India should consider whether cheap Russian oil beneficial after US imposes tariffs: Nobel laureate Abhijit Banerjee
oil imports from Russia
are 'worth it' after the Trump administration announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, Nobel laureate
Abhijit Banerjee
has said.
Last week, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order, slapping an additional 25 per cent levy on India for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total duties to 50 per cent -- among the highest imposed by the US on any country in the world.
The additional 25 per cent duty will come into effect on August 27.
"We need to think hard about whether Russian oil imports are worth it and then go back to the US to say that, you know, will they take it (tariff) off, if we stop importing Russian oil," Banerjee told PTI on the sidelines of an event organised by BML Munjal University.
Since the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 27 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia.
"It is not crazy to think about it. At a 25 per cent tariff, some of our exports are already not competitive, so maybe 50 per cent (tariff) does not matter," the eminent economist said.
India is the largest importer of Russian crude, purchasing 1.6 million barrels per day in July. However, it has not placed any orders for August and September, mainly because the discounts that initially encouraged Indian refiners to import oil from the Black Sea have decreased to about USD 2 per barrel.
In terms of volume, India imported 88 million tonnes from Russia in FY25, out of the total shipment of 245 million tonnes.
With such a minimal price advantage compared to other internationally available oil, Indian refiners did not place any orders for August and September.
Oil companies typically secure import contracts about two months in advance, meaning the supplies for August and September were arranged before Trump's August 7 announcement of higher tariffs.
The bilateral trade deal between the US and India has been stuck over the US demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy market.
Asked if India should lift curbs on investments from China, Banerjee said, "Maybe we should combine that with
trade negotiations with China
".
"I think it is a good moment to do it. The Chinese also need to think of how they will deal with the US, and what leverage points they have," Banerjee added.
Following the Galwan clash in 2020, India took a hard stance on China and its companies operating in the country.
Under Press Note 3 of 2020, the government has made its prior approval mandatory for foreign investments from countries that share land borders with India.
These countries are China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Bhutan, Nepal and Afghanistan.
Following the decision, FDI proposals from these countries need government approval for investments in any sector in India.
Asked whether India should join the ASEAN trading block, he said, "Maybe, I think we need to. I think China is much more important than ASEAN".
Responding to a question on how he sees the
Indian economy
doing this year amid geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties, Banerjee said, "Not as good as we expected".
He pointed out that the middle class is actually hurting, and for the past few years, private investments have also not picked up.
"Companies like
TCS
are not hiring, the salary of IT employees is not increasing... These are all issues we have not dealt with, and we are sitting on them, so we need to kind of embrace the fact," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
Govt draws up 50-country export plan to offset Trump tariff hit
New Delhi: The commerce ministry has shortlisted 50 countries as priority markets for diversifying exports to cushion the impact of steep US tariffs on Indian goods, two senior government officials said. These nations, spread across the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, Europe, and other key regions, together account for nearly 90% of India's outbound shipments. The plan focuses on redirecting goods affected by the tariff escalation — including textiles, seafood, engineering goods, gems and jewellery, petroleum products and chemicals—to alternative buyers through targeted trade promotion and market access initiatives. Meetings are taking place in the commerce ministry to draw up alternative plans for routing the affected products to potential markets. Officials from various ministries and industry bodies have been brainstorming to identify product-specific opportunities and push for faster trade facilitation with these destinations, said the first among the two mentioned above. The goal is to calibrate export plans without impacting labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, engineering goods, and agricultural and processed food exports, including shrimps. The US remains India's largest single-country export destination, but the government's strategy aims to reduce that dependence and secure long-term resilience for exporters hit by the ongoing tariff dispute. In FY25, India exported goods worth $86.5 billion to the US, or about 20% of the country's total merchandise exports of $433.56 billion. The move comes after US President Donald Trump announced a new 25% duty on Indian goods for its continued purchase of Russian oil, adding to an existing 25% tariff. The duties are set to take effect on 27 August, leaving a window for both sides to reach an agreement. The tariffs threaten to disrupt trade flows between the two countries and sectors like textiles, engineering goods, marine products, gems and jewellery and leather are particularly vulnerable. They could see exports fall by as much as 40%. In addition to seeking out new markets, the government is considering offering financial relief to exporters, said the second senior official. The government is also considering reintroducing the Interest Equalization Scheme (IES), which offers exporters a subsidy on interest rates to lower borrowing costs, and such initiatives would be funded by a new ₹20,000 crore export promotion mission. For engineering goods, the government is focusing on expanding exports to new target markets such as Sao Tome, Macao, Georgia, Croatia, Guinea-Bissau, Belize, Azerbaijan, Myanmar, Lithuania, Norway, Somalia, and Greece. Currently, key export destinations for Indian engineering goods include the US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and Italy. The Netherlands, South Korea, Belgium, Mexico, Japan, and Kuwait are also seen as promising markets. For agricultural and processed food products, the focus will be on Nigeria, Switzerland, Lithuania, Slovenia, Mexico, Sweden, Portugal, Cameroon, Djibouti, Latvia, Egypt, Senegal, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil. With tariffs in the US now at 50% for many garment products, Indian exporters are exploring alternative markets such as the UK, Australia, Canada, the Middle East, and emerging economies in Africa and Latin America to maintain shipments and offset expected order losses. The sectors that are of concern are textiles (exports worth $10.91 billion), engineering goods ($19.16 billion), agriculture ($2.53 billion), gems and jewellery ($9.94 billion), leather ($948.47 million), marine products ($2.68 billion), and plastics ($1.92 billion).
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ford's Answer to Cheap Chinese EVs Starts With a $30,000 Electric Pickup
LOUISVILLE, Ky.—Ford Motor says it has an answer to the cheap Chinese electric vehicles that are gobbling up market share around the world, and it starts with a $30,000 electric pickup. The automaker said Monday that it would spend $2 billion to overhaul a Louisville, Ky., factory to build a new line of affordable, high-tech EVs. It aims to launch the pickup in 2027. The EV strategy was three years and billions of dollars in the making. Ford says its new EVs will be designed with fewer parts, lighter materials and a manufacturing process overhauled for efficiency. Ford's EV business lost $5 billion in 2024, with executives predicting a bigger loss this year. 'This is a bold and difficult undertaking to compete with the best in the world,' said Doug Field, a former Tesla and Apple executive Ford hired in 2021 to lead its technical transformation. EV sales have stalled in the U.S., but automakers say the vehicles are still the industry's future. Americans want EVs that are smaller and affordable but also fun to drive and stuffed with technology, executives have said. Chinese automakers such as BYD have mastered this model. Their American rivals haven't. Ford says its new EVs will be made with 20% fewer parts. A wiring harness used in the new pickup, for instance, will be 4,000 feet shorter and 10 kilograms lighter than the one used in the company's first electric SUVs. They will be built differently as well. Large single-piece aluminum unicastings replace dozens of smaller parts. Instead of one long factory conveyor, three parallel, separate lines will run concurrently and then come together. Workstations will be more ergonomic. Ford says the process will be 15% faster even with additional insourcing and quality improvement measures that typically add time. The factory will initially employ 2,200 hourly workers, about 600 fewer than are working there now, churning out soon-to-be-discontinued gas-powered SUVs. Ford executives said there will be potential for growth at the site. The pickup will be powered by batteries made with lithium iron phosphate, which are about 35% cheaper to make than their nickel- and cobalt-based alternatives. The battery pack will serve as the vehicle's floor, a setup that saves space and makes for a quieter ride, Ford said. The company didn't disclose the vehicle's anticipated driving range. The new EV platform can be used for a range of vehicle types and sizes, as well as battery chemistries, executives said. Ford and rival General Motors have been racing to build their own lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, batteries. Ford is spending $3 billion to develop the batteries at a Michigan factory and aims to have them ready by next year. Ford's move comes at tough times for EVs in the U.S., as automakers scale back or avoid the segment altogether. Consumer interest has waned in the last couple of years after a burst of enthusiasm, and Congress and the Trump administration are quickly dismantling tailpipe-emissions and fuel-economy rules that long underpinned the production and sale of the vehicles. A federal tax credit of up to $7,500 for new and leased EVs is ending in September, worsening the end-of-year sales outlook. Tesla, long the industry EV leader, is struggling with a steep slide in global sales and this year fell behind BYD in European sales for the first time. The company this spring released a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y midsize SUV and a pared-down version of its pricey Cybertruck as well as minor updates to Model S and Model X. Yet the rapid rise of Chinese EV makers and growing global demand is keeping pressure on U.S. carmakers to invest in the technology. China's BYD and its counterparts are undercutting the competition on price with a low-cost supply base, cheap labor and lean designs, while offering slick digital features and moving aggressively into Europe, the Middle East and other Asian markets. Where Ford's Mach-E, an electric take on its Mustang muscle car, has a 320-mile range and starts at about $40,000, BYD's comparable Sea Lion 07 goes 379 miles on a single charge and starts around $26,000. Steep tariffs and regulatory hurdles have so far kept Chinese brands out of the U.S., but they are proliferating quickly in Mexico and Latin America. Along with the Mach-E, Ford's initial strategy hinged on making large electric SUVs and pickups. The company found that the huge batteries needed for these trucks are too expensive. On Friday, Ford said it would further delay launches of a new, large electric pickup and an electric commercial van. The pickup had been slated for late 2027 and the van for next year; both are now due in 2028, the company said. The company last year scrapped plans for an electric, three-row SUV. GM has also scaled back EV plans and is looking to smaller models. Instead of building electric pickups at a Orion, Mich., factory, it will build gasoline-powered ones. Meanwhile, it is bringing back the small Chevrolet Bolt EV. U.S. EV sales were essentially flat in the first half of 2025, a dramatic reversal from double-digit gains earlier this decade. Sales picked up in July as carbuyers looked to cash in on the credit before it expires. Write to Sharon Terlep at
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump says their meeting will reveal if Putin wants peace in Ukraine
President Donald Trump said Monday that he expected to determine mere moments into his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin this week whether it would be possible to work out a deal to halt the war in Ukraine. Trump called Friday's Alaska sitdown with Putin a 'feel-out meeting,' saying it 'might be good, might be bad,' and could end with 'keep fighting' or 'we can make a deal.'(Reuters file) 'At the end of that meeting, probably the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,' Trump said at a White House press conference that he called to announce plans for a federal takeover of Washington's police force to help combat crime. He said he thought Friday's sitdown with Putin in Alaska would be "really a feel-out meeting". Trump added that 'it'll be good, but it might be bad' and predicted he may say, "lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal.' Putin wants to lock in Russia's gains since invading Ukraine in February 2022 as Trump presses for a ceasefire that has remained out of reach. Trump's eagerness to reach a deal has raised fears in Ukraine and Europe about such an agreement favouring Russia, without sufficient input from Ukraine. Trump has alternately harshly criticised both leaders after promising - and so far failing - to swiftly end the conflict. Trump on Monday ducked repeated chances to say that he would push for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to take part in his discussions with Putin, and was especially dismissive of Zelenskyy and his need to be part of an effort to seek peace. He said the Ukrainian president had been to 'a lot of meetings' without managing to halt a war that Russia started. Trump also noted that Zelenskyy had been in power for the duration of the war and said 'nothing happened' during that time. He contrasted that with Putin, who has wielded power in Russia for decades. Trump said that, after his meeting with Putin, 'The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin" but it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' European allies have pushed for Ukraine's involvement, fearful that discussions could otherwise favour Moscow. To that point, Trump said he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders after his discussion with Putin to 'tell them what kind of a deal - I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal.' Trump spent the early part of his administration decrying Zelenskyy, even suggesting he was a dictator because his country has not held elections during the war. Zelenskyy was hounded out of the Oval Office in February after Trump and Vice President JD Vance suggested he hadn't been grateful enough for US support. More recently, Trump has expressed frustration with Putin that Russia hasn't appeared to take a push for a ceasefire more seriously, and softened his tone toward Zelenskyy. His comments Monday suggested he might have had another change of heart. 'President Putin invited me to get involved,' Trump said. He noted that he thought it was 'very respectful' that Putin is coming to the US for Friday's meeting, instead of insisting that Trump go to Russia. 'I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that can be made for both parties," Trump said. The president repeated that any major agreement could involve land swaps, without elaborating. He had threatened Moscow with more economic sanctions if more isn't done to work toward a ceasefire, but suggested Monday that, should Friday's meeting be successful, he could see a day when the US and Russia normalise trade relations. Putin is expected to be unwavering in his demands to keep all the territory his forces now occupy and to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, with the long-term aim of returning it to Moscow's sphere of influence. Zelenskyy insists he will never consent to any formal Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory or give up a bid for NATO membership. Putin believes he has the advantage on the ground as Ukrainian forces struggle to hold back Russian advances along the 1,000-km front. On the front lines, few Ukrainian soldiers believe there's an end in sight to the war. With the Europeans and Ukrainians so far not invited to the summit, Germany sought to prepare by inviting Trump, Zelenskyy, the NATO chief and several other European leaders for a virtual meeting on Wednesday. The German chancellery said the talks would seek additional ways to pressure Russia and prepare for peace negotiations and 'related issues of territorial claims and security'. Steffen Meyer, spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said the German government 'has always emphasised that borders must not be shifted by force' and that Ukraine should decide its own fate 'independently and autonomously". Earlier, a Ukrainian drone attack killed one person and wounded two others in a region some 418 km east of Moscow. Russia's Defence Ministry said its air defences intercepted and destroyed a total of 39 Ukrainian drones overnight and Monday morning over several Russian regions as well as over the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.
