New push to end controversial protections for NSW's Snowy Mountain brumbies
Independent Wagga Wagga MP Joe McGirr gave notice on Wednesday of his intention to introduce a Bill to repeal the Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act.
The Act, introduced by former deputy premier John Barilaro, recognised the 'heritage' value of brumbies and mandated their population be reduced to 3000.
While it will be years until a new target is set, Invasive Species CEO Jack Gough said even one horse in Kosciuszko would cause 'enormous amounts of damage'.
'The question is the scale of damage that we're prepared to accept,' Mr Gough said alongside Mr McGirr on Wednesday.
'Having 1/3 of the national park set up as an area that is essentially a horse paddock instead of a national park is not something that Australians want.'
Mr Gough admitted it would be difficult to reduce the number of feral horses in Kosciuszko National Park to zero, but stressed the risk the brumbies posed.
'We know that the Australian landscape did not evolve with large, heavy, hard-hoofed animals that are cutting up that landscape,' he said.
'They are draining the peat moss and are causing enormous amount of damage to the homes of our native species.'
In May, the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service reported as few as 1500 brumbies may be left in the park following extensive aerial culling.
While images released by the Park service showed recovery to the fragile alpine ecosystem, the method of reducing horse numbers has been controversial.
Animal Justice Party MP Emma Hurst said there was 'no justification' for aerial shooting at Kosciuszko, and that the party would not be supporting Mr McGirr's bill.
If it was passed, she expressed concern it would result in a 'push to kill any remaining animals that are there in the park'.
'The push to actually repeal this act, to open the doors to allow for that killing is mind boggling,' she said.
Ms Hurst called on NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe to 'keep her word' about aerial shooting.
Ms Sharpe told a budget estimates committee aerial shooting had 'ceased for now' in the horse retention area after the population reports were released.
Further aerial shooting has taken place outside of the retention area from June 10 until June 30, targeting 'all feral animals'.
In a statement, Ms Sharpe said the state government was close to reaching the legislated targeted of 3000 wild horses in Kosciuszko, two years ahead of deadline.
'We're now focused on population management,' she said.
'We will have a look at the Bill, as we do with all Bills.'
Future of the Brumby Bill remains unclear
If passed, the Mr McGirr's bill would create a transition period from January 1 until July 1, 2027, at which point the previous management plan would end.
The Wild Horses Community Advisory Panel will also be dissolved, with the state government freed up to create a new management plan.
On Wednesday, Mr Gough and Mr McGirr expressed their confidence that the Bill would be approved with support from Labor and Liberals.
Mr Gough said the so-called Brumby Bill had 'no friends left' in either the upper or lower houses, including from the Liberals, Greens, and Labor.
Ms Hurst was less certain, raising the possibility it may not be supported by Nationals Party or the Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers party.
Australian Brumby Alliance President Nikki Alberts is part of a vocal minority in the community who stridently oppose the shooting of brumbies in the park.
She also expressed fears that if the Heritage Act was repealed 'they'll go in and shoot them (the brumbies) all'.
Ms Alberts said the Alliance had put forward a proposal for management of the brumby population, with a focus on rehoming.
Currently, the NSW government employs a range of brumby management measures, including trapping and rehoming and early-days immunocontraceptives.
Originally published as New push to end controversial protections for NSW's Snowy Mountain brumbies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
20 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'Ashamed': Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestine branded 'absolute worst' foreign policy move after Hamas praise
The Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestine has been branded 'foreign policy at its absolute worst', after the announcement was praised by Hamas and criticised by the United States' top diplomat. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has claimed the government's decision to recognise Palestine at an upcoming United Nations meeting would help to 'isolate Hamas'. However, this was called into question on Wednesday when the listed terrorist organisation released a statement endorsing the move and praising Mr Albanese's 'political courage'. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Wednesday evening, veteran foreign affairs editor Greg Sheridan said it was shameful to see an Australian prime minister receiving such praise. 'I'm ashamed that an Australian Prime Minister is being lavishly praised by the most bloodthirsty, sick, sadistic, sexualized, sadistic terrorist group in the world, who praise his courage and say that he has advanced their cause,' Mr Sheridan said. The veteran journalist and foreign editor at The Australian said the Albanese government had achieved something unique in the nation's history, being both praised by a terrorist group and criticised by a key ally. 'On the same day it has been lavishly praised by the worst terrorist group in the world… the United States Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, a long-time friend of Australia, (and) very responsible, seasoned internationalist US Senator… says that Albanese is engaged in worthless populism for domestic politics,' he said. 'He could have been a lot tougher on it than that. 'Yet according to Albanese, Marco Rubio knows nothing about the Middle East… and Hamas knows nothing about what's in Hamas interests. Albanese and Penny Wong know everything - they've apparently dealt a death blow to Hamas and earned the thanks of the free world. 'I mean, this is Australian foreign policy at its absolute worst. When you are loved by the terrorists and you are making your closest allies pull their hair out in frustration, you are on the wrong course.' Asked about the growing number of countries who have announced plans to recognise Palestine at the September meeting of the UN, Secretary Rubio said such moves were 'largely meaningless'. 'It's symbolic, and they're doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,' he said. 'The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. It's not going to be decided by some press release by prime minister or president from some country. It's going to be decided on the ground, fact. 'All these statements are meaningless… They're not going to change anything.' The federal Coalition also lashed out at the decision on Wednesday, with shadow foreign minister Michaelia Cash saying it was a 'sad day for our nation'. 'Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should hang his head in shame after being praised today by the terrorist group Hamas for his decision to recognise a Palestinian state,' Senator Cash said in a statement. 'Mr Albanese has emboldened a terror group who murder civilians in cold blood and still hold 50 Israeli hostages in tunnels under Gaza. 'All Australians should be appalled at the massive propaganda victory Mr Albanese has handed Hamas on a platter.' However, Australia is not alone in announcing plans to recognise Palestine. French President Emmanual Macron, United Kingdom Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney have all recently announced similar plans.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
US urges Australia and regional allies to increase military spending, warning that time is running out to deter Beijing
The United States has ramped up its call for a stronger military posture from Australia and its Asian allies, warning they cannot afford to lag behind while European nations dramatically boost their defence spending in response to global threats. With the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in the Pacific looming, the Pentagon has issued a clear message - deterrence against China must become a collective priority. Senior US defence officials are looking to fortify military ties across the Indo-Pacific, with a pointed focus on Canberra and Tokyo. 'We need our allies to step up,' a US defence official told the Australian. 'How does it make sense for our Asian allies to sit back while the Europeans are stepping up and committing to 5 per cent of GDP to deal with Russia, which is one tenth the GDP of China?' While NATO members agreed in June to lift defence spending to five per cent of GDP, Washington sees Asian partners as lagging behind. South Korea has been singled out as a model ally, praised for its robust defence budget and substantial standing forces. Australia, by contrast, is facing criticism from US officials who argue Canberra is not investing enough, even to fulfil its commitments under AUKUS Pillar 1, which involves acquiring at least three US-built Virginia-class nuclear submarines. 'On defence spending, the objective analysis is that the Australian government is not spending enough on defence, even for Pillar I,' the official continued. 'This is a very real near-term problem. We have essentially no time in defence terms before 2027.' The year 2027 is viewed within the Pentagon as a key strategic benchmark, with intelligence suggesting Beijing could be in a position to launch an attempt to take Taiwan by then. In Washington, there's growing unease that Australia may not be pulling its weight. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's recent Curtin Oration, in which he praised former PM John Curtin for resisting pressure from wartime leaders Churchill and Roosevelt, has reportedly triggered concerns among Trump-aligned figures. The speech was seen as a subtle signal of resistance to rising American expectations, especially in light of mounting calls for Australia to commit more resources to AUKUS and the wider regional deterrence posture. Inside the Pentagon, key strategic goals include strengthening homeland defence, reinvigorating the US industrial base, countering China's growing assertiveness, and ensuring allies 'do more to pick up slack'. The ongoing AUKUS review, led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, is being described as 'fact-based, rigorous, and empirical'. It covers both Pillar 1 and Pillar 2, the latter focused on sharing advanced defence technologies with Australia and the UK. 'I think the main thrust of the review is to give people a real brass-tacks, clear-eyed understanding of where things stand,' a US official explained. Australia has already pledged $1.6 billion to support the US shipbuilding sector under the AUKUS framework.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Victoria is the nation's debt dunce but the competition is hotting up
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has previously indicated she is up for a conversation about how to broaden the tax base of states that don't have access to lucrative resource royalties. It may surprise some to learn that if you mention vertical fiscal imbalance, the premier can talk the leg off a chair. She also understands the urgency. Although a national agreement on health funding – the biggest expense items within her government's budget – commits the Commonwealth to eventually provide what the states consider a fair share, that day is still 10 years away. In the meantime, the state must find savings elsewhere or keep borrowing to make up the shortfall. This year the funding gap is $1.6 billion in a $22 billion health budget. (This column's earlier, unsolicited advice for the premier to dump her pet infrastructure project, the Suburban Rail Loop, has so far gone unheeded.) The state premiers didn't make it onto Chalmers' guest list and state/federal finances aren't on the agenda of his three-day powwow in Canberra next week. Eslake doesn't criticise these omissions from an already jam-packed roundtable program but he wonders how bad things need to get before Australia turns its mind to the thorny problem of rebalancing how money is spent and how revenue is raised across the Commonwealth. 'I think federal/state financial relations is an important issue, but I don't have a lot of company,' he laments. So, what exactly is this $900 billion elephant? According to the latest budget figures compiled by S&P Global Ratings, an international rating company that keeps a close eye on the fiscal position of the federal and state governments, this is the combined, gross debt of Australian states and territories forecast for the end of this decade. If we include the gross debt forecast to be on the federal government's own books by that stage, Australia's debt mountain will reach a $2.1 trillion base camp by June 30, 2029 along the way to a still unknown peak. Victoria, by its own budget figures, is the most indebted state in Australia. The $213 billion gross debt it has amassed as of July 1 this year represents nearly one third of the total debt currently owed by all states and territories combined. The best news for Victoria is that, in its push towards fiscal profligacy, it has some serious competition from Queensland and Tasmania. S&P lead analyst Martin Foo says while Victoria still has the weakest balance sheet of all state and territory governments, its raft of new property and payroll taxes unpopular with business has at least stabilised its fiscal position. 'We have pointed out consistently that a lot of the fiscal challenges Australia faces right now are at the state level, rather than federal level,' he says. 'Victoria has been the focus of attention for the last couple of years. Maybe it has flown under the radar a bit but some of the mid-sized and smaller states, particularly Tasmania and Queensland, are accumulating debt at a very rapid pace.' Eslake reckons his home state of Tasmania, which remains without a functioning government after two elections in the space of 15 months, already deserves Victoria's mantle as Australia's fiscal dunce. In 2019, Tasmania's gross debt was just $3.2 billion. That figure is forecast to treble this year and to increase more than six-fold from its pre-pandemic level by 2029. Loading Queensland is sharply accelerating the amount of debt it is taking on, with last year's figure of $106.6 billion forecast to nearly double by the end of the decade as the state prepares for the 2032 Olympics. Although these numbers look scarier the further you look into the future, the source of the problem is more immediate. The S&P figures show that in the last financial year, the states and territories posted a combined cash deficit of $55 billion.
