After brief X outage, Musk says refocusing on businesses
Musk has an extraordinarily full plate as owner/CEO of X, xAI (developer of the AI-powered chatbot Grok), electric-car maker Tesla and rocket builder SpaceX – not to mention his recent polarising efforts to help Trump slash the size of the US federal government. — AP
WASHINGTON: Social media platform X was hit by a two-hour outage on May 24, prompting owner Elon Musk to say he needs to spend more time focusing on his companies.
His statement echoed comments earlier this month suggesting he would reduce his role in US President Donald Trump's administration.
The world's richest person has an extraordinarily full plate as owner/CEO of X, xAI (developer of the AI-powered chatbot Grok), electric-car maker Tesla and rocket builder SpaceX – not to mention his recent polarising efforts to help Trump slash the size of the US federal government.
As backlash to those cuts grew and Tesla share prices slipped, Musk began drawing away from the government role, confirming last week that he was down to one or two days a week at the so-called "Department of Government Efficiency."
Still, the man who contributed more than US$235mil (RM988mil) to Trump's election campaign remains a close advisor to the US president, attending an Oval Office meeting with the South African president last week.
After the X outage, Musk suggested that he may have been away from his companies for too long.
"As evidenced by the X uptime issues this week, major operational improvements need to be made," he said.
"The failover redundancy should have worked, but did not."
X had largely returned to normal service by 11.00am US Eastern time (1500 GMT) on the same day.
The SITE Intelligence Group reported that hacker-activist group DieNet had claimed responsibility for the outage.
DieNet, it said, had called the attack a "test" of its so-called Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) capabilities – flooding the system with online traffic to make it inaccessible to legitimate users.
AFP was unable to independently verify DieNet's claim of responsibility, and X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the outage.
'Super focused'
"Back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms," Musk posted on X.
"I must be super focused on X/xAI and Tesla (plus Starship launch next week), as we have critical technologies rolling out."
SpaceX announced that it plans to attempt a new launch of its mega-rocket Starship next week. Still under development, Starship exploded in flight during two previous launches.
Starship is key to Musk's long-term plans to colonise Mars, and SpaceX has been betting on the launch of numerous Starship prototypes – despite the explosive failures – to quickly identify and address problems.
The South African-born billionaire has for weeks been signaling that he would reduce his political role to refocus on his businesses.
Early this month, Musk acknowledged that his ambitious effort to slash US federal spending did not fully reach its goals, despite tens of thousands of job cuts and drastic budget reductions.
This week, he said he would pull back from spending his fortune on politics, although he did not rule out backing future causes "if I see a reason."
Of his recent political donations, he said: "I did what needed to be done." – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
Trump Says US Is Evacuating Personnel From Middle East As 'It Could Be A Dangerous Place'
ISTANBUL, June 12 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- United States (US) President Donald Trump said Wednesday that American personnel are being evacuated from locations in the Middle East amid escalating tensions with Iran because "it could be a dangerous place, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. Speaking to reporters before attending the opening night of the award-winning musical Les Misérables at the Kennedy Centre, Trump acknowledged the withdrawal while maintaining his firm stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions. "Well, they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place. We'll see what happens. We've given notice to move out," he said when asked about reports of personnel relocations.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'
FILE PHOTO: Women dressed in traditional Mexican attire take part in a protest against federal immigration sweeps, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 11, 2025. REUTERS/David Swanson/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Three prominent Democratic U.S. governors face a grilling on Thursday from a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives panel over immigration policy, as President Donald Trump steps up a crackdown on people living in the country illegally. The governors of New York, Illinois and Minnesota are due to testify to the House Oversight Committee following days of protests in downtown Los Angeles over the Trump administration's aggressive ramping up of arrests of migrants. Tensions escalated as Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines into California to provide additional security. Trump's immigration crackdown has become a major political flashpoint between the White House and national Democrats. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, seen as a contender for the party's presidential nomination in 2028, in a Tuesday night video speech accused Trump of choosing "theatrics over public safety." Minnesota's Tim Walz, who ran unsuccessfully for vice president last year; Illinois' JB Pritzker, also seen a 2028 hopeful, and New York's Kathy Hochul, walked a careful line in their prepared testimony for Thursday's hearing, voicing support for immigration enforcement, if not Trump's tactics. "If they are undocumented, we want them out of Illinois and out of our country," Pritzker said. At the same time, Pritzker lashed out against "any violations of the law or abuses of power" and said, "Law-abiding, hardworking, tax-paying people who have been in this country for years should have a path to citizenship." Reuters/Ipsos polls show Trump getting more support for his handling of immigration than any other policy area. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz proclaimed, adding that state officials cooperate with federal immigration authorities, while noting that it offers "respect" to cities and counties that choose to give no more than the legal minimum support to the Department of Homeland Security. (Reporting by Richard Cowan; editing by Scott Malone and Sandra Maler)
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Donald Trump and the 'rhetoric of emergency'
TARIFFS, immigration, energy: In all these areas, Donald Trump has granted himself exceptional and broad presidential powers by declaring "emergency" situations that his critics insist do not exist. "In the United States, there is no tradition of emergency powers (granted to the president) under the Constitution," New York University professor Noah Rosenblum told AFP. But various laws allow the commander-in-chief's powers to be expanded on an exceptional – and usually temporary – basis. Historically such emergency powers have been invoked to deal with natural disasters, to deploy responders or troops, and to unlock critical funding. "But that, of course, is not how Donald Trump is using it," Rosenblum said. Since returning to the White House on January 20, the Republican president has repeatedly invoked states of emergency in a variety of areas – eight times in all, according to National Public Radio – thus green-lighting swift and forceful intervention on his administration's part. They have had little to do with hurricanes, floods or earthquakes. On his first day in office, Trump declared a "national energy emergency" in the United States – the world's leading oil producer. By early April, frustrated by the trade deficits the United States had with many countries, including some imbalances going back decades, Trump declared a national emergency, among other reasons, "to increase our competitive edge," the White House said. The result? Tariffs slapped on adversaries and allies alike. The flow of migrants arriving from Mexico has prompted Trump to declare a state of emergency at the US southern border, and he apparently feels empowered to respond with massive import duties, or forced deportations of undocumented migrants. Now, Trump has sent the US military into Los Angeles to quell protests, invoking a seldom-used law that allows the president to deploy National Guard units if there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion." The move countered the wishes of local authorities and California Governor Gavin Newsom, who accused Trump of a "dictatorial" drift. "The president is simply announcing emergencies when there aren't any," said Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, noting how local police have said they are capable of handling clashes with protesters opposed to raids by immigration agents. "All of these grants of potential emergency powers really don't account for the election of a president like Mr. Trump, who is not entirely rational, who is not dedicated to the rule of law, who is, in fact, an aspiring autocrat who is looking... to exercise extraordinary power," Bowman told AFP. Trump is not the first US leader to invoke exceptional circumstances to justify such moves, even if he does so in a way without precedent. His Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, for example, decided to forgive student debt given the "emergency" created by the Covid pandemic. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court was not convinced, however, and blocked the plan. In Trump's case, will the courts, which have been flooded by lawsuits, affirm the legality of actions taken in the name of imminent peril? The tendency of judges "in these kinds of things is to defer pretty heavily to the president," Bowman said. On Thursday, a California court will consider a request by Governor Newsom to suspend Trump's troop deployment. In a filing to the court, the administration said Trump's judgment has historical precedent. Courts did not interfere when President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops to protect school desegregation or when Richard Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail during a postal workers' strike, "and courts should not interfere here either," it said. Beyond the legal tussles, the relentless use of the language of urgency, of imminent threat or national peril, is part of a broader strategy, professor Rosenblum stressed. Trump, he said, "is using the perpetual rhetoric of emergency to keep us perpetually riled up and either on the defensive and so increasingly exhausted or scared and aggressive – and so demanding government intervention."
