logo
Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Global News2 days ago
First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity.
The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario.
It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights.
'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.
'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?"
Story continues below advertisement
The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada.
The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities.
The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government.
First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them.
3:31
Métis Nation of Ontario accused of recasting ancestors as Métis
Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario.
Story continues below advertisement
The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.'
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,' the group said in a media statement.
The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right.
Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario.
'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto.
While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory.
1:06
Manitoba Métis Federation president blasts Ontario group during identity summit
Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.'
Story continues below advertisement
'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said.
'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters.
'It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect."
The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.'
'Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.
'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO."
Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members.
The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry.
Story continues below advertisement
5:23
Ottawa signs self-government agreements with Metis Nation in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario
The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization.
Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns.
Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba.
One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document.
Story continues below advertisement
Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories.
3:01
Federal contracts given to Indigenous companies without proof
The Manitoba Métis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation.
The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk.
'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.
'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cowichan title lands encompasses B.C. mansions
Cowichan title lands encompasses B.C. mansions

Global News

time12 minutes ago

  • Global News

Cowichan title lands encompasses B.C. mansions

A landmark Aboriginal title claim successfully established by Cowichan Nation last week appears to encompass land occupied by a stretch of multimillion-dollar homes and an 18-hole golf course in Richmond, B.C. A map of the Cowichan title lands that was part of the B.C. Supreme Court ruling, combined with publicly available land documents, identify the mansions and other properties along Richmond's No. 6 Road, south of Blundell Road. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy They include a 10,600 square-foot home with 11 bathrooms and an official valuation of $7.78 million, as well as other multimillion-dollar residences and the Country Meadows Golf Course. The ruling says the Cowichan did not seek a declaration that private titles in the area were 'defective and invalid,' unlike government-owned land that makes up much of the claim. But Justice Barbara Young ruled the province has a duty to negotiate with the nation when it comes to the private land, whose titles were granted in an unjustifiable infringement of the Cowichan's Aboriginal title. Story continues below advertisement The B.C. government says it will appeal the ruling, which Attorney General Niki Sharma said Monday could have 'significant unintended consequences' over private property rights in the province.

1st day of Trump's D.C. takeover sees arrests, U.S. troops in streets
1st day of Trump's D.C. takeover sees arrests, U.S. troops in streets

Global News

time4 hours ago

  • Global News

1st day of Trump's D.C. takeover sees arrests, U.S. troops in streets

The new picture of law enforcement in the nation's capital began taking shape Tuesday as some of the 800 National Guard members deployed by the Trump administration began arriving in Washington as police and federal officials took the first steps in an uneasy partnership to reduce crime in what U.S. President Donald Trump called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after the Republican president announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the District's police department. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves, at least for a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. Story continues below advertisement 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Bowser said Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply doesn't match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in U.S. states, and Bowser said her administration's ability to push back is limited. 2:27 'This is about control': Protests erupt in Washington after Trump federalizes D.C. police Attorney General Pam Bondi posted on social media that the meeting was productive. The law allows Trump to take over the D.C. police for up to 30 days, though White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested it could last longer as they 'reevaluate and reassess' following the monthlong period. Extending federal control past that time would require Congressional approval, something likely tough to achieve in the face of Democratic resistance. Story continues below advertisement About 850 federal law enforcement officers were deployed in Washington on Monday and arrested 23 people overnight, Leavitt said. The charges, she said, included gun and drug crimes, drunk driving, subway fare evasion and homicide. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The U.S. Park Police has also removed 70 homeless encampments. People who were living in them can leave, go to a homeless shelter or go into drug addiction treatment, Leavitt said. Those who refuse could face fines or jail time. The city and Trump have had a bumpy relationship While Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back,' Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration. Story continues below advertisement Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasizing common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. 4:26 Trump announces federal control of D.C. police, vows to deploy National Guard to capital She watched with open concern for the city streets as Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives had evolved. Story continues below advertisement Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Trump has followed through on months of what many D.C. officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her longtime critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' said Clinique Chapman, CEO of the D.C. Justice Lab. A frequent critic of Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Chapman said Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer D.C. It's just about power.' Where the power actually lies Bowser contends that all the power resides with Trump and that local officials can do little other than comply and make the best of it. As long as Washington remains a federal enclave with limited autonomy under the 1973 Home Rule Act, she said, it will remain vulnerable to such takeovers. Story continues below advertisement Trump is the first president to use the law's Section 740 to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days during times of emergencies. 2:10 Trump orders more federal police in Washington, D.C. after assault on ex-Doge staff For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in D.C. reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office. He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out. Bowser's claims about successfully driving down violent crime rates received backing earlier this year from an unlikely source. Ed Martin, Trump's original choice for U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, issued a press release in April hailing a 25% drop in violent crime rates from the previous year. Story continues below advertisement In May, Trump abandoned his efforts to get Martin confirmed for the post in the face of opposition in Congress. His replacement candidate, former judge and former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, was recently confirmed. On Monday, Pirro — standing next to Trump — called his takeover 'the step that we need right now to make criminals understand that they are not going to get away with it anymore.' Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed reporting.

White House cage fight? UFC boss Dana White says it's happening in 2026
White House cage fight? UFC boss Dana White says it's happening in 2026

Global News

time4 hours ago

  • Global News

White House cage fight? UFC boss Dana White says it's happening in 2026

An Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event on the White House grounds will be taking place on July 4, 2026, according to UFC CEO and president Dana White. 'It is definitely going to happen,' White told CBS Mornings on Aug. 12, saying Independence Day is the proposed date as of now. White said that he spoke to U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday about the event, planned for America's 250th birthday. He also said that he plans to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka Trump, at the end of August to finalize details and review venue renderings. 'When he (Trump) called me and asked me to do it, he said, 'I want Ivanka in the middle of this,'' White said. 'So Ivanka reached out to me, and her and I started talking about the possibilities, where it would be and, you know, I put together all the renderings.' Story continues below advertisement White also told The Associated Press that the event is 'absolutely going to happen' at the presidential home in Washington, D.C., next summer 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS,' he said. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a one-of-one event,' White added. Trump previously said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Every one of our national park battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honour of America 250,' Trump said. 'And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight on the grounds of the White House.' 'Championship fight — full fight,' he added. 0:43 Trump announces UFC event to be held at the White House Former UFC champion Conor McGregor, who visited the White House on St. Patrick's Day, previously volunteered to take part in the match. Story continues below advertisement 'Excited with President Trump announcing a UFC fight event at the White House,' he wrote on July 4. 'I would be honoured! Count me in!' Happy 4th of July, USA. 🇺🇸 Excited with President Trump announcing a UFC fight event at the White House. I would be honoured! Count me in! 🤩☘️ — Conor McGregor (@TheNotoriousMMA) July 4, 2025 The plans for the first-ever UFC fight at the White House were shared hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, making the streaming service the new home to UFC events across the U.S. next year, through a seven-year agreement. Under the deal with UFC, Paramount will exclusively distribute UFC's full lineup of its 13 marquee numbered events and 30 Fight Nights on its streaming platform Paramount+ — with select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS — starting in 2026. It's a shift away from the UFC's existing pay-per-view model, which Paramount and TKO Group say will allow the mixed martial arts programming to reach more consumers nationwide. Story continues below advertisement White said in a post on the social media platform X that the deal with Paramount will make it more affordable and accessible for U.S. consumers to watch UFC events. 'This deal puts UFC amongst the biggest sports in the world,' he wrote. 'The exposure provided by the Paramount and CBS networks under this new structure is a huge win for our athletes and anyone who watches and loves this sport.' — With files from The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store