RFK Jr sacks entire US vaccine committee
Announcing the move in an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said that conflicts of interest on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (Acip) were responsible for undermining trust in vaccinations.
Kennedy said he wanted to "ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible."
Doctors and health experts have criticised Kennedy's longstanding questioning of the safety and efficacy of a number of vaccines, although in his Senate confirmation hearing he said he is "not going to take them away."
On Monday he said he was "retiring" all of the Acip panel members. Eight of the 17 panelists were appointed in January 2025, in the last days of President Biden's term.
Most of the members are practicing doctors and experts attached to major university medical centres.Kennedy noted that if he did not remove the committee members, President Trump would not have been able to appoint a majority on the panel until 2028."The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine," Kennedy wrote.He claimed that health authorities and drug companies were responsible for a "crisis of public trust" that some try to explain "by blaming misinformation or antiscience attitudes."In the editorial, Kennedy cited examples from the 1990s and 2000s and alleged that conflicts of interest persist."Most of ACIP's members have received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, including those marketing vaccines," he wrote in the Wall Street Journal.The move appears contrary to assurances Kennedy gave during his confirmation hearings. Bill Cassidy, a Republican Senator from Louisiana who is also a doctor, reported that he received commitments from the health secretary that Acip would be maintained "without changes."On Monday, Cassidy wrote on X: "Of course, now the fear is that the Acip will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion."I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case."Acip members are required to disclose conflicts of interest, which are posted online, and to recuse themselves from voting on decisions where they may have a conflict."The problem isn't necessarily that ACIP members are corrupt," Kennedy wrote. "Most likely aim to serve the public interest as they understand it."The problem is their immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy."Dr Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association, a professional organisation for American doctors, said mass sacking "upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives.""With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses," Dr Scott said in a statement.Kennedy did not say who he would appoint to replace the board members. Acip has a meeting scheduled starting 25 June, at which members are scheduled to vote on recommendations for vaccines for Covid, flu, meningococcal disease, RSV and other illnesses.The BBC contacted the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Acip chair, Dr Helen Keipp Talbot, for comment. — BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
6 hours ago
- Leaders
US Deploys Three Warships Near Venezuela Amid Rising Tensions
The United States dispatched three advanced warships toward Venezuela's coastline this week to disrupt major drug trafficking operations, AFP reported on Wednesday. This significant naval deployment directly supports President Trump's intensified efforts against narcotics flowing into America. Furthermore, it signals a sharp escalation in US pressure tactics against Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. Washington doubled its bounty to a staggering $50 million earlier this month specifically targeting Maduro on serious drug charges. These three powerful Aegis-class guided missile destroyers are now actively steaming toward Venezuelan waters, according to the anonymous US source who spoke with AFP. Simultaneously, US media reports indicate plans to deploy approximately 4,000 Marines to bolster regional security efforts soon. The Trump administration consistently refuses to recognize Maduro's previous election victories as legitimate. Officials explicitly accuse him of personally leading the notorious 'Cartel de los Soles' or 'Cartel of the Suns.' Consequently, the Treasury Department recently imposed a special terrorist designation upon this group last month. It also charged the cartel with supporting the Tren de Aragua and Sinaloa drug organizations, both labeled foreign terrorist entities earlier this year. White House Vows to Stop Drug Flood White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt firmly stated President Trump would employ 'every element' of national power to halt the drug influx during Tuesday's briefing. She emphasized his unwavering commitment to stopping drugs from flooding American communities and bringing perpetrators to justice, describing the Venezuelan government bluntly as a 'narco-terror cartel' operating under Maduro's control. Moreover, she declared the administration's firm position that Maduro holds no legitimate presidential authority whatsoever. Instead, Leavitt characterized him as a fugitive cartel leader indicted in the US for trafficking drugs that endanger American citizens through the narcotics trade flooding across the border. Facing this significant US military build-up, President Maduro announced a dramatic countermeasure on Monday, pledging to deploy a staggering 4.5 million civilian militia members across Venezuela immediately. Maduro specifically framed this massive mobilization as a necessary response to perceived US aggression and threats against his government's sovereignty. This move significantly raises regional tensions dramatically. Short link : Post Views: 20
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
US military vets are helping Afghans fight deportation
SAN DIEGO – As a journalist in Afghanistan, Abdul says he helped promote American values like democracy and freedom. That work, he said, resulted in him being tortured by the Taliban after the US withdrew from the country in 2021. Now he's in California applying for political asylum, amid the looming threat of deportation. "We trusted those values," he said. "We came here for safety, and we don't have it, unfortunately." But when Abdul walked into a San Diego court to plead his case, he wasn't alone. Ten veterans showed up for his hearing – unarmed, but dressed in hats and shirts to signify their military credentials as a "show of force", said Shawn VanDiver, a US Navy vet who founded 'Battle Buddies' to support Afghan refugees facing deportation. "Masked agents of the federal government are snatching up our friends, people who took life in our name and have done nothing wrong," he said. Approximately 200,000 Afghans relocated to the US after Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, as the US left the country in chaos after two decades fighting the war on terror. Many say they quickly felt embraced by Americans, who recognised the sacrifices they had made to help the US military and fight for human rights. But since the Trump administration has terminated many of the programmes which protected them from deportation, Afghans now fear they will be deported and returned to their home country, which is now controlled by the Taliban. VanDiver, who also founded #AfghanEvac in 2021 to help allies escape the Taliban when the US withdrew, said US military veterans owe it to their wartime allies to try and protect them from being swept up in President Trump's immigration raids. "This is wrong." The Battle Buddies say they have a moral and legal obligation to stand and support Afghans. They now have more than 900 veteran volunteers across the country. Many of the federal agents working for ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are veterans themselves, he said, and the Battle Buddies think their presence alone might help deter agents from detaining a wartime ally. "Remember, don't fight ICE," VanDiver told his fellow Battle Buddies outside court before Abdul's hearing, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE. "If somebody does fight ICE, capture it on video. Those are the two rules." As Abdul and his lawyer went into court, the veterans stood in the corridor outside in a quiet and tense faceoff with half a dozen masked federal agents. It was the same hallway where an Afghan man, Sayed Naser, a translator who says he worked for the US military, was detained 12 June. "This individual was an important part of our Company commitment to provide the best possible service for our clients, who were the United States Military in Afghanistan," says one employment document submitted as part of Naser's asylum application and reviewed by the BBC's news partner in the US, CBS News. "I have all the documents," Naser told the agents as he was handcuffed and taken away, which a bystander captured on video. "I worked with the US military. Just tell them." Naser has been in detention since that day, fighting for political asylum from behind bars. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told the BBC that there is nothing in his immigration records "indicating that he assisted the US government in any capacity". Whichever way Naser's case is decided, his detention is what inspired veterans to form the Battle Buddies. They say abandoning their wartime allies will hurt US national security because the US will struggle to recruit allies in the future. "It's short sighted to think we can do this and not lose our credibility," said Monique Labarre, a US Army veteran who showed up for Abdul's hearing. "These people are vetted. They put themselves at substantial risk by supporting the US government." President Trump has repeatedly blamed President Biden for a "disgraceful" and "humiliating" retreat from the country. But the US's withdrawal from Afghanistan was initially brokered by President Trump during his first term. In their wake, American troops left behind a power vacuum that was swiftly and easily filled by the Taliban, who took control of the capital city, Kabul, in August 2021. Afghans, many who worked with the US military and NGOs, frantically swarmed the airport, desperate to get on flights along with thousands of US citizens. Over the ensuing years, almost 200,000 Afghans would relocate to the US – some under special programmes designed for those most at risk of Taliban retribution. The Trump administration has since ended this programme, called Operation Enduring Welcome. It also ended the temporary protections which shielded some Afghans, as well as asylum seekers from several other countries, from deportation because of security concerns back home. "Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilising economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about terminating Temporary Protected Status for Afghans. She added that some Afghans brought in under these programmes "have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security". Afghans in the United States scoff at the suggestion that they'd be safe going back, saying their lives would be in danger. "I couldn't work," said Sofia, an Afghan woman living in Virginia. "My daughters couldn't go to school." With the removal of temporary protected status, the Trump administration could deport people back to Afghanistan. Although that is so far rare, some Afghans have already begun to be deported to third countries, including Panama and Costa Rica. Sofia and other members of her family were among the thousands of Afghans who received emails in April from the Department of Homeland Security saying: "It is time for you to leave the United States." The email, which was sent to people with a variety of different kinds of visas, said their parole would expire in 7 days. Sofia panicked. Where would she go? She did not leave the United States, and her asylum case is still pending. But the letter sent shockwaves of fear throughout the Afghan community. When asked about protecting Afghan wartime allies on 30 July, President Trump said: "We know the good ones and we know the ones that maybe aren't so good, you know some came over that aren't so good. And we're going to take care of those people – the ones that did a job." Advocates have urged the Trump administration to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led government. Advocates are hopeful that Naser will soon be released. They say he passed a "credible fear" screening while in detention, which can allow him to pursue political asylum because he fears persecution or torture if returned to Afghanistan. The Battle Buddies say they plan to keep showing up for wartime allies at court. It's not clear if their presence made a difference at Abdul's hearing – but he wasn't detained and is now a step closer to the political asylum he says he was promised. "It's a relief," he said outside court while thanking the US veterans for standing with him. But he said he still fears being detained by ICE, and he worries that the US values he believed in, and was tortured for, might be eroded. "In Afghanistan, we were scared of the Taliban," he said. "We have the same feeling here from ICE detention." – BBC
Asharq Al-Awsat
a day ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Report: Musk Quietly Puts Brakes on Plans for New Political Party
Billionaire Elon Musk is quietly putting the brakes on plans to start his new political party, telling allies he wants to focus on his companies, the Wall Street Journal said on Tuesday, citing people with knowledge of the plans. Musk unveiled the "America Party" in July after a public dispute with President Donald Trump on the tax cut and spending bill. He has recently been focused in part on maintaining ties with Vice President JD Vance, the paper said, and has acknowledged to associates that forming a political party would damage his relationship with Vance. Musk, the world's richest man, and his associates have told people close to Vance that the billionaire is considering using some of his financial resources to back Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028, the paper said. The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX spent nearly $300 million in 2024 to help Trump and other Republicans get elected, exerting enormous influence in the first few weeks of Trump's term as head of the newly created efficiency department (DOGE). Reuters could not immediately verify the Journal report. Tesla and the White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside regular business hours. Vance, who had called for a truce following Musk's all-public feud with Trump, reaffirmed his position this month and said he had asked Musk to return to the Republican fold. Tesla shares are down more than 18% this year after it posted in July its worst quarterly sales decline in more than a decade and profit that missed Wall Street targets, though its profit margin was better than many had feared. Musk also warned of "a few rough quarters" after the end of support for electric vehicles by the Trump administration. Investors worry whether he will be able to devote enough time and attention to Tesla after locking horns with Trump over his ambitions for a new political party.
