logo
Springsteen doubles down on political criticism with a digital EP that includes anti-Trump comments

Springsteen doubles down on political criticism with a digital EP that includes anti-Trump comments

Independent21-05-2025
There's no retreat or surrender from Bruce Springsteen — or from President Donald Trump, for that matter.
The rock star released a digital EP on Wednesday with four songs recorded live in Manchester, England last week, along with two of his addresses to the audience that attacked Trump's 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration.'
The Boss pointedly opened his concert in Manchester Tuesday night, his third in the English city, with the song 'No Surrender.'
A satirical video posted on Trump's social media account on Wednesday showed the Republican president taking a swing on the golf course and his 'ball' hitting Springsteen in the back as he stumbles to get onstage.
Springsteen, long a Trump opponent, began the latest skirmish in the culture war in England last week, where he opened a European tour. His same-state neighbor Trump — they both have homes in New Jersey — responded by calling the Boss a 'dried-out prune of a rocker.'
Both men have had other rock stars leap to their defense. Trump supporter Kid Rock appeared twice on Fox News Channel last week. He said his fellow Michigander, Bob Seger, 'smokes' Springsteen.
'Bruce Springsteen is another one of the liberals who has mountains of money who so desperately wants to keep his good standing in the eyes of Hollywood and the elite,' Kid Rock said. Springsteen 'plays the working-class guy' but his politics are 'ass-backward,' he said.
On Fox's influential show 'The Five,' former White House press secretary Dana Perino said she always found Springsteen overrated, and Greg Gutfeld denounced him with an off-color slur.
Neil Young has backed Springsteen, and Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder praised him during a concert in Pittsburgh over the weekend. Springsteen brought up issues, and in response 'all that we heard were personal attacks and threats that nobody else should even try to use their microphones or use their voices in public or they will be shut down,' Vedder said.
'The name-calling is so beneath us,' said Vedder, before Pearl Jam performed Young's 'Rockin' in the Free World.'
For Springsteen, 'No Surrender' replaced 'Land of Hope and Dreams' atop his concert set list. The EP released digitally on Wednesday also contained a cover of Bob Dylan's 'Chimes of Freedom.'
___
David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump isn't ruling out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of a NATO-like security role with European partners, saying ‘we'll be involved' — but they'll talk more about it later
Trump isn't ruling out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of a NATO-like security role with European partners, saying ‘we'll be involved' — but they'll talk more about it later

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Trump isn't ruling out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of a NATO-like security role with European partners, saying ‘we'll be involved' — but they'll talk more about it later

President Donald Trump on Monday refused to rule out sending American soldiers to enforce any peace deal between Russia and Ukraine and said he would be discussing the U.S. commitment to a future settlement with European leaders during a multilateral sit-down between him, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a group of European heads of state and government who'd travelled to the White House for talks. Speaking during a brief media availability alongside Zelensky in the Oval Office,Trump told reporters that both Europe and the United States would be involved in securing a post-war peace for Ukraine, but he refused to say outright that American troops would not be put on the ground to maintain that peace. 'We're going to work with Ukraine. We're going to work with everybody, and we're going to make sure that if there's peace, the peace is going to stay long term. This is very long term. We're not talking about a two year peace, and then we end up in this mess again. We're going to make sure that everything's good. We'll work with Russia. We're going to work with Ukraine. We're going to make sure it works. And I think if we can get to peace, it's going to work. I have no doubt about it,' he said. Pressed further on any guarantees for Kyiv by reporters, he said there would be 'a lot of help when it comes to security' in any post-war settlement, but he stressed that Europe would 'be the first line of defense' albeit with some American assistance. At the same time, the American leader seemed to rule out a future NATO membership bid for Kyiv, echoing a social media post he'd made earlier in the day, while hedging and telling the press that there hadn't been any such discussions yet. 'We're going to be discussing it today, but we will give them very good protection, very good security,' he said. Trump added that the European leaders who were waiting to meet with him and Zelensky were 'very like minded' on the matter. He also said he'd be speaking with Putin after his meetings with Zelensky and the assembled European leaders.

Why bats and newts are being blamed for Britain's sluggish economy
Why bats and newts are being blamed for Britain's sluggish economy

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Why bats and newts are being blamed for Britain's sluggish economy

Bad news for bats: the government is considering further changes to planning regulations in order to boost economic growth. Specifically, Rachel Reeves – desperate for the UK economy to grow and provide more jobs, homes and tax revenues – wants to relax the rules on wildlife and the environment, hence some headlines about bats, newts and snails. What does the chancellor want? To keep her job. That means getting Britain's wayward public finances under control, which means making the economic pie bigger so that tax receipts start rising without having to hammer workers and businesses every year with tax rises. She's not prepared to allow any flying mammals, rare amphibious creatures, fish or a few wildflowers to get in the way. Retained EU rules designed on the precautionary principle that a developer must prove there will be no net harm will go, and there'll be a cull in the list of 'protected species'. She wouldn't admit as much, but this is very much what Leavers would call a 'Brexit freedom'. Not much of a bonus for bats, though. Aren't they doing this already? No. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill before parliament proposes to restrict grounds for objection to a scheme, strengthen the powers of mayors and development corporations to impose decisions, and give developers more flexibility regarding nature migration schemes. Another law would be required to wage war on wildlife. Perhaps. He singled them out in an infamous speech last year that derided the '£100m bat tunnel holding up the country's single biggest infrastructure project', ie HS2. He is the Ozzy Osbourne of politics. What do we get in return? Growth. Specifically, 1.5 million new homes, 150 major infrastructure projects and, in the words of the prime minister: 'a very clear message …To the nimbys, the regulators, the blockers and bureaucrats … The alliance of naysayers … The people who say, no, 'Britain can't do this. We can't get things done in our country'. We say to them – you no longer have the upper hand … Britain says yes.' The country will almost certainly be better off, materially, from the additional investment, but it is equally apparent that all the new runways, power lines, roads and greenfield housebuilding will have an unfortunate impact on the environment and visual amenity. There's always a trade-off. Why didn't the Tories do this? They are, or were, the party of the countryside, hence their determined opposition to onshore windfarms, rural solar panel installations, housing developments in 'nice' areas and pylons marching across green and pleasant lands. What will happen? Labour will bulldoze both bits of legislation through, albeit with some grumbles from the new generation of Labour MPs who represent historically rural Conservative constituencies. Most opposition parties, including Reform, who don't think we need any green energy or housing projects at all, will make their objections clear. At the next general election, Labour will probably find its country seats much the hardest battleground.

The War Room newsletter: Why Putin's peace plan is more like poison
The War Room newsletter: Why Putin's peace plan is more like poison

Economist

timea minute ago

  • Economist

The War Room newsletter: Why Putin's peace plan is more like poison

Officials worry Trump backs the Kremlin's land grabs and fantasies Russia's leader is honoured, but offers little in return Clubs for shooting, rabbit-keeping and everything else are the backbone of its society A continent on holiday from geopolitical reality When they do it could spell trouble for TOGG, Turkey's domestic EV maker As the leaders prepare to meet, Russian forces break Ukraine's defensive line

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store