Hereditary peers make last-ditch plea to be spared in ‘ruthless purge' of Lords
Hereditary peers complained they were being treated like 'discarded rubbish' and questioned what they had done to be 'shown the door in such a way'.
They argued sparing existing bloodline members would be 'a statesman-like choice' and foster future goodwill.
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill, which has already been through the Commons, will abolish the 92 seats reserved for members of the upper chamber who are there by right of birth.
There are currently 86 hereditary peers after the suspension of by-elections pending the legislation, the majority of whom – 44 – are Conservative.
The Bill delivers on a promise in Labour's election manifesto and has been promoted as the first step in a process of reform.
During its passage through the Lords, peers backed a change proposed by the Tories to block the expulsion of hereditary members already sitting at Westminster.
Instead, the abolition of the by-election system would see their number decline over time as individuals die or retire.
However, the Conservative amendment faces defeat when the Bill returns to the Commons, where the Government has a majority, during so-called 'ping-pong', when legislation is batted between the two Houses until agreement is reached.
Speaking at third reading, Tory shadow leader in the upper chamber Lord True warned: 'Without the fullest trust, respect and goodwill between the Government of the day and His Majesty's Opposition… this House cannot function.
'And the brutal reality is that the full exclusion of over 80 peers does not evidence full respect and cannot be the basis of full goodwill.'
He added: 'The Labour Party has won.
'No hereditary peer will ever again take their oath at this despatch box, but I submit it is not necessary on top of that, to wield the brutal axe on our colleagues who sit here now.
'That is what the amendment passed by the House for grandfather rights asked the Government to moderate.
'There is a chance and there is a choice, to temper historic victory with magnanimity in that victory.
'Such a statesman-like choice would benefit this House in keeping members we value, and at the same time, unleash a spirit of goodwill that I believe could carry us all together through the rest of this Parliament.'
Conservative hereditary peer Lord Strathclyde, who previously served as leader of the House, said: 'We all accept the mandate that the Government has to end the involvement of the hereditary principle as a route of entry to our House. But I join my colleagues of all benches still wondering why those of us already serving here are due to be flung out.
'What have these sitting parliamentarians done to deserve being shown the door in such a way?'
He added: 'It's never too late to appear gracious and magnanimous… Labour's victory in abolishing heredity here is real. Need we have such a ruthless and unnecessary purge as well?'
Tory hereditary peer Lord Mancroft argued he and his colleagues were being 'thrown out of this House like discarded rubbish'.
He said: 'We are now to be treated in a way that no one else in employment or in any workplace in Britain can be treated.
'It is rightly illegal to sack anyone on the basis of their birth except here in the upper House of this mother of parliaments.'
Lord Mancroft added: 'It is very personal to each and every one of us to be treated like this by those we considered our friends and colleagues. It is also deeply, deeply offensive, and I would simply like to know why? Is that really too much to ask?'
Responding, the Leader of the Lords Baroness Smith of Basildon again highlighted the removal of hereditary peers had been in the Labour Party manifesto.
She said: 'Of course this feels personal to those departing hereditary peers. It felt very personal to me when I lost my seat as a Member of Parliament, with far less notice.'
Lady Smith added: 'Nothing about the legislation says that we do not value the work of hereditary peers, or that of any other member of the House.
'That has always been the case, but we were quite clear that the hereditary route is not the route into the House that the country or the Labour Party expects.'
Other changes made by the Lords to the Bill, which will be considered by MPs after the summer recess, included a Conservative move to create life peers who do not have to sit at Westminster.
Peers also supported a Tory amendment to abolish unpaid ministers in the upper chamber, amid long-held concerns about Government frontbenchers in the unelected House not being remunerated for their official duties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
4 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Childminder jailed for vile tweet on day of Southport attack to be released
The wife of a former Conservative councillor insisted she did not intend to incite violence when she tweeted urging people to set fire to migrant hotels. An ex-Tory councillor's wife jailed after she called for migrant hotels to be set on fire on the day of the Southport attack will be released in weeks. The Court of Appeal has ruled Lucy Connolly, 41, had not intended the post to incite violence with the post in which she urged people to "set fire to all the f* hotels full of the b** for all I care". This means Connolly, who was a childminder, will go free from HMP Peterborough in August having served 40 per cent of her term, reports the Mirror. She was jailed for 31 months in October following the tweet, which was viewed more than 300,000 times before it was deleted. The mum was found guilty of inciting racial hatred, after a court heard "serious disorder" broke out across the country following the murders of three young girls in Southport, Merseyside. False rumours spread online that the suspect was an illegal immigrant. In full, Connolly's tweet read: "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f* hotels full of the b** for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it." Her sentence, handed out at Birmingham Crown Court, was designed "to both punish and deter". But her husband, former West Northamptonshire councillor Raymond Connolly, was among several politicians to react with anger. Nigel Farage previously called for her release and called her jail term "absolutely excessive". Speaking at an event in May, Mr Farage, who is Leader of Reform, said: "I want to make it absolutely clear: Lucy Connolly should not be in prison. "While she should not have said what she said, understand there were millions of mothers at that moment in time after Southport feeling exactly the same way." Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: "People have received less time in jail — or no time — for actual physical and sexual assaults." However, Sir Keir Starmer has defended the sentence, saying he would "always support" the UK court system. But Connolly, from Northampton, is likely to be released next month, having served just 40 per cent of her term. One of Connolly's pals said she would be "with a glass of Whispering Angel in hand" this time in August, reports the Evening Standard. Following the Southport atrocities, there was a wave of unrest across the country with migrants being targeted in attacks at hotels. There were also several clashes with police in cities and towns across the UK. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pressure on Australia as allies to recognise state of Palestine; Thorpe condemns deaths in custody; and a big stick insect
Good afternoon. Pressure is growing for Australia to recognise a Palestinian state, after Canada announced it would join key allies France and the UK to formally recognise Palestine at the next UN general assembly meeting in September. The Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, told reporters that the planned move was predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to reforms, including fundamentally reforming its governance and holding general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part. Carney also said Hamas must release all hostages. The UK's announcement was also conditional, with Keir Starmer saying recognition would occur by September unless Israel held to a ceasefire, calling for the nation to commit to a two-state solution. Jim Chalmers, said he won't put a timeframe on Australian recognition of Palestine but said it's 'a matter of when, not if' it happens, while the Greens called for recognition as soon as possible. The Liberal senator James Paterson said Australia should not follow other countries based on an 'artificial measure of momentum'. Bruce Lehrmann claims police destroyed exonerating evidence and pending rape trial should be abandoned, court hears After-school carer charged with producing child abuse material at six facilities across northern Sydney Sam Groth's wife Brittany publicly defends couple's relationship as they threaten legal action against minister Helen Garner praises 'serious and sensitive' Dua Lipa after musician adds Australian author to her book club FBI opens first office in New Zealand 'to counter China and cybercrime' Fears for South Australia's annual cuttlefish gathering amid deadly algal bloom A newly discovered stick insect which weighs slightly less than a golf ball may be the heaviest insect in Australia, scientists say. The new species, named Acrophylla alta, was found in the high altitudes of the Atherton tablelands in north Queensland – and scientists said the habitat could be part of the reason for its large size. Watch the video here 'These are not just statistics. They are sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, cousins, siblings, grandchildren – lost to a system that continues to harm our people.' – Lidia Thorpe The Victorian independent senator condemned the 'shameful' number of Indigenous deaths in custody, including 17 this year, as the latest figures show just four of 19 Closing the Gap targets are on track to be met. Thorpe moved a condolence motion in the Senate, supported by Labor and the Greens, extending sympathies to the families of the 17 First Nations people who have died in custody this year and urging all parliamentarians to prevent further deaths in custody. Guardian Essential report: Albanese starts second term with solid approval, but Trump presidency looms – Australian Politics podcast As Anthony Albanese readies his second‑term reform agenda, Guardian Australia's Josh Butler speaks with Essential Media's Peter Lewis about the elephant in the room: Australia's dependence on the US and how its high‑stakes defence gambles could shape both his leadership and the nation's strategic future. Listen to the episode here Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Cloudbreak, near the island of Tavarua in western Fiji, is one of the best waves in the world. For decades, the long, hollow left-hand reef break has drawn surfers from around the globe; but until 2010, local surfers were forbidden from surfing the wave due to an exclusivity deal with a nearby surf resort. A decade and a half since Fiji's cabinet made all surfing areas open to the public, 16-year-old James Kusitino has just become Fiji's first professional surfer. Today's starter word is: IFF. You have five goes to get the longest word including the starter word. Play Wordiply. Enjoying the Afternoon Update? Then you'll love our Morning Mail newsletter. Sign up here to start the day with a curated breakdown of the key stories you need to know, and complete your daily news roundup. And follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. If you have a story tip or technical issue viewing this newsletter, please reply to this email. If you are a Guardian supporter and need assistance with regards to contributions and/or digital subscriptions, please email
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Andrew Bailey rests between us and reckless Reeves
The Chancellor and the governor of the Bank of England have had several disagreements over the past year. But their latest bust-up has crossed the line into intervention. Andrew Bailey shut down a meeting that Rachel Reeves had attempted to procure between the Treasury, the Bank's Prudential Regulation Authority and burgeoning challenger bank, Revolut, to try to hurry the authorisation of its banking licence. People familiar with the matter said the move to cancel the meeting was made over concerns the Bank's regulation should be independent from political interventions. They are absolutely correct, and this flagrant attempt from Reeves to force her 'growth at all costs' agenda at the expense of independence should be admonished. Despite its relative novelty, central bank independence is sacrosanct to the Western world. Even Donald Trump, who has persistently shown disregard for financial markets, has so far been forced to renege on his various attempts to replace the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome 'Mr Too Late' Powell, for fear of bond vigilante retribution. Here in the UK, it was Gordon Brown who finally brought about operational independence for the Bank of England, a policy that arrived surprisingly late in 1997. Ever since, it has been one of the few sacred cows of British politics, with parliamentarians of all stripes understanding the value of a credibly independent central bank. Given the policy's architect, it is all the more surprising that it is Rachel Reeves, who famously had a framed picture of Brown in her university bedroom, launching so many skirmishes against her former employer. I've written recently on Reeves's susceptibility to promises of growth, but this latest personal attempt to strong-arm the regulator into rushing its processes is a worrying step. This has nothing to do with my opinion on Revolut, but it is not a good look for the Chancellor to be seen to be effectively lobbying on the behalf of a private business. It will likely wind up an embarrassing and futile moment for Reeves, who has clearly made the move in a last-ditch effort to get Revolut to pick London when it eventually lists on a stock exchange. The bank has already expressed its preference to list in the US, with its co-founder expressing that he did not 'see the point' of listing in London. The news comes the same month that Bailey told the Treasury Select Committee in no uncertain terms that he disagreed with Reeves's assertion that regulation is 'the boot on the neck' of business. The FT reported his opinion was a touch stronger away from the cameras, with a colleague of his saying he was 'really p----d off' over the comments. There is certainly room for reforming the regulatory landscape in this country, but Reeves seems to be taking the Elon Musk approach of pulling out plugs and hoping it doesn't break. Bailey is not without his faults, but currently he seems to be the only person who remembers why we put some of this regulation in place to begin with. Another example is the huge clamour from the major UK banks to do away with ring-fencing, the regime that separates their retail operations from their investment banks. Reeves seems once again to have listened to whatever the City says it wants, and is open to such a move. But this regulation was imposed with good reason after the global financial crisis and should not be trifled with lightly. There may well be elements that can be improved, or even cause to scrap it, but this should be investigated from a more sensible standpoint than 'any regulation stifles growth'. I don't envy Reeves. The country has stagnated since 2010, and has been hit with several once-in-a-generation events. At each attempt to cut spending, she has been forced into a climbdown by a fearful Sir Keir Starmer, which has forced her hand into looking for a way to improve the nation's lot elsewhere. But while Starmer has been wrong to stand in her way on many occasions, Bailey is proving to be a rare voice of reason. Yes, Britain is stagnating and has been for a long time. We need to spur growth in this country, and regulations from planning to finance need to be tweaked. But tearing down the guardrails because nobody's fallen off the edge since you put them up isn't a plan for growth – it's a recipe for disaster.
