logo
#

Latest news with #ChiefsofOntario

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario
Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Global News

time10-08-2025

  • Politics
  • Global News

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity. The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario. It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights. 'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?" Story continues below advertisement The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities. The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government. First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. 3:31 Métis Nation of Ontario accused of recasting ancestors as Métis Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario. Story continues below advertisement The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,' the group said in a media statement. The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right. Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario. 'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto. While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory. 1:06 Manitoba Métis Federation president blasts Ontario group during identity summit Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.' Story continues below advertisement 'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said. 'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters. 'It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect." The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.' 'Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO." Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members. The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry. Story continues below advertisement 5:23 Ottawa signs self-government agreements with Metis Nation in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization. Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns. Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba. One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document. Story continues below advertisement Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories. 3:01 Federal contracts given to Indigenous companies without proof The Manitoba Métis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation. The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk. 'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders."

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario
Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Winnipeg Free Press

time10-08-2025

  • Politics
  • Winnipeg Free Press

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

OTTAWA – First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity. The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario. It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights. 'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?' The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities. The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government. First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario. The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.' 'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,' the group said in a media statement. The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right. Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario. 'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto. While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory. Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.' 'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said. 'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters. It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.' The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.' 'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO. Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members. The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry. The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization. Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns. Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba. One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document. Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories. The Manitoba Métis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation. The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk. 'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 10, 2025.

Ontario chiefs claim Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting on Thursday
Ontario chiefs claim Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting on Thursday

National Observer

time16-07-2025

  • Politics
  • National Observer

Ontario chiefs claim Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting on Thursday

The Chiefs of Ontario say Ottawa is levelling an unfair playing field for chiefs in a meeting planned with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday to discuss the government's controversial major projects legislation. Carney promised in June that he would meet with First Nations after chiefs said their rights were not respected by the rush to push the bill through Parliament. Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act, allows cabinet to quickly grant federal approvals for big industrial projects like mines, ports and pipelines by sidestepping existing laws. An email was sent to chiefs on July 9 opening up registration for the meeting and the Chiefs of Ontario said it was initially able to register chiefs as well as legal advisers, technical and support staff to attend. But a followup email a few days later confirmed the regional chief's registration but denied the registration requests for all others. "It's disappointing that technical staff, experts and lawyers from organizations and First Nations who were going to attend this meeting were uninvited after they were allowed to register. They all spent money on travel and accommodations to support chiefs during this critical discussion," the group representing 133 chiefs in the province said in a statement. "This legislation has the potential to fundamentally change this country and it's unrealistic and unfair that the government has technical staff and lawyers in the room, but chiefs will not have that support." The organization said it spent tens of thousands of dollars on flights and hotels for staff that now won't be allowed into the meeting. Carney's staff have not yet responded to a request for comment from The Canadian Press. Ottawa asked First Nations chiefs to submit their questions in advance of the meeting through an online platform by July 16, and gave them the option to vote on which questions will be posed by their peers. The invitation said that process will help highlight 'shared priorities and bring the most pressing issues to the forefront.' The bulk of the questions posted by Tuesday evening dealt with how the government will respect the rights of First Nations. "How does your government reconcile Bill C-5's goal of 'economic efficiency' with the constitutional duty to consult and accommodate First Nations under section 35," reads one question, posed by Chief David Monias of Pimicikamak Cree Nation in Manitoba. "Is economic streamlining being prioritized over constitutionally protected indigenous rights," he continued. On Tuesday nine First Nations in Ontario asked a court to declare as unconstitutional both Ottawa's Bill C-5, and Bill 5 in Ontario, a similar provincial law meant to fast-track infrastructure projects. They are seeking an injunction to prevent the governments from using some of the most contentious aspects of the bills. The communities say in the legal challenge filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Tuesday that Bill C-5 and Bill 5 both represent a "clear and present danger" to the First Nations' self-determination rights to ways of life on their territories.

Chiefs of Ontario say Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting Thursday
Chiefs of Ontario say Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting Thursday

Global News

time16-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Global News

Chiefs of Ontario say Ottawa acting unfairly in major projects meeting Thursday

The Chiefs of Ontario say Ottawa is levelling an unfair playing field for chiefs in a meeting planned with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday to discuss the government's controversial major projects legislation. Carney promised in June that he would meet with First Nations after chiefs said their rights were not respected by the rush to push the bill through Parliament. Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act, allows cabinet to quickly grant federal approvals for big industrial projects like mines, ports and pipelines by sidestepping existing laws. An email was sent to chiefs on July 9 opening up registration for the meeting and the Chiefs of Ontario said it was initially able to register chiefs as well as legal advisers, technical and support staff to attend. But a followup email a few days later confirmed the regional chief's registration but denied the registration requests for all others. Story continues below advertisement 'It's disappointing that technical staff, experts and lawyers from organizations and First Nations who were going to attend this meeting were uninvited after they were allowed to register. They all spent money on travel and accommodations to support chiefs during this critical discussion,' the group representing 133 chiefs in the province said in a statement. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'This legislation has the potential to fundamentally change this country and it's unrealistic and unfair that the government has technical staff and lawyers in the room, but chiefs will not have that support.' The organization said it spent tens of thousands of dollars on flights and hotels for staff that now won't be allowed into the meeting. Carney's staff have not yet responded to a request for comment from The Canadian Press. Ottawa asked First Nations chiefs to submit their questions in advance of the meeting through an online platform by July 16, and gave them the option to vote on which questions will be posed by their peers. The invitation said that process will help highlight 'shared priorities and bring the most pressing issues to the forefront.' The bulk of the questions posted by Tuesday evening dealt with how the government will respect the rights of First Nations. Story continues below advertisement 'How does your government reconcile Bill C-5's goal of 'economic efficiency' with the constitutional duty to consult and accommodate First Nations under section 35,' reads one question, posed by Chief David Monias of Pimicikamak Cree Nation in Manitoba. 'Is economic streamlining being prioritized over constitutionally protected indigenous rights,' he continued. On Tuesday nine First Nations in Ontario asked a court to declare as unconstitutional both Ottawa's Bill C-5, and Bill 5 in Ontario, a similar provincial law meant to fast-track infrastructure projects. They are seeking an injunction to prevent the governments from using some of the most contentious aspects of the bills. The communities say in the legal challenge filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice Tuesday that Bill C-5 and Bill 5 both represent a 'clear and present danger' to the First Nations' self-determination rights to ways of life on their territories. — With files from Allison Jones in Toronto

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store