Kerala CM refutes Opposition Leader's charges on Digital University Kerala, defends graphene project and audit procedures
In a detailed response, the Chief Minister termed the claims as 'factually incorrect' and defended the State's handling of the university's operations and its flagship Graphene Aurora project.
Mr. Satheesan had earlier written to the Chief Minister demanding a Vigilance investigation into alleged corruption.
He alleged that the university violated statutory norms and had made unauthorised advance payments to a private company, India Graphene Engineering and Innovation Centre (I-GEIC), which is involved in the Graphene Aurora programme. He also accused faculty members of misusing university infrastructure to float multiple private companies for project implementation, and that the university has not undergone any audit since its inception.
Rejecting these claims, Mr. Vijayan termed the allegation that no audits were conducted at DUK as baseless. 'A statutory audit has been carried out. The audit for the financial year 2023–24 has been completed. The university has formally requested the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) to undertake further audits. Further steps are awaited from the CAG,' the Chief Minister stated.
'In line with policy, regulations'
Addressing the accusations regarding I-GEIC, he elaborated that the formation of the company was in line with the university's declared policy and regulations. 'The claim that advance payments were made illegally is false. The company was formed in compliance with the university's statutes and with prior approval from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology,' he said.
Mr. Vijayan also defended the integrity of those involved in the management of I-GEIC. 'The chairman of the company is M. Madhavan Nambiar, a former Secretary of Civil Aviation of the Government of India. Other key members include senior industry professionals formerly associated with Tata Group, such as M.A. Pathan and Kamesh Gupta, as well as Prof. Alex Thomas from the university.'
The Chief Minister went on to clarify that the university's regulations encourage faculty entrepreneurial initiatives and support R&D through non-profit entities. Moreover, as a modern university, DUK is expected to generate funding for faculty and research projects independently. Misrepresenting these legitimate activities as corruption is a deliberate distortion, he added.
He also accused the Opposition of attempting to tarnish the reputation of transformative projects for 'political gain.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
A 60 day grace period to remain in US after a layoff is no longer sacrosanct for H-1B workers
Several laid-off H-1B workers are receiving notices to appear (NTAs)– the first step in the deportation proceedings, even while the 60-day grace period of authorised stay has not expired. Sameer Khedekar, immigration attorney and founder of Vanguard Visa Law explained, 'Upon lay-off a 60-day grace period is available to an H-1B visa holder who either transfers the H-1B status to a new employer or applies to change his/her visa status (say to a dependent visa) before the grace period ends. However, increasingly the Department of Homeland Security is sending NTAs in immigration courts. This is happening even when the laid-off H-1B worker has a change of status application pending. ' The notice points out to the date of withdrawal of the H-1B visa by the erstwhile employer and states that the individual has stayed in the US for longer than is permitted, he explains. Rajiv S. Khanna, managing attorney at points out that a policy memo issued on Feb 28, states that NTAs should generally be sent "upon issuance of an unfavourable decision on a benefit request" where the individual is not lawfully present. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo However, recent cases demonstrate USCIS improperly issuing NTAs to individuals who remain in 'authorized periods of stay' (such as during the 60-day grace period for H-1B visa holders) including those with pending change of status applications. To illustrate: An H-1B worker, who timely filed an I-539 application to change status to B-2 visitor within their 60-day grace period, received an NTA before a decision was made on the I-539. 'This contradicts guidance issued by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). In other words, if you have a properly filed, non-frivolous application pending, you should be considered in 'authorized stay' for unlawful presence purposes. Despite this, we are seeing a significant volume of NTAs," states Khanna. According to USCIS's recent release their screening and vetting efforts have led to approximately 1,840 NTAs a week since Feb 2025. Many of these appear to be issued in circumstances that raise serious questions about adherence to stated policy, adds Khanna. USCIS under the Biden administration had issued guidelines for laid-off workers, which included changing status during the 60-day grace period. It had pointed out that status can be changed to that of a dependent if the spouse holds an H-1B or L-I visa. Other possible non-immigrant options include change of status to that of a student visa holder (F-1) or obtaining visitor status (B-1 or B-2 visas). This guidance has been achieved and no fresh guidance has been issued. When an NTA is filed with the immigration court, removal proceedings commence and unlawful presence is triggered which has serious consequences. For now, in addition to the loss of a job, laid off H-1B workers have the looming threat of deportation proceedings.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
CAG loss estimate on BSNL-RJIL deal misread, correction done: MoS Telecom
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India estimates on losses to BSNL from Reliance Jio Infocomm was based on the misinterpretation of a clause on add-on technology, and it has been rectified in a transparent and equitable manner, Parliament was informed on Wednesday. The CAG report tabled in Parliament in April had said the government suffered a loss of ₹1,757.56 crore as state-owned telecom firm BSNL failed to bill Reliance Jio for 10 years since May 2014 as per their agreement on passive infrastructure sharing. "BSNL has Master Service Agreements (MSAs) with M/s RJIL, for leasing of BSNL's tower infrastructure to install their equipment. There is no revenue loss to BSNL and government. The estimate of CAG was based on the misinterpretation of the clause of add-on technology, which has now been rectified in a transparent and equitable manner. BSNL has since raised the revised invoices from RJIL," Minister of State for Telecom, Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar said in the Lok Sabha in a written reply. On measures taken by the government to fix accountability, recover losses and prevent recurrence of such lapses in the functioning of BSNL, Pemmasani said actions such as resolving the ambiguity in agreement clauses, monetisation of surplus inventory, issuance of revised demands and recovery have been taken. "Further, PSUs have been advised to timely process bills and be extra cautious while taking policy/business decisions," he said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
CAG estimates on losses to BSNL from RJIL a misinterpretation, correction done: MoS Telecom
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Comptroller and Auditor General of India estimates on losses to BSNL from Reliance Jio Infocomm was based on the misinterpretation of a clause on add-on technology, and it has been rectified in a transparent and equitable manner, Parliament was informed on CAG report tabled in Parliament in April had said the government suffered a loss of Rs 1,757.56 crore as state-owned telecom firm BSNL failed to bill Reliance Jio for 10 years since May 2014 as per their agreement on passive infrastructure sharing."BSNL has Master Service Agreements (MSAs) with M/s RJIL, for leasing of BSNL's tower infrastructure to install their equipment. There is no revenue loss to BSNL and government. The estimate of CAG was based on the misinterpretation of the clause of add-on technology, which has now been rectified in a transparent and equitable manner. BSNL has since raised the revised invoices from RJIL," Minister of State for Telecom, Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar said in the Lok Sabha in a written measures taken by the government to fix accountability, recover losses and prevent recurrence of such lapses in the functioning of BSNL, Pemmasani said actions such as resolving the ambiguity in agreement clauses, monetisation of surplus inventory, issuance of revised demands and recovery have been taken."Further, PSUs have been advised to timely process bills and be extra cautious while taking policy/business decisions," he said.
