logo
Sheikh Hasina charged with crimes against humanity: The court in question, what she is accused of

Sheikh Hasina charged with crimes against humanity: The court in question, what she is accused of

Indian Express2 days ago

Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal accepted on Sunday (June 1) that ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina could be charged with crimes against humanity.
The court directed investigators to produce Hasina, as well as a former home minister and a former police chief, before the court on June 16. Hasina has been in exile in India since August 2024, when an uprising led to the culmination of her 15-year reign in power. Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December 2024.
What is the standing of this court, and what is Hasina accused of? We explain.
The tribunal was established under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act. It was passed two years after the Liberation War of 1971 led to the formation of Bangladesh, formerly known as East Pakistan.
The Act provided for the 'detection, prosecution and punishment of persons for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and other crimes under International Law committed in the territory of Bangladesh during the war of Liberation, particularly between 25 March to 16 December 1971.'
It was seen as necessary, given the bloody nine-month period of fighting unleashed by the forces of West Pakistan, which rejected the results of the 1970 general elections. In East Pakistan, the Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (the father of Sheikh Hasina), won 160 of the 162 electoral seats. However, the ruling establishment of Pakistan refused to accord legitimacy to the win to restrict the growth of a popular, Bengali nationalist sentiment.
As a result of brewing discontent in East Pakistan due to the imposition of West Pakistan's cultural and political ideas over the years, it had the opposite effect, and protests broke out. On March 25, 1971, the Pakistani military began a brutal crackdown that saw the mass slaughter of Bengalis and the influx of Bangladeshi refugees into India. The conflict ended on December 16, days after India formally declared war on Pakistan on December 4.
How was the tribunal formed?
According to the book Trials for International Crimes in Asia (2015), some 82,000 members of the Pakistani armed forces and some 11,000 civilians were taken as prisoners of war or internees by the joint command of the Bangladesh and Indian forces. The Act was passed in 1973 to try 195 prisoners of war who were alleged to have committed war crimes.
However, in February 1974, 'Pakistan recognised Bangladesh as an independent state and the relationship between the two countries improved.' Bangladesh then granted clemency to the 195 suspects, and they were repatriated to Pakistan.
More than three decades later, the Hasina-led Awami League government 'revived the idea of trials, declaring its intention to prosecute members of the political opposition for war crimes.' To do so, it amended the Act in 2009 to include civilians under its ambit and formed a three-member tribunal, known as the International Crimes Tribunal.
Among the first people it prosecuted were members of the political opposition, including the Jamaat-e-Islami. The party was opposed to the liberation of Bangladesh and advocated for remaining with Pakistan, but has maintained that it did not commit atrocities during the war.
According to an AFP report, under Hasina, the ICT sentenced more than 100 people to death. The court was often criticised by rights groups for not following international conventions. For instance, the book notes that the 1973 Act permits trials in absentia (without the accused present), despite the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserting a person's right to be tried 'in his presence'.
Hasina was ousted following weeks of protests, initially led by students who opposed a controversial court decision to extend a quota in public jobs and education. The quota was for the children and grandchildren of people who fought in the Liberation War.
The government agreed to the protesters' demands on scrapping the quota, but the situation worsened after Hasina equated the protesters with the descendants of the razakars – those who led the brutal repression during the 1971 war. Over time, it coalesced into anti-Hasina protests, and the subsequent police crackdown saw more than 450 people killed.
According to the Bangladeshi newspaper The Daily Star, five specific charges have been brought against Hasina. Chief Prosecutor Tajul Islam submitted the complaint to the tribunal, including counts of murder, attempt to murder, and other 'inhumane' acts. The defendants were accused of 'inciting, facilitating, being complicit in, and failing to prevent these crimes committed against civilians by law enforcement and armed cadres of the Awami League and its affiliates.'
Second, Sheikh Hasina is accused of 'ordering the extermination of student protesters through the use of helicopters, drones, and lethal weapons.' It then accuses them in the case of the murder of Abu Sayed, a protesting student, near Begum Rokeya University in Rangpur. 'Sheikh Hasina is accused of making inflammatory remarks and ordering the use of deadly weapons against protesting students,' the report said.
There are two other cases mentioned – the shooting and murder of six unarmed protesters in Dhaka's Chankharpul and the shooting of six student protesters in Ashulia.
Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India.
... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Modi bowed to Trump, but Indira made Pak bow by confronting US: Jagga Reddy
Modi bowed to Trump, but Indira made Pak bow by confronting US: Jagga Reddy

Hans India

time31 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Modi bowed to Trump, but Indira made Pak bow by confronting US: Jagga Reddy

Hyderabad: Telangana PCC working president T Jagga Reddy claimed here on Monday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi bowed to US President Donald Trump. This was in contrast to ex-prime minister Indira Gandhi, who made Pakistan bow by confronting the US, he said at a press conference in Gandhi Bhavan. Reddy pointed out that terrorists infiltrated from Pakistan into Kashmir and killed 26 people, yet the BJP government showed no response. 'You made mistakes; why blame Rahul Gandhi? Kishan Reddy and Sanjay must answer for their failures, otherwise, we will retaliate', he warned. According to Reddy, Rahul Gandhi, as the Opposition leader, demanded a parliamentary session and answers for people. 'Was that a crime? You compromised because of Trump, but you blame Rahul Gandhi's family? You are the ones doing politics using Pakistan, it was Modi who secretly visited the Pakistani PM's house. BJP ministers answer this. Rahul Gandhi never visited Pakistan. Modi, however, skipped Atal Bihari Vajpayee's birthday, went to Pakistan, fed cake to Nawaz Sharif, and gave clothes to his mother,' the Congress leader said. The TPCC leader wanted the BJP to apologise for spreading false propaganda against Rahul Gandhi as baseless allegations were being made against him. He claimed that the BJP government was in shock. 'Kishan Reddy and Bandi Sanjay are attacking Rahul Gandhi. Instead of answering Rahul Gandhi's questions, Modi is criticising him. The Intelligence department must answer how terrorists entered Kashmir and killed 26 people in a park. Kishan Reddy and Sanjay must answer why has Modi still not addressed the nation? While in a state of slumber, you're criticising Rahul Gandhi and diverting politics. You made mistakes—why blame the opposition leader? You speak ignorantly despite having knowledge,' he said. Reddy said while a war seemed imminent, people believed Modi would defeat Pakistan; suddenly news broke that the war was stopped. Everyone expected a statement from Modi, but instead, Trump made the announcement. 'Rahul Gandhi said, 'Go ahead with the war, we will stand behind you'. But it was Trump who announced that he stopped the India-Pakistan war. Isn't it shameful that Trump announced the ceasefire instead of Modi? You compromised, and yet you blame our leader,' he thundered. 'As soon as Trump made that announcement, Indira Gandhi's legacy started trending on social media. People opposed Modi bowing to Trump's words. During Indira Gandhi's time, even when America tried to interfere, she boldly stated that no interference was needed,' he said. He claimed that Modi skipped Vajpayee's birthday to go to Pakistan. 'Didn't he go to Nawaz Sharif's house and touch his mother's feet? You must answer this. Is it appropriate to go to Pakistan secretly on Vajpayee's birthday? Kishan Reddy and Sanjay must answer, then talk about Rahul Gandhi. Where do you hide your face for Modi's mistakes? Indira Gandhi was compared to Goddess Durga in Parliament. Modi abrogated Article 370… then why is terrorism back? A PM who cursed Pakistan three times, yet didn't even identify the person who killed 26 people. Don't you feel ashamed, Kishan Reddy', he asked. Jagga Reddy asserted that BJP leaders in Telangana have heads but no brains, and that they are full of conspiracies and deceit.

Tharoor-led Indian MP delegation, Pakistani team both to be in Washington at same time
Tharoor-led Indian MP delegation, Pakistani team both to be in Washington at same time

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tharoor-led Indian MP delegation, Pakistani team both to be in Washington at same time

An Indian parliamentary delegation, led by Shashi Tharoor, is currently in the United States, coinciding with the anticipated arrival of a Pakistani delegation in Washington. Tharoor highlighted the potential for increased attention due to the presence of these two delegations in the same city simultaneously. The Indian delegation showcases the country's diverse political representation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads An Indian parliamentary delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor will be in the United States for the final leg of its official visit. Interestingly, a Pakistani delegation is expected to be in Washington at the same time, leading to what Tharoor described as an 'interesting phenomenon'.Speaking about the timing, Tharoor noted that the Pakistani group would 'almost' be in Washington 'on the same date' as the Indian team. 'Tomorrow, they will be in Washington,' he said, adding, 'We will also be in Washington on the same day.'He said this overlapping presence could draw attention. 'There may be an increase in interest,' Tharoor remarked, 'because of the fact that there are two duelling delegations in the same city.'The Indian delegation includes Members of Parliament from different political parties. The team comprises Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur, Shashank M Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, and Tejasvi Surya, along with former Indian Ambassador to the US, Taranjit Singh visit to the United States is part of India's larger global outreach following the Pahalgam terror attack, aimed at conveying India's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism.

Thane police file charge sheets in 48 hours in three crimes against women
Thane police file charge sheets in 48 hours in three crimes against women

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Thane police file charge sheets in 48 hours in three crimes against women

THANE: In a move towards ensuring speedy justice, the Thane police have taken swift action in three cases involving crimes against women. The Kolsewadi, Manpada and Bazarpeth police stations, which fall within Zone 3 of the Thane police commissionerate, have successfully completed investigations and filed charge sheets in three separate cases within 48 hours of the crimes' registration, officers said. All three cases involve sexual harassment. In the first case, the Kolsewadi police received a distress call from a hospital after a 16-year-old girl attempted suicide. Assistant police inspector (API) Suresh Narwade immediately dispatched a team to the hospital, where the girl told the police that her father had verbally abused and sexually harassed her for using a mobile phone, said an officer. The Kolsewadi police arrested the accused and booked him for sexual harassment under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, 2012. In another case, a 30-year-old woman from Manpada in Dombivli was allegedly sexually harassed by her maternal uncle via WhatsApp messages. The woman, who has lost both parents and lives alone, was disturbed after her brother, who had moved out of the state, announced his marriage over a family WhatsApp group without personally informing her, said the police. After she expressed her hurt through a message in the group, her maternal uncle allegedly sent her vulgar and abusive replies. Initially hesitant, the woman eventually approached a lawyer friend who helped her file a police complaint. API Eknath Paulbudhe from the Manpada police station said that his team gathered crucial digital evidence, including the WhatsApp chat history, call data records and statements from both parties and witnesses, before filing a charge sheet within 48 hours. 'Recording statements immediately is key, as it captures vital details from the victim and witnesses,' said API Paulbudhe. 'Quick filing of charge sheets helps initiate and conclude trials faster, easing the burden on courts and police officers.' In the third case, a 24-year-old woman filed a complaint against her brother-in-law for sexually harassing her and threatening her family. According to the Bazarpeth police, on the evening of May 25, the accused allegedly visited the woman's house and said, 'My wife no longer lives with me. Come with me to a lodge and fulfil my desires.' He also allegedly verbally abused her and her parents. API Amol Andhale from the Bazarpeth police station registered a case under BNS sections 74 (assault or use of criminal force against woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 75 (sexual harassment), 79 (acts, gestures, or words intended to insult a woman's modesty), 351(2) (criminal intimidation), and 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace). 'Our officers have successfully filed charge sheets in three cases within 48 hours,' deputy commissioner of police (zone 3) Atul Zende. 'We are giving top priority to women-related cases, ensuring swift investigation and legal action. It is our responsibility to create and maintain a safe environment for women in our jurisdiction.' Varsha Chandane, public prosecutor at the Thane sessions court, who has been handling women-related cases, said, 'It is truly commendable to file charge sheets promptly and begin the trial immediately. This prevents the misuse of time, which often leads to witnesses turning hostile. In many cases, we've seen that by the time the trial begins—sometimes after a year or more—witnesses forget crucial details. This can ultimately benefit the accused. Such swift action must continue in order to ensure justice is delivered.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store