logo
US health chief Kennedy clashes with legislators over vaccine comments

US health chief Kennedy clashes with legislators over vaccine comments

TimesLIVE15-05-2025

Robert F. Kennedy Jr came under fire on Wednesday from legislators who said he has made false statements over vaccine testing and safety since taking the nation's top health job.
Kennedy made his first appearance in Congress since his confirmation as health and human services secretary in February, facing questions over everything from his mass layoffs at federal health agencies to his handling of a worsening US measles outbreak.
Some of the most heated exchanges centred on his remarks on vaccines. Kennedy has for years sowed doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, but pledged to maintain the country's existing vaccine standards to secure his appointment in the Trump administration.
Republican US Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician from Louisiana who helped pave the way for Kennedy's confirmation, corrected the secretary's assertion that the Covid-19 vaccine is the only shot tested against a placebo in clinical trials.
'The secretary said no vaccines, except for Covid-19, have been evaluated against placebo. For the record, that's not true,' said Cassidy, who chairs the Senate committee on health, education, labour and pensions (HELP).
'Coronavirus, measles, and HPV vaccines have been, and some vaccines are tested against previous versions, just for the record,' said Cassidy.
Democratic Senator Christopher Murphy of Connecticut said Kennedy had not lived up to his commitment to Cassidy and the committee during his confirmation hearing.
'As soon as you were sworn in, you announced new standards for vaccine approvals that you proudly referred to in your own press release as a radical departure from current practice, and experts say that departure will delay approvals,' said Murphy.
'You also said, specific to the measles vaccine, that you support the measles vaccine, but you have consistently been undermining the measles vaccine,' Murphy said. 'You told the public that the vaccine wanes very quickly ... and said that the measles vaccine was never properly tested for safety. You said there's fetal debris in the measles vaccine.'
'All true,' Kennedy shouted back as Murphy listed his comments. 'I'm not going to just tell people everything is safe and effective if I know that there's issues,' he said.
The measles vaccine has been shown to be safe and highly effective at preventing infection and does not contain fetal debris.
Kennedy has drawn condemnation from health officials for what they say is a weak endorsement of measles shots during an outbreak that has infected more than 1,000, mostly unvaccinated, people and killed three.
Audience members at the HELP hearing wore stickers saying 'When Bobby lies, children die,' and 'anti-vax, anti-science, anti-America' in reference to Kennedy's vaccine views.
Some protesters shouting opposition to Kennedy's positions, were dragged out by capitol police, including Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben and Jerry's ice cream.
'You're killing poor children in Gaza and paying for it by cutting Medicaid for children here,' shouted Cohen, who had attended a pro-Palestine event with Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib earlier on Wednesday, referring to Medicaid cuts proposed in the Republican spending bill and US support for Israel's war in Gaza.
'UP TO ME'
Kennedy has said his top priorities as health secretary include identifying the environmental contributors to autism and tackling rising rates of chronic disease.
He has vowed to remake the nation's health agencies, including cutting 10,000 jobs at the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health.
Wednesday's Senate hearing and one before a House Appropriations subcommittee earlier in the day were meant to review Kennedy's health-related spending plans under President Donald Trump's budget proposal, including an $18bn cut to NIH funding and $3.6bn from the CDC.
Democrats and other critics have portrayed the cuts as a gutting of the country's public health infrastructure. Kennedy told the appropriations committee they would save taxpayers $1.8bn per year and make the department more efficient.
'Our reductions have focused on aligning HHS staffing levels to reflect the size of HHS before the Covid-19 pandemic, which saw about a 15% increase in the number of employees,' Kennedy said in his opening statement to the House subcommittee.
The cuts and firings were his decision, not edicts from Elon Musk, Kennedy said when asked about the billionaire Trump ally's involvement. Musk is leading the DOGE initiative to cut government funding and reshape the federal bureaucracy.
'Elon Musk gave us help in trying and figuring out where there was fraud and abuse in the department,' Kennedy testified. 'But it was up to me to make the decision, and there are many instances where I pushed back.'
Kennedy said he was willing to work with Democrats on lowering prescription drug prices in response to a question from Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who votes with Democrats.
Trump signed an executive order on Monday directing drugmakers to lower their prices to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts said would be difficult to implement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guatemalan deportee back in US after judge orders Trump to facilitate return
Guatemalan deportee back in US after judge orders Trump to facilitate return

TimesLIVE

time4 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Guatemalan deportee back in US after judge orders Trump to facilitate return

A Guatemalan man who was deported to Mexico despite stating he feared being persecuted there was flown back to the US on Wednesday after a judge ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return. Judges have directed US President Donald Trump's administration to help return several migrants to the country because they were wrongly deported, and the man's arrival appeared to mark the first time one of those migrants has been able to come back. US district judge Brian Murphy in Boston on May 23 ordered the Guatemalan man's return after the justice department notified him that its claim that the man had expressly stated he was not afraid of being sent to Mexico was based on erroneous information. That ruling was the latest instance of a judge ordering the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a migrant swept up in the Republican president's efforts to carry out mass deportations as part of his hardline immigration agenda, following a mistake in an individual's case. The government likewise made an error with Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador in March despite an order protecting him from removal. He remains there despite a judge ordering the administration to facilitate his return.

Donald Trump-Elon Musk blow-up: How it unfolded
Donald Trump-Elon Musk blow-up: How it unfolded

The South African

time6 hours ago

  • The South African

Donald Trump-Elon Musk blow-up: How it unfolded

A timeline in quotes of the public meltdown of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship over several astonishing hours on Thursday. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. The US president was responding to comments made by Musk two days earlier in which Musk had called his 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending a 'disgusting abomination'. Responding on X to Donald Trump's comments on Thursday, Musk fired back at 12:19 local time: 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill… Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' In the Oval Office, Trump continued: 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here… All of a sudden, he had a problem.' To this, South Africa-born Musk responded: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' (12:25) And then in a fresh post 21 minutes later: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' 'Such ingratitude.' Just over an hour later, at 13:57, Musk carried on, with a post that he pinned to the top of his timeline: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Donald Trump fired back on Truth Social under an hour later, as the spat got increasingly bitter. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' (14:37) US media have put the value of the contracts at $18 billion. At 15:10 Musk referred to US government documents on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in jail while awaiting trial for sex crimes. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' (Trump, 16:06). 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately' (Musk, 16:09). SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the International Space Station under a contract worth more than $4.9 billion. Later in the day, Musk appeared to walk back his earlier comment on this subject, replying to a user on X: 'OK, we won't decommission Dragon,' though his tone was unclear. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse

Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again
Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again

The Citizen

time7 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again

The department's target for the current financial year is to table the Basic Income Support policy to Cabinet for approval. The implementation of South Africa's Basic Income Grant has been delayed once again, with the Department of Social Development announcing that further consultations are required before the policy can be finalised. The department presented its progress report to the portfolio committee on social development on Wednesday, outlining the ongoing challenges and next steps in developing the Basic Income Support policy. Despite more than two decades of policy development, the Basic Income Grant remains elusive, with approximately 9.2 million people currently dependent on the Covid-19 Social Relief of Distress Grant and 19.2 million beneficiaries across the South African Social Security Agency's (Sassa) other programs. The department has been working to create opportunities for grant-dependent individuals while navigating concerns about affordability and sustainability. Latest Basic Income Grant policy developments The Department of Social Development has been actively working on the Basic Income Support policy, with the first draft presented to the social protection, community and human development cluster Cabinet committee on 26 November 2024. However, the committee directed that additional consultations be conducted with internal members, with a particular focus on the policy's affordability and its linkages to economic opportunities. Following this directive, an interdepartmental workshop was organised on 31 March 2025 to discuss the revised document. During this meeting, all members agreed on the necessity of identifying ways to connect the grant with employment and sustainable livelihood opportunities targeted at the economically active population. The meeting acknowledged that the labour market, especially public employment initiatives, would not be able to absorb all current Social Relief of Distress beneficiaries. Deputy director-general Brenda Sibeko informed members of parliament (MPs) that the policy has been revised again and could potentially be approved within a year. 'If the policy is approved in the current financial year, then it means that after that, we have to write the law that makes the basic income support to be a permanent income support policy like the other grants,' she explained. ALSO READ: Sassa CEO's multimillion-rand package revealed amid suspension and grant hikes Ongoing consultations and timeline A second interdepartmental workshop is planned for the end of June 2025, which will be followed by bilateral meetings with the Presidency, Department of Labour, and National Treasury. The department intends to approach the committee in the second quarter of the 2025/26 financial year to request Cabinet consideration of the revised draft Basic Income Support policy. 'Once the consultations are concluded, the department will approach the SPCHD Cabinet Committee again in the second quarter of the 2025/26 financial year, to request Cabinet to consider the revised policy, and if approved, publish it for public comments,' the department explained. ALSO READ: Sassa SRD grant to be 'converted' to basic income grant – Mbalula says [VIDEO] Parliamentary frustration mounts MPs expressed growing frustration with the prolonged delays in developing a comprehensive Basic Income Grant policy. EFF MP, Noluvuyo Tafeni, voiced this concern directly, asking: 'When was the Basic Income Grant policy proposal first made? It was about some 30 years back, and there is still no progress.' The Basic Income Grant has indeed been on the country's policy agenda for more than 20 years, with the first proposal dating back to 1998. A technical proposal was subsequently drafted in 2002, but it failed to gain Cabinet approval. Financial challenges and sustainability concerns National Treasury has expressed significant concerns about the affordability and sustainability of introducing a Basic Income Support policy, given the country's high unemployment rate and current fiscal position. The department is working with various stakeholders to identify alternative ways to strengthen the implementation of the current Social Relief of Distress grant while creating pathways for beneficiaries to transition to other economic opportunities. Despite these challenges, the committee heard that the department has received approval to extend the Social Relief of Distress provision until the end of March 2026, with a budget of R35 billion. The department has proposed that the Social Relief of Distress grant be made permanent, with a phased approach to increase benefits progressively. The proposed entry-level Basic Income Support grant would be set at the Lower Bound Poverty Line, with long-term plans to eliminate poverty at the Upper Bound Poverty Line. ALSO READ: Sassa problems and glitches this year, will we get a basic income grant in 2025? Basic income grant supporting infrastructure and pilot programs While policy development continues, the Department of Social Development is working on several parallel initiatives to support the eventual implementation of the Basic Income Support policy. The department said it was collaborating with stakeholders to assist the South African Social Security Agency in enhancing system interoperability to improve efficiency in data-sharing for both eligibility assessment and economic linkages. Additionally, the department, along with Sassa and partners, is piloting ways to link grant beneficiaries to employment activities. An interdepartmental task team, including key departments such as National Treasury, the Presidency, Higher Education and Training, and Public Works, is working on various pathways to improve access to training, employment, and entrepreneurship support to reduce reliance on social grants as the only pathway out of poverty. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa hints again at expanding SRD grant – and will Treasury go 'BIG' this time? Next steps and legislative process The department's target for the current financial year is to table the Basic Income Support policy to Cabinet for approval. Should such approval be granted, the department will need to amend the Social Assistance Act to introduce a new social grant category. While the formulation of the amendment can be done relatively quickly, the timing of the legislation and its passage will depend on how rapidly Cabinet approves the draft bill, which will then be tabled to Parliament for processing. During this legislative process, it will be necessary for the Social Relief of Distress grant to be extended beyond March 2026 to ensure the continuation of income support. 'In order to ensure stability during this consultation period, the department will consult National Treasury for the SRD provision to be extended until the legislative process is complete, to ensure that its beneficiaries are protected from extreme poverty and vulnerability,' the department stated. NOW READ: Household food basket shows food prices still increasing

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store