White British children are now minority in one in four schools
Analysis of school census data, collected from more than 21,500 primaries and secondaries in January, shows that in a quarter of them, the majority of the cohort is recorded as ethnic minority or white non-British.
In 72 schools, no white British pupils are recorded, and in 454, they make up less than 2 per cent of the student body.
The demographic shift is apparent in many of the country's big cities such as London, Birmingham, Manchester, Bradford and Leicester.
At Rockwood Academy, in Birmingham, for instance, none of the 1,084 students were recorded in the census as 'white British', while just 12 of the 2,779 pupils at Loxford School, in the London borough of Redbridge, were white British.
The figures, released by the Department of Education this week, have been published as a report predicted that white British people will become a minority in the UK population within the next 40 years.
The Buckingham University study projects a big rise in the proportion of the UK population comprising foreign-born and second-generation immigrants, from below 20 per cent to 33.5 per cent within the next 25 years.
By the end of the century, six in 10 people in the UK will either not have been born in the UK, or will have at least one immigrant parent, and one in five will be Muslim, according to the report by Prof Matt Goodwin.
The dramatic population change raises 'profound questions about the capacity of the UK state to both absorb and manage this scale of demographic change', he claimed.
Concern about legal and illegal immigration levels, and their long-term impact, is fuelling a surge in support for Reform. In this week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, in Scotland, Labour prised a win from the SNP but only Reform saw a significant swing in its favour, taking 26.1 per cent of the vote.
The party's performance has led to predictions that Reform is on course to pick up more than 10 seats in next year's Scottish Parliament elections, and poses a real threat in the 2029 general election.
The school census data demonstrates that the white British share of the young population is in decline in many areas. Children in state schools in a third of council areas are now mostly ethnic minority or white non-British, up from about a quarter a decade ago.
In all 32 London boroughs, apart from Bromley, white British children are in a minority. In Bromley, they make up 50.3 per cent. In Newham, just 5 per cent of children were recorded in the school census as white British. The figure in Harrow was 7 per cent.
Other local authority areas in England where the majority of children are not white British include Manchester, Nottingham, Coventry, Luton, Milton Keynes, Peterborough, Oldham and Blackburn and Darwen.
The analysis of the school census figures excludes independent schools, schools where a high proportion of students had no ethnicity classification, and those where there were a very low number of pupils.
Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, raised the 'scandal' last week of white working-class educational failure, saying that children had been 'betrayed' and 'left behind in society'.
Government data shows that only 21 secondary schools in England where more than a fifth of pupils are white working class had any record of success with this group.
Nick Harrison, the chief executive of the Sutton Trust social mobility charity, said white working class underachievement was 'a ticking time bomb for equality of opportunity in our country'.
In an attempt to steal ground from Reform, Ms Phillipson announced a new independent inquiry into white working class educational outcomes, which will be led by Sir Hamid Patel, the chief executive of a leading academies trust, and Estelle Morris, a former Labour education secretary.
While the issue has been widely researched in the past, it has resulted in little or no action to try and tackle the problem. A comprehensive inquiry undertaken by the Commons education committee in 2021 found a significant educational achievement gap between white working class children and their more advantaged peers, and between this group and their equally disadvantaged ethnic minority counterparts.
According to the report, attainment gaps are fuelled by high concentrations of poverty, inadequate resources, low teacher quality, and a lack of aspiration and investment in disadvantaged areas. Use of the term 'white privilege' was also criticised for potentially alienating disadvantaged white communities
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Treasury looks at inheritance tax ahead of autumn budget
The Treasury is reportedly considering tightening inheritance tax rules to address a £50bn shortfall in public finances. Proposed measures include scrapping the 'seven-year rule' for gifts and introducing a potential lifetime cap on gifts to limit pre-death asset transfers. Inheritance tax, which applies to estates worth more than £325,000, generated a record £6.7bn in 2022-2023 and is seen by some as a de facto wealth tax. The move comes amid pressure on Rachel Reeves to find solutions for a projected £41.2bn shortfall by 2029-2030, with calls for a broader wealth tax. Despite suggestions for wealth taxes from some Labour figures, the Treasury's official stance is to focus on economic growth and avoid raising income tax, National Insurance, or VAT.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action terror ban risks ‘I am Spartacus' moment, Labour peer warns
A Labour peer has warned that the government's ban on Palestine Action is at risk of becoming an 'I am Spartacus' moment, suggesting the decision to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation was disproportionate. Shami Chakrabarti, a former shadow attorney general and civil liberties campaigner, urged the government to 'think again', warning that the group's ban may lead to more people, not fewer, taking to the streets to support it. She said her concerns are 'greater now even than they were before' after more than 500 people were arrested over the weekend, demonstrating in support of the group. An "I Am Spartacus" moment – from the 1960 film, Spartacus - refers to a situation where a group of people collectively claim to be one person, often in solidarity or defiance, to protect that individual or to confuse an authority figure. The Metropolitan Police confirmed on Sunday that 532 arrests were made, 522 for displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation at the march in central London over the weekend. Asked whether the government had got it wrong on the issue, Baroness Chakrabarti told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I'm afraid that my concerns are greater now even than they were before. This is in danger of becoming a sort of 'I am Spartacus' moment where more people, not fewer people, are taking to the streets.' She added: 'There are blurred lines now… some people are, as always, protesting about the horrific events they're watching unfold in Gaza, but others think they're standing up for civil liberties because this ban was disproportionate.' The Labour peer warned that 'even criminal damage is not terrorism'. 'Spraying paint on airplanes, which is a serious criminal damage, is not the same as being the IRA or al Qaeda or a group that actually wants to blow people up. 'And so we've got more people taking to the streets, a bigger headache for the police. Frankly, I'm very sympathetic to the police on this issue. I think it may be time to think again.' It comes just days after she told The Independent that the 'proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions' – a reference to Margaret Thatcher's unpopular policy that triggered civil disobedience and riots. The group hit the headlines earlier this year when four members were accused of causing around £7m worth of damage to aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. The mass detention of protesters on Saturday is thought to be the highest number of arrests made by the Metropolitan Police in a single protest event since the poll tax riot of 31 March 1990. Earlier this week, MPs from across the political divide warned of an excessive use of counterterrorism powers that was riding roughshod over the right to peaceful protest, after it emerged that many of those held were aged over 60. Meanwhile, civil liberties groups, including Amnesty and Libert,y said the arrests were 'disproportionate to the point of absurdity' and that the government's terrorism laws were a threat to freedom of expression. Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the mass arrests as 'madness', saying Palestine Action was not 'equivalent to real terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or Islamic State'. Lord Hain, who led the anti-apartheid movement and the Anti-Nazi League in Britain during the 1970s and 1980s, went on to warn that the ban will 'end in tears for the government'. 'We are seeing retired magistrates, retired and serving doctors and all sorts of people being arrested and now effectively being equated with terrorists such as al-Qaida, which is absolutely wrong', he said. 'It's going to get worse [for the government] because I don't see people from that 'middle Britain' background who have joined these protests in such large numbers to suddenly decide that all is OK.' But home secretary Yvette Cooper defended the police and suggested those who were arrested may not 'know the full nature of this organisation'. After the arrests, Downing Street defended the move to ban the group, saying it was 'violent', had committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, and that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had found the organisation had carried out three separate acts of terrorism. 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear: this is a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury and extensive criminal damage,' Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman said on Monday.
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour minister opens door to an inheritance tax raid as Rachel Reeves scrambles to plug her £50bn spending hole - and Chancellor 'will also hit households with stealth and sin levies'
A Labour minister today opened the door to an inheritance tax raid as Chancellor Rachel Reeves looks to plug a £50billion spending hole at her next Budget. Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, failed to rule out changes to the so-called 'death tax' this autumn amid growing concerns about the state of the public finances. It follows claims that Treasury officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help fill the multi-billion pound shortfall. Under consideration is the prospect of a lifetime cap which would limit the amount a person could gift before their death, the Guardian reported. The Tories warned that the plans revealed Labour's 'politics of envy' and said people should not be punished for passing on their hard-earned money. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research recently judged that Ms Reeves needs to find £50billion in tax rises or spending cuts to balance the books by the end of the decade. The respected think tank said higher-than-expected public sector borrowing and weaker economic growth had left the Chancellor with an 'impossible' choice between the two options. As well as a possible inheritance tax raid, Ms Reeves is also said to be looking at a fresh increase in the capital gains tax rate, as well as further 'stealth' and 'sin' taxes. A new analysis by Pantheon Macroeconomics predicted Ms Reeves will hit households with 'a mix of 'sin' tax and duty hikes, the freezing of income-tax thresholds, and either pension-tax or unspecified spending restrictions in 2029-30 to fill the hole in the public finances'. A sin tax is a tax on goods and services which are deemed harmful to individuals or society, such as tobacco or alcohol, as well as gambling. Freezing income-tax thresholds is often referred to as a 'stealth tax' because more people are pulled into paying higher rates of tax as their wages grow. The Pantheon report added: 'Public finances are in a desperate condition, and the Government appears to be limping from one fiscal event to another with no clear plan to deal with medium-term fiscal pressures and long-term sustainability.' Adam Corlett, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation, told The i Paper: 'With the Chancellor likely to need significant tax revenues in her Budget this autumn, sin taxes are a sensible place to start. 'Specific policies could include raising gambling duties and aviation levies, while motoring taxes are also in need of reform. 'But while sensible, there are limits to how much these reforms can raise, and the Chancellor may need to look to more mainstream taxes if the fiscal hole she needs to fill is particularly large.' Asked by Sky News this morning if Ms Reeves is planning an inheritance tax raid, Dame Diana said: 'I'm not the Chancellor and she's obviously going to announce her Budget in the autumn and we'll make her announcements then. 'But what I'm really clear about is that the decisions that she's already taken have allowed, for example, for me as the policing minister to make sure that we're getting those 3,000 additional police officers this year into our communities to keep people safe. 'So I think the Budget will come in October and we'll hear then what she wants to announce.' Responding to Dame Diana's comments, Tory MP Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, warned against 'punishing' savers for Labour's fiscal black hole. 'The mask has slipped,' he said. 'Labour is coming for your family's future to fund their failure - and they won't stop at inheritance tax. 'Those who've worked hard, saved responsibly and hope to leave something behind shouldn't be punished to pay for Labour's economic black hole. 'It's the same old Labour: tax first, think later. Nothing is safe under Labour - not your savings, not your pension, not even the gift of helping your children. 'This is the politics of envy and working families will pay the price.' Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told GB News there would 'inevitably' be tax rises in the autumn following Labour's failure to 'get a grip' on welfare spending. New figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions yesterday, showed the number of people claiming Universal Credit hit 8 million last month. The steep rise in the number of claimants over the past 12 months was driven almost entirely by people who are not required to work. The number of people on Universal Credit with 'no work requirements' reached 3.7 million in July this year - an increase of 39 per cent or 1 million since July 2024. It means 46 per cent of all Universal Credit claimants are not expected to do anything to prepare or to look for work. Sir Keir Starmer last month saw his attempt to cut Britain's ballooning benefits bill derailed by a major rebellion among Labour MPs. The Prime Minister was forced to scrap most of his planned welfare changes in the face of a huge Labour revolt. An earlier U-turn on axing winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners has also left Ms Reeves with billions of pounds to try and find in spending cuts or tax rises in her next Budget. Ms Reeves has already ruled out increasing National Insurance, income tax and VAT for workers leaving her limited options to raise money unless she changes her fiscal rules. Inheritance tax raises around £7billion a year and is paid by around four per cent of estates. It is currently set at a rate of 40per cent of the value of estates above £325,000. Labour officials are said to be concerned about the amount of money being extracted from pension pots and gifted to relatives. They are reportedly looking for a way to tap into the wealth of the 'boomer' generation who have benefited from rising property prices and gold-plated pensions. Gifts made seven years before someone dies are at present not subject to inheritance tax. Those given three to seven years before death are taxed on a sliding scale known as 'taper relief'. The rate reduces each year from 32per cent to 8per cent. A Treasury source told the Guardian: 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. 'But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' Tory MP Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, warned Ms Reeves against 'punishing' savers for Labour's fiscal black hole The source added: 'IHT can raise more, and even if we do nothing, it will raise more money as the threshold for paying it stays frozen. 'But we have to look at the levers for taxing wealth if the aim of the government is to avoid hitting earnings from work as much as possible.' At the last Budget, Ms Reeves changed the rules so farmers paid inheritance tax for the first time on estates over £1million. The paper also reported that Ms Reeves is looking at whether to increase capital gains tax rates by a few percentage points. This could be teamed with an allowance for those who put money into British businesses so as not to deter investment into the UK. Ms Reeves has been under pressure from her backbenchers to introduce a form of wealth tax to target the rich. A Treasury spokesman said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy - which is our focus. 'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' The possible changes to inheritance tax come after Sir Keir's popularity today sunk to its lowest level to date. The Government's approval rating slipped to minus 55, according to pollsters YouGov. Just 13 per cent of the public included in the survey said they approved of the Government's record since returning to power under Sir Keir last summer - the same percentage as the previous week. But those who disapproved slipped by another percentage point, down to 68 per cent. It meant the net approval rating lurched to a record low for this administration. The weekly poll makes grim reading for Labour HQ, and follows a series of blows to Sir Keir's authority, including fresh accusations he has failed to get a hold of the small boats crisis, and claims he has presided over a 'two-tier' justice system. He also had to deal with the resignation of his homelessness minister over a rental home row. The YouGov data came after it was officially confirmed more than 50,000 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel since Labour won the 2024 general election. Analysis claimed the milestone was reached in 401 days of the Starmer government, compared with 603 days for Rishi Sunak's administration, and more than 1,000 days under Boris Johnson's. Liz Truss did not last long enough to reach the landmark, although a total of 10,532 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel during the 49 days of her premiership.
