Labour Slams ‘Big Tax Breaks' For Tech Giants As Government Ditches Digital Levy
Labour says the government's decision to dump plans for a digital services tax is a tax break for tech giants like Facebook and Google. Russell Palmer, Political Reporter
Labour says the government's decision to dump earlier work on a digital services tax is a tax break for tech giants like Facebook and Google.
The government has confirmed it is removing the bill from its legislative agenda. It would have imposed a 3 percent tax on digital services for New Zealand users starting in January this year.
Chris Hipkins told reporters at Parliament scrapping it would not have been a priority or the savings from pay equity claims in a Labour Budget.
'We already know where some of that money's going – it's going to tax cuts for landlords, tax breaks for tobacco companies; just today we found out it's hundreds of millions of dollars are going to tax breaks for multinational tech firms like Google and Facebook.'
Labour, using forecasts from the Half-Year Economic and Fiscal Update in December, calculated the tax would have brought in about $479m over the next four years – starting from January 2026 – and $146m a year after that.
'Frankly, paying Kiwi women properly would be my priority,' Hipkins said. 'I think this government should stand up to New Zealand – I don't think giving big tax breaks to Google and Facebook is how we should be trying to ingratiate ourselves with Donald Trump's administration.'
Revenue Minister Simon Watts, announcing the move in a statement on Tuesday, said the previous Labour government had introduced the bill in 2023 because of a perceived lack of progress from other countries in developing a similar measure – but the situation had since changed.
'A global solution has always been our preferred option, and we have been encouraged by the recent commitment of countries to the OECD work in this area,' he said.
'New Zealand has long supported, and benefited from, collective action and the global rules-based system. By focusing on a global solution, it will enable an agreed, consistent outcome across participating countries.'
Watts said a multi-lateral process would be a more enduring model.
'Our assessment is, is there a better process to deal with the underlying challenge out there, and as a basis we've made a decision to take away the DST Bill that was put on the order paper.'
He said Inland Revenue remained focused on compliance and integrity, including for offshore customers.
Hipkins however said he had seen 'no evidence whatsoever that there's going to be an international solution to that'.
'Frankly it's not right that Google, Facebook and other big tech companies aren't paying their fair share of tax whilst other New Zealanders are being asked to pay more, and low-paid Kiwi women are basically being told that they're not going to be paid fairly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Transpower Proposes Investment To Future-Proof Upper South Island Network
Transpower has today submitted a proposal to the Commerce Commission for approval to invest $193 million in the upper South Island as electricity demand in the region continues to grow. The option put forward by Transpower is to build two new switching stations near Orari and Rangitata, upgrade two transmission lines through the Waitaki Valley, and to install voltage management equipment. Transpower Executive General Manager Grid Development Matt Webb said the proposed grid upgrades will strengthen the transmission network and ensure areas north of Twizel will continue to have a reliable electricity supply into the future. 'Demand in these areas has been growing steadily, particularly during the summer months when power is used for irrigation,' he said. 'With more homes and businesses switching to electricity use, and forecast electrification of South Canterbury's farming and primary processing sectors, demand for electricity is expected to increase even further.' There is limited electricity generation north of Twizel, so power travels from the Waitaki Valley via high voltage transmission lines to Christchurch and further north to reach the top of the South Island. Mr Webb said that electricity transmitted over long distances needs voltage support to keep the supply stable and avoid surges or other disruptions. 'The more electricity we move, the more voltage support we need. Our proposed upgrades will create connections between existing electricity circuits, increase transmission line capacity, and help keep voltage stable,' he said Transpower is also considering what other solutions could support or defer this investment. 'Our proposal includes $7 million for initiatives that could defer or avoid some investment in transmission infrastructure,' Mr Webb said. 'Known as 'non-transmission solutions', these include large batteries and demand response, where industrial customers or electricity retailers work with their customers to shift demand away from peak demand periods. 'By investing in our national network now, we are future- proofing a reliable electricity supply that serves a huge part of the South Island, enabling its people and businesses to thrive. This investment will ensure this part of our upper South Island's network has the strength and resilience it needs to meet increased demand into the 2030s. 'We've engaged extensively on what the options are to continue to provide a reliable power supply and, overall, our key stakeholders support our investment proposal and acknowledge that grid reinforcement in the region is required.' The proposed investment amount includes an allowance for inflation and interest during construction. The Commerce Commission will consider Transpower's investment proposal, including consulting on it, as part of its process to ensure New Zealanders receive good value for money from Transpower's investments.
Techday NZ
2 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Agentic AI is Australia's unrealised productivity lever
As ongoing Productivity Commission reports show, Australia's flat productivity is a persistent national challenge, so much so that the Labour government is hosting a three day industry roundtable focused on restarting our economic engine. If productivity is corrected, the Productivity Commission estimated that it would leave the average Australian worker $14,000 better off by 2035. However, simply working harder isn't the answer. The latest ABS Labour Force data highlights that Australians are working ever more hours. We collectively clocked 2 billion hours in July 2025, which is a 2.1% annual increase. Yet, our national productivity stagnates. Instead, we should be working smarter. As the Economic Reform Roundtable convenes in parliament, it's positive to see the Treasurer put more emphasis on AI as a key lever to solving Australia's productivity deficit - estimating AI could add more than $116 billion to the economy over the next decade. But the national conversation is still catching up to reality. While policy debates dwell on generative AI, the frontier has already evolved to agentic AI: systems that plan, action, and collaborate with humans across workflows. The risk isn't moving too fast; it's moving too slow and falling behind the global status quo. With Microsoft's Work Trend Index 2025 showing that 81% of business leaders globally expect AI agents to be part of their strategy in the next 12–18 months, it's crucial for Australian industry and government to recognise agentic AI as a critical asset in not only course-correcting our productivity, but moving us ahead economically too. However, like any transformational technology, the fundamental challenge is skills; agentic AI requires new skills and a rethink to how we approach work. Fortunately, there's already a lot the white collar workforce can learn from how the software development world has reinvented itself with agentic AI. Software development's blueprint for agentic AI success The software development industry provides a powerful blueprint for agentic AI adoption, particularly for a market like Australia that suffers a perpetual tech skills shortage which puts consistent pressure on developers to deliver more and more. AI coding agents are opening up doors for human developers to have their own agent-driven team, all working in parallel to amplify their work. Technical teams are now able to assign tasks that would typically detract from deeper, more complex work, allowing developers to focus on high-value coding tasks that have the most impact. We've seen a profound impact on the use of GitHub Copilot's agentic capabilities, with many now using the tool in their day-to-day work. Australian industry leaders like Commonwealth Bank, EY, and MYOBhave embraced AI-assisted software development, leading to surging productivity gains. More broadly, between 60-75% of developers report feeling more fulfilled and less frustrated when using GitHub Copilot - a metric businesses shouldn't take for granted when striving to maximise productivity. By taking on repetitive, time-consuming tasks asynchronously, AI agents free developers to focus on what matters: solving problems, delivering value, and building products at scale. What once took days now takes hours, turning release cycles from marathons into sprints, offering up a surefire way to reshape the productivity puzzle. What can businesses learn from this? Employees who are empowered with AI,integrating it deeply into their workflow, emerge with greater ambition, sharper technical fluency, and higher job satisfaction. The evidence shows that developers aren't writing less code; they're orchestrating more complex, system‑level work, and this should provide an exciting example for businesses to follow. It will take a lot of 'unlearning' at the senior manager level (and a lot of trust in employees) but a 'reimagining of work' across a business' workforce will open creative and innovative doors that have probably not been conceived of yet. For this opportunity to be harnessed across Australia's economy however, we need to instill these skills in future generations; 'managing AI' should be a fundamental skill every citizen learns. AI education is the key to empowering an innovative society We can't expect graduates to thrive in an AI-driven economy if they haven't learned with AI. It's the equivalent of trying to prepare the future workforce to work with computers, apps, and other modern digital means, and then handing them a pencil. Australia has taken an important first step with the Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools, recently endorsed by education ministers in June 2025. But a framework centered on GenAI alone is already being outpaced by the next frontier with agentic AI. Students should be given the opportunity to learn about AI as a dedicated subject in school curriculums. They should be taught to brief, supervise, and evaluate autonomous systems: the very skills that will be critical to their future jobs on day one. Never before has technology been so ubiquitous and instrumental in the future of the economy - leaving it out of early learning would not only do a disservice to students, it's also not conducive to a competitive economy. This isn't a theoretical risk either. Australia is already struggling to attract and retain AI talent. We lean heavily on skilled migration for advanced roles; we punch above our weight in research output but capture only a sliver of AI patents, a clear sign of a commercialisation gap. Too many talented graduates, including those who've helped build world-class systems, are taking their skills offshore. The fix is straightforward: create clear, supported pathways from classroom to career so students can learn, build, live, and work in Australia. As we await tangible policy following the Economic Reform Roundtable, it's imperative that both government and industry understand one thing: productivity is intrinsically linked to economic growth - and AI sits at the heart of this. If Australia wants to compete, the choice is simple: reinforce agentic AI as a productivity lever and reinvest in the human capability that unlocks it. While the Roundtable can set the direction, what remains is the will to link policy with practice so investment and education moves together toward reversing the trend of declining national productivity, and making our economy world-leading with AI.
Techday NZ
2 hours ago
- Techday NZ
AI bots drive 80% of bot traffic, straining web resources
Fastly has published its Q2 2025 Threat Insights Report, which documents considerable changes in the sources and impact of automated web traffic, highlighting the dominance of AI crawlers and the emergence of notable regional trends. AI crawler surge The report, covering activity from mid-April to mid-July 2025, identifies that AI crawlers now constitute almost 80% of all AI bot traffic. Meta is responsible for more than half of this figure, significantly surpassing Google and OpenAI in total AI crawling activity. According to Fastly, Meta bots generate 52% of observed AI crawler interactions, while Google and OpenAI represent 23% and 20% respectively. Fetcher bots, which access website content in response to user prompts - including those employed by ChatGPT and Perplexity - have led to exceptional real-time request rates. In some instances, fetcher request volumes have reached over 39,000 requests per minute. This phenomenon is noted as placing considerable strain on web infrastructure, increasing bandwidth usage, and overwhelming servers, a scenario that mirrors distributed denial-of-service attacks, though not motivated by malicious intent. Geographic concentration North America receives a disproportionate share of AI crawler traffic, accounting for almost 90% of such interactions, leaving a relatively minor portion for Europe, Asia, and Latin America. This imbalance raises concerns over the geographic bias in datasets used to train large language models, and whether this bias could shape the neutrality and fairness of AI-generated outputs in the future. The findings build on Fastly's Q1 2025 observations, which indicated automated bot activity represented 37% of network traffic. While volume was previously the chief concern, Fastly's latest data suggests that the current challenge lies in understanding the evolving complexity of bot-driven activity, particularly regarding AI-generated content scraping and high-frequency access patterns. Industry-wide implications Fastly's research, compiled from an analysis of 6.5 trillion monthly requests across its security solutions, presents a comprehensive overview of how AI bots are affecting a range of industries, including eCommerce, media and entertainment, financial services, and technology. Commerce, media, and high-tech sectors face the highest incidence of content scraping, which is largely undertaken for training AI models. ChatGPT in particular is cited as driving the most real-time website traffic among fetcher bots, accounting for 98% of related requests. Fastly also notes that a continuing lack of bot verification standards makes it difficult for security teams to distinguish between legitimate automation and attempts at impersonation. According to the report, this gap creates risks for operational resilience and poses challenges for detecting and managing unverified automation traffic. Verification and visibility "AI Bots are reshaping how the internet is accessed and experienced, introducing new complexities for digital platforms," said Arun Kumar, Senior Security Researcher at Fastly. "Whether scraping for training data or delivering real-time responses, these bots create new challenges for visibility, control, and cost. You can't secure what you can't see, and without clear verification standards, AI-driven automation risks are becoming a blind spot for digital teams. Businesses need the tools and insights to manage automated traffic with the same precision and urgency as any other infrastructure or security risk." The report recommends increased transparency in bot verification, more explicit identification by bot operators, and refined management strategies for handling automated traffic. In the absence of such measures, organisations may encounter rising levels of unaccounted-for automation, difficulties in attributing online activity, and escalating infrastructure expenses.
