
Sydney and Toronto had equivalent home prices, then Canada's crashed. Could Australia see a similar slump?
Australian city prices have climbed by about A$85,000 over the subsequent three years, while Canadian prices have crashed by C$150,000, leaving the median Canadian home nearly 20% cheaper.
The Canadian correction has raised questions over whether properties in Australia, economically comparable to its Commonwealth comrade, could face a similar selldown.
Borrowers in both countries enjoyed low interest rates in 2020 and 2021, driving up prices. Australia's most expensive city, Sydney, saw median values surge A$250,000 from 2020 to early 2022, reaching nearly A$1.2m.
Overheated demand drove prices far higher in Toronto, Canada's biggest city, up by A$400,000 to a peak of C$1.3m over the same period, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA).
Canada's central bank responded by ratcheting up interest rates while the government banned foreign buyers and curbed immigration, sending prices into freefall. Toronto's median price fell below C$1.1m and is yet to recover.
Toronto's pandemic buying boom saw home sales surge in 2021 then halve by 2023 as high numbers of homes arrived on the market simultaneously, further dragging down prices.
Demand slumped further as locals fled Toronto for more affordable towns with the advent of remote work.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Tyson Erlick's landlord clients at Property Management Toronto had been excited by surging home prices back in 2021. One investor paid C$1m for a sub-50 square metre flat in downtown Toronto's Yorkville neighbourhood that's now worth about C$700,000.
'We're seeing a lot of landlords panic,' Erlick said. 'You're now looking at a mega loss.'
Sydney endured a brief slump but resumed its upward climb by early 2023, with rents and home prices rising as a growing population grappled with a shortage of homes.
Rents in Toronto, already constrained by local government rent caps, have fallen on average since 2023. Homebuyers are taking out smaller mortgages on houses and apartments, or condominiums, as they're called in Canada.
Greater Toronto resident Dave, who lives 70km from the city centre, bought a condo for a $100,000 discount in July 2024 after the previous owners struggled to sell.
'There are so many condominiums that they can't sell,' said Dave, who asked for his surname not to be shared. 'We were lucky.'
The improved affordability in Canada has raised the prospect a similar slump could happen in Australia.
Both countries saw a rare nationwide price drop when interest rate hikes in 2022 limited borrowing power, though Australians faced slower and smaller rate increases.
Along with surging migration and strong job creation, smaller rate hikes kept Australian prices from falling more than 10%, according to Eliza Owen, head of research at property data firm Cotality.
'As long as Australians can keep paying their mortgage and they don't have to sell, that will always restrict supply [and] limit the amount that property values can fall,' she said.
Australian home values have kept rising through 2025, up 3.7% in the year to July according to Cotality, and Commonwealth Bank analysts predict that pace will reach 6% by December.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
An economic shock and blowout in the unemployment rate would be a direct but damaging way for that momentum to reverse, Owen said.
'That technically would make housing cheaper, but it doesn't necessarily make housing more affordable if a crash is coming alongside severe economic downturn [and] people really can't afford to buy,' she said.
Donald Trump's tariff threats, for example, have prolonged Canada's crash by pushing more Canadians out of work, leaving buyers without incomes and unable to pay off their mortgages.
Data released at the end of July showed Canada's economic activity had fallen for two consecutive months as it grappled with US trade chaos. The same day, Trump lifted tariff rates on Canadian goods from 25% to 35%.
The number of unemployed Canadians reached 1.6 million and the national unemployment rate climbed to 7% in May, from 5% in early 2023.
The share of Canadians more than 90 days behind on mortgage repayments remains small but has doubled since 2022, much faster than in Australia.
Tariffs have had a muted impact on the Australian economy, where the jobs market remains robust, unemployment has only risen to 4.3% and mortgage arrears remain at modest levels.
While Sydney's unemployment rate remains low, at 4.5%, Toronto's is nearly than double that, approaching 9%, leaving fewer locals with the incomes to take advantage of a slight improvement on the city's still-unaffordable homes, according to the renters advocate Bruno Dobrusin.
'The vast majority are still struggling with increasing rents, without the capacity to benefit from the slowdown of home prices,' said Dobrusin, organiser at the York South-Weston neighbourhood's tenant union.
Housing in both countries is already too far out of reach for price corrections to help affordability, according to Carolyn Whitzman, a housing researcher and adjunct professor at the University of Toronto.
'It is nice to see a little bit of a correction in what has been such a steady and frightening upward climb,' said Whitzman, who has lived in Toronto and Melbourne.
'[But] if a house is 300% too expensive, and goes down by 20%, it still isn't going to help you.'
Economists do not expect a near-term slump in Australian house prices, which are accelerating amid rate cuts and supply shortages. While Canada's temporary price correction will not solve its affordability, it should remind Australians real estate is not immune to a drop, Whitzman said.
'Both Australia and Canada started to believe that it was impossible that house prices ever fall [but] at some point house prices have to fall,' Whitzman said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nat Barr calls out EV false advertising
Published: | Nat Barr has called for a crackdown on false advertising after it was revealed several electric vehicle brands had misled motorists about the driving range of their cars. The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) tested five EVs in its Real-World Testing Program and found some models drove up to 111km less on the road than they did in laboratory testing. The 2023 BYD Atto 3 was the worst performer, with a driving range of 369km on a single charge — 23 per cent less than the 480km recorded in its lab testing. The 2024 Tesla Model 3 had a real-world range of 441km, which was 14 per cent less than the 513km it achieved in the lab. The 2022 Kia EV6 and the 2024 Tesla Model Y both had driving ranges of eight per cent shorter than their lab tests. The best performer was the 2024 Smart #3, which logged a real-world driving range of 432km, which was five per cent below its compulsory lab test. Barr asked Sunshine Coast Mayor Rosanna Natoli on Thursday morning if companies should be forced to be more forthright about their cars' ability in the real world. 'Just looking at the reasons why you get less than advertised on the battery,' Barr said. 'Hot weather can change it, cold weather can change it, driving on different terrain can change it, stopping and starting can change it, braking can change it. 'A lot can change the amount you get from the standardised testing. Basically, everything can change it. 'Do you think they should maybe change what they advertise?' Natoli said the lack of accuracy about the range of EVs was concerning for regional owners and that 'range anxiety is a real thing'. 'I guess, for the moment, it is a wait and see with that, particularly when you get outside of the cities, it's a real danger,' she said. The AAA found last month that 60 per cent of likely EV buyers flagged range and recharging as the main reasons that might prevent them from buying an EV. 'As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range,' AAA managing director Michael Bradley said. The AAA said Aussies deserved to know how vehicles performed on roads. The Real-World Testing Program has tested 114 fuel-powered cars, vans, and utes since it began in 2023, finding that more than 77 per cent exceeded fuel consumption recorded in lab tests.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Why the Freddo creator's daughter refuses to buy it - and what it says about the economy
Changing in cost but seemingly never in popularity, the Freddo chocolate bar has become a health check for the UK economy. When he created the confectionary almost a century ago in Australia, British teenager Harry Melbourne couldn't have foreseen he was also crafting a barometer for the cost of living. But that's the function of the once-10p chocolate frog in some corners of the internet, where memes track how its price has risen - up to as high as £1 this year - and how fans feel about it. Harry's own daughter shares their fury. In childhood she would wait for her father to come home with boxes of Freddos, but she now has vowed never to buy one again. "Dad was disgusted with how small it is now and how much they charge for it," Leonie Wadin, 74, told Money from her home in Melbourne. "He'd roll over in his grave if he could see it now; he'd be disgusted. It was a penny chocolate. "Since Dad died, I haven't bought a Freddo." The origin story As much as the modern Freddo would upset her father, Leonie said he "never knew" its appeal had reached his native UK and would have been "so proud". Harry was only 14, she said, when he cooked up the bar at the confectionery company MacPherson Robertson in 1930, having changed the mind of a boss who wanted a chocolate mouse. "He said children are scared of mice, so why not a frog? Because kids go down to the lake and catch tadpoles," Leonie said. By the time Harry was 15, Freddo - named after his "best mate" Fred - was on the shelves in Australia, selling for a penny. It doesn't sell for a penny any more, but does the maths support people being so annoyed? The numbers There are different ways of looking at it: the price of a Freddo, how many you can buy relative to how much you're earning and the rate of inflation. Let's start with the first two. In 1999, the Freddo cost 10p at a time when the newly introduced national minimum wage was £3.60 for workers aged 22 and over. That meant your hourly pay could get you 36 bars (ignoring tax and national insurance). Today, a Freddo typically costs at least 30p (though some retailers sell it for 35p), and the minimum wage is £12.21 (as of April this year), giving you 40 bars. This argument undermines the memes - as does any argument about shrinkflation because Freddo's size has stayed fairly consistent in the UK, weighing in at 18g. The British consumer doesn't appear to be getting short-changed (though in Australia, it's a lighter bar at 12g, which may explain Leonie's particular ire). Inflation and how much a Freddo should cost now To further understand Leonie's grievance (as well as everyone else's), you might look at inflation, which measures how fast the cost of goods and services is rising. At its UK relaunch in 1994, a Freddo cost 10p and it stayed that way until 2007. If its price had increased in line with inflation, today a bar would go for about 21p, not 30p or 35p, according to the Bank of England's inflation calculator. But measures of inflation, specifically the consumer price index (CPI), look at the average price rise of goods and services bought by households, not changes for each individual product. Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, says two key Freddo ingredients explain its specific price rise since the turn of the century. "Both cocoa and sugar prices have shot up, with the former up more than 750% between then and now, and raw sugar prices up almost 250%," she said. "So finding that the price of a Freddo has jumped 200% in the intervening period shouldn't surprise anyone." Wages have increased, she added, "but of course it would cost you more to get to the shop in the first place, as fuel and travel prices have also risen". All of which suggests - and this might shock you - that the internet's anger may not be justified. But there's another way of looking at it... Emotion, rather than maths Memes aren't reflective of maths so much as sentiment, the way people feel. Spending £1 now gets you three Freddo bars, at best. In 1999, that got you 10 - and this is evocative. As Hewson, from AJ Bell, put it: "That childish glee of popping into a shop with £1 and coming out with 10 wrapped bars was tangible. "Knowing that today we'd only emerge with three or fewer chocolate treats feels unfair." This may explain why the bar is perceived as too expensive now. Freddo gets political The Bank of England's governor is mandated to keep inflation at around 2% each year. If the Bank misses this target by 1% - meaning if inflation falls below 1% or above 3% - the governor has to send a letter to the chancellor explaining why. While that doesn't mean the governor is about to make any apology for the price of Freddo, one MP recently tried to force the issue directly. Labour's Patrick Hurley, who represents Southport, said last October he would launch a petition to bring the price down to 5p and send it straight to Cadbury. He got the idea after he was questioned by children at a secondary school, though he told the BBC it was a "whimsical, light-hearted thing we can do" to engage the youth in politics. "If you start talking about gas bills," he said, "the average 14-year-old might switch off, but if you talk about the price of chocolate bars..." Money reached out to Hurley, but he didn't get back to us. The petition doesn't appear on his website now. 'Freddo is never gonna die' For Leonie, the sentiment goes deeper than the price - she feels Cadbury has made all that money from her father's idea. But the sweets giant did keep in touch with Harry, even up to his 90th birthday, four years before he died, when it sent a Freddo cake and a small Freddo statue. Leonie has five children, 10 grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. They all know Harry's story. And for all her gripes over the chocolate's soaring cost, she doesn't want them to miss out on the excitement she felt when her dad brought boxes home from work. "They're very proud of their great-granddad, they still buy them, they love them," Leonie said of the youngest in her family. And that's the legacy she wants her family to cherish after her. "Carry on through every heritage, that's what I want," she said. "The Freddo has to be passed on, Freddo is never going to die. "It will always be there… I just want it all passed down, so that the frog is always in our lives." And if you're wondering what Cadbury has to say... We got in touch with Mondelez International, which owns Cadbury, and this is what they want to say: "Freddo has endured popularity across generations since originally launching in the UK back in 1973, and continues to be a key part of Cadbury's range today. "Whist it's important to stress that as a manufacturer we do not set the retail prices for products sold in shops, our manufacturing and supply chain costs have increased significantly over the past 50 years, and Freddo has become more expensive to make. "We have absorbed these increased costs wherever possible, however on occasion we have made changes to our list prices or multipack sizes to ensure that we can continue to provide consumers with the Freddo that they love, without compromising on the great taste and quality they expect."


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Ontario seeks proposals for feasibility study on cross-Canada energy corridor
Aug 7 (Reuters) - The Ontario government on Thursday issued a request for proposals for a feasibility study to explore the best way to establish a new economic and energy corridor in the state. The proposed corridor includes new Alberta-to-Ontario pipelines, which would transport Western Canadian oil and gas to refineries in southern Ontario and to tidewater ports such as a new deep-sea port on the coast of James Bay. The study will also assess the feasibility of port developments on James Bay, Hudson Bay and the Great Lakes, along with a potential refinery along the pipeline route. The energy corridor follows a recent memorandum of understanding between Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan to collaborate on protecting Canadian workers, expanding energy and trade infrastructure, and advancing nuclear development to meet rising demand. 'In the face of unprecedented tariffs from the United States and increasing geopolitical instability, Canadians must work together across governments to build the energy and trade infrastructure we need to unlock new markets domestically and protect jobs,' said Kinga Surma, Ontario's minister of infrastructure.