Robert Kraft's son launches campaign for Boston mayor
The son of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, Josh Kraft, has launched a campaign to be Boston's mayor.
'I love with this city with its many unique neighborhoods, and its people. The people of Boston are hard working, humble, and above all, proud of this city, no matter which neighborhood they come from,' the younger Kraft said Tuesday in a post on Facebook.
'Serving Boston has been my passion and a great source of joy and purpose in my life, which is why I am running for Mayor,' he added. 'I hope you will join my campaign to bring more housing and more opportunity to Boston.'
Josh Kraft, who is running as a Democrat, according to his campaign website, has a father with historically close ties to President Trump. According to his Facebook page, the younger Kraft is the New England Patriots Foundation president.
'I've spent my entire career working in and around the neighborhoods of Boston — from Roslindale to East Boston, from Mattapan to Charlestown, from South Boston to Roxbury, first as employee and then as CEO of the Boys and Girls Clubs of Boston,' Josh Kraft's Facebook post reads.
Robert Kraft, in October, equated President Trump to a 'drunk fraternity brother' during his first time in the White House, noting their previous longtime friendship.
'I couldn't believe it,' Robert Kraft told Charlamagne tha God on 'The Breakfast Club' radio program. 'It was like having someone who's a drunk fraternity brother become [president of the United States].'
Earlier in the interview, Kraft said he's a Democrat but that Trump 'became a social friend in the early '90s' when he was going down to Florida.
'And then when my wife of blessed memory died 13 years ago, he was one of four or five people who reached out to me and was really, really nice,' Kraft continued. 'The only donation I ever gave to him was he called me when he got elected. And I made a strong donation to his inauguration.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laura Loomer faces internet backlash after ‘body shaming' AOC during NYC's Puerto Rico day
The Internet has come out in full force against far-right activist Laura Loomer after she 'body shamed' New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — with Internet sleuths digging up a photo of the Trump ally in a similar-looking outfit. 'Yikes AOC has gained at least 50 pounds since getting into Congress,' Loomer wrote on X while sharing a clip of Ocasio-Cortez wearing a red dress as she spoke at New York City's Puerto Rican Day Parade on Sunday. 'She's getting massive,' Loomer added before tagging the congresswoman. However, social media users did not take kindly to Loomer's bizarre criticism. Her post drew in over 13,000 largely negative comments by Monday morning. 'Body shaming isn't the way,' one person commented under the post. Another chimed in: 'I am no Democrat but you attacking another woman's look is very disgusting.' Countless Internet users took the attack on AOC as a moment to dunk on Loomer's appearance. 'If I looked in the mirror and saw what you see staring back at me, I would never speak about another person's appearance,' one person wrote. 'You look like you're wearing a purge mask, no offense,' another chimed in. 'You are the last person who should comment on someone's appearance, Looner. You're a walking plastic surgery nightmare,' a commenter added. 'She could gain another 100 and still be more attractive than you,' another person wrote. Some users even dug up photos of Loomer donning a similar red tank top dress – which they claim looked even worse on the MAGA activist. 'Here's you in an almost identical dress. What's with the belly? Pregnant?' one person wrote. 'Haha good one, is this you?' another person wrote alongside the same photo of Loomer. Other took pity on Loomer's apparent cry for help, with one commentator writing,' You are not being a very nice person. Have you considered going to therapy? @betterhelp can help.'
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Bring in the troops!': Trump raises the stakes as ICE tactics spark protests in L.A.
For those concerned about Donald Trump and his authoritarian-style agenda, the last few days have been, at a minimum, unsettling. On the East Coast, for example, military vehicles, including tanks, are getting into position to roll down the streets of the nation's capital, for a June 14 military parade to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army — which also happens to coincide with Donald Trump's birthday. And then, of course, there's the West Coast. As The Associated Press summarized: Tensions in Los Angeles escalated Sunday as thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to President Donald Trump's extraordinary deployment of the National Guard, blocking off a major freeway and setting self-driving cars on fire as law enforcement used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. In recent months, federal officials, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, have engaged in overly aggressive and legally dubious tactics while executing the White House's deportation agenda, sparking a predictable public backlash. As NBC News reported, it was against this backdrop that ICE officers on Friday carried out raids in three locations across the city, where dozens of people were taken into custody. California Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the raids, calling them 'chaotic federal sweeps' that aimed to fill an 'arbitrary arrest quota,' and protests soon followed. It was the next day when Trump announced that he was calling up 2,000 National Guard troops to quell the protests, ignoring the objections of the state's Democratic governor. As The New York Times reported, 'Governors almost always control the deployment of National Guard troops in their states,' and this marked 'the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state's National Guard force without a request from that state's governor.' (Sixty years ago, it was Lyndon B. Johnson who sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators.) Last year, while serving as South Dakota's Republican governor, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that if Joe Biden tried to federalize National Guard troops, it would constitute a 'direct attack on states' rights' and spark a 'war' between Washington and GOP-led state governments. Over the weekend, however, Noem took the opposite position. Around the same time, by way of his social media platform, Trump proceeded to celebrate the 'great job' National Guard troops did in Los Angeles before the troops actually arrived, which was bizarre but consistent with the incumbent president's general approach to reality. For his part, Newsom — whom Trump keeps describing as 'Newscum' because the president has the temperament of an ill-tempered tween — accused Trump of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' The California Democrat added, 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a president.' After Tom Homan, the administration's 'border czar,' raised the prospect of arresting state and local elected officials, Newsom effectively dared Homan to try. There's no reason to believe that conditions will improve quickly. The governor has formally asked Trump to pull Guard troops, an appeal that will likely be ignored. In the meantime, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has suggested he's prepared to deploy U.S. Marines onto American streets — a point that was echoed by U.S. Northern Command. Asked whether Americans might soon see active-duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson told ABC News that he doesn't believe such a step would be 'heavy-handed.' Soon after, the president told reporters that he's meeting with U.S. military leaders, and after publishing a statement about Los Angeles having been 'invaded and occupied,' there was renewed speculation about whether the Republican might be preparing to invoke the Insurrection Act. Indeed, Trump also wrote that he was directing Noem, Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' Shortly after midnight, on Monday morning, Trump also wrote online, 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' He similarly told reporters that he expects to have U.S. troops 'everywhere.' In his latest New York Times column, David French concluded, 'It's too early to declare a constitutional crisis, and in any case, debating the label we attach to any new event can distract us from focusing fully on the event itself. But each new day brings us fresh evidence of a deeply troubling trend: America is no longer a stable country, and it is growing less stable by the day.' A few weeks before Election Day 2024, as he referred to Americans he disagreed with as 'scum,' then-candidate Trump talked about the possible deployment of the National Guard or the U.S. military on American soil to be used against those he labeled 'the enemy from within.' At the time, it led many to wonder whether Trump, if returned to power, might be willing to use — or in this case, abuse — military resources to stifle dissent. Republicans characterized such concerns as hysterical and paranoid. Eight months later, those fears are suddenly relevant anew. This is a developing story. Check back for updates. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Biden's diagnosis shows two things. Cancer hits everyone and some forgot that
Earlier this week, former president Joe Biden announced that he'd been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. For the millions of us who've been told, 'You have cancer,' this kind of diagnosis is a deeply personal and painful moment that takes time to absorb. Then, we're faced with what seems like a zillion other questions, including whether to reveal the diagnosis and to whom. It was wrenching when I heard those three words when I was only 26. Days before Biden's announcement, a friend wrote to let me know that she'd been diagnosed with breast cancer, and that she had waited two weeks before telling anyone but her husband because she wanted her son's wedding to go off without a cloud in the sky. As she put it, 'Two weeks before the wedding, I heard, 'Yes, it is breast cancer and it's in the lymph nodes so we need to see if it's spread….'' She has a sense of humor, and so she continued, sharing her to-dos. 'All the scans and tests and MammaPrint—breast cancer crash course on staging, chemo, radiation, surgery, reconstructive surgery, wigs, side effects … oh, and don't forget to order the flowers for the rehearsal dinner.' There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to cancer. We try to do the best we can. Upon hearing the news, most politicians—whether Republican or Democrat—issued heartfelt statements of condolence, similar to what Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) posted on Facebook: 'I am saddened to hear of President Biden's cancer diagnosis and am wishing him and his family well as he begins treatment.' If you're taking notes, this is what you do when a friend, family member or colleague tells you they have a serious illness. You may even add in a hug. Opinion: Republicans keep clinging to Biden's health to ignore Trump's decline I couldn't help but notice that after some perfunctory condolences, others jumped in accusing Biden of a cover-up. As one commentator said on Fox News, 'That's a terrible thing for him and his family, so I hope he beats it. But look, I don't believe that they just found out Friday because they're not credible on anything they've done.' That turned into a drum roll, leading to bipartisan conspiracy theories about when Biden knew. 'I don't think it's coincidental that this was announced this week,' former Representative Dean Phillips (D-Minnesota) told the New York Times. 'It's hard to comport otherwise.' It doesn't help the president's case that Original Sin, a book by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, had just been published, alleging Biden insiders papered over his cognitive decline. The current president weighed in, too, telling reporters: 'I'm surprised that ... the public wasn't notified a long time ago because to get to stage 9 [the stage of disease that Biden faces is] that's a long time." Trump added, '[S]omebody is not telling the facts. … It's a big problem.' By the way, Biden does not have 'stage 9' disease; there's no such thing. The nine refers to his Gleason score, which is a way of assessing how likely cancer cells are to grow and spread. Knowledge matters. Understanding, even more so. But yes, the former president has advanced and metastatic cancer. Medical experts agree that Biden had this cancer for some time, no doubt during his presidency. But 'having' it is not the same as 'knowing' it, which is also different than 'hiding' it. When my sister was diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer in late 2017, it was clear to both of us that she'd had the disease for quite some time, likely years. But she only found that out after all the necessary tests, including a nine-hour 'debulking' surgery. Diagnosis, staging and developing a treatment plan take time, whether you're a former president or one of the 2 million Americans who will be diagnosed this year. Opinion: Republicans keep clinging to Biden's health to ignore Trump's decline Biden's critics have rushed to judgment, which is never wise, and even less so in frightening medical situations. Sometimes those of us with cancer get ahead of ourselves, too, finding ourselves going down rabbit holes. This is why I try to practice a philosophy of 'wait to worry'−or stay in the present. Patience, people. As the days go by, we're learning more. In fact, since the initial announcement, a Biden spokesperson disclosed that the president received his last known blood test, what's known as the PSA, to check for prostate cancer, in 2014, when he was 72. (He's now 82.) That's in line with the current guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which 'recommends against PSA-screening for prostate cancer in men 70 years and older.' (According to its website, this recommendation is currently being updated.) More than 600,000 Americans will die from cancer this year, according to the National Cancer Institute; even with improved treatments and outcomes, this disease–'the emperor of all maladies'–is frightening. I think about my friends with this disease, not to mention my sister, and try to remember to think before I speak or tweet. And to lead from the heart because, as we all know, 'there but for the grace of God go I." Steven Petrow is a columnist who writes on civility and manners and the author of seven books, including 'The Joy You Make' and "Stupid Things I Won't Do When I Get Old." Follow him on Threads: @ You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Biden's cancer diagnosis reminds we politicize everything | Opinion
