logo
The myth of Iran's invincibility has been broken, and the fallout could be far-reaching

The myth of Iran's invincibility has been broken, and the fallout could be far-reaching

CNN25-06-2025
For over than three decades, Iran built a web of proxy networks to push its battles far beyond its borders – keeping enemies at bay, as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tightened his grip on power. Direct strikes on Iran remained inconceivable.
That image of invincibility crumbled in the space of hours on June 13, when Israel launched a surprise, unprecedented attack deep inside Iran, shattering Tehran's sense of security and unraveling its carefully cultivated aura of strength.
Its strikes took out top military leaders and some of Iran's most prominent nuclear scientists, including a few as they slept at home with their families. The human toll was significant, with 627 killed, including at least 49 women and 13 children, according to Hossein Kermanpour, head of the information center at the Ministry of Health. The US joined Israel's campaign on Sunday, striking three nuclear sites before declaring a ceasefire between Israel and Iran the day after.
Many in Iran and abroad now fear the country's leadership – its pride and defenses wounded – may tighten its grip at home while adopting a much more hawkish stance in both domestic and foreign policy.
Israel and the US had floated regime change as a potential outcome of their attacks on Iran, which they hoped would result in a state more friendly to them. Their failure to bring this about has prompted the regime to claim victory.
Iran's leadership has shown resilience, replacing those it lost and carrying out a harsh crackdown on those it sees as being complicit in Israel's assault.
Signs also point to a regime that is much more paranoid, and likely to rule with a tighter fist at home in fear of cooperation with its enemies.
After three years of rule by a conservative government led by Ebrahim Raisi, Iran last year elected reformist Masoud Pezeshkian, who had campaigned for dialogue with Iran's foes, and presented that as a means to address the country's domestic issues.
For many Iranians, he was seen as the last hope to deliver a nuclear agreement with the West and re-integrate Iran into the international community.
During the 12-day conflict, Iran repeatedly struck back at Israel, causing extensive damage to major cities like Tel Aviv and killing 28 people. Its ability to retaliate under fire won praise at home, even among those CNN spoke with who are opposed to the regime.
'People are at the moment feeling very nationalistic. We just went through a war together that everyone feels was unjustified, so the government has a degree of goodwill,' said Ali, 36. 'They put us in the firing line with their policies but generally, they handled the war well.'
But it's what happens next that has many Iranians concerned. There are growing fears of an imminent crackdown on reformists and calls for change, as the regime moves to root out perceived collaborators with Israel. By Wednesday, authorities had arrested 700 people accused of being 'mercenaries of Israel,' state-affiliated Fars News Agency reported.
Neda, a 45-year-old Iranian, said she believes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), an elite wing of the Iranian military that is sanctioned by the US, 'will likely get stronger, consolidating even more power,' especially if a disorganized leadership creates a power vacuum.
Khamenei is reportedly hiding in a bunker, with little access to communications, and has yet to be seen in public since Israel and Iran reached the ceasefire, which came into effect on Tuesday.
'They (government) were strong in their show of force (against Israel) and that will at least for some time play well,' Neda told CNN. 'There's no telling if the gains we made (in bringing reform) over the past few years will remain. What was it all for? We've always known change must come from the inside and that was happening. Now where do we find ourselves?'
All the Iranians who spoke with CNN did so under the condition of anonymity out of fear for their safety.
Arash Azizi, a New York City-based Iran expert and author of the book 'What Iranians Want,' said Iranians are likely worried about 'a wounded regime coming after them and closing the political and civic space further.'
Repression might worsen, he told CNN, adding that the Iranian opposition abroad has proven itself to be 'inept and politically irrelevant,' while civil society at home is 'on the defensive.'
Experts say that the attacks on Iran have only emboldened conservatives who have long felt that the West and Israel cannot be trusted and that negotiations are merely a tactic to weaken the country. The fate of reformers and pragmatists now hangs in the balance, and only time will tell whether they survive the change in the leadership's ranks that is likely coming, they said.
Watch CNN's Fred Pleitgen describe how a building in the Iranian capital was badly damaged by an airstrike and speak to residents who witnessed the blast. 'The attacks have bolstered hardliners who argue that diplomacy with the West is futile and that Iran must remain militarily self-reliant,' Sina Toossi, a senior fellow at the Washington, DC-based Center for International Policy, told CNN. 'Reformist voices, pro-engagement with the West forces, have been marginalized in this climate.'
'In the short term, hardliners are likely to prevail,' he said. 'But that may shift depending on the broader outcome of the conflict and whether diplomatic efforts with the US pay off.'
On Sunday, the US joined Israel's campaign against Iran, striking three nuclear facilities and risking a full-blown war with the Islamic Republic. But US President Donald Trump subsequently announced the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, preserving the regime that he later said he didn't want to change because it 'would lead to chaos.'
'The broader lesson is that the Islamic Republic is not invincible, but neither is it easily toppled,' Toossi said.
Israel's attack on Iran did not lead to popular uprisings, but rather a show of unity amongst Iranians who saw their country as being attacked in an unprovoked war, even as they remain wary of the repression that may follow.
'Whether people are supporters of our government or not, there is an anger we feel about Trump and Israel,' Reza, a 35-year-old man in Iran, told CNN.
The longest serving leader in the Middle East, Khamanei has ruled with an iron fist for more than 35 years, quashing protests since at least 2005.
As the highest authority in Iran, much of the country's domestic and foreign policy is influenced, if not shaped, by him.
Some experts say that despite the show of national unity after the conflict with Israel, there is likely frustration with Khamenei.
'He was too cautious when he had to be bold, and too bold when he had to be cautious,' said Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, adding that the cleric is likely seen as having destroyed Iran's deterrence and 'rendered the country vulnerable.'
'A lot of the blame is put on him and his decision making – his inflexibility at the negotiating table, his defiance in the face of much stronger conventional military powers,' Vaez told CNN. When the dust settles, there may be questions about the ailing leader and his decisions over the years, he said.
Questions may also arise about the role and the importance of a Supreme Leader in the long term, according to Vaez.
'There is a strong desire from the Revolutionary Guards and military forces in Iran to double down and adopt a much more entrenched position, further militarizing the internal sphere and even eventually pursuing nuclear weapons as the ultimate deterrent,' Vaez said.
The paranoia around Israel's infiltration in government will likely lead to a 'purge' at the top level of the system, which might lead hardliners to prevail, he added.
With a ceasefire between Israel and Iran in place, CNN's Frederik Pleitgen gets an up close look at the damage left behind from an airstrike that took place in Tehran days ago. The fate of reformist Pezeshkian and his moderate camp remains unclear. While the Supreme Leader remained in hiding, it was Pezeshkian who spoke to Iranians, making public statements and even attending an anti-war protest in Tehran.
Still, reformists aren't escaping public anger. A 42-year-old woman in Iran questioned the viability of the current regime. 'They've put us in a quagmire,' she told CNN. 'This happened on a reformists' watch.'
Experts say that the shattering of the regime's aura of invincibility will change Iran, but how that shift plays out is uncertain and dependent on how the Iranian leadership and foreign powers react to the 12-day conflict.
For the Iranian people, a sense that they were at least safe within their country's borders has been quashed.
'The Islamic Republic had one social contract with society, which is that it deprived them of all freedoms… in return for providing security,' Vaez said. 'Now, that image has been shattered in the eyes of the Iranian people.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK and EU at Zelenskyy's side in Washington for meeting with Trump
UK and EU at Zelenskyy's side in Washington for meeting with Trump

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK and EU at Zelenskyy's side in Washington for meeting with Trump

European leaders including Keir Starmer will join Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a White House meeting with Donald Trump on Monday in an extraordinary joint effort to push back on a US-backed plan that would allow Russia to take further Ukrainian territory. As well as the UK prime minister, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, Italy's PM, Giorgia Meloni, and the Finnish president, Alexander Stubb, will all accompany Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. Nato's secretary general, Mark Rutte, and the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, will also attend. The unprecedented show of support seems designed to prevent a repeat of the public mauling experienced by Zelenskyy during his last trip to the White House, in February, when Trump and the US vice-president, JD Vance, accused him of ingratitude and disrespect and told him: 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now.' Trump, after his summit on Friday with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, has reportedly endorsed the Kremlin's one-sided plan to end the war in Ukraine. It includes Kyiv giving up territory that Russia has been unable to seize and no ceasefire until a final deal has been agreed. Posting on Truth Social, Trump accused the media of misrepresenting his 'great meeting in Alaska' – an encounter widely seen as a victory for Putin and a humiliation for the US president. On Sunday, Trump claimed he had made 'big progress' on Russia, without giving details. European leaders on Monday will reaffirm their support for Ukraine's territorial integrity and argue against a land swap plan that rewards Russian aggression. They will also seek further clarity on what security guarantees the US is willing to offer in the event of a settlement. In a conciliatory statement announcing his visit to Washington, Starmer praised Trump for his 'efforts to end Russia's illegal war in Ukraine'. At the same time, Starmer reasserted Europe's red lines. He said the 'path to peace' could not be decided without Zelenskyy and said Russia should be 'squeezed' with further sanctions. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN that Putin had agreed for the first time for the US and Europe to provide protection to Ukraine as part of a deal. This would be outside the auspices of Nato but would be the equivalent of the alliance's article 5 self-defence pact, Witkoff indicated. Speaking in Brussels alongside von der Leyen, Zelenskyy rejected Putin's latest demand for more land. The Russians want Ukraine to cede the entirety of the Donetsk region, including a number of Ukrainian-controlled cities, as well as Luhansk province, which Moscow mostly occupies. Zelenskyy said Putin had been trying for 12 years to fully capture Donetsk oblast, without success. He said the current frontline should form the basis for negotiations, adding that territory could only be discussed in a three-way format with Kyiv at the table. A powerful Ukrainian army was the best security guarantee, he added. Starmer, Merz and Macron hosted a video call with European allies on Sunday before their Washington trip. 'Ukraine must be a steel porcupine, indigestible for potential invaders,' von der Leyen said, stressing there could be no Russian-mandated limits on Ukraine's armed forces. According to the New York Times, Trump told European leaders he believed a peace deal could be negotiated if Zelenskyy agreed to give up the Donetsk region. They were unconvinced. The EU shares the Ukrainian view that Putin would use any new territory as a springboard for a further attack. Two sources with direct knowledge of the talks in Alaska told the Guardian that Putin had offered to freeze the frontline in southern Ukraine if he got Donbas. The plan would mean thousands of civilians would be forced to abandon their homes in key eastern cities such as Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, which have withstood years of Russian attacks. Before Friday's Alaska summit, Trump said he wanted an immediate ceasefire. Over the weekend, however, the US president endorsed Russia's demand for a peace deal first and a truce second. Ceasefires 'often times do not hold up', Trump said in a social media post. Trump also appears to have dropped his threat of economic penalties on countries that buy Russian oil if Moscow refuses a deal. He has repeatedly threatened to impose secondary sanctions, setting various deadlines and failing to follow through when they expire. Trump on Sunday expressed his frustration at recent media coverage. 'It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me,' he posted. 'There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me. I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!' He added: 'If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal.' Speaking to the BBC, the former British defence secretary Ben Wallace described Trump's apparent support for Putin's demands as 1930s-style 'appeasement'. He said the strategy – with pressure piled on Ukraine to agree – may save lives 'in the short term' but in the long term 'would probably put us at greater risk'. A joint statement issued by European leaders on Saturday said they were 'ready to work with US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support' but 'it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force.' They said they welcomed 'President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace'. Zelenskyy said in a statement after his conversations with Trump and the European leaders: 'The positions are clear. A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as possible, the fire must cease both on the battlefield and in the sky, as well as against our port infrastructure. All Ukrainian prisoners of war and civilians must be released, and the children abducted by Russia must be returned.' Related: Donald Trump reportedly delivered letter from first lady to Vladimir Putin Olga Tokariuk, a fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, said Zelenskyy had a 'difficult task' in Washington. He had to 'demonstrate that Ukraine wants peace, but not at any cost, to ensure Ukraine still gets US support,' she said. At the same time he could not make concessions 'unacceptable for Ukrainians'. Trump was unlikely to treat Zelenskyy with the 'same friendliness as Putin', she predicted. 'The US under Trump is no longer willing to stand by its democratic allies, while instead it is embracing the tyrants,' she added. Additional reporting by

Decades of Socialist Rule at Stake as Bolivia Vote Count Starts
Decades of Socialist Rule at Stake as Bolivia Vote Count Starts

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Decades of Socialist Rule at Stake as Bolivia Vote Count Starts

(Bloomberg) -- The vote count is underway in Bolivia's presidential and congressional elections that may end years of socialist rule and herald warmer relations with Washington. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The election took place amid unrest, shortages and the steepest inflation in more than three decades. The economic crisis has undermined support for the ruling MAS party, which has held power almost without interruption since 2006. Two pro-business candidates are battling for the upper hand in a field of eight presidential aspirants. Preliminary results are expected on Sunday evening. Samuel Doria Medina made a fortune in cement, then invested in fast food chains such as Burger King and Subway. Jorge Tuto Quiroga served as president in 2001-2002 when President Hugo Bánzer Suárez stepped down due to ill health. Both candidates say they would cut spending and seek international loans to inject capital into the economy. Both also would seek foreign investment in oil and gas exploration and in lithium production — Bolivia is home to the world's largest deposits of the metal. The highest-profile leftist candidate is Andrónico Rodríguez, a socialist senator who has distanced himself from both the current president, Luis Arce, and former President Evo Morales, whose feud split the ruling party. Arce opted not to run for a second term. Morales called on supporters to spoil their votes. The election is the first since 2005 when neither Morales nor a hand-picked successor were on the ballot. Under Bolivian election rules, a candidate can win in the first round with just 40% of the vote, provided there's a margin of more than ten percentage points over the runner-up. If no one wins in the first round, there'll be a runoff on Oct. 19. The new president will be sworn in on Nov. 8. The economy has been struggling for a decade amid declining natural gas production and dwindling central bank dollar reserves. Bolivia's dollar bonds have been among the top performers in emerging markets this year, on optimism that the election will herald a government able to unlock international loans and implement economic reforms. Under Morales and Arce, Bolivia had close links with Venezuela, Nicaragua, Russia and China but often had sour relations with Washington. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store