Tāmaki Makaurau by-election can be formally held
Photo:
YouTube / Newshub, RNZ / Angus Dreaver
The Tāmaki Makaurau by-election can formally be held, with the Governor-General issuing the writ today.
The 6 September by-election was triggered by the death of Te Pāti Māori MP
Takutai Moana Tarsh Kemp
.
The party has chosen
former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara
to contest the seat.
Labour list MP
Peeni Henare
, who held the seat from 2014 to 2023, will stand again, as will Hannah Tamaki for Vision New Zealand.
National, ACT, New Zealand First, and the Green Party have decided not to field candidates.
Nominations for candidates close at noon on 5 August, and the last day for the return of the writ naming the successful candidate is 28 September.
The by-election is not affected by the Electoral Act changes recently announced by the government.
People can enrol to vote in the by-election if they are eligible to vote in New Zealand elections, are of Māori descent, and have lived in the electorate for more than one month.
Voters enrolling or updating their details after Wednesday will need to cast a special vote.
However, voters of Māori descent who are on the general roll will not be able to change to the Māori roll before the by-election is held. They will be able to change rolls afterwards.
The Electoral Commission said it expected to have more than 120 voting places in a range of locations across the electorate.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
32 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Education Minister cut Māori words from future junior books, documents reveal
Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Education Minister Erica Stanford has imposed a near total ban on Māori in new additions to a series of books used to teach five-year-olds to read. An Education Ministry report shows Stanford decided in October last year to exclude all Māori words except for characters' names from any new books in the Education Ministry's Ready to Read Phonics Plus (RtRPP) series. The paper showed the decision was driven by concern Māori words were confusing for children learning to read English though evidence of that was mixed. Stanford told RNZ the decision affected only 12 books that would finish the series, after which the series, including 27 books with Māori words, could be reprinted. The ministry's report said: "Under this option, we would not include kupu Māori in all phases of the RtRPP scope and sequence for any future books. The 13 RtRPP books currently in development do not contain any kupu Māori, apart from character names." It was not clear in the paper whether the books would be reprinted. "As noted above, the RtRPP resources are expected to have a lifespan in schools of approximately 10 years, so it would take several years for the books containing kupu Māori that are currently in circulation to be replaced in practice." The document showed Stanford also instructed the ministry to develop a teaching sequence in the English curriculum to help teachers prepare children to read Māori words from their second year at school. Stanford told RNZ that would stop teaching children in mainstream classrooms to pronounce and read Māori from being "left to chance". The ministry's document said currently from Year 4, Māori words were included in the curriculum with increasing frequency and complexity. Stanford told RNZ she considered rewriting the 27 books that contained Māori words to retain only the proper nouns in Māori, but later decided against it. "These are very early readers that teach children to learn to read and there are already 'heart' words in there that children have to memorise in English and if there are some te reo words in there as well, then that's okay and we'll leave them as they are," she said. She described the decision as the middle position between conflicting advice. The minister's October decision included reprinting one of the books, 'At the Marae', as a big book but not as a 'reader' for children to take home - something that angered many teachers and principals in the past week. The document showed Stanford raised the issue after "experts in structured literacy approaches" told her that including two different languages in the books could confuse learners and make it harder for them to master English phonetics. The ministry's paper said evidence about that was mixed but there was a case to consider the amount of Māori words in books for children learning to read. Literacy experts told RNZ this week Māori words were part of everyday New Zealand English and did not present problems for beginning readers because their spelling was regular and their vowel sounds matched some of the English vowels. The document said 26 of the 75 Ready to Read books had up to three Māori words and a 27th, 'At the Marae', had six Māori words. A hand-written note on the document showed the minister wanted te reo Māori introduced when children stopped using "decodable" books like the Ready to Read series, usually at the end of their first year at school or early in their second year. "I want to include in the NZC (English) a section on Te Reo vowel sounds and pronunciation to ready students for reading te reo words in school journals as previously discussed," she wrote. Stanford also noted that: "Interestingly - I asked kura leaders if they would accept English words in te reo Māori decodable books and they no. So it would be consistent to keep one language only in very early Year 1 decodable books, except for names." The ministry's paper said the Ready to Read series was designed to teach the reading of English "and the sound-letter correspondences in English". "Our advice to schools is to teach kupu Māori in RtRPP books as "told" words. The foundational skill of phonic decoding within the resoruces is based on the English language and students are not expected to decode the kupu Māori," it said. The paper warned the options could result in pushback from schools. "If we discontinue the use of kupu Māori (apart from character names) in RtRPP books, there may be a negative response and media attention. [REDACTED] In particular, recalling existing books has the potential to generate pushback." The minister wrote in response: "It's only in Year 1 decodable books that teach English and it would align with the approach taken in te reo decodables. Te Reo would be introduced immediately after the use of decodable stops which is typically end of Year 1 early Year 2 where students move on to journals." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Here's what we know about the 3,145 candidates running in local elections
There's an abundance of Johns, Mikes and Davids, plus other scintillating statistics about the people vying for your vote. Nominations have closed, hoardings have popped up on roadsides and candidates are out and about, actively seeking your vote: it's officially local elections season. But what do we know about the 3,145 individuals running for 1,639 vacancies in 607 elections across 77 councils (some of them multiple times)? We trawled through the data – which LGNZ handily pulled from nomination forms into a couple of spreadsheets – and here's what we found. There are so many Johns, Mikes and Davids Scroll through alllllll the people standing in this year's local elections and some names will keep cropping up. John, Michael/Mike and David/Dave are the most popular names. While we don't have demographic details of candidates like age and ethnicity, Department of Internal Affairs data on baby names gives us an idea: these were among the most common names for boys born in New Zealand in the 1950s and 60s, so it's likely many of these candidates are baby boomers and older gen Xers. The same mostly holds true for women, although there are fewer women standing, and thus lower counts for their names overall. Karen was one of the most popular names for girls in the 1950s and 60s. However, Sarah was at its peak in the 1970s and 80s, and Rachel became popular in the late 70s. (Click the arrow at the top of the graph to show women's names.) This tracks with LGNZ's elected member census from 2022, which found that almost half of the men elected to local government were 61 and older (49%), while the percentage of women over the age of 61 was 27%. Live in the North Island? You'll probably have a Māori ward referendum The legislation that allows councils to have Māori wards for voters on the Māori roll has existed since 2001. However, many councils added Māori wards in 2022, when the Labour government removed a requirement for a binding referendum to be held if a petition signed by 5% of the region's population challenged the establishment of one. While all councils that have a Māori ward will still have that seat in the 2025-2028 term, the majority of those councils will have to hold a referendum on whether to keep or abolish it after that, as the current government has reinstated a referendum requirement. There's a clear geographical trend to councils with Māori wards, with the majority of councils in the North Island adopting them – but not in Tāmaki Makaurau. Some councils have Māori representation but don't need to hold referendums. Wairoa District Council, Ōpōtoki District Council and Waikato Regional Council have already held referendums for their Māori wards that received majority support. Bay of Plenty Regional Council has a piece of local legislation that created its Māori ward, so it exists under a different law and doesn't need to have a referendum. Environment Canterbury, another regional council, has Māori representation through appointees, rather than a vote, so it doesn't need to hold a referendum either. Only one mayor in the country has lasted eight terms – and he wants another Wayne Guppy, mayor of Upper Hutt, was first elected to the position in 2001. That means he's been mayor long enough that people who weren't even born when he first received the mayoral chains are now old enough to vote for him. However, the majority of mayoral candidates standing for re-election have completed only one term, and there are almost as many mayoral elections where the incumbent is not seeking re-election. Reasons for not standing again vary; Mackenzie District Council mayor Anne Munro is stepping down due to a cancer diagnosis, while Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry said he is ready for a fresh start outside of local politics. The majority of elections with no incumbent are in the North Island, with only four of 23 elections in the South Island having no existing mayor standing. Ranked choice voting is much less common than first past the post While central government elections use the MMP system, the many elections for local bodies make things more complicated. Instead of just a party vote and an electorate vote, you will have a mayoral vote and a vote for local councillor(s); many places also have community or local boards, licensing trusts and regional councils too. Most local elections use first-past-the-post voting, meaning the winner is the person who gets the most votes. Some elections use ' single transferable vote ' systems, where you rank candidates based on how much you want them to win. If your first-ranked candidate doesn't get enough votes, your vote then passes to your second-ranked candidate and so on, meaning you still have a say even if your preference isn't met. Wellington and Dunedin are the biggest cities that have adopted this method. Otago Regional Council and Whangārei District Council will be holding their first STV elections in 2025. Big cities have fewer candidates to population (but there's a catch) In central government elections, there are about 69,875 people in each electorate, represented by one MP, with slightly more (74,367) for Māori electorates. Counting list MPs, there are about 43,000 people per MP. Comparing this ratio to local government elections shows how much easier it is for people who are keen to represent their community to be elected. Auckland has the highest ratio of people:candidates, at one candidate for every 3,800 people, while the Chatham Islands has the smallest at 1:45. Bigger cities have more people to candidates – but bigger cities often have more choice, because more people choose to run. You also get more options of people to vote for: in Auckland, most people get to vote for a mayor, one or two councillors on the governing body and local board members, while in a smaller area like Westland you might just get to vote for one ward councillor and one mayoral candidate. These statistics conceal how despite the greater rate of representation, seats in smaller councils have less competition overall, especially for more minor positions like community boards. Part of the argument for merging councils is that while there might be some loss to how represented citizens are, bigger councils have bigger budgets (including for paying elected members) and there might therefore be more and better candidates as a result. Candidate priorities: rates, community and choice Some candidates submit affiliations with their nomination, saying what they stand for, or naming the ticket they represent. The most common words in these slogans reveal some obvious trends. The Labour-affiliated ticket 'The People's Choice', in Christchurch, clearly had its candidates coordinating to all have the same information on their nominations. Other party presences in local politics pop up too, like 'Green', 'Act' and direct 'Labour' candidates. There were the exact same number of 'our' and 'you/your' pronouns in slogans, while there was only one instance of 'my', in the phrase 'your life is my life' from a candidate in Rolleston. 'Lower', unsurprisingly, was universally paired with 'rates'. For this analysis, we included 'for' 'your' 'our', but not 'the' or 'a', with the logic that the preposition 'for' contains more information about what a candidate believes than the article 'the'.
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Pretending the internet doesn't exist won't protect our young people from harm
As parliament's inquiry into the online harm encountered by young New Zealanders gets under way, there are concerns it will follow the same rushed process that resulted in Australia's social media ban for under-16s. New technologies that upend long-established ways of communicating often spark concern over how to ensure young people use these tools safely. We all want young people to be safe, and to grow up to be responsible citizens, but too often these concerns manifest in the form of punitive measures that seek to control young people, rather than teaching them the critical thinking and emotional skills they need to use new forms of media safely. From outlandish concerns that the Harry Potter books were bringing children into contact with drugs and the occult, to the (debunked) argument that video games make children violent, concerned adults, despite their best intentions, have historically been quick to blame new media and new trends for problems that almost always stem from an intersection of complicated social and economic factors. The most recent source of unease for parents and policy makers has been social media – a term vague enough so to allow policymakers to lump niche messaging applications like Telegram together with large gaming platforms like Steam, and other video platforms like YouTube and TikTok to create an all-encompassing monolith that poses a risk to young people. Driven by (thoroughly debunkable) claims that social media use is the direct cause for a generation of anxious youth, legislators across the globe have called for inquiries into the use of social media among society's 'most vulnerable' demographic. Aotearoa has recently followed this trend with the government's Education and Workforce Committee recently announcing an inquiry into the harm young New Zealanders (might) encounter online and how government, businesses and society should work to counteract these harms. The terms of reference for the inquiry solicited responses from people addressing 'the nature, severity, and prevalence of online harm experienced by young people in New Zealand, including but not limited to online bullying, exploitation, addictive use, mental health impacts, educational impacts, and exposure to harmful content', with a particular eye to develop practical, cost-effective solutions to counteract online harm. Written submissions closed on July 30, with the committee hearing invitation-only oral submissions this month. It plans to report its findings to parliament by the end of November. The concern with an inquiry of this nature is that it risks following the same rushed process to ban people under 16 from social media that the Australian government is set to implement at the end of 2025. The Australian approach was not only rushed, but was undertaken without seriously consulting the demographic that the bill claims to protect. Instead of teaching young people the skillset needed to be responsible, critically informed and safe digital citizens, the proposition to ban everyone under 16 from the vaguely defined monolith 'social media' instead takes the convenient route of simply pretending the internet does not exist. Out of sight, out of mind. But that approach is increasingly at odds with the reality of growing up in the 21st century for a range of reasons. Young people are taught using digital technologies, many of the skills they learn online will help them later in life to navigate increasingly digital economies and workplaces, culturally and linguistically diverse youths use social media to access and enhance their English, many of the civil services that they will need to grow up and navigate are offered online, and at a general level, the internet serves as a vital infrastructure for remote and disadvantaged youths to find solace with others in similar circumstances. Of course we all want to protect young people from harm – whether online, or in real life – but framing social media bans as a step taken to 'protect' young people from digital media actively works against the more realistic approach of working to protect them within the digital environment. This isn't just opinion, it's backed up by evidence. In the response that a group of colleagues and I submitted to the Education and Workforce Committee, we argued that Aotearoa would do well to take an evidence-based and potentially world-leading approach to the education of young people that will equip them with the tools they need to be responsible, sensible and ultimately safer within the context of the digital environment. In the response, we walked through some of the common charges brought against social media. Chief among these charges is the argument that social media is to blame for a generation of mentally ill youth. This is a claim that is easy – and often politically convenient – to agree with. But taking a closer look at the surrounding social and economic factors involved in youth mental health, the claim that social media is the root cause of mental illness in youth doesn't quite add up, especially in the New Zealand context. Instead, there are many competing issues at play in Aotearoa: a broken mental health system, the inability or unwillingness of politicians and large corporations to act to prevent the climate crisis, and a general feeling of malaise that is solidified through the erosion of democratic processes and expansion of the surveillance state. In some ways, social media actually provides young people with the infrastructure needed to begin countering these issues: there is evidence that engaging with political issues on social media translates into real-life civic engagements like showing up to protests, volunteering and contacting elected officials. But systematic issues remain firmly entrenched. For instance, in the case of Aotearoa's strained mental health system, a survey of 540 psychiatrists across Aotearoa revealed that 94% of respondents found that the mental health system was unfit for purpose, and that increased funding was needed to better understand the socio-economic drivers of mental health issues. This is not a unique finding: other studies have revealed similar dissatisfaction among practitioners and patients in the mental health systems in Aotearoa. Globally, young people face a set of crises. Climate change, declining socio-economic equality, an increasingly polarised political landscape premised on hate and homogeneity and the fact that it is increasingly unaffordable to be able to live are much more likely to be drivers of mental health issues among young people. A policy designed to keep young people off of the internet is not going to help solve any of them. Climate change, socio-economic inequality and the mental health crisis will not be solved by pretending the internet doesn't exist. It will actively harm young people and future generations. Many of the crises that we face today require policy that is not purely content with cost-effective, simple solutions that the Education and Workforce Committee is soliciting. Instead, policy can and should be designed to educate, empower and ultimately let young people have a say in decisions that directly impact them and their future.
