
Willing to form alliance for '26 polls: Assam Cong prez
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
He said the party is seriously considering forming a pre-poll alliance ahead of the assembly elections and has already initiated talks with a few parties.
Speaking at the Assam United Citizen's Convention, attended by Yogendra Yadav, Hiren Gohain, and several other leading figures, Gogoi said a solid coordination between opposition forces could have defeated BJP and its allies in the 2021 election itself. "We need discussions.
Social service and electoral politics are different matters. When political decisions and matters arise, Congress will talk to everyone.
In elections, Congress will talk to everyone, listen to everyone. We have started listening. We have already sat with some political party leaders," Gogoi added.
Raijor Dal president Akhil Gogoi said his party is eagerly waiting for Congress's green signal to join the alliance. "Everyone is waiting for the announcement of the opposition alliance. Raijor Dal and all other parties are waiting for their go-ahead," said Akhil.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
How Constitution shields Chief Election Commissioner from arbitrary removal
Amid growing friction between the Congress-led Opposition and the Election Commission of India (ECI), India Today has learnt that the Opposition is considering initiating a formal notice of removal against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. This unprecedented move follows allegations by Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi and others, accusing the Election Commission of India of large-scale 'vote theft' and procedural irregularities, especially during the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and the conduct of the 2024 Lok Sabha development raises questions about the removal process of a Chief Election Commissioner and the legal framework that governs office of the Chief Election Commissioner is a high constitutional post, entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring free and fair elections in the country. Given its importance, the Constitution of India provides a strong safeguard for the independence and autonomy of this office, laying down a removal process that is as stringent as that for a judge of the Supreme ON OUSTING OF CEC The primary provision governing the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner is articulated in Article 324(5) of the Constitution of India. Article 324(5) of the Constitution states, in relevant part — "...the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court..."To understand the process, one must examine Article 124(4) of the Constitution, which outlines how a Supreme Court judge may be removed. According to this provision, a judge can be removed only by an order of the President, following an address passed by each House of Parliament. The address must be supported by both an absolute majority of the total membership of the House and a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. Removal is permitted only on grounds of 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity.'The term 'proved' is crucial, as it implies that a formal enquiry must precede any parliamentary action. A similar process applies to the Chief Election investigation and enquiry mechanism is governed by the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. Article 124(4) of the Constitution says "A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity."advertisementAlthough the Constitution does not define 'misbehaviour,' it is generally understood to include wilful misconduct, corruption, moral turpitude, abuse of office, or repeated dereliction of duty. Misbehaviour must be deliberate and sustained, not accidental or isolated. Cumulative acts that reflect a pattern may also qualify.'Incapacity,' on the other hand, refers to physical or mental conditions that render an official unfit to discharge their begin the removal process, a motion must first be introduced in either House of Parliament. It requires signatures from at least 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha, depending on the House in which it is submitted, the Speaker (in the Lok Sabha) or the Chairman (in the Rajya Sabha) decides whether to admit the motion. Admission does not imply guilt, but is necessary to initiate further proceedings. If admitted, a three-member enquiry committee is constituted. This committee must include a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of a High Court, and a distinguished committee investigates the charges, frames specific allegations, and gives the CEC an opportunity to respond. Once the enquiry is completed, the committee submits its findings to the presiding officer of the House where the motion was the committee finds no evidence of misbehaviour or incapacity, the process ends and the motion is dropped. If the findings support the charges, the motion is presented to both Houses of Parliament along with the Houses must then debate and pass the motion with the required special majority. If the motion passes in both Houses during the same session, an address is sent to the President of India, who is constitutionally bound to remove the Chief Election is important to note that this removal mechanism is separate from other ways in which the CEC may vacate office. As per Section 4 of the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991, the term of office for a CEC is six years or until the age of sixty-five, whichever is earlier. The CEC may also resign voluntarily by submitting a written resignation to the President.- Ends


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Seize assets of school directors in Shalarth ID scam: Bawankule
Nagpur: Maharashtra revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule has demanded strict action against school directors accused of duping job-seekers in the Shalarth ID scam, insisting that teachers caught in the deceitful web are victims, not culprits. Bawankule urged concerned authorities to attach properties of school directors who collected money from unemployed youth by promising teaching jobs. "Many have mortgaged their homes, taken loans, and still struggled for employment. It is the school managements that misused their authority and fabricated Shalarth IDs. The govt will not abandon teachers who are innocent in this matter," he said while addressing reporters after a review meeting at Bachat Bhavan in the city on Monday. Bawankule added he has already held discussions with school education minister Dada Bhuse and would push for immediate relief and justice for affected teachers. On the flood situation across Maharashtra, Bawankule said the state machinery was placed on high alert. "Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis and disaster management minister Girish Mahajan are personally monitoring relief efforts. Red-alert districts are under strict watch, food packets and essentials are being airlifted, and damage surveys have begun to expedite compensation," he said. The guardian minister for Nagpur and Amravati districts also targeted Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for questioning electoral rolls and the integrity of electronic voting machines (EVMs). "Revision of rolls is a continuous process, and objections can be filed within the stipulated time. Congress failed to act then, but after eight months Gandhi suddenly cries foul. When they win, EVMs are acceptable; when they lose, they blame the machines. Such double standards only undermine public trust," Bawankule remarked. Outlining his long-term vision, Bawankule said the govt is committed to making Nagpur a model city by 2029. "Large funds have been allocated by CM Fadnavis through District Planning Committee. Projects will roll out in three phases, covering urban infrastructure, rural employment, and livestock development via self-help groups. A developed Nagpur is no longer a dream, but an achievable target," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka legislators blur party lines to speak against primate trouble
Bengaluru: After grappling with elephants and leopards, semi-urban and rural areas of Bengaluru South (Ramanagara) are now under siege from another problem — monkeys! Cutting across party lines, members of the Legislative Council on Monday urged the state govt to step in and protect residents and farmers from the growing simian trouble. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Raising the issue during a debate on human–wildlife conflict, Congress MLC S Ravi appealed to forest minister Eshwar Khandre for immediate intervention, pointing to increasing monkey raids in villages around Kaggalipura and Bidadi. Highlighting the scale of crop damage, Ravi cited the case of fellow Congress MLC Sudham Das. "He has a coconut orchard with around 600 trees but hasn't been able to harvest even one coconut this year because of monkeys," he said. Joining the chorus, JD(S) MLC Govindaraju said many homes in the region were forced to cover windows and balconies with nets to stop monkeys from entering homes. He also alleged that the forest department was compounding the issue by releasing monkeys caught in other parts of the state into Bengaluru South. The MLCs urged the govt to chalk out a concrete plan to tackle the escalating monkey trouble before it could cause more damage to both people and crops. Khandre promised the MLCs that he would soon discuss the issue with forest officials and rescue these monkeys for release in forest areas. 40 casualties due to elephants in Bengaluru's backyard The MLCs also recalled that 40 people became casualties of human-animal conflict in Bengaluru South. "Our district forest boundary extends from Bengaluru city to MM Hills along the border of Tamil Nadu. Over the last three years, as many as 15 people were trampled to death and another 25 were left with permanent injuries," Ravi pointed out while demanding quick action to reduce these conflicts, including setting up an elephant camp either at Sangama or Muthathi on the banks of the river Cauvery. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The forest minister revealed that rail barricading is the only solution, and till now, half of Bengaluru South has been secured with the fencing. "Out of the 13km requirement in Bengaluru South, we have completed 8km of work and similarly in Bannerghatta National Park (BNP), out of the 45.5km required fencing, we have completed 24km. The remaining work needs Rs 42 crore and as soon as the govt releases funds, we will complete the work and prevent elephants from entering human habitations," he briefed.