Sudan: United Nation (UN) Human Rights Chief deplores killing of dozens of civilians in Kordofan
The UN Human Rights Office has verified the killing of least 60 civilians by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in North Kordofan's Bara locality since 10 July. Civil society groups have reported that up to 300 people were killed.
At least 23 other civilians were reportedly killed and more than 30 others injured when airstrikes by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) hit two villages in West Kordofan from 10 to 14 July. In addition, on 17 July, at least 11 civilians - all members of a single family - were killed in a SAF airstrike in Bara locality.
'It is distressing that more than two years since the conflict began parties to the conflict in Sudan continue to demonstrate callous disregard for civilians' lives and safety,' said Türk.
The latest civilian deaths come amid worrying reports that the RSF is mobilising for an offensive on El Obeid, the capital of North Kordofan state. The UN Human Rights Chief also expressed continued concern for the safety of civilians in El Fasher, North Darfur, following multiple RSF attacks on the besieged city in recent days, including a ground attack on 11 and 12 July, which reportedly resulted in civilian casualties.
'An escalation of hostilities in North Darfur and Kordofan will only further aggravate the already severe risks to civilians and the dire humanitarian situation in a conflict that has already wrought untold suffering on the Sudanese people,' said Türk. 'I urge those with influence to act to prevent such an escalation, and to ensure that both parties uphold their obligations under international law, including on the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure.'
The High Commissioner renewed his calls on the warring parties to ensure safe, sustained and unimpeded access to humanitarian aid, including through humanitarian pauses, and to prevent and repress violations of international law. 'All alleged violations must be fully and independently investigated and those responsible brought to justice,' he said.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
12 hours ago
- The National
Saudi Arabia and Jordan denounce Itamar Ben-Gvir's 'provocative' visit to Al Aqsa Mosque
Saudi Arabia has condemned 'provocative' practices by Israeli officials at Al Aqsa Mosque compound, after Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir visited the holy site on Sunday. 'Such practices fuel conflict in the region,' the kingdom's Foreign Ministry said. The Jordanian Foreign Ministry described the act as a 'flagrant violation of international law and international humanitarian law, an unacceptable provocation, and a condemned scalation', stressing that Israel holds no sovereignty over Al Aqsa Mosque. Under a delicate decades-old status quo arrangement with Muslim authorities, the compound is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and Jews can visit but may not pray there. The Waqf, the foundation that administers the complex, said Mr Ben-Gvir was among another 1,250 who ascended the site and who it said prayed, shouted and danced. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in response to the visit that: 'Israel's policy of maintaining the status quo on the Temple Mount has not changed and will remain unchanged.' New anger erupted in Israel after Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad released two videos of Israeli hostages held in Gaza, as efforts to get a ceasefire deal stall and the country's far-right government appears to favour continued fighting to a ceasefire. PIJ released a six-minute video on Thursday showing distressed hostage Rom Braslavski, 21, which it said was recorded days before contact was lost with his captors. The next day, Hamas released a video of emaciated Evyatar David in a tunnel, part of which filmed him digging a hole that he said he thought would be his grave. The video was published as Steve Witkoff, US Middle East envoy and a pivotal figure in ceasefire negotiations, was visiting relatives of Israeli hostages. The footage caused rage in Israel, as well as the Israeli government. Mr Braslavski's mother said: 'Don't cry over the children in Gaza – cry for Rom,' according to The Times of Israel. Opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a post on X: 'Let every government member watch Evyatar's video tonight before going to sleep and try to fall asleep while thinking of Evyatar trying to survive in a tunnel.' Protesters also blocked a motorway in Tel Aviv on Sunday morning, calling for a hostage deal in solidarity with the hostages. Polling consistently suggests that Israelis also oppose the war, with the majority concerned for the well-being of hostages and Israeli soldiers. Concern over the war's effects on Gazan civilians remains low, with 74 per cent of Israeli Jews saying 'they are not distressed by the humanitarian situation in Gaza', according to a poll published on Sunday by Israeli think tank INSS. The continuing opposition to the war inside Israel comes as many ministers double down on the necessity of continuing the conflict. Far-right Israeli Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu said on Wednesday that releasing hostages should not be the main goal of the war. '[Hostages] should be called 'prisoners of war … and 'prisoners of war' are dealt with at the end of the war,' he added. Mr Ben-Gvir, who leads the Otzma Yehudit party to which Mr Eliyahu belongs, said on Sunday that the 'only way' to return hostages and win the war against Hamas was by sending the message that 'we are already occupying all of the Gaza Strip, declaring sovereignty across the entire Gaza Strip, eliminating every Hamas member and encouraging voluntary emigration'. Mr Ben-Gvir made the comments at the flashpoint Al Aqsa compound in Jerusalem where he also prayed, challenging rules covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Hamas called its attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, 'Al Aqsa Flood' and said they were in part response to the breaches of the mosques status quo, including by ministers in Mr Netanyahu's government.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
UN video shows shots fired at Palestinians waiting for aid
The UN has released a video showing shots being fired towards people waiting for food in Gaza, many of them children, as an aid convoy approaches. The shots are fired into the ground in front of a crowd of people, who begin rushing towards the UN vehicles as they draw near. ' Israeli forces were firing warning shots just inches away from a crowd waiting for a UN convoy with food supplies,' the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha) said. It said the shooting took place on Wednesday near the Karam Abu Salem border crossing from Israel into southern Gaza. In the video, a male voice says: "No, no, don't do this, don't do this" as people swarm towards the vehicles, despite the shots fired seconds earlier. "Check your door's locked, check your door's locked, safety lock as well," another male voice says. Ocha spokesperson Olga Cherevko said the UN team faced "several constraints" when they went to pick up food supplies from the border crossing. "One of the constraints that we faced was waiting about 2.5 hours at an Israeli forces checkpoint, which by the time we were allowed to pass, we were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our lorries." Israel also did not give the UN enough time to secure the aid on the lorries, Ms Cherevko said, making it easier for the packages to fall off. The UN footage was released amid growing international anger over Israel's restrictions on the delivery of aid as it presses a military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, despite extreme levels of hunger in the Palestinian enclave and the rising number of deaths among people trying to receive food. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said on Friday that at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food. It said 859 deaths occurred near aid sites run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), and 514 along the routes of food convoys. "Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military," it added. Twelve more people died while trying to collect aid on Saturday morning, the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported, as well as 10 others killed in Israeli attacks across the enclave. Gaza health authorities have also been reporting more and more people dying from hunger-related causes. The total stands at 147, among them 88 children, most of whom died in the past few weeks. Israel said it is taking steps to increase aid access and last Sunday announced humanitarian pauses in its war against Hamas to allow the delivery of relief supplies. However, aid agencies say they are not receiving enough permissions from the Israeli military for the entry of aid. US President Donald Trump 's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Gaza on Friday in what the White House said was a preparation to draw up a new plan to deliver aid to the territory. Mr Trump has repeatedly expressed concern over the levels of starvation in Gaza. "We want to help people. We want to help them live. We want to get people fed. It is something that should have happened long time ago," he told the Axios news website on Friday. Ms Cherevko said access to aid had to be expanded so that more food was entering on a regular basis and "communities have the confidence that supplies are coming and that they will be receiving them and that they will be distributed properly". Israel has denied pursuing a policy of starvation.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Sudanese people are losing faith in the 'government of hope'
When former UN official Kamil Idris was sworn in as Sudan's new prime minister this spring, he became the first person to hold the position in a permanent capacity since Abdalla Hamdok resigned in January 2022 amid ongoing political turmoil. His appointment by Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan elicited a polarised response. Proponents viewed it as a potential turning point in Sudan's democratic transition, citing Idris's political independence, technocratic expertise, and established ties with international organisations. They argued that his non-partisan background would help in navigating Sudan's complex transitional landscape. Sceptics, meanwhile, questioned the legitimacy of an unelected leader, arguing that his appointment - as opposed to a popular mandate - could constrain his autonomy. Critics have also pointed to the persistence of military influence, suggesting that Idris might function as a civilian proxy, with his authority circumscribed. This perspective underscores broader apprehensions about the deep involvement of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in politics - a role that contradicts the principle of a military remaining neutral in governance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While not all observers may recognise this dynamic, analysts, and those closely following Sudanese politics, note SAF's entrenched influence in political life. Furthermore, during the ongoing conflict in Sudan this politicisation of the army has led to suggestions about the close connections with the Islamist-led regime which had been overthrown by the revolution of 2018/2019. There is heightened skepticism about whether Sudan's current transition will produce a genuinely inclusive civilian government, or if military-backed structures will continue to shape power behind the scenes, and therefore the risks of a facade of civilian rule without substantive democratisation. Idris faces multiple challenges, chief among them the ongoing war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has raged since April 2023, severely destabilising Sudan's economy and social cohesion. Forming a new government was his first hurdle. Last month, Idris unveiled plans for a non-partisan, technocratic "government of hope" - a move that swiftly drew criticism from key political factions, who accused him of sidelining major civilian coalitions that had been instrumental in resisting military rule. Escalating tensions Although Idris has vowed to convene an inclusive dialogue with Sudan's political and social stakeholders, this initiative faces significant challenges, as some parties contest the legitimacy of his appointment and decry his government as unrepresentative of their interests. Notably, the Sudanese Congress Party, the Socialist Arab Ba'ath Party, and Somood, the Civil Democratic Alliance (CDA) led by the former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. The latter was a product of the fragmentation of Taqadum, a civilian coalition formed in early 2024 of specific political actors from the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC). Eventually, Tadadum split with two movements emerging; some FFC members joined Somood under Hamdok's leadership while others joined the Sudan Founding Alliance (Ta'sis), championed by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemeti). By forming an alliance with the latter, these civilian political actors rejected the authority of the Idris-led government. For its part, Somood has opted instead to engage directly with warring factions, circumventing the government based in Port Sudan. Tensions had been escalating since Idris dissolved the previous caretaker government in early June. Signatories of the Juba Peace Agreement protested the move, viewing it as an erosion of their negotiated gains. The dispute revolves around an article in the Juba agreement that had guaranteed signatories a 25-percent share of executive authority throughout the transitional period established by the Constitutional agreement of August 2019. Critics argue that the Juba deal has failed to address broader societal demands or to resolve persistent on-the-ground grievances, intensifying calls for its revision or scrapping. But ignoring its safeguards would erode trust in political settlements, destabilise the transition, and undermine national unity. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? Mohamed Sid Ahmed al-Jakumi, head of the Northern Track, a signatory to the Juba deal, has demanded adherence to the 'quarter of power' principle, under threat of legal action. He has called for key ministries to be led by independent experts, rejecting the 'monopolisation' of power by any party. Amid this dispute, Idris advanced his cabinet formation late last month, issuing decisions to appoint Lieutenant General Hassan Daoud Kabron Kayan as defence minister and Lieutenant General Babiker Samra Mustafa Ali as interior minister. In early July, three technocratic appointments followed, with several Sudanese professors placed in charge of the agriculture, higher education and health ministries. Among the figures were Muiz Omer Bakhit, minister of health, Ismat Gurashi Abdullah Mohamed, minister of Agriculture and Irrigation, Ahmed Mudawi Musa Mohamed, minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research. These three ministries were said to be pro-revolution. Idris emphasised merit-based selection, but the nominations have ignited a backlash, with critics scrutinising the appointees' allegiances and warning of militarised governance. Significant setback Since then, Idris has appointed another 10 ministers to his 'government of hope', filling the rural development, justice, finance, trade, and religious affairs ministries on 7 July; and the fisheries, culture, minerals, social welfare, and transport portfolios a week later. Idris described the appointments as the result of a thorough review of national competencies and expertise. The remaining seven ministerial appointments remain pending. But already, the ministerial appointments represent a significant setback for the transitional process. Many of the appointees were involved in the previous government. For example, just to cite a few names, Mahassen Ali Yacoub who was the acting minister of trade and industry in the previous government that took over after the coup of 2021, is holding the same post in Idris-led government. Also, Abdall Mohamed Daraf, who is appointed as minister of Justice, is publicly known for his political support for the previous government, raising questions about the extent of his neutrality in this sensitive position. Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation Read More » This could undermine trust in the state's commitment to meaningful reforms, while sending a deeply concerning signal to both the international community and the US-hosted process aimed at resolving the Sudanese crisis. Rather than advancing progress, these appointments reflect is only a repetition of past mistakes and failed modalities of governance despite different forms of organisation. Finally, Tasis finalised its charter and managed to establish a parallel 'peace and unity government' on 26 July with Hemeti as the leader of the presidential council. It has espoused a compromise pertaining to the commitment of its ally Al Hilu, the leader of one of the fragments of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A-North) and a stanuch advocate of a secular Sudanese state. Overall, Idris's efforts have unveiled deepening fractures between civilian and military actors, among Juba signatories, and within the realm of public opinion. Sudan's political landscape remains paralysed by entrenched polarisation, with the war economy and societal fragmentation aggravating divisions. This deadlock, compounded by grievances and institutional distrust, risks precipitating state fragmentation unless a consensus-driven dialogue emerges among military, political and civilian forces. The enduring contest for dominance has left Sudan trapped in a cycle of instability for nearly seven decades, as political and military elites have consistently failed to resolve their protracted power struggles. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? As fragmentation looms, Sudanese people demand action, not just hope. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
