Swimmers protest after Weymouth's ‘beloved' sea rafts removed over health and safety fears
The town council removed the two platforms due to safety concerns around blind spots to the RNLI lifeguards on duty, but the move has been accused of being a 'cost-cutting measure'.
Local residents have taken to the waters to protest against their removal and demand their return as soon as possible.
Jade O'Brien, who launched a petition to the council, said: 'For over 40 years the rafts have stood in these waters, providing safe recreation and cherished experiences for generations.
' Weymouth town council decided to remove these beloved rafts, citing safety concerns of blind spots to the lifeguard on duty.
'However, incidents have been rare, and Greenhill Beach has consistently maintained a strong safety record. It doesn't make sense.'
She continued: 'The rafts not only signify leisure but are integral to our community. They encourage children to exercise, learn to swim, and develop water confidence.
'By removing them, we are not only subtracting an element of enjoyment but also diminishing the vitality of Greenhill Beach.'
Nearly 4,000 people have signed a petition to restore the rafts, while the council have denied it forms part of a cost-cutting move.
In a statement on their website, they said that the council had been informed on 10 July that RNLI would not include a platform or pontoon as part of their primary or secondary areas of operation, and so the rafts would not be considered as part of their immediate responsibilities.
This was due to them creating a 'blind spot for the lifeguards which operate from the beach and therefore pose a risk to members of the public'.
As a result, the council's insurance providers confirmed they were unable to offer cover in the event of claim for incident or accident.
A spokesperson for the council said: 'We remain committed to trying to find a way to get the rafts returned to Greenhill Beach. To do this we will continue to work with our partners and take advice on how we can achieve this.
'Our goal is to get the rafts back out in the sea as soon as possible, whilst ensuring that the council's legal health and safety obligations are met.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Princess Anne presents King's Award to Wellingborough Hindu group
The Princess Royal has presented a Hindu community charity with the King's Award for Voluntary recognises the contribution made by the Wellingborough District Hindu Association (WDHA) since it began more than 50 years Anne visited the organisation on 17 July but details have only just been released.A spokesperson from the WDHA said: "Volunteers are an integral part of our success, and this award is in recognition of their valuable contribution." WDHA began in the early 1970s, when local volunteers came together to form a community hub. After years of fundraising, they purchased a building that became the Sanatan Hindu Mandir, where members now meet. Princess Anne and Northamptonshire's lord-lieutenant James Saunders Watson were greeted with traditional Hindu customs, including a garland ceremony, before meeting with volunteers and local watched a folk dance performance showcasing India's cultural heritage and unveiled a commemorative plaque to mark the day ended with the formal presentation of the King's of WDHA Vinod Patel said the visit helped to highlight "generations of volunteers whose dedication made this possible". Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Couple celebrate victory after five-year row with neighbours over giant cypress tree that went to top of government and saw police called in
A couple have won a bitter row with their neighbours over a hedge they claimed were making their lives a misery. Keith Smith, 71, and his wife Julie, 68, were left frustrated by a row of cypress trees belonging to David Hunter and Niena Hunter Mistry in the Edinburgh suburb of Prestonfield. The five-year feud, which began as a mild disagreement, grew increasingly to involve Edinburgh Council, the Scottish Government and even the police, who were called to the home multiple times. The Smiths turned to the City of Edinburgh Council in a bid to have them chopped down, but were left stunned when the council rejected. However, they later successfully appealed to the government and the trees had to be cut to 8.5ft. One tree remained, which the Smiths, who have resided in their detached home for 44 years, insisted towered over their garden and left it in darkness. Mr Hunter went to the Scottish Government in a bid to save his tree, but that has been rejected and it will have to be lopped to 8.5ft. In his appeal letter, Mr Hunter insisted the tree was not part of the hedge and begged for it to be kept. He said: 'The individual tree identified in the varied notice cannot reasonably be said to be part of the boundary hedge. 'It appears as a separate individual tree and has never been trimmed. 'We would be very grateful if you would take all our points and concerns into account and request that you quash the revised high hedge notice.' In a document to the government, the Smiths said: 'The cost to the public purse must be considerable in terms of government, council and police resources. 'We, the Smiths, have suffered hugely financially, emotionally and physically by this process and sincerely hope, this will now lead to resolution.' Mrs Smith had earlier said she was constantly 'anxious, stressed and scared' to enter her garden and claimed the conflict had impacted on her marriage. Government reporter Amanda Chisholm said: 'During one period of sunshine, I observed that the disputed tree casts shadow over a significant proportion of the neighbouring property's rear garden. 'In any case, the varied high hedge notice applies to the hedge as a whole, which has already been found to adversely affect this property's reasonable enjoyment. 'In my view the part of the hedge that has not been reduced in height continues to do so.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Captain of doomed plane that crashed at Southend Airport and first officer, 24, are pictured as airline pays tribute
THE captain of the plane that crashed at Southend Airport and killed four people has been named and pictured for the first time. The small medical aircraft corkscrewed in the air shortly after taking off from the London airport before doomed aircraft plummeted to the ground on July 13. 4 4 4 4 Now, it has been reported that Captain Danny Franken, 53, and first officer Floris Rhee, 24, were two of the four who died at the scene days ago. Mr Franken, from Harderwijk, was married with two children and also worked as a first officer for KLM on Boeing 777, according to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf. He was described by his family in an obituary notice as a "dearest husband, cheerful caring father, wonderful son, brother, son-in-law, brother-in-law and uncle". The other two people onboard the plane - a female nurse and a male doctor - also died in the crash. The nurse was named in reports as 31-year-old Maria Fernanda Rojaz Ortiz, a German national originally from Chile, and the doctor was named as German national Dr Matthias Eyl, 46. The UK was rocked by the tragic air disaster on July 13 after footage showed the Beech B200 Super King Air crashing. The plane was heading for Lelystad in the Netherlands, with an estimated departure time of 3.45pm. The plane was returning to its base having transported a patient into the UK for treatment when tragedy struck. Southend Airport was closed following the incident so investigations could be carried out, before reopening on July 17. Those inquiries have been ongoing, according to the Air Accident Investigation Branch. Marco Rietvelt, managing director of Zeusch Aviation, said: "Danny and Floris were not only highly skilled pilots, but also greatly valued and popular members of our team. "Their passion for flying was matched by their dedication to their colleagues and the important missions they carried out. "We are all deeply shocked and saddened by this tragic loss. "Our priority is to support the families of those lost, as well as our employees, during this incredibly difficult time. "We are also fully committed to assisting the authorities in their ongoing investigation." The plane was operated by the Netherlands-based Zeusch Aviation.
