African fish may hold key to reversing muscle ageing in humans, scientists say
Scientists have used a 'surprising' new animal model – the African killifish – to show that muscles reverse to an 'early-life' state towards the end of life, an advance which may lead to reversing age-related strength loss in humans.
While previous research has shown that muscles start to waste in old age in a condition called sarcopenia, the precise reason or the mechanism by which this happens has remained elusive.
In the new study, scientists from the Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI) at Monash University found, using what they call the 'surprising' new animal model, that towards the end of life, muscles actually reverse to an 'early-life' state that slows death.
The findings, published recently in the journal Aging Cell, offer clues to slowing, halting, or even reversing age-related loss of muscle mass and strength, researchers say.
They highlight that the findings also come at a critical time when the world is witnessing a dramatic increase in the prevalence and severity of sarcopenia throughout the ageing global population.
'There is a pressing need to understand the mechanisms that drive sarcopenia, so that we can identify and implement suitable medical interventions to promote healthy muscle ageing,' study co-author Peter Currie from ARMI said.
The African turquoise killifish, scientifically known as Nothobranchius furzeri, has emerged recently as a new model animal for studying ageing.
This is aided by the fact that the killifish, which live for an average of 4 to 6 months, have the shortest known life span among vertebrates bred in captivity.
Their short life span is also accompanied by symptoms of ageing seen in humans such as the appearance of cancerous lesions in the liver and gonads, reduced regenerative capacity of the limbs (fin), and genetic hallmarks of human ageing as well as shortening of the end of chromosomes.
In the new study, which is the first to use the killifish to study sarcopenia, scientists characterised the cells and molecules of its skeletal muscle from early life, aged and extremely old late-life stages.
The comparisons revealed many similarities to sarcopenia in humans and other mammals, researchers say.
They say the same signature signs of ageing are reversed during the late-life stage in humans and the killifish, 'suggesting that in extremely old animals, there may be mechanisms in place that prevent further deterioration of skeletal muscle health, which may ultimately contribute to an extension of their life span'.
'Importantly, the late-life stage during which we observed improved muscle health perfectly coincides with a stage when mortality rates decline,' Avnika Ruparelia, another author of the study, said.
'We therefore postulate that the improvement in muscle health may be a critical factor contributing to the extension of life span in extremely old individuals,' Dr Ruparelia said.
Scientists also analysed the metabolism of fish at different stages of the ageing process.
They found that some features of the metabolism of the very oldest fish were rejuvenated to resemble those of young fish.
Researchers found a critical role played by lipid metabolism in this rejuvenation process.
'During extreme old age, there is a striking depletion of lipids, which are the main energy reserves in our cells,' Dr Currie explained.
'We believe that this mimics a state of calorie restriction, a process known to extend life span in other organisms, which results in activation of downstream mechanisms ultimately enabling the animal to maintain nutrient balance and live longer. A similar process is seen in the muscle of highly trained athletes,' he explained.
Scientists say the finding that potential drug interventions can manipulate metabolism linked to ageing is an exciting prospect, 'especially given the social, economic and healthcare costs associated with the ever-growing aged population around the world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dead NASA satellite inexplicably comes back to life to fire huge pulse that lit up the sky
A NASA satellite that had remained inactive in orbit for nearly six decades suddenly emitted a powerful radio signal, leaving astronomers around the world stunned. The brief but intense signal, detected by radio telescopes in Western Australia, lasted only a fraction of a second yet became the brightest object in the sky, momentarily outshining entire galaxies and stars. The source of this unexpected burst was Relay 2, a communications satellite launched by NASA in 1964. After both of its transmitters failed in 1967, the satellite had been silent and declared defunct until now. Experts believe the signal wasn't deliberately transmitted by the satellite, but was triggered by an external event. One possibility is an electrostatic discharge: a sudden release of electrical energy, similar to a spark, caused by the satellite building up charge as it orbits through Earth's magnetic field. Another theory is that a micrometeoroid, a tiny piece of rock traveling at high speed, struck Relay 2, causing a burst of heat and charged particles that emitted the brief but intense signal. The burst briefly emitted about 400 watts of power, similar to a small microwave oven. The fact that this signal remained that powerful after traveling from space to Earth makes it especially rare. Australian scientists, who were scanning the sky for fast radio bursts (FRBs)—short, high-energy flashes typically originating from deep space—made the startling discovery. According to NASA, FRBs can briefly outshine entire galaxies, a phenomenon that occurs in the blink of an eye. However, this signal was unique: it originated not from a distant galaxy but from within Earth's orbit, just about 2,800 miles above the planet's surface. 'We thought we might've found a new pulsar or a never-before-seen object,' Dr. Clancy James, lead researcher and associate professor at Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy, told New Scientist. 'Instead, we saw an incredibly powerful radio pulse that eclipsed everything else in the sky for a split second.' The burst was detected by the Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP), a network of 36 radio telescopes. Researchers quickly traced the source to Relay 2, which happened to be passing overhead at that exact moment. Despite lasting only nanoseconds, the radio burst was extraordinarily strong. Scientists estimated its strength at more than three million janskys, a unit used to measure radio wave intensity. That's roughly 100 billion times stronger than the radio signals from your typical smartphone. The shape of the signal was clean and well-defined, allowing scientists to analyze it in detail. Relay 2 was originally launched to improve satellite communication and conduct studies on Earth's radiation belts, areas filled with charged particles trapped by the planet's magnetic field. It carried two transmitters and was designed to spin for stability. But by mid-1967, both transmitters had failed, and the satellite became just another piece of space junk orbiting Earth. At first, researchers thought the detected signal came from a distant cosmic object. But a closer look confirmed it aligned exactly with Relay 2's position in the sky. 'This must have been caused by an external trigger, like an electrostatic discharge or a micrometeorite hit,' Dr. James explained. The burst lasted 1,000 times faster than previous electrostatic signals detected from satellites, which typically last a microsecond (one-millionth of a second). This makes it the fastest and most powerful signal of its kind ever recorded near Earth. While the signal caused a stir in the astronomy world, it also raised concerns. Many telescopes scan the sky for signals from far-off galaxies, and an unexpected burst from a nearby defunct satellite could cause confusion or lead to false discoveries. Still, some scientists see a silver lining. Dr Karen Aplin, a space weather expert at the University of Bristol, said this surprise detection could lead to new tools for studying electrical activity in space. 'It may ultimately offer a new technique to evaluate electrostatic discharges in orbit,' she said.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Psychiatrist body holds firm on 25% pay bid but NSW Health says shortages are ‘more nuanced'
Closing submissions have been heard in the long-running dispute between psychiatrists – who are pushing for a 25% pay increase – and the New South Wales department of health, bringing to a close a landmark legal action brought by the psychiatrists, who argue psychiatric care in NSW is facing 'collapse' because of poor pay and conditions. Over two days this week, the Industrial Relations Commission court in Sydney heard closing submissions from lawyers, before the full bench retired to consider their decision. At the heart of the dispute is the proposition from the psychiatrists, represented by the Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation (Asmof), that NSW staff specialist psychiatrists are significantly underpaid compared with their interstate counterparts. This, they argued, has led to an exodus of qualified psychiatrists to other jurisdictions or the private sector, leading to drastic and dangerous understaffing of psychiatric units and overwork and moral injury of staff. Asmof is arguing for a special levy to increase their pay by 25% to stem the flow of specialist doctors leaving the state's public system. In January, 206 psychiatrists in NSW threatened to resign; 62 have resigned, while others await the commission's decision. In closing submissions Thomas Dixon, the barrister for Asmof, pointed the commission to evidence it had heard about the 'proliferation' of mental health patient presentations in the public health system in recent years, at the same time there has been a reduction in the number of public psychiatric specialists. Dixon said that in the five years from July 2019, the number of staff psychiatric specialist vacancies in NSW increased from 35 full-time equivalent (FTE) roles to 131, a near 400% increase. 'Why is this occurring?' he asked the full bench. 'The reasons are many, including pay … stress, overwork and concern for patient outcomes. All of these factors were caused or exacerbated by staff shortages. 'Staff shortages are having a negative impact on the quality of patient care and integrity of the health system.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email According to Asmof, psychiatrists are paid significantly more in states other than NSW. Salaries were up to 51% higher in Western Australia, 44% higher in the Northern Territory, 38% higher in South Australia, 28% in Queensland and 25% in Tasmania. They are 2% higher in Victoria, but Asmof said that in Victoria, as most psychiatrists do not work full-time, they are paid an hourly rate which amounts to 31% more than in NSW. Dixon reminded the court of evidence it had heard that giving a pay rise to psychiatrists would actually end up costing the government less than its current policy, which was to fill gaps in staffing with locums or visiting medical officers (VMOs). Dixon said that a full-time staff psychiatrist cost the same as a VMO working at 0.6FTE. Ian Neil SC, the barrister representing the secretary of health and the NSW department of health, argued that there was no evidence that increasing the pay of psychiatrists with a special levy would have any impact on the attraction and retention of staff, except for stopping those who had threatened resignation pending the outcome of the arbitration, which he urged the court not to consider. 'Asmof loaded up the gun and pointed it at our heads,' Neil said of the mass resignation threat. 'That ought not to be taken into account.' Neil told the court that increasing the pay for psychiatrists by 25% in an interim 12-month order was problematic in that it meant the commission would have to keep that pay uplift in other award negotiations going forward, and that it would not address the issue that Asmof hoped it would remedy. 'Wage fixing is not an appropriate mechanism to address the problem of attraction and retention, of itself,' he said. 'The problem of workplace shortages … are a much more nuanced problem that requires a nuanced response.' Neil was pushed by the justices to give an account of what the health secretary contended the solution was for the problem of attraction and retention, if not a pay increase, to which he said: 'There is no simple answer to that question because it's not a simple issue. It would be a simple issue if funds were infinite, it would be a simple issue if the source of trained staff specialist psychiatrists were infinite, but none of those propositions are true or realistic.' The full bench has adjourned to consider its judgment.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists issue urgent warning over drinking bottled BEER – as they discover a single glass bottle contains 50 times more dangerous microplastics than a plastic bottle
With temperatures set to hit 32°C in parts of the UK this weekend, many Brits will be looking forward to cracking open a cold beer in the sunshine. But a new study might make you think twice before reaching for your favourite bottle. Scientists fom the French food safety agency, ANSES, have discovered that drinks sold in glass bottles - including water, beer, and wine - contain more microplastics than those in plastic bottles. Initially, the researchers were baffled with this finding. However, they soon worked out that the microplastic particles were getting into the drinks through the paint on the outside of the bottles. 'We expected the opposite result,' Iseline Chaib, who conducted the research, told AFP. 'We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, color and polymer composition—so therefore the same plastic—as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles.' Worryingly, the long-term effects of these microplastics on human health remain unclear. Initially, the researchers were baffled with this finding. However, they soon worked out that the microplastic particles were getting into the drinks through the paint on the outside of the bottles. For the study, the team set out to evaluate the levels of microplastics in various popular drinks sold in France. Their analysis revealed an average of around 100 microplastic particles per litre in glass bottles of soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea, and beer. That was between five and 50 times higher than the rate detected in plastic bottles or metal cans. The researchers inspected the glass bottles, and discovered small scratches on the caps, likely created due to friction between the caps when they were stored. For water, both flat and sparkling, the amount of microplastic was relatively low in all cases, ranging from 4.5 particles per liter in glass bottles to 1.6 particles in plastic. Wine drinkers will also be relieved to hear that wine contained few microplastics — even glass bottles with caps. Soft drinks however contained around 30 microplastics per liter, while lemonade had 40 microplastics per liter. Beer was the worst offender, with a whopping 60 microplastics per liter. As it stands, the researchers do not know whether these microplastics represent a health risk. However, researchers are increasingly concerned about the capacity of such particles to be internalised within cells causing alterations in cellular function, particularly when interacting with organs in children and causing definitive alterations in adult life. There is a growing body of evidence that plastics could play a key role in early-onset cancer genesis, where healthy cells turn cancerous. Last year, a study found cancer cells in the gut spread at an accelerated rate after contact with microplastics. Experts have also raised the alarm about a potential between microplastics and reproductive health. Scientists warned in June that they found tiny plastic particles in men's sperm. Thankfully, the researchers say that drink manufacturers could easily reduce the amount of microplastics shed by bottle caps. As part of the study, the team tested a cleaning method involving blowing the caps with air, then rinsing them with water and alcohol. This was found to reduce microplastic contamination by 60 per cent. WHAT CAN MICROPLASTICS DO TO THE HUMAN BODY IF THEY END UP IN OUR FOOD SUPPLY? According to an article published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, our understanding of the potential human health effects from exposure to microplastics 'constitutes major knowledge gaps.' Humans can be exposed to plastic particles via consumption of seafood and terrestrial food products, drinking water and via the air. However, the level of human exposure, chronic toxic effect concentrations and underlying mechanisms by which microplastics elicit effects are still not well understood enough in order to make a full assessment of the risks to humans. According to Rachel Adams, a senior lecturer in Biomedical Science at Cardiff Metropolitan University, ingesting microplastics could cause a number of potentially harmful effects, such as: Inflammation: when inflammation occurs, the body's white blood cells and the substances they produce protect us from infection. This normally protective immune system can cause damage to tissues. An immune response to anything recognised as 'foreign' to the body: immune responses such as these can cause damage to the body. Becoming carriers for other toxins that enter the body: microplastics generally repel water and will bind to toxins that don't dissolve, so microplastics can bind to compounds containing toxic metals such as mercury, and organic pollutants such as some pesticides and chemicals called dioxins, which are known to causes cancer, as well as reproductive and developmental problems. If these microplastics enter the body, toxins can accumulate in fatty tissues.
