
‘RFK Jr is a disaster': Staff describe chaos in ‘anti-science' regime
For the workers of Building 21, keeping a low profile is considered the best way to survive.
Zoom meetings are avoided out of fear they are being secretly recorded. Conversations about budgets and policies are held in soundproof offices, as if they were matters of national security. Many employees carry small notebooks with them, jotting down notes instead of logging them on a computer. The desks of several sacked colleagues are empty — save for the few who have left family photos and possessions behind in case a judge rules they can return.
It sounds like a scene out of Nineteen Eighty-four — yet this is the headquarters of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia. Here, staff do everything they can to avoid the twentysomething officials from the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) who stalk the building's corridors, said a global health specialist at Building 21, who asked that his name not be used.
'There is a constant sense that we're being watched and monitored,' the source said. 'Doge leadership are located several floors above but they have this omnipotent presence … We're counted when we swipe our badges into the building.'
Ever since Robert F Kennedy Jr was appointed health secretary in February, more than 10,000 staff — many with decades of experience — have been fired. Now, the tens of thousands of health workers and scientists still employed by the US government feel like their lives have been turned upside down, according to ten current and former staff at the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), speaking to The Times.
Under instruction from Kennedy and Doge, health priorities have been reset, longstanding scientific norms disrupted and thousands of research programmes cancelled because of their perceived 'wokeness', officials said.
'RFK Jr is a disaster,' said one CDC grant specialist who joined the agency within the past five years. 'He is completely dismantling things to the point where the damage is going to become irreparable.'
• Tom Whipple: Trump's tragic war on science could be an opportunity for Britain
Kennedy's vision to 'make America healthy again' has sparked the most significant transformation of the country's health infrastructure in generations. And the health secretary's allies argue this reform is long overdue. But in interviews with The Times, sources describe scenes of dysfunction and chaos that threaten to make America sicker.
Decades-old research centres dedicated to preventing chronic diseases like cancer and heart disease are being shuttered, one source said. Another claimed that layers of bureaucracy had been added to the approval process for grants, even though Doge's stated aim is to improve government efficiency.
A third source said funding was so short that staff were rifling through others' desks for stationery: 'We are literally going through the offices of our fired colleagues to scavenge supplies like paper and pens as we no longer have the ability to buy those types of things.'
Asked to comment on the claims, Andrew Nixon, director of communications at the US Department of Health and Human Services, said: 'Secretary Kennedy was appointed to drive bold, necessary reforms in a system long plagued by inefficiency and complacency.
'Streamlining outdated programmes, ensuring fiscal discipline and demanding transparency are not attacks on science — they are a defence of it. Secretary Kennedy remains committed to evidence-based leadership that serves the American people — not the preservation of status-quo bureaucracies.'
Kennedy's crusade to overhaul America's vaccine policies has generated the most controversy. Earlier this month he abruptly fired all 17 members of the advisory committee on immunisation practices (ACIP), a group that has reviewed vaccine trial data and advised the government on which jabs to approve for more than six decades.
The former independent presidential candidate, who has claimed for years that some vaccines are unsafe and could cause autism, said the committee was hobbled by conflicts of interest. Firing its members en masse, he said, would 're-establish public confidence in vaccine science'. Days later he hired eight new advisers, including a Covid conspiracy theorist and prominent critic of pandemic-era lockdowns.
Dr Charlotte Moser, one of the 17 sacked experts, said vaccines were being 'politicised' under Kennedy. 'My fear at this moment is for the health of the people of the United States if vaccines become less available,' she told The Times in her first public interview since her dismissal.
She pointed to the removal of Covid-19 vaccines from the list of jabs recommended for pregnant women and children — a decision that was made last month without any input from Moser and her colleagues, and which 'does not align with the science', she said.
Dr Yvonne Maldonado, another former committee member, warned that 'the firings, disruption and the chaos' of Kennedy's administration were 'incredibly damaging' and unlikely to benefit public health. 'I can't think that these downstream impacts are going to be good ones,' she said in her first public comments.
month Kennedy announced 'Generation Gold Standard' — a $500 million initiative to develop vaccines using technology dating from the 1950s. Scientists fear it marks a step back from newer, more innovative vaccine technologies like the mRNA platform, which was used for several highly effective Covid vaccines but has been demonised by antivaxers, including the organisation that Kennedy once chaired, Children's Health Defence.
An NIH source with knowledge of the initiative said the senior leadership had bypassed all the 'typical internal scientific review, discussions and grant-making processes' to launch the programme. The source said Kennedy was 'fixated on a link between vaccines and autism' and described the programme as a 'waste of money'.
'He's dropping half a billion dollars on God knows what,' said the NIH source, who asked not to be named because he is still working for the agency.
• Meet the antivax whisperer fighting the vaccine slump
Preventing chronic disease is one of the cornerstones of Kennedy's mission. In proposals that are widely supported, he has pledged to improve the quality of American produce, crack down on ultra-processed foods, detoxify the environment, diminish people's dependence on drugs and promote cleaner, healthier lifestyles.
But insiders say the teams of experts needed to achieve these aims are being dismantled. 'He's shooting himself in the foot,' said a federal worker who was recently fired from the CDC's global health centre.
Earlier this year the CDC's childhood lead-poisoning prevention programme was shuttered — despite one in two American toddlers showing detectable levels of lead, a neurotoxin that can cause cognitive impairments and developmental issues, in their blood. No reason was given for the programme's closure.
It meant the CDC was unable to help when Wisconsin requested formal aid to tackle a growing lead-contamination crisis in its schools in March. 'Due to the complete loss of our lead programme, we will be unable to support you with this,' the CDC said in response.
Kennedy later said the lead programme's 26-person team would be rehired, but one CDC source close to the situation told The Times: 'Those folks are not back yet.'
It is also understood that the Prevention Research Centres (PRC) programme — a network of 20 research hubs dedicated to chronic disease prevention in poorer communities in the United States — is to be closed after its team of federal scientists was fired in April. 'They're saying that they're just going to cancel the entire programme,' a CDC source with knowledge of discussions said.
Universities and clinics partnered with the PRC programme, like Georgia State University and the Arkansas Centre for Women's Health, have been 'left in the dark about what happens next, with no one available to answer their questions'.
Established in 1984 and renewed last year for another five years, the programme is likely to have prevented thousands of premature deaths from obesity, addiction, diabetes and cancer. 'It's one of the country's most vital and important research programs,' the CDC source said.
At the FDA, experts responsible for inspecting factories to ensure food products are safe have been hamstrung by the mass firing of project managers, administrators and communication specialists, according to one source from the agency's human foods programme. 'These are the people who keep the day-to-day operations running,' the source said.
Inspectors are now expected to book flights and hotels for assignments using their own credit cards, but because it can take weeks to get reimbursed many are reluctant to travel, the FDA source said. He added that a hiring freeze and funding constraints had made it harder for laboratories to analyse samples, further slowing the inspection process.
'The erosion of the oversight will eventually result in [food producers] cutting corners, maybe not being caught as quickly,' said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. 'As a result, things are going to slip and people will get sick.'
• RFK Jr and Dr Oz are on a mission to save Canadian ostriches
With Kennedy unable to pursue his vision of reform amid the disruption, questions are being raised over who really is in charge of the nation's health. One source speculated that it is Russell Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, who is calling the shots.
'It's unclear to me how much RFK is actually in charge versus other Trump appointees, like Vought,' said a CDC programme co-ordinator with more than ten years at the agency. 'Kennedy clearly has certain ideas he's interested in but at this point it seems more about cutting programmes than anything else.'
Despite the push to save money and improve efficiency, three sources criticised Kennedy's team of Doge officials for adding extra layers of bureaucracy to the processing of CDC grants.
Every time a grant recipient wishes to make a drawdown from their funding allocation they must now fill out a questionnaire, which gets sent to Doge for final approval. Previously, grant recipients who had been meticulously assessed and cleared for funding could access their money whenever they wanted. 'It's the exact opposite of efficiency,' the CDC grants specialist said.
Among staff who have been fired — but whose contracts remain in limbo as federal judges review whether Kennedy's mass terminations are lawful — many said they had no desire to return to an administration they accused of being anti-science.
'There's been a number of different steps that we could take to potentially get back into the agency and I haven't taken any of them,' said the worker fired from the CDC global health centre. 'What this administration is doing, whether it's RFK, Trump or Doge, is so antithetical to my own values that I can't work there any more.'
As for those continuing to labour under Kennedy's regime, there is not much hope for the future. 'It's the perpetual anxiety, it's the lack of knowing anything that is going on. There is no plan in place,' said the global health specialist in Building 21. 'This will have real consequences for people both here in America and overseas. It breaks my heart.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
How can hospitals have dignity if staff don't notice you're dead?
There have been miracles happening at a mental health hospital in the east of London — miracles so remarkable that I am surprised so little has been made of it. What happened at Goodmayes Hospital in Ilford was that a patient died — but then three days later was seen by staff cheerfully eating his breakfast. Extraordinary goings-on, don't you think? Or perhaps, worryingly, not quite as extraordinary as they appear. The man who died and then — stone rolled away from the tomb — was up and about eating his cornflakes three days later was called Mr Winbourne Charles. He had been admitted to Goodmayes suffering from depression, and five months later he killed himself. So how was he seen eating his breakfast three days later? He wasn't. The staff who were meant to be watching him had not even noticed that he had died: they lied on the official forms, not realising that Mr Charles had been in a coffin for the best part of 72 hours. Such was the level of care and concern. Such was the rigour and the attention to detail. • Rod Liddle on his radio comeback: Somehow I'm still on air When Mr Charles was admitted to Goodmayes it was with a clinical psychological assessment which revealed he was a very high-risk patient and should be observed once every 15 minutes. Goodmayes downgraded that assessment so that he should be observed only once an hour. But it didn't really matter, because the staff didn't even do that. It turns out that he hadn't been observed for at least two hours when he was found dead. You might gauge the interest the Goodmayes staff took in their employment, and in the people they were there to care for, by their behaviour at Mr Charles's inquest. One staff member gave evidence lying in their bed at home, because they weren't due at work that day. Another gave evidence from the Tube because they were on their way to the airport to take a nice break in the sun. In my days of court reporting the coroner would have sent round the Old Bill to drag that person from their pit and grounded all flights — but times change. The authority has seeped away. We know about Mr Winbourne Charles partly because of another inquest into another unnecessary death at the same hospital and some expert digging by the BBC, which revealed at least 20 more very dubious deaths at the North East London NHS Foundation Trust. People who had been on short-term medication for years and years. People neglected. The staff not doing what they were paid to do. At Mr Charles's inquest the coroner recorded a verdict of death by suicide contributed to by neglect. The trust accepted the verdict and admitted that the behaviour of its staff at the inquest had been 'unacceptable', and so you might expect things to be changing in Goodmayes right now. You'd be wrong. On the hospital's own site the latest review — from May this year — details the utterly useless nature of the service provided for patients. Underneath it says: 'Goodmayes Hospital has not yet replied' — but then, in fairness, it says that underneath all the reviews, dating back to 2023. Where do we start with this farrago? Perhaps with the nature of management in the public sector, where a laxer atmosphere and regimen prevails than in the private sphere, and where it seems that the ethos is far more about supporting the staff than providing for the customer, or patient. There are no sales figures and financial imperatives to sharpen the concentration a little. The unions are on the side of staff and the managers dare not demur. Nobody is on the side of the patient, the taxpayer. But I do not think that is the main problem. In the past year I have been detailing here the various manifestations of Skank Britain and the cultural shifts that have led us down this fetid back alley. The dissolution of authority and the refusal of people to take responsibility for their own actions, or indeed for themselves. The notion of such terms as 'discipline' and 'duty' becoming de trop and the insistence by each errant individual that he or she mustn't be judged and will behave exactly as they wish, thank you. The almost complete lack of regard for that most annoying of encumbrances, other people. A lack of dignity in the self and towards others. And, perhaps more than anything else, the long-term whittling-away of a communitarian ethos, the sense that as a nation we have a responsibility to look out for one another and to do the right thing. All of that stuff has largely gone, I fear. Goodmayes Hospital is as much a function of Skank Britain as some feral lout on the Tube with his feet on the seats and hideous music blaring out of his infernal device. Two members of Palestine Action broke into RAF Brize Norton and claimed to have put out of action a couple of Voyager air-to air refuelling tankers. Three questions arise. First, why weren't they shot? Second, the prime minister called it an act of vandalism — but isn't it, more properly, an act of treason? And, finally, why hadn't Palestine Action already been put on the list of proscribed terrorist organisations and its members arrested? You will be relieved to know that Olsi Beheluli is still with us. Olsi, an Albanian by birth, has recently been released from prison after an 11-year stretch for heroin dealing. In a move that suggests he is perhaps not the sharpest tool in the box, he photographed himself sitting in front of a vast pile of banknotes worth £250,000. Anyway, the Home Office wanted him out of the country, but the immigration tribunal judges wouldn't have it. In gaining British citizenship, Olsi had signed a form which stated that he had never done anything that 'might indicate that you may not be considered a person of good character'. Dealing skag didn't remotely count. Readers of a certain age may remember the comedian Dave Allen's observation that, as 10 per cent of road accidents were caused by drink-drivers, it followed that 90 per cent were caused by people who were sober. 'Why don't those people keep off the roads and let us drunks drive in safety?' he asked. The dyscalculic lefties will all be channelling Dave, having read about the Ministry of Justice stats released last week which showed that more than a quarter of all sexual assaults on women last year were carried out by people not born in this country. You can hear them now: 'That means 74 per cent were carried out by British people and nobody has suggested investigating them. Racist!'


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Sunday Times letters: Restoring public confidence in the NHS
Write to letters@ Shaun Lintern ('An extra £29bn a year to spend, but it's public trust that NHS bosses fear squandering', politics, Jun 15) is right to point out that the public is losing patience with the NHS but he omits to mention that there is still widespread support for the principles of tax funding and universal coverage on which the NHS is based. Restoring public confidence must involve progress in improving patients' access to care and in preventing illness. The government's mission concerning the NHS included improving healthy life expectancy for all and reducing the gap in healthy life expectancy between the English regions. The ten-year NHS plan, which is due to be published soon, must set out the measures that will be taken to implement this mission through action on the wider determinants of health and in the NHS Sir Chris HamChief executive of the King's Fund 2010-18; Solihull, W Midlands Further to your report, the National Health Service, which was founded in the year I was born, has become an outdated concept. The arrogance of NHS and political leaders of all persuasions in failing to embrace or even investigate other countries' health services over the years has led to a failure in cancer care, mental health care and palliative care, as well as an inability to cut waiting times for surgery and improve access to A&E and GP services. France, Canada and other nations run their health services so much better than we do, using hybrid models in which everyone enjoys the benefits. The question is whether Wes Streeting and the present NHS honchos can admit past errors in policy and get their act together. There is more at stake than public Derek Pettit (ret'd)Newnham on Severn, Glos I am mystified why politicians keep saying that workers in the NHS need to be 'more productive'. Staff already go above and beyond what they are paid for in terms of the hours worked and the care given, to compensate for an inadequately sized workforce. There is no point in providing more community facilities for medical investigations if there is nobody to staff them. Remember the staffing struggles at the Nightingale hospitals set up during the pandemic? I was born in the same year as the NHS and, having worked in it, was a long-time supporter of the organisation. Now, like many elderly friends, I have a deep dread of having to go to A&E and perhaps waiting days on a trolley for treatment or HoffState registered nurse (ret'd), London E14 Your report on the chancellor's spending plans is yet another insight into the Labour mindset ('Praying for something to turn up', politics, Jun 15). The ten-year plan to 'plough £750 billion into infrastructure' will include the launch of a website featuring details of the government's 'pipeline of the projects' plus a new industrial strategy to include energy subsidies for manufacturing companies. That's all well and good but others might suggest that, while the nation is hugely in debt, the best policy would be one focusing on consolidation. With the economy on its knees, productivity at its lowest ebb and unemployment at 4.6 per cent — not forgetting the colossal sums suggested for the defence review and the sizeable costs of the spending review — Labour's 'pipeline of the projects' seems more like a 'programme of the vanities'.Alastair ConanCoulsdon, Surrey We should not be wasting taxpayers' money on charging points for electric vehicles because government grants are merely leading councils to rush into installing low-powered chargers instead of providing the infrastructure that drivers need ('Supercharge EVs to drive Britain's car industry out of the doldrums', business, Jun 15). It is fortunate that the private EV charging industry has committed £6 billion to installing public charging. A privately funded rollout would be quicker and more efficient. We know which areas need charging and exactly where to put them. We don't need the government to use taxpayers' money: we simply need it to streamline planning rules and grid connections so we can handle it ourselves. A quicker rollout would not only improve public confidence in electric vehicles but would also create jobs, skills and opportunities. At a time when the government is obsessed with 'growth', it is surprising that it hasn't grasped the EV opportunity with both GhafoorChief Executive, Anthony Horowitz's admission that he dislikes being called Grandpa (Jun 15) led my wife and me to realise we're not alone. We decided our four grandchildren should call us 'Crisp' and 'Jelly'. It's easier for the children and fun for and Jenny ChapmanMendlesham Green, Suffolk I had no problem with being called Grandad but, after a discussion with my granddaughter about rap artists, I am now happy to be known as ForwardRedditch, Worcs Bill Jones outlined a fair way to manage illegal migrants arriving on our shores (letter, Jun 15). The welfare state has been stretched far beyond its limits. In building modern Singapore, the political genius Lee Kuan Yew said his priority was to build a 'fair, not welfare, society', while he thought our welfare state was the root of Britain's malaise. Few would ReidWoodford, Lancs Dianne and Charlie Hubbert, who have fostered more than 50 children, are an inspiration (magazine, Jun 15). Their story was heartwarming, uplifting and made me cry, but for all the right BrennanBolton Your report on gig prices struck a chord ('Hot tickets: are we being ripped off?', culture, Jun 15). A friend and I recently tried to book tickets to see Johnny Marr in Southampton. We called at the specified release time — to be told a minute or so later that the show had sold out. Soon after, £40 tickets for the show were being offered for more than £1,000 each on a resale site. In Europe, tickets are cheaper and more easily available to fans rather than being snapped up by bots and touts. If venues really want to keep live music alive, they need to revert to selling direct to fans, including via record stores and ticket Ladd-JonesSwanmore, Hants Finally parental burnout is 'a thing' ('Don't be ashamed if you're sick of your little darlings', news, Jun 15). For years I assumed I was the only mother who dreaded weekends and holidays as I didn't have the patience required to be both nurturing and entertaining for hours on end. Sometimes I'd hope for rain so instead of taking them to the park I could close my eyes on the sofa while they made a den out of chairs and sheets. Striving for perfection helps no one, least of all children, and merely provokes self-loathing. My children are now 26 and 27, with fond memories of being urged to watch yet another Thomas the Tank Engine video so that their father and I could take a CalmanLondon SE21 Dominic Lawson's article 'Putin's sway over the US is worse than you think' (Jun 15) prompted me to look at the way Vladimir Putin took over the Russian Federation. In the early days of his rule he ensured he had all the 'dirt' on his victims before toppling them. Perhaps this is the case with President Trump, whom Putin appears to disdain but who is the right man in the right place to help Putin to save his own ServaesHambledon, Surrey It is no surprise that UK chief executives are falling behind their US counterparts when half of the UK's productivity gap with the US is down to poor management capabilities ('The recipe for a great British CEO', books, Jun 15). As an American who has lived in the UK for three decades, I have seen how seriously the US takes management: investing in business schools, training chief executives in people leadership and strategy and valuing management experience. In the UK we still live with the David Brent effect, treating middle managers as punchlines instead of vital leaders. Unsurprisingly, 82 per cent of managers are given the role with no formal training. We ought not to write off our chief executives but instead train FranckeCEO, Chartered Management Institute Perhaps Professor Elizabeth Whittaker should 'employ' old people like me (I am 89) to tell parents who are scared to inoculate their children how awful childhood diseases can be ('The antivax whisperer winning the wary round to the jab', news, Jun 15). In 1942, aged six, I contracted measles. A sturdy child, I recovered fairly quickly, but my sister, aged three, was desperately ill and lost the sight in one eye. In 1965, our daughters also contracted measles and were both very ill. To our great relief, by the time our third daughter was born the measles vaccine was available. My grandmother had 13 children; six died of childhood illnesses. So much has been achieved since then. We must not let it be thrown away because of HartWatford I loved Matt Rudd's article on artificial fragrances and his weekly shopping woes (magazine, Jun 15). I, too, bought coconut-scented loo rolls by mistake. Looking on the bright side, at least my bathroom smells like a tropical MacLeanCheltenham Send your letter to: letters@ Please include an address for publication and a phone number in case of any queries. Letters should be received by midday on the Thursday before publication.


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Right way' to use mosquito repellent on holiday
Travellers should always check NaTHNaC's information pages for specific location-based information regarding disease risks Mosquito bites aren't just frustratingly itchy - they can pose a considerable health risk when travelling to different parts of the world. Malaria, dengue, Zika and yellow fever are all diseases transmitted by these insects, potentially causing severe illness, which can sometimes be deadly. It's important to check the proper advice for your summer holiday destination, and equally important to use repellent correctly. Repellents need to be applied both day and night, indoors and outdoors, in regions where mosquito-borne diseases are prevalent. Government advice, updated in 2023, suggests: "A product with 50% DEET is recommended as a first choice. If DEET is not tolerated, use of a repellent containing the highest strength formulation available of either icaridin (20%), eucalyptus citriodora oil, hydrated, cyclised or 3-ethlyaminopropionate is recommended." While you may be tempted to apply repellent before sunscreen, the Government warns that it should always be used afterwards for the most effective results. Using suncreams with an SPF of 30 to 50 is also key, as DEET can reduce their potency. Most repellents must be reapplied frequently, especially in hot countries and after spending time in the pool or sea. However, users are encouraged to read each repellent's packaging for more specific guidance. "50% DEET is safe for those pregnant and breastfeeding and for babies older than two months," the Government's guidance adds. "Get advice before you travel from your doctor or pharmacist if your baby is aged under two months. READ MORE: PMDD red flags as Vicky Pattison opens up about health battle "Take insect repellents with you—in case of shortages at your destination." It's also worth wearing long-sleeved clothing, trousers, long dresses, and socks to stop mosquitoes from reaching the skin. Nets treated with insecticide are recommended too, particularly in situations where you might be sleeping outdoors or in a space without air conditioning. The Government adds: "Check your net for rips and tuck the ends under the mattress. There may also be a risk of bites from ticks and other insects; the same protective measures will help reduce bites from these too..." Travellers should always check NaTHNaC's information pages for more specific location-based information regarding disease risks. Four to six weeks before a trip, visiting a practice nurse, GP, or pharmacist is generally advisable, as vaccinations and medications may be encouraged in certain situations. "Yellow fever vaccine is recommended for certain countries, and antimalarial tablets may be advised to protect against malaria for some destinations," the Government adds. "If you have health problems, are pregnant or planning pregnancy it is particularly important to get tailored pre-travel advice six to eight weeks before travel. With careful preparation, most pregnant women are able to travel without experiencing health problems." You can also head to the Government's website for further insights. Three key ways to prevent mosquito bites while travelling Use mosquito nets in situations where you are sleeping outside or in spaces without air conditioning Frequent and correct application of insect repellent - putting it on after sun cream Wear long-sleeved clothes, socks, trousers and long skirts where possible