The peat ban is coming. Will your favorite dram disappear with it?
Peated whiskies, flavored with decaying organic matter from bogs, could soon be a casualty of new regulations designed to protect peatlands – one of the Earth's most potent carbon sinks.
In the U.K., the government is moving aggressively to end commercial uses of peat and protect peatlands. Long used in gardening as a rich source of compost, the practice is being abandoned as national bans on peat use take shape. When those gardening-focused bans are fully implemented, peat's role in the whisky industry – which historically accounted for just a sliver of peat use – will make up a much larger percentage of commercial peat usage.
This week, a cluster of 10,000-year-old peatlands in England were designated as new national nature reserves. New legislation proposed earlier this year aims to extend bans on burning across peatlands, a last-ditch effort to restore the 80% of England's peat bogs that are currently considered degraded. The U.K. hosts 13% of the world's peat bogs, which comprise only 3% of the Earth's surface area but store nearly one third of its carbon.
'Our peatlands are this country's Amazon rainforest – home to our most precious wildlife, storing carbon and reducing flooding risk,' U.K. Nature minister Mary Creagh said.
Whisky beyond peat
While plenty of whiskies are peat-free, peat is the signature ingredient that creates the smoky, complex flavors that many whisky drinkers seek out. Peated whiskey has a reputation as an acquired taste, but it commands special respect in the industry for its depth of flavor and its link to traditional production methods in Scotland and Ireland.
Peat comes into play when malted barley is dried with a kiln. Peat added to the flames produces thick smoke that then envelopes the grains, infusing them with layers of flavor drawn out of the earth itself. Pulling peat out of the peated whisky process would be a break with tradition, but one that would leave the industry much better adapted to a changing climate long-term.
As other industries have moved away from peat, the search for alternatives is on. In gardening, coconut coir made from the fibrous material that covers coconuts is a popular choice. Wood shavings, rice hulls, leaf litter and kitchen waste compost are other options, though some you might prefer to not make themselves known to your palate at your next whisky tasting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'You were roarsome!' and 'Queens of Europe'
Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox. Related Internet Links Daily Express Daily Mail Daily Mirror Daily Star Daily Telegraph Financial Times Guardian Independent Metro Sun The i Times
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Says Partner Won't Put Her on the Deed to His Home After He Asked Her to Leave Her Job to Raise Their Child
The woman — who shared her story on a community forum — said her partner claims she shouldn't be their home's co-owner because she's 'not financially contributing' A woman says that her longtime partner refuses to add her to the deed to his new house — despite the fact that they live together and share a child — and she's now wondering if she is 'expecting too much.' The woman detailed her story in the 'Am I Being Unreasonable?' forum on the U.K.-based community site Mumsnet, a place where women can go to seek input and advice from other women about a variety of topics. In her post, the woman said that she has been with her current partner for five years and that they share a 2-year-old. 'Things have been slightly rocky since having our child, but other than that, our relationship is good,' she explained. The original poster (OP) went on to say that they currently live in a home that her partner purchased before they met, and that they are planning on moving into a 'bigger family home' this year. 'I contributed to the [current] house before baby arrived, but haven't [gone] back to work as my partner very fortunately earns a good wage and doesn't want me to go back to work until our child is three and starts nursery [school],' she continued. The OP then said that while she isn't on the deed to their current shared home, she assumed that she would be made co-owner of the new one based on her contributions to their family. However, when she brought this up to her partner, he told her 'absolutely not' because she's 'not financially contributing.' 'I disagree with this as I feel that I am contributing in the sense that I'm bringing up his child and keeping his house clean, etc.,' she continued, adding that her partner claims he wants to eventually get married. 'I feel very insecure about this,' she admitted, before also stating that while her partner covers food and household expenses, she has been using her personal savings for all other purchases, and her 'savings are nearly done.' 'I feel that he is reluctant on making a commitment, and especially a financial commitment — not even just to me, but his own child. He also refuses to update his will or life insurance policy if anything were to happen to him,' she said. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'Am I expecting too much?' she asked, before adding that she feels as though she needs 'to have some sort of security about our relationship, especially since I'm dependent on him.' The vast majority of commenters said that they thought the OP's feelings were valid — but also said that she shouldn't have gotten herself into the situation in the first place. 'YABU [you are being unreasonable] for having gotten into this situation. You're not married and don't have [...] personal wealth, so a break from full-time work wasn't sensible,' said one person. They added, '[It seems] clear that retaining his personal assets and money is his priority. He also sounds sexist. For me, without immediate marriage and change of attitudes, the relationship would be over.' 'For the love of God do not have more children with him!' said someone else. 'You're taking all the risks here. Go back to work, stop being so dependent on him. I'd say get married, as that legal contract would be the best protection [...]. You need to put yourself and your child first because he certainly won't.' The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! Another person said, 'I would be looking to get back to work full-time ASAP. He can 'not like it,' but he either needs to give you financial security [so] you can be a stay-at-home mom, or you need to get yourself paid employment. He can't eat his cake and have it.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Driven 'Mad' by Sister-in-Law's Posts About Dad Who 'Died 10 Years Ago': 'At What Point Is This Just Attention-Seeking?'
"It drives me mad. I've gone so far as to silence her," the woman said A woman is taking issue with her sister-in-law over social media posts she makes about her late father — who died a decade ago. In a post on the U.K.-based forum Mumsnet, the woman said her in-law's dad "died 10 years ago, and yet, it's almost daily, but definitely weekly, she's posting her grief on Facebook." The woman further detailed that her sister-in-law will write about "[how] much she's missing him, how grief is so silent and misunderstood," and it "escalates" on holidays — including Father's Day, Christmas and Easter — as well as "the day he died [and] the day they found out he was ill," plus "her kids birthdays [and] her birthday." "I used to get on with her well, but she's always driven me mad by text and socials," the woman continued. "At what point is this just attention seeking? It drives me mad. I've gone so far as to silence her because I can't bear the 'hope you're okay, hun,' stuff." The Mumsnet user added that her sister-in-law's "behavior has absolutely trashed my opinion of her," and it was exacerbated when she claimed her in-law "even got in competition with a relative of hers raising money for charity, because she had to be the one seen to be doing it and wouldn't collaborate." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In the comments section of the post, the woman was met with support from others, many of whom suggested that her sister-in-law needs professional aid to help her cope with the loss. "It sounds like she needs some counselling to help her manage her grief," one Mumsnet user wrote, as another said, "This sounds like an abnormal grief reaction. She really needs therapy, if she has not had this already." The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! Others, meanwhile, couldn't help but feel that the woman's sister-in-law was taking things a step too far — and possibly continuing to post about her grief solely to get the reactions she has become accustomed to. "There's a huge difference between missing someone on special occasions or memorable dates and actually posting about it ... No need," wrote a commenter. Said one more: "It may be cruel of me, but I have no tolerance at all for performative or over-sentimental public grief." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
