Public media is in the crosshairs. How will Alaska's congressional delegation vote?
Should public media be spared the budget cutting axe of President Donald Trump and the congressional allies of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE?
I'm not going to directly answer that question myself, because I'm not an unbiased observer: I've worked for years as a reporter and contractor for Alaska Public Media, Anchorage's public radio and television station. I also have close friendships and working relationships with many of the reporters across the state whose jobs could be at stake.
I do, however, feel confident in saying that there's another, related question that's objectively interesting and less problematic for me to try to answer, which is: Will Alaska's elected officials vote to buck Trump and preserve public media's federal funding?
That question has become increasingly urgent with the Trump administration plan to end the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, or CPB.'
That nonprofit organization, in turn, grants money to both NPR and PBS, as well as to stations across the country — including more than 20 in Alaska, from Utqiagvik on the North Slope to Ketchikan near the Canadian boarder.
Alaska's stations received more than $12 million from CPB last year, which can amount to 40% or more of their annual budgets.
NPR, which Trump and his allies have attacked as biased towards liberals, derives roughly 1% of its budget from CPB, though it also collects money from individual stations that run its programs.
Alaska's public media leaders told me they believe Trump's proposal is more likely to pass the Republican-controlled U.S. House.
They're counting on the U.S. Senate — where only a few GOP votes would be needed to sink the plan — to be their firewall.
They describe Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski as a rock solid ally in preserving the funding. And they expect Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, a longtime supporter of public media, to come to their defense, too.
But they also say they won't know for certain until the votes are cast.
'I don't want to say that I'm fully confident of their votes,' said Tom Abbott, general manager of KFSK in the Southeast Alaska fishing town of Petersburg, which gets some 30% of its budget from CPB.
But, Abbott added: 'We've had very strong support from both of our U.S. senators, for several years now.'
I was curious to know where Sullivan, Murkowski and Alaska's sole member of the U.S. House, Republican Nick Begich III, stood on what's reported to be an impending proposal from Trump to rescind $1.1 billion, or two years of funding, for CPB.
I asked each of their offices Wednesday.
Begich's spokesperson didn't respond by my deadline. Murkowski's spokesman, Joe Plesha, was unequivocal, saying that she is a 'fierce advocate for Alaska's public broadcasting and vehemently opposes this reported rescission.'
'While the administration might be targeting NPR and PBS by rescinding this funding, the real casualty will be local public broadcasting, which is vital for Alaska,' Plesha said.
Sullivan's spokesperson, Amanda Coyne, also sent a statement: 'While Sen. Sullivan believes that NPR has become overly partisan and has veered far from its mission to include a diversity of voices in its coverage, he understands that Alaska's public radio stations are essential to our state, especially in rural areas.'
Sullivan has also, in recent days, responded to constituents who have emailed in support of public media funding, saying in a form letter that he 'will continue to work with the current administration to stress the importance of public broadcasting in Alaska and nationwide.'
Sullivan's position is particularly interesting because of his politics: Unlike Murkowski, he's rarely publicly criticized Trump's policies.
But while Trump's White House has ripped into public media — saying this monththat 'the NPR, PBS grift has ripped us off for too long' — Sullivan has long recognized its value, at least as far as the services it provides in rural communities.
In 2020, he accepted a 'champion of public broadcasting' award from a coalition of public television stations. He also joined with Murkowski in recommending an Alaskan, Diane Kaplan, for a seat on CPB's board of directors, and former President Joe Biden appointed her in 2022.
Kaplan is now in the news this week for a lawsuit she and CPB filed against Trump, alleging that the president is illegally attempting to fire her and other board members.
Begich's vote will be interesting to watch, as well.
The representative, who's just a few months into his first term, has aligned himself closely with Trump.
But he's also sent constituents correspondence about public media funding that references the challenge of communication and information sharing in Alaska's rural communities, saying that public media plays a 'crucial role' in residents' access to news and emergency alerts.
'I support fiscal responsibility and efforts to reduce wasteful government spending,' he said in one recent message. 'I also recognize that certain investments provide valuable returns to our communities. I will continue to advocate for policies that enhance infrastructure, improve broadband access, and support communication networks that serve all Alaskans, including those in our rural communities.'
Republicans have targeted federal funding of public media for years. But those efforts have never gained as much traction as they're getting now.
Abbott, in Petersburg, describes the current threat to federal funding as 'by far, the most serious' in his 28 years as general manager. With the proposal from Trump expected, though still not yet introduced, 'it puts us all in an uneasy position.''We're kind of waiting for the ax to drop,' he said.
Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at natherz@gmail.com or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani taps senior aide to ousted anti-Israel Rep. Jamaal Bowman as new campaign manager
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has brought on a new campaign manager — who recently served as senior advisor to fire drill enthusiast and Israel-bashing ex-Rep. Jamaal Bowman. Maya Handa will take the reins of the socialist's bid for mayor following his stunning Dem primary win over supposed frontrunner Andrew Cuomo last month, Mamdani's campaign announced Friday. The Queens assemblyman will face Cuomo, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and lawyer Jim Walden, all running as independents, in the November general election, along with the Republican nominee, Curtis Sliwa. 3 The socialist frontrunner for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has brought on a new campaign manager — who recently served as a top advisor to fire drill enthusiast and Israel-bashing ex-lawmaker, Jamaal Bowman. Paul Martinka Handa most recently ran the day-to-day for the mayoral primary campaign of state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who struggled to break out from the crowded Democratic field. Before jumping into the chaotic horse race, Handa served as senior advisor to Bowman, whose last consequential act as a New York representative in DC was pulling a fire alarm to delay a key House vote. Shortly after, the 'squad' member was voted out of office. Bowman, a vocal critic of Israel who has accused the country of carrying out a genocide in Gaza, is also on Mamdani's short list for schools chancellor. Handa, a political operative with ties to the Working Families Party, has a resume packed with lefty lawmakers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren's bid for president and Mondaire Jones' 2020 campaign for Congress. 3 Bowman is also on Mamdani's list to potentially be the next school's chancellor. Robert Miller 3 Mamdani's campaign also announced they hired Afua Atta-Mensah as senior political director and Deandra Khan as director of labor and intergovernmental affairs. Andrew Schwartz / Mamdani's campaign also noted Handa's previously worked for Queens Assemblymember Claire Valdez and Brooklyn Councilmember Shahana Hanif, but those gigs were absent from her LinkedIn resume. Other new hires announced by Mamdani's team on Friday were political strategist and progressive organizer Afua Atta-Mensah as senior political director and Deandra Khan — who recently served as top advisor to the president of the Local 32BJ SEIU union — as director of labor and intergovernmental affairs.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Anti-Trump DA Alvin Bragg sure acts like he has something to hide — we're suing to find out
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg holds potentially hundreds of communications appearing to link his office to senior Biden administration officials and other political actors in connection with his unprecedented criminal prosecution of then-former President Donald Trump. We've asked for those records, and he's not turning them loose. So we're taking him to court. Last September, America First Policy Institute launched a formal investigation into the people and motivations behind Bragg's decision to prosecute Trump. Advertisement Our effort had a simple goal: figuring out whether Bragg's case was a routine legal probe — or lawfare, a politically engineered hit job orchestrated to influence the 2024 election. The charges brought against Trump were extraordinary. Never before has a question of federal campaign-finance law — which the FEC declined to pursue, no less — been morphed into a state-level misdemeanor, already time-barred under New York law, then Frankensteined into a felony by alleging it was committed to conceal some other crime never defined by the prosecution, nor unanimously agreed upon by jury. Advertisement Confusing? That's the point. Bragg's office thrives on obfuscation. Public records should be accessible. Criminal prosecutions should be transparent. This case was neither — and still isn't. We were drawn to investigate because we saw just too many coincidences to ignore. Michael Colangelo, a top DOJ official with a focus on white-collar crime, left his Biden administration post to join Bragg's office just months before Trump was indicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. Advertisement Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Bragg's prosecution, had a history of political donations to Biden and to political groups opposed to Trump, the defendant before him. He was officially 'cautioned' on that by the state ethics board. Merchan's daughter Loren worked on Kamala Harris' 2020 campaign and during Trump's trial served as president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive political consulting firm hired by the Biden-Harris ticket. It all paints a curious picture: A DA who campaigned on a promise to take down Trump, aided by a Biden DOJ veteran, bringing legally contorted charges before a judge with clear partisan connections. Advertisement If this wasn't coordinated, it's one lucky political pile-up. The American people deserve answers. In pursuit of those answers, and in defense of the public's right to know, AFPI submitted a request to Bragg's office under New York's Freedom of Information Law in September 2024. We sought any records that could shed light on whether political influence or coordination played a role in Bragg's decision-making. Our request was specific, lawfully submitted and directly tied to one of the most consequential legal proceedings in modern American history. Ten months later, no records have been produced. None. Though they apparently exist. Instead of providing transparency, the DA's office has engaged in delay, double-talk and silence. We've asked for a list of responsive documents. They won't give one. Advertisement We've asked which of our specific requests the withheld documents pertain to. They won't say. We know, based on our investigation and his office's limited correspondence with us, that the DA possesses hundreds of records of communications with or about political agents who should have had no influence in a 'routine' prosecution, like Lauren Merchan's Authentic Campaigns. Bragg refuses to explain why the public isn't entitled to see them. There is no legal justification for this blackout. No privilege excuses total stonewalling. Advertisement There is only evasion. It's been nearly a year. The records exist, and the DA cannot explain why they remain secret. That alone should raise alarms. AFPI has now turned to the courts to compel compliance. The law does not permit selective transparency by the Manhattan DA. It does not allow politically sensitive cases to be shielded from scrutiny. Advertisement As the New York Legislature declared when it passed the state's open-records law in 1977, 'The people's right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents leading to determinations is basic to our society.' We agree. Advertisement That's why on July 17, AFPI filed its petition in New York County Superior Court requesting that Bragg's records, whatever they may reveal, be released to the public. The law demands openness, and we intend to see it enforced. Jessica Steinmann is executive general counsel and Jack Casali is an attorney at the Center for Litigation at the America First Policy Institute


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book
House Democrats are trying to get their hands on the now-infamous book celebrating Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday after it was suggested the disgraced financier's estate is in possession of it, Axios has learned. Why it matters: As the minority party in Congress, Democrats have been largely toothless in their attempts to investigate President Trump. They believe this is a rare opportunity to obtain concrete information. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is leading the effort, told Axios it would be "very difficult" to obtain the book if it was in the hands of the Department of Justice. "In this case, you literally have a private attorney," said the California Democrat. "A private attorney is much more likely to comply. It's a much easier challenge than going after the administration." Driving the news: Khanna and House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote to attorneys for the Epstein estate's executors asking for a "complete, unredacted copy" of the book, according to a copy of their letter obtained by Axios. Citing Wall Street Journal reporting that Trump submitted a poem and drawing for the book, the lawmakers wrote that it may be "essential" for a probe of the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein matter. Trump has denied the Wall Street Journal's reporting and sued the outlet for libel. What they're saying: " We write with deep concern regarding potential public corruption, abuse of power, and failures in the federal law enforcement response to the Epstein case," Khanna and Garcia wrote. They argued that members of the Oversight Committee should be permitted to review the book before deposing Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly put it together. "Information gathered from this document may also inform the development of legislative reforms addressing sex trafficking networks, financial regulation, or other critical matters," they added. State of play: Brad Edwards, a lawyer for over 200 of Epstein's victims, said in an MSNBC appearance Thursday, "I know the executors of the estate are in possession of that book." "If somebody simply called" Epstein's executors "and said, 'Give us the book,' they would probably give you the book," Edwards said. "They have attorneys, their attorneys are good people. If they didn't just voluntarily turn over the book out of fear of reprisal, Congress could just issue a subpoena to their attorneys ... they would turn the book over immediately." The three attorneys for Epstein's executors did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Axios. What's next: Khanna and Garcia asked that Epstein's estate turn over the book by August 10. Khanna told Axios: "I will make sure, if we get it, that whatever we do in terms of releasing it is what the victims want, what the victims' attorney wants, and not just trying to score partisan points." "If the victims don't want certain things, I am going to guarantee that the victims are the topmost consideration," he said. "But I do believe that they will want some of it released and once we get it, we can."