How Whanganui Achieved Lowest Rates In The Country
Mayor Andrew Tripe says the low figure is the envy of the country and the payoff in a sustained drive to adjust how the council operates.
"[It] didn't happen by accident - it's the result of a deliberate strategy to keep costs under control," Tripe said.
"Many of the savings are structural and will flow through to future years. We expect there will be opportunities to reduce the 2026/27 rates increase as well."
In a survey by Local Democracy Reporting on average rates for 2025/26 throughout the country, Waitomo District Council had the next lowest rates at 2.9 percent, and Bay of Plenty Regional Council was third lowest in the country at 3.0 percent.
Five councils - Upper Hutt City, Waipa District, Hamilton City, Hastings District and Clutha District - were looking at jumps of 15-17 percent.
The average rates hike is about 8.7 percent, compared with last year's 14 percent.
In his first tilt at local government in 2022, Tripe's successful campaign for the mayoralty included driving efficiencies to reduce the rates burden.
A six-point plan was developed early in the electoral term to reduce costs and ease reliance on rates.
As well as improving efficiency, the plan looked at reducing services, finding alternative funding for projects, identifying non-rates sources of revenue, and growing the population so there were more households to pitch in on rates.
"The plan has taken a while to get some traction, however the benefits of that approach are now starting to show," Tripe said.
The savings drive led to works and services being deferred, scaled back or cut but Tripe said investment in infrastructure had been prioritised.
Variations to the long-term plan included Tripe's push to ditch a planned food scrap collection, reducing rates by $1 million or about 1.5 percent, he said.
Council restructuring saved $1.2m a year.
Deferrals
Deferrals included pushing out by a year a $1m grant for Whanganui Surf Lifesaving Service's rescue centre. The project was not at the stage where funding was needed, Tripe said.
An $8m of planned spending on an opera house upgrade was delayed to await a business case.
The Waitahinga Quarry development project was deferred while the council focused on other projects, and all council vehicle replacements have been deferred for the year.
A planned full review of the district plan has also been deferred, saving $700,000. Tripe said the council was no longer required to conduct a full review of the plan following central government's decision to make changes to the Resource Management Act.
Non-rates income was expected to increase by almost 20 percent in the year ahead.
"We are expecting higher fee revenue in some activities such as parking and aquatics.
"We have moderated our property renewals budget down for affordability and to ensure we can deliver the planned programme.
"Three waters capital programmes have been moderated to ensure that they are deliverable in the 2025/26 financial year."
The council had also made minor reductions to venues improvement budgets and optimised corporate budgets for items like IT hardware replacements.
It was committed to "investing solidly" in core infrastructure, with more than 80 percent of capital spending earmarked over the next 10 years for the likes of footpaths, roading, and stormwater.
There was also an 11 percent increase in infrastructure spending from 2024/25.
The council also tightened spending on insurance cover by taking a risk-based approach on property and removing some assets from its insurance schedule.
Unbalanced budget
The council has forecast an unbalanced budget of $5.5 million for 2025/26 due to increased depreciation costs from inflation and large new assets like the redeveloped Sarjeant Gallery and wastewater treatment plant.
"While we are repaying debt on these long-life assets, we believe it's not fair for current ratepayers to also fund future replacements. Running an unbalanced budget is prudent in the short-term."
Tripe said the council's balance sheet was strong, debt was under control and additional repayments were being made to loans.
Asked how these decisions would affect long-term planning, Tripe said the council was looking beyond the short-term and planning for the future.
"We're creating a strategy for Whanganui with five goals: to grow, build for, protect, celebrate and activate Whanganui."
This included plans to establish a standalone entity to improve housing stock and allocating an extra $590,000 toward debt repayment, on top of existing repayments.
Paying down debt more quickly would benefit future generations, Tripe said.
"This equates to 0.7 percent of the 2.2 percent average rates increase."
Asked if he was confident the council was investing adequately in the district's future, Tripe said Whanganui was faring well in a difficult national economy.
"We should be excited about our future. Whanganui has a fantastic range of facilities for our community and the council is committed to maintaining these and ensuring that the infrastructure is in place for Whanganui to continue to be a great place to live, work and visit."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Northland orca expert: Reject Waipiro Bay marina fast-tracking
It would span the equivalent of about 17 rugby fields, with dredging up to 3m deep removing the equivalent of about 21,000 twenty tonne truckloads of seabed. Dredgings will be made into mudcrete to help reclaim the equivalent of about six rugby fields of the area for carparks and shops. The marina design notably includes 14 super-sized 50m boat berths, for which no potential price range has been indicated in economic reports supporting the application. The applicant's economist estimates 30m berths could sell for up to $1.2 million. A spokesperson for Heatley's Azuma Properties and Hopper's Hopper Developments said they were taking a cautious approach regarding wildlife impacts Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop Bishop is considering whether to allow the developers to apply for fast-tracked consenting via an expert panel. A spokesperson for Bishop would not confirm a decision date, stating only that 'advice to inform a decision is expected shortly'. In response to Visser's orca concerns, Bishop's spokesperson said he was able to make an assessment based on feedback from a range of people including locals, the Minister for the Environment, other relevant ministers, local authorities and Māori groups. If referred, the developers can submit a more detailed application, which the spokesperson said would be subject to Environmental Protection Authority checks. Bishop's spokesperson said fast-tracking cut through the 'thicket of red and green tape and the jumble of approvals processes that has, until now held NZ back from much-needed economic growth while still protecting the environment'. Meanwhile the developers' spokesperson said the marina aimed to enhance boating access and services for the eastern Bay of Islands, while contributing to the local economy and community. 'We know how important it is to approach this kind of development with care - especially in a coastal environment like Waipiro Bay. 'Hoppers and Azuma are committed to responsible development and have a strong track record of delivering high-quality marine projects,' the spokesperson said. Visser has written to Bishop outlining her concerns, saying the marina should instead go through the standard Resource Management Act (RMA) process so community views can be properly considered. Her stance aligns with Far North Mayor Moko Tepania, who recently said the RMA allows people to have their say. Visser said the fast-track application 'underplayed' the long-term and irreversible environmental changes that would severely affect orcas and dolphins. She also challenged the application's claim that the marina would not adversely alter marine mammal habitats. Waipiro Bay marina could not be viewed in isolation from other coastal developments across NZ, she said. 'People think of it like it's just a single marina, but that's not the case.' Visser said orcas travelled 100–150 km a day along the coastline. 'They live as long as humans do. Think about how much coastal development we've seen in our lifetimes, and you'll understand what orca are facing. There's a cumulative impact.' Visser said the proposed Waipiro Bay marina would permanently destroy a nationally important area for NZ's fewer than 200 orca, which are ranked as 'nationally critical' — the Government's highest threat level. She said orca needed relatively undeveloped places to rest, socialise, raise young and feed. Developers are seeking the option of fast-track consenting to develop a $100 million-plus marina to the left of the yachts moored in the foreground Waipiro Bay. Waipiro Bay was one of those key places, making it significant in an increasingly crowded marine environment. Visser said the wider Bay of Islands, including Waipiro Bay, was declared a marine mammal sanctuary in November 2021. The sanctuary restricts human and boating interaction within 300 metres of marine mammals. Visser said the marina's public boat ramp would dramatically increase vessel traffic in Waipiro Bay and surrounding areas, raising the risk of harmful boat interactions including boat strike which she had already documented in the Bay of Islands. Dr Ingrid Visser's decades of work looing out for orcas was regonsied with a Kiwibank Local hero of the Year Award in 2024 However, the developers' spokesperson said orca pods successfully navigated Whangārei Harbour's Marsden Cove marina, another Hopper development. Orca often hunted stingray there, offering onlookers memorable experiences. 'Their presence and co-habitation is something we value,' the spokesperson said. The developers reiterated that Waipiro Bay marina was designed to be functional and beneficial to the local community and economy. ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Future of ORC now under scrutiny
The much maligned Otago Regional Council (and for justifiable reasons) has now attracted the attention of Shane Jones, the Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Resources, and for justifiable reasons. After 35 years of existence regional councils have not delivered the promise of balanced environmental and productive outcomes. One of the many problems is the institutionalisation of long-standing councillors which also needs the minister's attention but not through any internal local government review. Here's why a totally independent review is crucial. Please read on as here is yet another horror story about to unfold. During the 1930s at St Bathans, the Falls Dam was built to supply water for gold mining, irrigation and to supplement the Manuherikia River. Water races were built to bring water to Omakau and the parched land on the way to enable the growing of crops that could only grow in this area with the addition of water. The wise people in Wellington said, we will give you a right to take and use this captured water forever, so as to benefit us all by growing food. This was widely seen as a great idea at the time by the entire populous. Mercifully, environmentalists hadn't been invented at that time. Irrigatable land was allocated a certain amount of water and with a right to use. In times of drought , those with "prior right ranking" retained the right to take and use this captured water. It was widely reported that even back then, water for the river was always seen as a first priority. All was fine until the Resource Management Act (RMA ) came into being in 1989 and extinguished all water rights — even to this captured water. Regional councils had a 30-year lead-in period to prepare for this massive change. Meantime the Falls Dam structure — along with other dams in the area and built around the same time, were quietly sold to the water users by the government of the day for a peppercorn. The government clearly had reports on the deteriorating condition of the dams, so they knew the dams were a contingent liability. The dams would need replacing so they happily sold the dams to the water users but not necessarily with the water right to fill the dams. That would require a process led by the regional council, with its urban-based majority. The council then allowed a water "permit" to be issued to water users but with a renewal demand from the regional council every six years. Meantime the dam became increasingly in need of replacement and $100million to do so. The Dangerous Dams legislation was passed some years ago, which forces the dam owners and water users to replace the dam. So, where will the money come from? Question: who would invest one New Zealand dollar in this rebuild if the environmental lobby (who will contribute even less) can control the flows from the dam — as they do through an urban majority on the ORC? This is only one reason why Mr Jones is worthy of unstinted praise for his commentary on a failed system called regional councils. Regretfully, the ORC is controlled by a majority of councillors who still believe we can build hospitals without productivity in all its many forms. Recently, a staff report on the area to where the Macraes gold mine wishes to expand, identified a number of rare and or endangered invertebrates in the same area, so the competing interests are at loggerheads. The gold mine, of course, is a successful commercial enterprise offering 600 jobs and contributing to the wellbeing of our region and indeed New Zealand. The ORC is a not-for-profit organisation which feels compelled to save everything that crawls, hops, skips, flies and swims — albeit in smallish numbers — and which simply cannot be moved to a safer spot. We humans can easily be repatriated but apparently insects don't or can't — at least according to the ORC. There surely must be a tradeoff to be had. Now, the great irony is that there is increasing noise around the repatriation of the ORC itself — out of existence or to an area known as a unitary council. This has happened further north and with some success. A small complicating factor could be — what to do with the ORCs brand new $60-plus-million headquarters. One unkind thought would be to turn the building into a insectarium which is safe haven for any and all endangered species — excluding ORC councillors and staff. On second thoughts maybe a place could be found for them as well. ■Gerrard Eckhoff is a former Otago regional councillor and Act New Zealand MP.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mixed reaction to planning halt
A Dunedin city councillor says her blood "runs cold" at the government's decision to halt council planning work ahead of an overhaul of resource management laws. However, some elected representatives across Otago are welcoming the changes and Dunedin's mayor says he sees an opportunity. Changes to council planning were announced yesterday at a Local Government New Zealand conference by the Minister Responsible for Resource Management Act (RMA) reform, Chris Bishop. The government would stop "unnecessary" plan changes — suspending requirements for councils to review plans or implement national planning standards. They would be unable to notify new plan or policy statements or changes to them unless they met certain exemption criteria. Mr Bishop said councils were spending too much time on plan processes which would likely be incomplete or "largely wasted" under the government's RMA replacement — expected to be in place by 2027. Dunedin city councillor Sophie Barker said she was concerned the government was "riding roughshod" over the wishes of local communities. "This is a government that preached localism as important, then looks to be taking our planning decisions out of our hands, and that of our communities. "When I see rhetoric like ... Mr Bishop's speech my blood does run cold." Cr Lee Vandervis said the RMA changes would save council time and money and allow staff to be involved in more productive local work. "The less work we have to do for central government and [Otago Regional Council] compliance, the more we can concentrate on making Dunedin resilient and self-sufficient." Dunedin Mayor Jules Radich viewed the situation as an opportunity. "This could be the ideal time to drive higher growth in Dunedin based on lower costs, more jobs and higher income," he said. Cr Steve Walker said the "Americanisation of New Zealand politics by this coalition government is leading us to a place most reasonable New Zealanders don't want to go". Cr Carmen Houlahan said most people at the conference "aren't that impressed" with the "massive" changes planned for local government. Also at the conference was Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan, who said local government delegates were "underwhelmed" by Mr Bishop's speech. "We're getting used to the contempt shown by this government now, as this is the second year we've had much the same approach from ministers. "I think one person may accidentally have clapped." Mr Cadogan said it brought more "unrealistic pressure" on councils. "It's pretty hard going when you're all, as councils, faced with mounting costs, huge rate rises and then there's strong conversation around rates capping." Otago regional councillor Michael Laws described local government as a "make-work scheme". "It's a whole series of people with vision statements, policy and plans and agendas that really just create work for themselves ... and impede in the most negative way on the daily lives of us all." The government's response to local and regional council bureaucrats and "ineffectual governors" was deserved, he said. Cr Laws said his reading of Mr Bishop's speech was all the regional council's work under way on plans and policy statements would have to stop and this would include the regional policy statement in mediation. There would be a full briefing at the council today on the situation, he said. Yesterday, the Otago Daily Times asked councils across the South what they made of the announcement. Most said it was too early to make a detailed comment on the announcement and they would take time to consider how it would affect their operations. Several were unable respond to the ODT's questions before deadline. —Additional reporting APL staff
