Lawmakers condemn protest at home of Democratic WA legislator
Lawmakers have sprung to the defense of a Washington state lawmaker who faced a protest at her home over the weekend.
Rep. Tarra Simmons estimated 20-25 protesters showed up at her Bremerton home on Saturday. The Democratic lawmaker held two town hall events that day in her district and was planning to stop at home after the first, but said she got calls from neighbors about the demonstration, so stayed away.
'I believe that people should have a right to free speech and assembly, I just wish they'd do it at my office or the Capitol,' Simmons said Tuesday.
Matthew Adams, who ran for Bremerton City Council in 2021, took credit for the hourlong protest. He said the demonstrators stayed on public property. 'We were pretty respectful,' he added.
He said they focused on Simmons because of her approach to public safety. Simmons, who was formerly incarcerated, has been a staunch advocate for strengthening rights and improving conditions for people in the criminal justice system, including those in prison.
'Criminals come to our homes, so why can't we go to theirs?' Adams said Tuesday.
Some of the signs at the protest included a mugshot of Simmons. Another called her a 'Tarra-ist.'
Elected in 2020, Simmons said her legislative career has been about eliminating the stigma people continue to face long after leaving prison. Her criminal record has been expunged.
'This harassment could lead people to relapse and recidivate,' she said. 'Lack of opportunity and constant harassment of people who have been incarcerated is what I'm trying to fight.'
The tactics drew condemnation from both sides of the aisle.
'I think it is out of line for people to be targeted at their private homes for their political views,' said House Majority Leader Joe Fitzgibbon, D-West Seattle.
House Minority Leader Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, agreed. 'I don't think it's morally right to be harassing folks in their own home and making them feel unsafe,' he said. But he also called Simmons 'soft on crime.'
One of her proposals, House Bill 1125, would pave the way for felony offenders to petition for a new prison sentence. But the House didn't pass the measure before a deadline, so it is likely dead for the year.
'By protesting at her house, you lose the very good message, which is that Tarra Simmons wants to let criminals out of jail early, and, instead, how the protest was conducted was the story, and I don't think that's wise,' Stokesbary said.
Stokesbary hopes Democratic leaders condemn protests at the homes of Republican lawmakers, citing Washington Education Association demonstrations over the past decade.
After the protest at her home, demonstrators took to Simmons' town hall in Bremerton, which she attended with her seatmates.
Adams said he called her a 'scumbag' there. He said he likes Democratic Rep. Greg Nance, who is also from Kitsap County, but not Simmons.
Adams said he doesn't plan to hold another similar protest, saying he thought this one was effective.
In recent years, Lt. Gov. Denny Heck has championed bringing greater civility to politics. He spearheaded the development of the Project for Civic Health with the University of Washington, Henry M. Jackson Foundation and William D. Ruckelshaus Center.
A report from the group found governing has gotten harder at the local level, with more than one mayor reporting protesters outside their homes. One had that happen during a wedding.
'The incapacity for civil dialogue across differing opinions is a serious disease of our body politic,' the report reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Bill 180 targets 'home rule,' limits building back stronger after hurricanes
A new hurricane recovery law limits the ability of local Florida governments to control development, even when they're not directly impacted by a storm. Senate Bill 180 is dubbed the 'Emergencies' act, but it has broad implications for development, conservation and storm resiliency. The bill was intended, in part, to support homeowners recovering after disasters by reducing permitting requirements. The law prevents counties, cities and towns from limiting growth in a way that might be seen as 'burdensome or restrictive," and it allows residents and developers to sue local governments if they feel inhibited by growth restrictions, according to the bill. This provision has already played out in many communities around the state, including Stuart, which voted to pause most development last December so it could restructure its zoning codes. SB 180 reversed those changes. 'Totally handcuffing local government leaders from addressing local land use and planning needs is egregious and undermines local government efficacy at its roots,' Stuart Mayor Cambell Rich wrote in a May 14 letter to the governor. What is Senate Bill 180? State lawmakers and Gov. Ron DeSantis approved SB 180, with a single dissenting vote in the Florida House. It went into effect July 1. 'After a storm, Floridians need a clear path to recovery,' the bill's sponsor, Sen. Nick DiCeglie, R-St. Petersburg, said May 2 on the House floor. 'We're fighting for families to focus on rebuilding without additional delays or burdens, especially for those who sustained damage or lost their homes.' However, groups such as The Republican Liberty Caucus decry the bill as 'an attack on Home Rule and local democracy,' and conservationists worry the law prevents communities from building back stronger after hurricanes. One provision prevents local governments from limiting development for a year if a hurricane struck within 100 miles. Another restricts cities and counties from requiring structures to be rebuilt up to flood code if they were severely damaged by multiple natural disasters over time. If a building is damaged up to 50% of its fair market value from a single storm, it must be rebuilt up to code. Under SB 180, if 50% of the structure is damaged from multiple storms over a few years, it doesn't. That would mean a home flooded by Hurricane Ian in 2022 and again by Hurricane Debby in 2024 may not be required to rebuild stronger. 'Governments are responding to what their constituents are asking them to do, which is to help them rebuild after storms so they don't flood again,' said Kim Dinkins, policy and planning director of 1000 Friends of Florida, a nonprofit conservation thinktank. Among its many provisions, SB 180 also: Increases disaster management planning Enhances emergency resource coordination Promotes financial transparency Limits local governments from requiring structures be rebuilt up to code Allows residents and developers to sue local governments over growth restrictions Senate Bill 180 affects hurricane preparedness The 2024 hurricane season devastated many parts of Florida with a trio of hurricanes: Debby, Helene and Milton. Their combined storm surge and intense winds left the entire state under a disaster declaration, with most counties needing individual or public recovery assistance for at least one storm. The Treasure Coast was battered by record tornadoes spurred by Milton, especially in the Spanish Lakes neighborhood. Many buildings not up to code or in flood plains were damaged or destroyed during the storms. However, SB 180 allows some homeowners to rebuild to previous standards without accounting for modern flood codes, such as elevating the building. This has already played out in In Volusia County, where Deltona was issued a pre-suit notice by developers who objected to the city's restrictions on growth as it addressed flooding issues lingering after Hurricane Milton. 'SB 180 hamstrings local governments just as we're seeing more frequent and intense hurricanes and tornadoes,' Dinkins said. Florida law affects controlled growth Orange County spent eight years planning to limit suburban sprawl, conserve undisturbed rural lands and promote affordable housing and walkable areas. The comprehensive plan, titled Vision 2050, was touted as a blueprint for a 'smarter, more sustainable future' by the county. Then, the Florida Department of Commerce sent a letter to the county stating the plan was 'null and void' under SB 180. Multiple counties, including Manatee, Pinellas and Pasco, plan to present at the Florida Association of Counties conference in September to challenge the 'more burdensome or restrictive' amendments in SB 180. 'By undermining local authority, SB 180 puts Floridians at greater risk from flooding, pollution, and unchecked sprawl,' said 1000 Friends of Florida president Paul Owens in a news release. 'We urge lawmakers to act swiftly to repeal these harmful provisions in 2026.' Jack Lemnus is a TCPalm enterprise reporter. Contact him at 772-409-1345, or follow him on X @JackLemnus. This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: 'Attack on home rule': Florida SB 180 law limits local growth planning Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Extreme heat in prisons brings more legal challenges, pressure on states
Incarcerated people exercise in the maximum security yard of the Lansing Correctional Facility in April 2023 in Lansing, Kan. This year, several states have taken steps to install air conditioning and expand cooling measures to address sweltering heat inside prisons, but many across the country remain years away from significant upgrades. (Photo by) Summer heat is bearing down on U.S. prisons, where temperatures in uncooled cells can climb well into the triple digits. Facing growing pressure from advocacy groups, lawsuits and climate projections that show hotter days ahead, some state prison systems are moving to install air conditioning and expand cooling measures — though many facilities remain years away from significant upgrades. But in other states, such efforts have stalled or failed. That may lead to more lawsuits in the future, experts say, even as judges may raise the bar for such cases. An emphasis on being 'tough on crime' and prioritizing other public safety measures may have contributed to less attention on prison conditions in some states. In others, slowing revenue growth and pressure to rein in corrections spending could be making new investments a harder sell. At least two states this year, Virginia and Texas, considered legislation addressing excessive heat in prisons but neither measure became law. The Texas bill would have required the state Department of Criminal Justice to purchase and install climate control systems in all of its facilities by the end of 2032. About two-thirds of the state's correctional facilities have only partial or no air conditioning. The measure passed the House but did not advance in the Senate before the legislature adjourned in June. In Virginia, lawmakers approved a bill that would have required the state corrections department to install heat and air conditioning in its prisons and to ensure cell temperatures not exceed 80 degrees. Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed it, citing the cost of installation and operational burdens. Youngkin also wrote that existing state corrections data 'does not substantiate the claims of extreme temperatures or health risks.' But in Delaware, the fiscal year 2026 capital budget approved last month includes $2 million in funding to install air conditioning at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center. These changes mark the latest actions in a long-running debate over how correctional systems respond to rising summer temperatures — an issue that affects both incarcerated people and staff. Some of the policy debates and facility updates this year follow years of advocacy and litigation over the health, safety and operational challenges posed by heat in correctional settings. Stifling prison heat used to be just a Southern problem. Not anymore. The problem of excessive heat in prisons has persisted for decades and has unfolded alongside other challenges, including chronic understaffing and overcrowding. In some cases, these problems have led to extended facility lockdowns, even during the summer months. 'There are people working in prisons and they have the right to work in climates that are comfortable,' said Nancy La Vigne, a criminal justice researcher and dean of the School of Criminal Justice at Rutgers University. 'When they're not, there's retention issues, and it's hard to replace staff. And when you don't replace staff, then you have challenges in maintaining the safety and security of the facility.' In New York, for example, correctional officers staged a three-week strike earlier this year and many didn't return to work. Some facilities now are operating with 30%-60% fewer guards than needed, resulting in some incarcerated people getting only an hour or two outside of their cells each day. A 2023 study published in the peer-reviewed PLOS One journal found that mortality in state and private prisons rose during periods of extreme heat, with deaths increasing 3.5% on extreme heat days and up to 7.4% during three-day heat waves. Between 2001 and 2019, nearly 13,000 people died in prison during the summer months, almost half of them in the South, though the study did not determine how many of those deaths were directly attributable to heat. Climate change is fueling longer, more intense periods of extreme heat. Exposure to extreme heat can worsen conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and asthma, and has also been linked to worsening mental health and higher suicide rates among incarcerated people. 'Average temperatures are rising, and you're going to have more and more states around the country where incarcerated people are held in conditions that are not livable because they're too hot,' said Sharon Dolovich, a law professor and director of the Prison Law and Policy Program at the University of California, Los Angeles. At least 44 states lack universal air conditioning within their prison facilities, even in regions known for sweltering summer temperatures, according to a 2022 USA Today analysis. A recent Reuters investigation also found that nearly half of state prisons across 29 states have partial or no air conditioning in housing units. But some states are investing millions to update their prison facilities. In North Carolina, corrections officials are working toward their goal of installing air conditioning in all 54 state prisons by 2026. To date, 33 facilities are fully air-conditioned, 17 are partially air-conditioned, and four have no air conditioning, according to its dashboard. In California, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, which operates 31 adult prisons, has spent $246 million in the past five years on cooling improvements at five prisons, according to a department spokesperson. Lawmakers this year also approved funding for the Air Cooling Pilot Program at three facilities, with $17.6 million allocated for fiscal years 2025-26 and $20 million for fiscal years 2026-27. It will evaluate the effectiveness of two alternatives prior to a statewide plan to address high indoor temperatures across the California prison system. State prisons turn to extended lockdowns amid staffing shortages, overcrowding The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, as of Aug. 1, is building 12,827 'cool beds,' or prison cells in air-conditioned units, and is in the process of procuring an additional 7,162, according to its dashboard. Texas is one of the states most closely associated with heat-related deaths in prison. A 2022 study estimated that, on average, 14 deaths per year in Texas prisons are associated with heat. And a Texas Tribune analysis found that at least 41 incarcerated people died during a record-breaking heat wave in 2023. In March, a federal judge ruled the extreme heat in Texas prisons is 'plainly unconstitutional,' but declined to order immediate air conditioning, saying the work could not be completed within the court order's 90-day window and temporary systems might delay a permanent fix. Sweltering summer heat can turn prisons into pressure cookers. People inside already may have health conditions, limited access to cooling, or take medications that make it harder for their bodies to handle the heat. And research suggests that high temperatures can heighten irritability and aggression, sometimes fueling more conflicts between incarcerated people or with staff. 'It makes you more miserable. … If you to the point of even thinking about suicide, that's just going to add to it,' said Ronald McKeithen, who spent 37 years incarcerated in Alabama prisons and is now the director of second chances at the Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice. McKeithen recalls feeling 'on edge' due to tension among other incarcerated people on hot days. At the Oshkosh Correctional Institution in Wisconsin, Devin Skrzypchak said the heat worsens his bladder condition, and he often can't get the incontinence briefs he needs. The heat forces him to drink more water, and on days when ice isn't available, he's left drenched in sweat. 'At times, it's a living hell. … It can be very excruciating,' Skrzypchak wrote in a message to Stateline through the facility's messaging platform. At times, it's a living hell. … It can be very excruciating. – Devin Skrzypchak, who is incarcerated at Oshkosh Correctional Institution in Wisconsin D'Angelo Lee Komanekin — who has spent about 25 years in and out of different Wisconsin corrections facilities — said prison architecture plays a major role in why temperatures inside climb so high. 'The planet is getting hotter and hotter,' said Komanekin, who relies on a small plastic fan to stay cool. Komanekin also is incarcerated at the Oshkosh Correctional Institution. 'They're doing nothing about the architecture. Some institutions' windows open, some don't, but most of the doors have steel doors with trap doors.' Older prison designs that rely heavily on steel and concrete building materials often trap heat, making it difficult to keep temperatures down in the summer. Aging facilities also are less likely to be equipped for the installation of central air conditioning. Some state prison systems, including Alabama's and Wisconsin's, are adding air-conditioning or air-tempering systems to new prison construction and major renovation projects. Legal experts say the issue of excessive heat in prisons is likely to become more pressing as climate change drives longer and hotter summers. Extreme heat in correctional facilities has already been the subject of litigation in dozens of states, with plaintiffs arguing that high temperatures constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Court rulings in these cases have varied, but some experts say even more lawsuits are likely if facilities do not adapt. 'The conditions are going to worsen. [Incarcerated people are] going to be looking for every possible avenue for assistance they can,' Dolovich, the UCLA law professor, told Stateline. Prison abuse, deaths and escapes prompt calls for more oversight One of the latest cases comes from Missouri, where the nonprofit law firm MacArthur Justice Center filed a class-action lawsuit in May on behalf of six incarcerated people at Algoa Correctional Center. The lawsuit alleges that the conditions violate their constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment. It seeks to require the Missouri Department of Corrections to work with experts to develop a heat mitigation plan that keeps housing unit temperatures between 65 and 85 degrees. If the department cannot meet that standard, the plaintiffs are asking for the release of three of the incarcerated people who have less than a year remaining on their sentences. Lawsuits such as the Missouri case often focus on claims that extreme heat worsens existing medical problems. To proceed, they must meet two legal requirements: proving the heat poses a serious health or safety risk, and showing prison officials knew about the danger but failed to address it, according to Dolovich, whose work has focused on the Eighth Amendment and prison conditions. Courts may also raise the bar for proving such claims if judges echo decisions in cases with similar Eight Amendment arguments related to the death penalty and homelessness, Dolovich said. Judges have shifted, she said, toward a 'superadding terror, pain and disgrace' standard under the Eighth Amendment — a higher threshold requiring proof that conditions were created with the intent to cause unnecessary suffering. Dolovich added that some recent court decisions have provided only narrow remedies, such as ordering ice and fans instead of installing air conditioning. 'Prison officials have a moral and a constitutional responsibility to respond to changing conditions. In this case, it means air conditioning. … Anything less than that, to me, is indefensible.' she said. Stateline reporter Amanda Hernández can be reached at ahernandez@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
For Kansas GOP, Trump and his ‘beautiful' bill parallel Brownback's poisonous tax ‘experiment'
President Donald Trump holds up the "big, beautiful bill" that was signed into law as during a Fourth of July military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Brandon - Pool/Getty Images) Within a year, Kansans will be voting to elect a new governor and fill a U.S. Senate seat, plus four congressional seats, among elections for other offices. Candidates are already announcing for office, and campaigns are getting underway. Most Republican candidates are fawning at the feet of President Donald Trump. The groveling of these sycophants may be misplaced as Kansas voters recall the toxic remains of Gov. Sam Brownback's infamous tax experiment, initiated in 2012 and abandoned in 2017 after five years of unfair taxes, deficit spending, and record debt. Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' has followed a path that parallels Brownback's tax experiment and may experience the same result. After six months in office, available evidence suggests that Trump and the bill may become political liabilities for the grovelers. Take a look at the parallels. Both Brownback and Trump chose partisanship rather than seeking common ground, and as a result, political liability falls entirely on Republicans. Democrats were shut out of decisions. Both partisan plans had to be forced through with brazen arm-twisting. When Brownback's tax bill stalled over disagreements between the legislative chambers, the governor double-crossed state Senate leadership and signed a flawed bill intended for negotiation. Brownback later stood aside as the Kansas Chamber of Commerce PAC effectively purged state senators of the governor's party who opposed the policy. Trump issued multiple threats of primary challenges targeted at resistant Republicans to bring them into line on the 'big, beautiful bill.' One senator who balked fell victim to the pressure and announced he would not seek reelection. Both Brownback's tax experiment and Trump's bill were Koch inspired. Brownback sought the advice of Arthur Laffer, a Koch-sponsored tax-cut guru, and shortly thereafter embraced 'a real live experiment' to eliminate state income taxes. Koch and a handful of well-heeled donors underwrote a million-dollar campaign through the Chamber PAC to elect legislators willing to do their bidding. Their campaign succeeded. Americans for Prosperity, a Koch political network, called early for Trump to renew and deepen tax cuts and launched a multimillion-dollar campaign to 'turn up the heat' on Congress for quick passage. Both Brownback's tax experiment and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' had common intent: Benefiting the wealthy while costing everyone else. Brownback's experiment tilted the tax burden from rich to poor; it further exempted 330,000 businesses from the income tax and promised the eventual elimination of the tax. Trump's law gives households with incomes in the top 10% a break of $12,000 per year while those in the bottom 10% pay an additional $1,600, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office. The top 1% are the prime beneficiaries. Additionally, both Brownback and Trump coupled tax cuts for the rich with measures undermining aid to the needy. Brownback restricted eligibility for income support and food assistance and blocked the expansion of Medicaid. The budget office estimates the 'big, beautiful bill' will slash more than $1 trillion in spending from Medicaid and food assistance for the next 10 years, primarily by restricting eligibility for aid. Ten to 12 million will be cut from Medicaid, and those qualified for food assistance will fall as well. Brownback's experiment created red ink as far as the eye could see, and Trump's plan will do the same. The Kansas Legislative Research Department projected soaring deficits from Brownback's tax experiment, amounting to $2.5 billion in the first five years. Even after a sales tax increase, the depletion of state balances and the diversion of highway funds, the state faced a mid-year deficit of $300 million in 2017. The Congressional Budget Office estimates Trump's law will increase the deficit to $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years and add $4 trillion to the national debt when interest payments are taken into account. Even so, the rhetoric of both Brownback and Trump soared: Brownback claimed his experiment would provide 'a glide path to zero' for state income taxes. And further: 'Look out Texas, here comes Kansas!' Trump declares the 'big, beautiful bill' would 'make this country into a rocket ship. It's going to be really great. … We'll have growth in record numbers.' After five years of unbalanced budgeting, one-sided taxing, and unprecedented borrowing, Kansas voters had seen enough of Brownback's experiment. The governor's approval ratings steadily sank to the lowest in the nation among governors. In 2016, voters ousted Brownback's legislative allies and elected a bipartisan legislative coalition that expeditiously abandoned the experiment and restored sanity to state finances. In Trump's first six months, his disapproval ratings have bumped up by 10 percentage points, well above comparable figures for Biden, Obama, and George W. Bush. Recent polling indicates 55% disapproval of the 'big, beautiful bill,' compared with 29% approval. In the upcoming election contests, Kansans will have the opportunity to query incumbents about their choices: shoddy partisan tactics over bipartisanship. Sponsorship by Koch. Support for taxes that benefit the rich and ditch the poor. Votes that swamped the state and nation in a sea of red ink. We now what they did back in 2016. We'll see what they decide in 2026. H. Edward Flentje is a professor emeritus at Wichita State University and formerly was director and professor in the Hugo Wall School of Public Affairs at the university. He has written and edited numerous publications, including most recently co-writing and co-editing 'Reform and Reaction: The Arc of Kansas Politics.' Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
