Woman Driven 'Mad' by Sister-in-Law's Posts About Dad Who 'Died 10 Years Ago': 'At What Point Is This Just Attention-Seeking?'
A woman is taking issue with her sister-in-law over social media posts she makes about her late father — who died a decade ago.
In a post on the U.K.-based forum Mumsnet, the woman said her in-law's dad "died 10 years ago, and yet, it's almost daily, but definitely weekly, she's posting her grief on Facebook."
The woman further detailed that her sister-in-law will write about "[how] much she's missing him, how grief is so silent and misunderstood," and it "escalates" on holidays — including Father's Day, Christmas and Easter — as well as "the day he died [and] the day they found out he was ill," plus "her kids birthdays [and] her birthday."
"I used to get on with her well, but she's always driven me mad by text and socials," the woman continued. "At what point is this just attention seeking? It drives me mad. I've gone so far as to silence her because I can't bear the 'hope you're okay, hun,' stuff."
The Mumsnet user added that her sister-in-law's "behavior has absolutely trashed my opinion of her," and it was exacerbated when she claimed her in-law "even got in competition with a relative of hers raising money for charity, because she had to be the one seen to be doing it and wouldn't collaborate."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
In the comments section of the post, the woman was met with support from others, many of whom suggested that her sister-in-law needs professional aid to help her cope with the loss.
"It sounds like she needs some counselling to help her manage her grief," one Mumsnet user wrote, as another said, "This sounds like an abnormal grief reaction. She really needs therapy, if she has not had this already."
The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!
Others, meanwhile, couldn't help but feel that the woman's sister-in-law was taking things a step too far — and possibly continuing to post about her grief solely to get the reactions she has become accustomed to.
"There's a huge difference between missing someone on special occasions or memorable dates and actually posting about it ... No need," wrote a commenter.
Said one more: "It may be cruel of me, but I have no tolerance at all for performative or over-sentimental public grief."
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Migration fuels second largest annual jump in population in over 75 years
The population of England and Wales is estimated to have jumped by more than 700,000 in the year to June 2024, the second largest annual numerical increase in over 75 years, figures show. Almost all of this rise was due to international migration, with natural change – more births than deaths – accounting for only a small proportion. There were an estimated 61.8 million people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up 706,881 from 61.1 million in mid-2023, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Net international migration – the difference between people moving to the country and leaving – was the 'main driver' of the jump in population and accounted for 98% (690,147) of the increase, the ONS said. The number of people living in England and Wales has risen annually since mid-1982, with migration contributing most to population growth every year since mid-1999. Before then, increases were caused mainly by natural change. The rise of 706,881 in the 12 months to June 2024 is the second biggest year-on-year numerical jump in population since at least 1949, which is the earliest comparable ONS data. It is behind only the rise of 821,210 that took place in the preceding 12 months from mid-2022 to mid-2023. This means the population is estimated to have grown by 1.5 million between June 2022 and June 2024: the largest two-year jump since current records began. Nigel Henretty of the ONS said: 'The population of England and Wales has increased each year since mid-1982. 'The rate of population increase has been higher in recent years, and the rise seen in the year to mid-2024 represents the second largest annual increase in numerical terms in over 75 years. 'Net international migration continues to be the main driver of this growth, continuing the long-term trend seen since the turn of the century.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Second-largest population increase in England and Wales in over 75 years - mainly fuelled by migration
The population of England and Wales has grown by more than 700,000 in the year to June 2024 - the second-largest increase in over 75 years. The change was largely fuelled by international migration, with natural change - the difference between births and deaths - accounting for only a small proportion. According to the Office for National Statistics, there were an estimated 61.8 million people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up from 61.1 million the year before. It is the second-largest numerical jump since at least 1949, when comparable data began. And it is behind only the rise of 821,210 that took place in the preceding 12 months from mid-2022 to mid-2023. Nigel Henretty of the ONS said the population of the two countries has increased each year since mid-1982, but said the rate of population increases has been higher in recent years. "Net international migration continues to be the main driver of this growth, continuing the long-term trend seen since the turn of the century," he said. Net international migration - the difference between people moving to the country and leaving - accounted for 690,147 of the estimated population increase of 706,881 people, or 98% of the total. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Buzz Feed
6 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
37 Infuriating People Who Don't Think They're A Problem
This entitled mom who thinks the world (and this cake, apparently) revolves around her: This person, who can probably stop wondering why they're still on a dating app: This American who didn't like when their logic was used against them: The hotel that advertised this "Kids Eat Free" breakfast that was, uh, not free to say the least: The person who wrote this question, because everyone knows a shared ping pong table at work is way more important than a livable wage: This aunt who decided to hijack a relative's Facebook post announcing the birth of their literal child, because her great grandson turned 1 month old on the same day: The hotel owner who decided that "breakfast included with stay" means a Pop-Tart, some Sunny D, and a bag of Ruffles: This a-hole who is so out of touch, he literally responded to his friend being short on cash by saying, "Come have some LOBSTER with us": This girlypop who will not be impressed unless you break the bank to woo her: The passive-aggressive coworker who put up these signs about *checks notes* sniffling: This CAT shampoo that says "cat" in the title, in the instructions, AND has a massive cat on the bottle, but in teeny tiny font says, "for use on dogs only": This absolutely bonkers HOA with a policy requiring all dog owners to register their dogs' DNA for $86 each so they can test any poop they find in the neighborhood: Here's what the letter says:"Dog Registration Policy All dogs that live in or visit the [REDACTED] are required to be registered in a DNA database. This program is run by [REDACTED] for Poo Prints and works by creating a unique DNA profile for each dog in the community. The DNA is collected by swabbing the inside of the dog's mouth to collect cheek cells. The DNA profiles of all the dogs in the community are entered into a database stored by [REDACTED] Lab. When a waste sample is found, it is collected by our management company and sent to the lab. The DNA in the dog's feces is matched to a dog in the system and the violator is fined and charged for the cost of the analysis. New and existing dogs and visiting dogs of existing owners are required to be registered within 2 weeks of program implementation or occupancy or visit. The cost for the DNA program registration is $86.14 per dog. This cost covers the DNA swabbing, DNA collection kit, and database registration. Payment can be made with your regular monthly assessment. Pet Registration is [REDACTED] regular scheduled times at the community clubhouse or by appointment at [REDACTED]. Please email DNA Program Manager [REDACTED] with any questions or to make an appointment. FINE SCHEDULE First Fine = Analysis and test fee and postage Second Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Third Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Analysis fee and postage = $147.30 Failure to register a dog within 2 weeks of move in = Progressive fines starting at $150, up to $500 per month." This Uber driver who is putting both of their lives in jeopardy because he can't go ten minutes without watching a TikTok: This mom who got mad at her kid for "stealing her birthday weekend" (spoiler alert: it was her idea and she didn't remember, so she decided to make it everyone else's problem): This (hopefully ex) friend who was certainly not happy that his "bro" thoughtfully commissioned some art of him and his recently deceased dog instead of getting something more flashy for his birthday: The genius who asked for a photo of the item missing in this person's order (which they can't get a refund or replacement without): The bank employee who saved this girl's number when she opened an account and texted her to go dancing?? As if she'd find that anything other than wildly creepy?: This supervisor who apparently has never heard someone say, "Your poor planning does not constitute an emergency for me.": This Airbnb host who tried to charge a customer ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS for turning down the thermostat: The grinches, I mean, residents of this apartment complex who went to a building-wide game night and stole all the games and snacks so nobody else could have fun: This person who not only took three years to pay their friend back, but also did in in the pettiest way possible: This shopper who said, "Oh, you know where I should leave this raw chicken I picked up and no longer want? In the food warmer!" like an entitled a-hole: The landlord who is renting out a $1,200 apartment with NO KITCHEN: This landlord who agreed to give the tenant leaving the house a 24-hour warning before bringing new tenants for a decidedly did not: The chef who put sausage and peppers on the appetizer then proceeded to plate them like this: This waiter, who really tried to sneak an $87 tip from a customer on an order that was $38: For context, the tip was intended to be $7, and the order total was written as $45.23 on the receipt. The fast-food employee who read "extra cheese" and maliciously complied: This online shop that asks for tips at checkout, because apparently, we do that everywhere now: This Facebook Marketplace seller who had a customer driving 45 minutes to purchase a bookshelf, but decided to sell it to someone else while the original customer was on the way: This grocery store bakery that could really use an in-house editor: This Amtrak employee who said, "I can't see the problem, so there is none, bye!" This boss who asked an employee to work a 17-hour shift (3:30 p.m. to 8:30 a.m.) on the 4th of July so he didn't have to work for 12 hours: This company that sent out a whole ass package that definitely could've just been an email: The designer who wrapped a bunch of planks together, called it a table, and said, "Here, damn!": The person who left this warning on someone's car literalllllly right in front of the "visitors parking" sign: The neighbor who saw absolutely nothing wrong with blocking the street for several days so other people can't access their homes while they renovate their own: And finally, this person, who expressed feelings for their roommate (who is in a long-term relationship), was expectedly turned down, then decided to send them a cute little text out of the blue saying they need to move out:
