Keep calm and train skilled manufacturing workers in spite of tariffs: report
Social Sharing
U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports may contribute to unemployment in the short term, but Ontario's manufacturing sector still stands to grow long-term, and much more needs to be done to make sure Canada has enough workers with the skills to do the jobs.
That's the message of a new report from Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters titled Keep Calm and Keep Training.
Canada's automotive sector may be under pressure from U.S. tariffs, said the organization's president and CEO, Dennis Darby. But the country is a major producer of food products, machinery, chemicals and oil and gas, and recent investments in EV and battery production present huge opportunities.
"We think there could be a million people working in manufacturing by … 2035," Darby said.
The sector employed just over 830,000 people in 2024.
The report draws information from two surveys of manufacturers conducted in December 2024 and January through March 2025.
Focus on education funding
"The big insight was somewhere just under 30,000 people a year are going to retire out of the sector over the next eight years," Darby said.
"And we are certainly not in a great position right now to be able to replace all of those folks."
It found that even in southwestern Ontario, which is heavily exposed to the effects of the U.S. trade war, respondents cited shortages of some skilled trades people.
"While this pressure will abate to an extent as the short-term impact of tariffs is felt, general concerns with the aging of manufacturing workers highlight the need for long-term regional coordination," it read.
The report touches on a number of threats to the sector's workforce – economic unpredictability, skill shortages and funding constraints at colleges and universities – and identifies a range of potential solutions.
Those included more incentives for apprenticeship programs; more exposure to trades in high schools; better collaboration between industry and post-secondary institutions; more degree offerings, such as mechatronics; more seats in college apprenticeship programs and attracting workers from underrepresented groups.
But a big focus is funding for education, particularly at the secondary and post-secondary levels – money to expand programs, invest in high tech equipment and create more seats.
There is also a call for more incentives for apprenticeship programs.
Economist Jim Stanford, the director of the Vancouver-based Centre of Future Work, said the report's focus on continued training makes sense because as Canada navigates through the instability caused by the Trump administration, it will need the best workforce possible.
Employers need to do their part
And he said he fully supports governments playing a bigger role in it.
But he said employers also need to do their share, including paying corporate taxes.
"You know, it's always ironic when business groups who are constantly demanding tax cuts and other forms of incentives are also saying, 'Government, you must step up your support for colleges and universities,'" he said.
"Yes, we need that support. And everyone, including companies, has to pay their fair share toward it."
CBC News reached out to the Ministry of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security for a response to the report.
Among other things, we asked whether the government intended to increase post-secondary funding and address the request for funding for high tech training equipment.
The press secretary for Minister Nolan Quinn replied with an emailed statement saying the ministry continues to ensure Ontario has the highly skilled workforce needed to drive economic growth.
"As our latest step to protect Ontario, we're investing over $800 million to fund news STEM and skilled trades seats at colleges and universities across the province, building on last year's historic $1.3 billion investment and the $5 billion we contribute annually to post secondary education – strengthening the pipeline of highly skilled workers to drive our economy across our critical sectors, including manufacturing," Bianca Giacoboni said.
"We're also expanding the Skills Development Fund by nearly $1 billion to support workers impacted by U.S. tariffs, provide in-demand job training, help employers up-skill staff, and [create] new, innovative partnerships between industry and post secondary [institutions]."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. and Chinese officials meet in London for high-stakes trade talks
Top U.S. and Chinese officials were meeting in London on Monday to try to defuse a high-stakes trade dispute that has widened beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening to cripple supply chains and slow global growth. Officials from the two superpowers were meeting at the ornate Lancaster House to try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing. Since then, the U.S. has accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments. U.S. economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. team wanted a handshake from China on rare earths after Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke last week. 'The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes,' Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the expectation was that immediately after the handshake, export controls would be eased and rare earths released in volume. The talks, which could run into Tuesday, come at a crucial time for both economies, with investors looking for relief from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. China's export growth slowed to a three-month low in May while its factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years. In the U.S., the trade war has put a huge dent in business and household confidence, and first-quarter gross domestic product contracted due to a record surge in imports as Americans front-loaded purchases to beat anticipated price increases. But for now, the impact on inflation has been muted, and the jobs market has remained fairly resilient, though economists expect cracks to become more apparent over the summer. Attending the talks in London will be U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice-Premier He Lifeng. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. The second round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration. During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to 'a very positive conclusion,' setting the stage for Monday's meeting in London. The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported on Friday that China has granted temporary export licenses to rare earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the U.S. wanted the two sides to build on the progress made in Geneva in the hope they could move towards more comprehensive trade talks. The preliminary deal in Geneva sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 Index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18 per cent after Trump unveiled his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2 per cent below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. While the U.K. government will provide a venue for Monday's discussions, it will not be party to them and will have separate talks later in the week with the Chinese delegation. The dollar slipped against all major currencies on Monday as investors waited for news, while oil prices were little changed.
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Forget Robotaxis and Humanoid Robots: Morgan Stanley Thinks This Technology Is the Real Secret for Tesla Stock to Soar
While investors fixate on Tesla's (TSLA) robotaxi ambitions and humanoid robots, Morgan Stanley believes the company's next breakthrough could come from an unexpected direction: the emerging drone and electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) market. The investment bank sees this 'low altitude economy' as representing a $9 trillion total addressable market by 2050. Tesla's potential entry into this space has gained attention following recent geopolitical events. Moreover, Morgan Stanley noted that drone warfare capabilities have become strategically critical. CEO Elon Musk himself warned on Tesla's earnings call that countries unable to manufacture their own drones risk becoming 'vassal states' to those that can, highlighting America's current manufacturing deficit compared to China. What makes Tesla uniquely positioned for this market isn't just ambition, but the company's existing technological infrastructure. Morgan Stanley highlights Tesla's proven expertise in battery storage, navigation systems, autonomous driving technology, robotics, and large-scale manufacturing as transferable skills that are ideally suited for the development of drones and eVTOLs. The financial implications could be transformative for Tesla shareholders. Morgan Stanley estimates that capturing even a small fraction of the eVTOL market could add between $100 to $1,000 per Tesla share. These estimates indicate potential upside that could easily dwarf the current robotaxi valuations. Morgan Stanley argues that a single eVTOL could generate revenue equivalent to 15 ride-hailing vehicles, which showcases the superior economics of aerial transportation. Unlike robotaxis, which face regulatory hurdles and require extensive real-world testing, the drone market presents a more immediate opportunity for growth. Tesla's vertical integration advantage positions the company to compete effectively against established aerospace players who lack its innovation speed and cost structure. Ark Invest Is Bullish on the Robotaxi A research report from ARK Invest positions Tesla as the clear frontrunner in the emerging robotaxi market. Ark Invest, run by famed growth investor Cathie Wood, cited several critical competitive advantages that could generate massive value for investors. According to the report, Tesla's competitive edge lies in its unparalleled data collection capabilities. For instance, the EV maker's existing fleet generates over 5 million miles daily through its Full Self-Driving software and has accumulated 87 million total US miles, compared to Waymo's 70,000 daily miles. This vast data advantage provides Tesla with diverse real-world driving scenarios that competitors cannot match. Fleet scalability represents another crucial differentiator. While Waymo operates roughly 700 vehicles across limited cities, Tesla can leverage 6.5 million existing vehicles globally equipped with compatible hardware. It can rapidly deploy Model 3 and Model Y vehicles from lease returns and inventory, while customer-owned vehicles can supplement the fleet through opt-in programs. Cost advantages further strengthen Tesla's position. ARK estimates Tesla's Model 3 production cost at $40,000, compared to Waymo's vehicles, which cost over $100,000, with sensor packages alone costing over $40,000. Additionally, Tesla's vertical integration reduces its reliance on external manufacturers, such as China-based Zeekr (ZK), which faces potential tariff headwinds. The financial opportunity appears enormous. ARK projects that robotaxi platforms could reach $4 trillion in net revenue by 2030, with Tesla potentially commanding take rates exceeding Uber's (UBER) 30% due to a superior cost structure. Higher utilization rates above 50% could significantly undercut traditional ride-hail pricing. Beyond financial returns, Tesla's autonomous driving technology could prevent over 40,000 U.S. deaths annually. FSD-equipped vehicles have already demonstrated five times better safety than non-FSD Tesla vehicles and 16 times better than average cars. Is TSLA Stock Undervalued? While Tesla is part of multiple expanding addressable markets, the company must demonstrate its ability to execute and gain traction in these key stock currently trades at 155x forward earnings, which is higher than its three-year average of 114x. Analysts expect Tesla's earnings to increase by 29% annually over the next five years. Out of the 41 analysts covering TSLA stock, 16 recommend 'Strong Buy,' two recommend 'Moderate Buy,' 13 recommend 'Hold,' and 10 recommend 'Strong Sell.' The average target price for TSLA stock is $292, roughly in line with its current price.
Globe and Mail
39 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Amazon Paying $4 Billion to Break Up With UPS?
Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is an online retail powerhouse, selling and delivering its own products and acting as a middleman for other retailers. The company's delivery trucks are ubiquitous in some areas of the country. But it has even bigger aspirations when it comes to getting products to customers. So why did United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) decide to stop handling as many Amazon deliveries? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » The Amazon and UPS breakup As with any good breakup drama, the story between Amazon and UPS, as United Parcel Service is called for short, is hard to call. UPS says that the Amazon business it was doing was high volume, but low margin. That meant that it didn't add enough to the bottom line to make it worth the top-line benefit. UPS says it plans to step away from half of the business it does with Amazon over the next couple of years. That effort is in keeping with UPS' goal of improving the quality of its business. But management highlighted that it will still work with Amazon on some things. Notably, Amazon is increasingly good at delivering its own wares, but it doesn't have a strong handle on returns. With a large retail store network, UPS can still provide return services to Amazon at an attractive return for UPS shareholders. So the relationship isn't dead -- it's just different. Or, you could say, they will still be friends. Amazon is paying up to fill the gap UPS' decision to put limits on its relationship with Amazon is a problem for Amazon. While it is true that Amazon has been growing its distribution capabilities, it now has to step up more quickly than it might have planned. To that end, Amazon recently announced that it was making a capital investment of up to $4 billion to enhance its ability to make rural deliveries. And it inked a deal with UPS' peer FedEx (NYSE: FDX), where that carrier will handle larger packages for Amazon. The market saw all of this as a win for FedEx and a loss for UPS. For Amazon, it wasn't too big a deal, noting that the stock is widely adored on Wall Street right now. While Amazon's stock is about 15% below its all-time high, its price-to-sales and price-to-earnings ratios are both above their five-year averages. And they are both fairly lofty on an absolute basis, as well. Still, it looks a little like Amazon is scrambling to take on the distribution services that UPS is willingly giving up. So what about UPS? The company's stock has lost more than half of its value since hitting a peak in 2022. In fact, it made the Amazon announcement just as it appeared it was getting its business back on track following a period of weakness that led to a corporate overhaul. Indeed, revenue had started to grow and margins appeared to have stabilized. Moving away from low-value Amazon business was a preemptive move made at a time when UPS had shifted from business weakness to business strength. In other words, UPS is being proactive because it sees the writing on the wall. Its Amazon business was going to keep shrinking anyway, so why not get ahead of it? The costs Amazon is incurring to make up for the loss of UPS as a delivery service is a sign that this was a big deal. But it will be a bigger deal for Amazon than UPS, since UPS was clear that the business wasn't very profitable. In fact, UPS could end up the big winner if the ability to slim down allows it to further improve its margins, even if the top line of its income statement shrinks along the way. Don't sleep on UPS as an investment Wall Street loves Amazon, and perhaps for good reason. But the stock is trading with a premium price tag. UPS, which could actually end up being the big winner in its breakup with Amazon, is deeply unloved. Notably, its price-to-sales and price-to-earnings ratios are well below their five-year averages. The stock's dividend yield, meanwhile, is historically high at around 6.7%. There's no question that UPS has extended the length of its turnaround by breaking up with Amazon. But the near-term pain could be exactly what it needs to rise up again. Contrarian investors, dividend investors, and value investors should all be doing a deep dive into UPS today with the idea of adding this unloved delivery service to their portfolios. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
