
US military vets are helping Afghans fight deportation
Now he's in California applying for political asylum, amid the looming threat of deportation.
"We trusted those values," he said. "We came here for safety, and we don't have it, unfortunately."
But when Abdul walked into a San Diego court to plead his case, he wasn't alone.
Ten veterans showed up for his hearing – unarmed, but dressed in hats and shirts to signify their military credentials as a "show of force", said Shawn VanDiver, a US Navy vet who founded 'Battle Buddies' to support Afghan refugees facing deportation.
"Masked agents of the federal government are snatching up our friends, people who took life in our name and have done nothing wrong," he said.
Approximately 200,000 Afghans relocated to the US after Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, as the US left the country in chaos after two decades fighting the war on terror.
Many say they quickly felt embraced by Americans, who recognised the sacrifices they had made to help the US military and fight for human rights.
But since the Trump administration has terminated many of the programmes which protected them from deportation, Afghans now fear they will be deported and returned to their home country, which is now controlled by the Taliban.
VanDiver, who also founded #AfghanEvac in 2021 to help allies escape the Taliban when the US withdrew, said US military veterans owe it to their wartime allies to try and protect them from being swept up in President Trump's immigration raids.
"This is wrong."
The Battle Buddies say they have a moral and legal obligation to stand and support Afghans. They now have more than 900 veteran volunteers across the country.
Many of the federal agents working for ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are veterans themselves, he said, and the Battle Buddies think their presence alone might help deter agents from detaining a wartime ally.
"Remember, don't fight ICE," VanDiver told his fellow Battle Buddies outside court before Abdul's hearing, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE.
"If somebody does fight ICE, capture it on video. Those are the two rules."
As Abdul and his lawyer went into court, the veterans stood in the corridor outside in a quiet and tense faceoff with half a dozen masked federal agents. It was the same hallway where an Afghan man, Sayed Naser, a translator who says he worked for the US military, was detained 12 June.
"This individual was an important part of our Company commitment to provide the best possible service for our clients, who were the United States Military in Afghanistan," says one employment document submitted as part of Naser's asylum application and reviewed by the BBC's news partner in the US, CBS News.
"I have all the documents," Naser told the agents as he was handcuffed and taken away, which a bystander captured on video. "I worked with the US military. Just tell them."
Naser has been in detention since that day, fighting for political asylum from behind bars.
Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told the BBC that there is nothing in his immigration records "indicating that he assisted the US government in any capacity".
Whichever way Naser's case is decided, his detention is what inspired veterans to form the Battle Buddies. They say abandoning their wartime allies will hurt US national security because the US will struggle to recruit allies in the future.
"It's short sighted to think we can do this and not lose our credibility," said Monique Labarre, a US Army veteran who showed up for Abdul's hearing. "These people are vetted. They put themselves at substantial risk by supporting the US government."
President Trump has repeatedly blamed President Biden for a "disgraceful" and "humiliating" retreat from the country.
But the US's withdrawal from Afghanistan was initially brokered by President Trump during his first term.
In their wake, American troops left behind a power vacuum that was swiftly and easily filled by the Taliban, who took control of the capital city, Kabul, in August 2021. Afghans, many who worked with the US military and NGOs, frantically swarmed the airport, desperate to get on flights along with thousands of US citizens.
Over the ensuing years, almost 200,000 Afghans would relocate to the US – some under special programmes designed for those most at risk of Taliban retribution.
The Trump administration has since ended this programme, called Operation Enduring Welcome. It also ended the temporary protections which shielded some Afghans, as well as asylum seekers from several other countries, from deportation because of security concerns back home.
"Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilising economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about terminating Temporary Protected Status for Afghans.
She added that some Afghans brought in under these programmes "have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security".
Afghans in the United States scoff at the suggestion that they'd be safe going back, saying their lives would be in danger.
"I couldn't work," said Sofia, an Afghan woman living in Virginia. "My daughters couldn't go to school."
With the removal of temporary protected status, the Trump administration could deport people back to Afghanistan. Although that is so far rare, some Afghans have already begun to be deported to third countries, including Panama and Costa Rica.
Sofia and other members of her family were among the thousands of Afghans who received emails in April from the Department of Homeland Security saying: "It is time for you to leave the United States."
The email, which was sent to people with a variety of different kinds of visas, said their parole would expire in 7 days.
Sofia panicked. Where would she go? She did not leave the United States, and her asylum case is still pending. But the letter sent shockwaves of fear throughout the Afghan community.
When asked about protecting Afghan wartime allies on 30 July, President Trump said: "We know the good ones and we know the ones that maybe aren't so good, you know some came over that aren't so good. And we're going to take care of those people – the ones that did a job."
Advocates have urged the Trump administration to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led government.
Advocates are hopeful that Naser will soon be released. They say he passed a "credible fear" screening while in detention, which can allow him to pursue political asylum because he fears persecution or torture if returned to Afghanistan.
The Battle Buddies say they plan to keep showing up for wartime allies at court. It's not clear if their presence made a difference at Abdul's hearing – but he wasn't detained and is now a step closer to the political asylum he says he was promised.
"It's a relief," he said outside court while thanking the US veterans for standing with him. But he said he still fears being detained by ICE, and he worries that the US values he believed in, and was tortured for, might be eroded.
"In Afghanistan, we were scared of the Taliban," he said. "We have the same feeling here from ICE detention." – BBC

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Global South can claim climate mantle at COP30
Of all the seismic geopolitical shifts in recent years, perhaps the most striking is the West's rapid decline as a force in global climate governance. Under President Donald Trump's second administration, the US has become both more aggressive and more isolationist. Meanwhile, the EU has grown timid, fragmented, and inward-looking. Will the Global South, especially Brazil, South Africa, India, and China, step up to fill the climate leadership vacuum? In 1972, at the UN's first major environmental conference in Stockholm, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi famously declared: 'Poverty is the worst form of pollution.' To this day, the Global South grapples with the challenge of pursuing sustainable development while promoting environmental responsibility. Many developing countries have long feared that climate policies might reinforce historical inequalities or constrain their growth. But now, the Global South has an opening to ensure that the international agenda reflects its priorities. Many policymakers recognize the need for a change. While global cooperation has produced numerous important climate commitments, such as those made at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and those contained in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, they remain largely unfulfilled. Moreover, financial support from the rich world has been well below what is needed, hindering climate action in developing countries, eroding trust in Western leaders, and lowering global ambitions. The Global South has no shortage of climate visionaries — from Wangari Maathai to Vandana Shiva and Chico Mendes — who have connected environmental protection with community empowerment. But the West has controlled the climate narrative for decades, because it dominates the science that informs the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the multilateral development banks that provide climate financing, and the global media outlets that shape public opinion. That is particularly true for the US. Despite its stumbles, such as when President George W. Bush withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001, the rhetorical ambition of other US presidents, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, ensured the West remained a leading voice in shaping the climate agenda, even when not matched by action. Trump's resurgence has brought that era to an end. The EU, weakened by the rise of the far right and preoccupied with bolstering its defenses, lacks the political will and has fallen short of providing the economic means to lead on international climate cooperation and finance. This collapse has shattered the idea of a coherent 'West,' if such a creature ever existed. But it could empower the Global South, which bears the brunt of climate shocks, to lead a more equitable and inclusive clean-energy transition. Despite short-term hurdles, in the long run, reducing fossil-fuel dependence — more feasible now that renewables are more scalable and reliable — can help stabilize economies and improve public health. Many Global South governments have already played key roles in shaping the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris climate agreement. China has also become the undisputed global leader in green tech, outpacing the West in the shift to renewables. Facing US trade barriers, China's surplus of solar panels, batteries, and wind turbines could be redirected to developing countries, strengthening their energy sovereignty. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential. Maiara Folly, Jayati Ghosh and Jorg Haas There are signs that Brazil, India, South Africa, and China are building on this foundation to forge a cohesive climate agenda ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in Belem, Brazil, which is focused on collective action. In April, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres brought together 17 heads of state from the global south and the EU for a summit aimed at elevating countries' climate ambitions in the lead-up to COP30. Brazil has also leveraged its BRICS+ presidency to build momentum for COP30, creating a roadmap for expanding cooperation on energy security and establishing the BRICS Laboratory for Trade, Climate Change, and Sustainable Development. In early July, the BRICS+ Summit of presidents and heads of state approved a leaders' framework declaration on climate finance. Whether these initiatives will deliver tangible results remains uncertain, given BRICS+ countries' divergent interests. Meanwhile, South Africa is using its G20 presidency to amplify African voices and push for debt relief, green industrialization, and low-cost finance — in other words, it is attempting to address the structural barriers that prevent vulnerable countries from investing in climate mitigation and adaptation. With the right financial and technological support, the green transition can drive broad-based prosperity in the developing world. The costs of clean tech have plummeted, largely owing to China's industrial capacity, making some of the material conditions for climate leadership in the global south more favorable. Moreover, China could finance decarbonization projects in other countries through renminbi loans, export credits, and debt-for-clean-energy swaps. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential, and South-South cooperation on agreed climate targets offers a powerful platform to revitalize it. The Global South is also well-positioned to lead plurilateral initiatives that advance climate solutions. These coalitions of the willing are crucial for countering the Trump administration's bullying tactics — namely, the use of trade negotiations to shift other governments' investment priorities and weaken their green policies. Of course, Western countries must be held accountable at COP30 for their historic emissions and unmet climate-finance promises. But the summit represents a vital opportunity for the global south to demonstrate that climate and development goals are not mutually exclusive. To seize it, these countries' leaders must subordinate their differences to their overriding interest in presenting a clear-eyed vision of an energy transition that uplifts their people and protects the planet. • Maiara Folly is Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Brazil-based think tank Plataforma CIPO. • Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is a member of the Club of Rome's Transformational Economics Commission and Co-Chair of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation. • Jorg Haas is Head of the Globalization and Transformation Division at the Heinrich Boll Foundation. ©Project Syndicate


Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US issues fresh sanctions against Iran's ‘shadow fleet'
The Trump administration on Thursday issued a fresh round of Iran-related sanctions targeting 13 entities based in Hong Kong, China, the United Arab Emirates and the Marshall Islands, as well as eight vessels, the US Treasury Department said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the sanctions would disrupt Iran's oil exports. 'Today's action… degrades Tehran's ability to fund its advanced weapons programs, support terrorist groups, and threaten the safety of our troops and our allies,' Bessent said. 'Under the leadership of President Trump, Treasury remains determined to hold accountable all those who seek to aid the Iranian regime and threaten global security,' he added. Meanwhile, the State Department said it was imposing sanctions on two China-based crude oil and petroleum products terminal and storage operators that it accused of facilitating the import of millions of barrels of illicit Iranian oil onboard multiple US-designated tankers. The State Department said this was department's fourth round of sanctions targeting China-based terminal operators, 'which play a vital role in the trade network for Iranian crude oil that funds Iran's terrorism abroad and destabilizes the region.'

Al Arabiya
10 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Military options on Ukraine to be presented to national security advisers: US official
Military chiefs from the United States and a number of European countries have developed military options on Ukraine and will be presenting them to their respective national security advisers, a US official told Reuters on Thursday. Reuters has previously reported that US and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, following President Donald Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine. 'These options will be presented to each nation's respective national security advisers for appropriate consideration in ongoing diplomatic efforts,' the official said. The official said meetings between the chiefs of defense for the United States, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and Ukraine took place in Washington, D.C., between Tuesday and Thursday. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Trump's promise during a summit on Monday of security guarantees for Kyiv, but many questions remain unanswered. Officials have cautioned that it would take time for US and European planners to determine what would be both militarily feasible and acceptable to the Kremlin. One option was sending European forces to Ukraine but putting the US in charge of their command and control, sources have told Reuters. Russia's Foreign Ministry has ruled out the deployment of troops from NATO countries to help secure a peace deal.