The AIADMK defends its role in Keeladi excavations, wants politics out of the issue
The AIADMK has defended its role in the Keeladi excavations when it was in power. It also accused the ruling DMK of 'indulging only in politics' on the issue.
On Wednesday, the main Opposition party, long criticised for being silent on the issue, claimed credit for the Keeladi excavations during April-August 2018. Puratchi Thalaivi Peravai secretary and Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly R.B. Udhayakumar made these remarks in a statement. The next day, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin attacked the AIADMK for 'maintaining silence'.
On Friday, the party fielded deputy propaganda secretary K. Pandiarajan, who was the Minister for Tamil Language and Culture and Archaeology during 2017-21, to explain to the media the AIADMK government's record in archaeology in general and Keeladi in particular.
The former Minister pointed out that the average annual allocation for the Tamil Nadu State Department of Archaeology (TNSDA) was hardly ₹2 crore once. This went up to ₹105 crore, including the Centre government's share. Touching upon the archaeological work at Adichanallur in Thoothukudi district, he said that it was Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami who got the Union government to sanction the establishment of a site museum (which is being built at a cost of ₹17 crore).
Litigation before Madurai Bench
Tracing the origin of the Keeladi controversy, Mr. Pandiarajan recalled that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) had, at one stage, decided not to pursue the project further. Jayalalithaa was the Chief Minister then, and she decided that the State government would step in if the Centre walked out. So, the AIADMK government applied to the Central government for approval, even as litigation was pending before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. Later, the Central Advisory Board of Archaeology (CABA) permitted the TNSDA to conduct excavations, which were done in stages. The reports were submitted to the Union government. At the 2019 Book Fair in Chennai, Mr. Palaniswami released the first report.
When the ASI did the work in Keeladi, it confined itself to a few acres of land. But when the TNSDA stepped in, about 100 acres was acquired. It was from the Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, Miami, Florida, U.S., that the dating report was obtained for the Keeladi findings, the former Minister said, adding that the proposal for a site museum at Keeladi was approved when Mr. Palaniswami was the Chief Minister.
'Culture of sticking posters'
Acknowledging that the TNSDA was created in the late 1960s when the DMK was in power, Mr. Pandiarajan, however, said that of a total of 39 excavations done so far, 33 were carried out when the AIADMK was in power. But the DMK government wanted to 'take credit for all the work' done by the AIADMK government. 'This is the height of the culture of sticking posters [on what the previous government had achieved],' Mr. Pandiarajan said, wondering how much the ruling DMK had allocated for the Keeladi excavations and whether those who were agitating on the issue had read the reports produced by the AIADMK government.
It was for ASI official Amarnath Ramakrishna to clarify the points raised by the ASI on the Keeladi excavations, and there was no room here for politics, Mr. Pandiarajan said, adding that the ASI did not question the antiquity of the Keeladi civilisation but raised some questions based on the reports submitted by the State government when the AIADMK was in power.
A 'blatant lie'
Speaking to reporters at Anna Arivalayam, DMK MLA N. Ezhilan said the Edappadi Palaniswami-led AIADMK government started the Keeladi excavationS based only on a Supreme Court verdict. He said the AIADMK government allocated funds only for two excavations: ₹5 lakh for Pattaraiperumpudur in Tiruvallur district and ₹55 lakh for Keeladi. He termed the AIADMK's claim of allocation of ₹105 crore a 'blatant lie'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
AIADMK cadre hold one-day hunger strike in support of mango farmers
Coimbatore: AIADMK cadre held a one-day hunger strike at New Bus Stand in Krishnagiri from 9am to 5pm on Friday, demanding the govt to fix the right price for mango procurement. AIADMK deputy general secretary and Veppanahalli MLA KP Munusamy presided over the strike. After the hunger strike, Munusamy said farmers from Krishnagiri district cultivated mangoes on an area of 35,000 hectares. Thought the yield is good this year, farmers say, they didn't get the right price for mangoes. "Similarly, mango pulp factories are also struggling to pay the right price due to the stock of mango pulp already produced and the high yield. The affected mango farmers should be given a compensation of Rs 30,000 per acre, and the govt should also establish a mango board and fix a mango procurement price of Rs 13 per kg." Rajya Sabha MP Thambidurai, former minister Balakrishna Reddy, Krishnagiri MLA Ashok Kumar, Uthankarai MLA Tamilselvan, and many others from AIADMK participated in this hunger strike.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
AIADMK complains against DMK over EPS cartoon
Trichy: AIADMK functionaries have sought legal action against DMK IT wing for sharing a derogatory cartoon criticizing party general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami . In a complaint submitted to SP S Selvanagarathinam on Friday, they sought action against industries minister T R B Rajaa who is the secretary of DMK IT wing. "The cartoon shared by the official handle of DMK's IT wing was in a very bad taste. If action is not taken against the perpetrators, we will hold a massive protest after obtain permission from our general secretary," AIADMK's Trichy north district secretary M Paranjothi said. Accompanied by former MP P Kumar and former chief whip R Manoharan, the functionaries asked the police to take down the cartoon shared by DMK on its official social media pages and handles. Meanwhile, AIADMK MLA C Vijaya Baskar accused DMK of distorting history. He claimed that AIADMK, during its previous term, had taken several measures to celebrate Tamil Nadu's rich and ancient history. "Following Jayalalithaa, when EPS was chief minister, he sanctioned Rs12 crore for a museum in Keeladi. The AIADMK proudly celebrated Tamil heritage, but in an attempt to overshadow those efforts, DMK is targeting a tall leader like EPS with personal and derogatory caricatures," he added.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
DMK's political fallout that unfolded after the massacre of EPRLF leaders by the LTTE in 1990
The brutal killing of Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front's secretary-general K. Padmanabha, along with 14 others, in Chennai on June 19, 1990 had a lasting impact on the contemporary politics of Tamil Nadu. It also delivered a body blow to the EPRLF, most of whose leaders were wiped out in the attack in a busy colony at Kodambakkam. The assassination led to a furore, and the then DMK government and Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi became the prime target of political attack. Then on, critics of the DMK, such as the AIADMK and the Congress, carried on a relentless campaign until they got the DMK government dismissed in January 1991 on the ground that Karunanidhi and his administration were 'pusillanimous' in dealing with the security situation and were 'not being able' to maintain law and order. The EPRLF, a key adversary of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), 'has never been able to fill the vacuum' caused by the 1990 killings, says EPRLF's former central committee member Sritharan Thirunavukkarasu, also known as Sugu. It went through different rounds of churning. These days, it is a political party that has a limited base in parts of the Northern Province — Jaffna and Vavuniya — in Sri Lanka. Attack against DMK One of those who had spearheaded the political attack against the DMK was Congress leader P. Chidambaram, according to the materials available with The Hindu Archives. At a press conference a day after the assassination, Mr. Chidambaram, who later became the Union Minister for Finance and Home Affairs, said the Chief Minister owed an apology to the people and to the State legislature for 'persistently misleading them'. Despite repeated warnings by the Opposition parties about LTTE activities in the State, the Chief Minister maintained that there was no camp and no armed activity, Mr. Chidambaram said, demanding Karunanidhi's resignation on moral grounds. Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Vazhapadi K. Ramamurthy, a bitter critic of the DMK leader, remarked that the State was 'slowly turning into a Punjab or Kashmir.' (Both Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir were suffering from militant activities then). It was another matter that the two Congress leaders, after several years, had no hesitation in becoming Karunanidhi's allies. Jayalalithaa's take AIADMK general secretary Jayalailthaa was no less vehement than the Congress leaders in condemning the government. In an interview to The Hindu in July 1990, she called the massacre 'an unpardonable crime'. As Karunanidhi 'is not the type' to own up responsibility, the President should remove him from power, she said. The politburo of the CPI(M), an ally of the DMK, said Padmanabha represented forces which had taken up the genuine demands of the Tamil minority within the 'framework of a united Sri Lanka'. It said the gruesome murders in the heart of the city indicated the serious danger posed by the LTTE which had been 'allowed to continue its disruptive activities without any check'. BJP vice-president K. Jana Krishnamurthi called the killing 'a slap on the face of the DMK government'. He accused the government of allowing the militants to treat Tamil Nadu as 'an open choultry'. However, Karunanidhi, who had condemned the killings, rejected the demand for his resignation. Speaking at a meeting in Karur on July 10, he wondered why he should resign. 'For what? In Sri Lanka, Tamils are being killed. If I step down, will that mean that Tamils in Sri Lanka will not be killed?' Karunanidhi said the demand for his resignation was born out of the massacre. 'But, why link the massacre of Padmanabha and the DMK rule and the campaign for my resignation? When 40 passengers were killed in a bomb blast at the Madras airport [in August 1984], did the then Prime Minister [Indira Gandhi] or those in power in Tamil Nadu [the then Chief Minister, M.G. Ramachandran] offer to resign,' he asked. 'Came in disguise' A few days later, Director-General of Police (DGP) P. Dorai said, 'There is no political fetter of any sort in dealing with the menace posed by the Tamil militants in general and the LTTE in particular.' Since 1976, the people of Tamil Nadu had been watching the 'internecine' feuds among the Tamil militant groups. There had been shoot-outs during 1982, 1984, and 1986, the DGP said, terming 'incorrect' the view that Tamil Nadu would become another Punjab or Jammu and Kashmir. On Karunanidhi's reported remarks that the police would have arranged adequate protection, had Padmanabha informed them of his arrival in the city, the DGP said the EPRLF leader came in disguise by shaving off his beard. Mr. Thirunavukkarasu remembers the manner in which the authorities and the political parties in India had enabled the funeral to be performed for the slain EPRLF leaders. In a first of its kind, the bodies of the foreign nationals were allowed to be kept near Rajaji Hall on the Government Estate for members of the public to pay homage. The CPI(M)'s moral and emotional support to the EPRLF members at that time is worth remembering, he adds. Within a year, another shocking incident occurred in the State, which was under the President's rule. This time, former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was killed, along with 15 others, including a Superintendent of Police.
