at a wave of Defend Our Juries protests across the UK in response to the ban implemented by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper last month. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ade Adelekan said: 'The Met is very experienced at dealing with large scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Anyone showing support for Palestine Action can expect to be arrested. I would once again urge people to consider the seriousness of that outcome. 'An arrest under the Terrorism Act can have very real long-term implications – from travel, to employment, to finances. Also, as we have seen this week, it is very likely an arrest in these circumstances will lead to a charge.' A further pro-Palestinian demonstration on Saturday, organised by the Palestine Coalition, will march from Russell Square to Whitehall followed by an assembly with speeches. Public order conditions have been imposed on the march which mean it must not form or begin before 12pm, protesters must not deviate from or stop to form assemblies along the agreed route and the protest must end by 5.30pm, the Met said. The force added it was not aware of an organised counter protest at the event. The National March for the Hostages will then have 'a policing and security operation' in place when it begins in central London from 3pm on Sunday. Stop the Hate, who are organising the march, have previously held a number of smaller counter protests in recent months. Officers will also again be deployed to the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf in anticipation of any further protest. More public order conditions are likely to be imposed on some of the various other protests in the coming days, the force said. 'This is going to be a particularly busy few days in London with many simultaneous protests and events that will require a significant policing presence,' Mr Adelekan said. 'I'm grateful not just to the Met officers who will be working incredibly hard over the coming days but to those colleagues from other forces who have been deployed to London to support us.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store