Wife Says ICE Denied Husband Medical Care
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The wife of a Colombian asylum-seeker detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is accusing the agency of violating his rights, allegedly denying him medical care, and attempting to deport him without a court hearing.
Manuela Flórez, 28, says her husband, Juan Eduardo Pineda Noreña, 32, was arrested by federal immigration agents in the parking lot of his plumbing job in Summit, New Jersey, on July 15, 2025.
"I feel broken, exhausted, and desperate. Every day is a fight to save him. I'm watching the person I love suffer in silence, and I feel powerless," Flórez told Newsweek.
"They didn't allow him to contact anyone, didn't explain what was happening, and treated him like a criminal—despite him having no criminal record and an active asylum case," she added.
Newsweek has contacted ICE as well as its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
Manuela Flórez, 28, is pictured here with her husband, Juan Eduardo Pineda Noreña, 32.
Manuela Flórez, 28, is pictured here with her husband, Juan Eduardo Pineda Noreña, 32.
Supplied
Why It Matters
Immigration authorities have faced increased scrutiny amid allegations of misconduct, placing the agency at the heart of the national debate over immigration policy. After President Donald Trump directed a surge in arrests to advance his pledge of mass deportations, concerns arose about the legality and human consequences of ICE's enforcement actions
What To Know
Pineda, who arrived in the U.S. in October 2022, was granted humanitarian parole, filed for asylum, and received a work permit and Social Security number. He was working legally and complying with all ICE requirements before his arrest, according to his wife.
Pineda's extended family fled Colombia after threats from armed groups and now lives in Spain. Flórez, who is also seeking asylum in the U.S, says that deportation would leave her husband isolated and in serious danger.
Now he is in ICE custody at Pine Prairie Detention Center in Louisiana after a transfer from Elizabeth Detention Center in New Jersey.
Pineda is allegedly being denied medication for his asthma, postsurgical pain treatment for a recent back operation, and medical attention for a high fever he's had for multiple days.
Flórez said her husband told her the conditions inside the facility are "inhumane and degrading."
Pineda told his wife that the detention center is overcrowded with more than 150 men crammed into a space meant for 80.
"New detainees arrived and were forced to sleep on the floor, without mattresses or bedding," she said.
"He is physically and emotionally deteriorating every day," she said.
Flórez alleges ICE is relying on a deportation order issued in 2022—before her husband was granted humanitarian parole, filed for asylum, and received a work permit.
She says using an outdated order to remove him ignores his current legal status and bypasses his right to a hearing.
She also claims agents have been pressuring detainees to sign documents without allowing them to read them.
She says her husband has had no court hearing scheduled and fears ICE could deport him at any moment.
Juan is a law-abiding taxpayer and adhered to all requirements of the legal immigration process, his wife says.
"We are completely devastated. We live in fear every day. The emotional toll this has taken on us is overwhelming," Flórez said.
"He came to the U.S. to escape danger, to work, and to build a life with dignity. Now, he is being punished and silenced, trapped in a system that is ignoring his humanity, denying him medical care, and violating his rights.
"He deserves medical attention. He deserves legal due process. He deserves to be heard. And above all, he deserves to live."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trade deals don't make Trump's emergency tariffs legal
President Trump has taken an expansive view of his authority to levy tariffs in his second term trade war with nearly every U.S. trading partner. Calling on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Trump administration has imposed tariffs at rates not seen since the 1930s, claiming to address a national emergency caused by fentanyl trafficked across the border and persistent trade deficits. Defending those actions, on Monday, Trump's Justice Department entered an extraordinary letter into the tariff litigation now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which will soon issue a ruling. That letter points to a recurrent theme in Trump's trade approach, a weak legal foundation for his actions papered over with an even more flimsy rationale for preserving it. The letter from Solicitor General D. John Sauer and Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate claims that President Trump's July announcement of 'the largest trade agreement in history' with the European Union, plus other recent deals with Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan and the United Kingdom, proved the tariffs should stay in place. That argument might make for a good press release. But in a court of law, it's entirely beside the point. The central question before the court isn't whether the president's tariffs have produced diplomatic headlines (even though they don't amount to much). It's whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act gives the president the authority to impose them in the first place. Congress passed the act to give presidents a way to address genuine national emergencies, things like hostile foreign actions, espionage or terrorism — not as a catch-all to impose peacetime tariffs whenever it might create negotiating leverage. In fact, the U.S. Court of International Trade, whose decision to vacate Trump's tariffs is now under appeal, held that the government's argument for using tariffs to 'pressure' countries to address the proclaimed emergencies 'does not comfortably meet the statutory definition of 'dealing with' the cited emergency.' It reached that stance because the argument would allow the president 'to take whatever actions he chooses simply by declaring them 'pressure' or 'leverage' tactics' to extract concessions unconnected to the declared threat. The Justice Department continues to push for an expansive reading of the president's authority to levy tariffs. But the letter takes this a step further. It offers a string of doomsday predictions: Without international emergency powers tariffs, 'trillions of dollars' from other countries won't be paid, the U.S. could see a '1929-style result,' millions might lose their homes and jobs, even Social Security and Medicare could be 'threatened.' That's not legal analysis. It's fearmongering. And it's untethered from any evidence in the record. Most of the so-called deals are not even written down, or available to review. Of the announcements made on the content of those deals, serious questions have been raised about the level of commitments, and their durability. Furthermore, the promised investment may not even be possible, and contradict the president's goal of lowering the trade deficit, which is central to his actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. It also contradicts the Justice Department's previous arguments for a stay of the lower court's ruling, claiming that the government could refund the tariffs if it lost the appeal. Even if the deals the president cites were, in fact, secured because of these tariffs, it still wouldn't make them legal. You don't get to break the law to make a deal, then point to the deal as proof the law should bend to fit your actions. That's bootstrapping, plain and simple. Nor is it true that the U.S. has no other trade tools at its disposal. There are various other trade authorities that the president could lean on. The president could also negotiate actual trade agreements with the support of Congress. The irony is that the Justice Department's own letter inadvertently proves the critics' point. If the president believes these tariffs are so essential, he should ask Congress for the authority to impose them. That's how the separation of powers works. In the meantime, the courts are there to ensure that even the most popular, politically expedient or 'powerful' policy stays within legal bounds. Tariffs based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were never legal. No amount of retroactive dealmaking can change that. Grasping at straws for a new rationale for Trump's self-inflicted tariff wound adds insult to that injury. The Court of Appeals should not be swayed by this desperate appeal. A clear and decisive ruling against the tariffs is necessary to stop further abuses of executive authority on trade, otherwise, this version of 'emergency powers' will become the new normal in U.S. trade law, and Americans will pay the price, not just in their wallets.
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Democratic Mayor Indicted by Grand Jury
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal grand jury has indicted New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, concluding a lengthy corruption probe into the city's first female mayor. Cantrell's attorney, Eddie Castaing, confirmed to The Associated Press that an indictment was returned Friday, with her name read aloud in federal court as a defendant. The specific charges have not yet been disclosed. The indictment caps a years-long investigation into the two-term Democrat, whose tenure has been marked by both early achievements and deep political turmoil. Cantrell, who is term-limited, will leave office in January after surviving a 2022 recall effort and enduring frequent clashes with the City Council during a turbulent second term. Once a high-profile leader credited with major city initiatives, Cantrell's public presence has diminished in recent months. She has not posted on her official X account since July 15, when she highlighted "historic declines" in crime. Political observers say her influence has waned, weakened further by voter-approved changes to the city charter that curbed her powers. Former allies and supporters have drifted away amid what critics call self-inflicted wounds and escalating feuds with the council. Cantrell and her remaining backers contend she has been unfairly targeted as a Black woman and subjected to a harsher standard than male leaders, accusing opponents of undermining her authority. Earlier this year, Cantrell described her treatment as "very disrespectful, insulting, in some cases kind of unimaginable." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Day laborer fleeing ICE raid in California was fatally struck by SUV, local official says
(KTLA) – Several dozen people gathered outside a Home Depot in Monrovia, California, on Thursday evening to protest federal immigration raids, including one that led to the death of a day labor hours earlier, according to witnesses. Monrovia City Manager Dylan Feik said the man was fleeing an Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid at the Home Depot on Thursday morning. Witnesses said they saw him run across the store's parking lot and onto the eastbound 210 Freeway, where he was struck by an SUV and killed. Teen with disabilities reportedly detained by ICE outside L.A. school The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to a request for more information from Nexstar's KTLA. But a representative told the Los Angeles Times that the man was not being pursued by their agents when he ran onto the freeway. Protesters at Thursday's event, however, believed the man's death was a direct result of ICE raids like the one in Monrovia. 'I was heartbroken,' said Selene Lockerbie, who attended Thursday's protest. 'I feel like Monrovia was violated … to know that a man lost his life today just trying to work. Just trying to take care of himself and his family.' Karen Suarez, another demonstrator, said she consoled the victim's daughter at the scene. 'I just went up to her and said, 'I'm really sorry about your dad.' She was so shaken up,' Suarez told KTLA's Sandra Mitchell. Immigrant advocates say 13 people were detained by federal agents during Thursday's raid. Several were also injured, according to Pablo Alvarado from the National Day Laborer Union. 'They're afraid of going to the clinics and hospitals, so we're going to make sure there's a doctor who comes to see them,' said Alvarado. 'The first thing is humanity of people.' The Trump Administration's crackdown on illegal immigration in Southern California shows no sign of slowing, despite frequent protests and outrage expressed by local, state and federal lawmakers, largely Democrats. Also on Thursday, approximately 100 federal agents conducted a sweep in L.A.'s Little Tokyo neighborhood where California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a news conference to promote his plan to redraw the state's congressional districts in response to Texas Republicans' plan to do the same.
