Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as irate Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'
Negotiations between Senate Republicans and Democrats collapsed, leading to a recess without confirming numerous Trump nominees. Trump's attack on Schumer further derailed potential agreements. Republicans are considering rule changes to expedite confirmations upon their return, while Democrats decry such moves. The partisan gridlock reflects escalating obstruction tactics over executive and judicial nominees.
AP Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y., speaks during a news conference on tariffs, Thursday, July 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib) The Senate left Washington Saturday night for its monthlong August recess without a deal to advance dozens of President Donald Trump's nominees, calling it quits after days of contentious bipartisan negotiations and Trump posting on social media that Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer can "GO TO HELL!" Without a deal in hand, Republicans say they may try to change Senate rules when they return in September to speed up the pace of confirmations. Trump has been pressuring senators to move quickly as Democrats blocked more nominees than usual this year, denying any fast unanimous consent votes and forcing roll calls on each one, a lengthy process that can take several days per nominee. "I think they're desperately in need of change," Senate Majority Leader John Thune said of Senate rules Saturday after negotiations with Schumer and Trump broke down. "I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that." Schumer said a rules change would be a "huge mistake," especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. "Donald Trump tried to bully us, go around us, threaten us, call us names, but he got nothing," Schumer said.
The latest standoff comes as Democrats and Republicans have gradually escalated their obstruction of the other party's executive branch and judicial nominees over the last two decades, and as Senate leaders have incrementally changed Senate rules to speed up confirmations - and make them less bipartisan. In 2013, Democrats changed Senate rules for lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations as Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's judicial picks. In 2017, Republicans did the same for Supreme Court nominees as Democrats tried to block Trump's nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch. Trump has been pressuring Senate Republicans for weeks to cancel the August recess and grind through dozens of his nominations as Democrats have slowed the process. But Republicans hoped to make a deal with Democrats instead, and came close several times over the last few days as the two parties and the White House negotiated over moving a large tranche of nominees in exchange for reversing some of the Trump administration's spending cuts on foreign aid, among other issues. The Senate held a rare weekend session on Saturday as Republicans held votes on nominee after nominee and as the two parties tried to work out the final details of a deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" Trump posted on Truth Social. "Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country." Thune said afterward that there were "several different times" when the two sides thought they had a deal, but in the end "we didn't close it out." It's the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn't allowed at least some quick confirmations. Thune has already kept the Senate in session for more days, and with longer hours, this year to try and confirm as many of Trump's nominees as possible. But Democrats had little desire to give in without the spending cut reversals or some other incentive, even though they too were eager to skip town after several long months of work and bitter partisan fights over legislation. "We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as we have right now," Schumer said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
3 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump ends Musk's ‘five things' rule for federal workers — why did the White House finally snap and pull the plug?
Synopsis Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program has been officially scrapped by the Trump administration, ending months of confusion and pushback from federal workers. Introduced earlier in 2025 to boost accountability, the rule forced government employees to email weekly work summaries. But after growing backlash and internal agency resistance, the Office of Personnel Management finally shut it down. This marks a clear shift in President Trump's federal reform approach and signals the administration's distancing from Musk's influence in Washington. The move reaffirms trust in traditional oversight while rejecting unnecessary tech-driven mandates that created more chaos than clarity. Elon Musk's bold attempt to reshape federal productivity has come to an end. The Trump administration has officially scrapped Musk's controversial 'Five Things' weekly email directive, a rule that had required federal employees to report five accomplishments every week. Initially launched as part of Musk's aggressive government reform strategy, the program faced mounting criticism, internal pushback, and logistical chaos. Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program officially scrapped by Trump administration amid backlash and confusion- In a major move that reflects growing tension between President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, the Trump administration has officially ended Musk's controversial 'Five Things' email directive that had stirred widespread confusion and discontent across federal agencies. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a formal notice on August 5, 2025, revoking the program, marking a definitive shift away from Musk's once-celebrated push for government efficiency. The 'Five Things' initiative, introduced earlier this year under Elon Musk's short-lived leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), required all federal employees to send weekly emails listing five key accomplishments from their work. Originally promoted as a tool for enhancing productivity and accountability, the policy quickly became a source of confusion, frustration, and resistance across multiple government departments. In the official memo released this week, OPM Director Scott Kupor stated that federal supervisors already have the 'tools and flexibility needed' to evaluate employee performance, rendering Musk's email summaries redundant and ineffective. This announcement comes just months after Musk's high-profile departure from the federal government and a public falling-out with President Trump, who had initially championed the program but later distanced himself as implementation faltered. In January 2025, President Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a bold experiment aimed at reducing bureaucracy, slashing government costs, and streamlining federal operations. Musk, known for his disruptive business style at Tesla and SpaceX, wasted no time in pushing aggressive reforms. One of his first and most visible directives was the weekly 'Five Things' email rule. According to internal sources, Musk believed the practice would enhance workplace discipline, improve visibility into government functions, and cut down on inefficiencies. But what seemed like a simple accountability tool on the surface turned into a logistical headache for many government workers. As early as February 2025, signs of internal pushback began to surface. Agencies such as the Department of Defense, NASA, State Department, and Health and Human Services began advising employees to pause or disregard the directive entirely. Internal memos cited concerns about legal risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and conflicting chains of command. Some supervisors complained that the requirement added administrative burdens without delivering meaningful insights. Others argued that the centralized summaries violated existing agency reporting protocols. In fact, by April, many departments had already unofficially stopped enforcing the rule—even before Musk left his post. Initially, President Trump praised Musk's approach, calling it 'ingenious' and a 'wake-up call for lazy bureaucracy.' But as criticism mounted and implementation faltered, the administration began quietly stepping back. By June, tensions between the two had boiled over. Trump publicly criticized Musk's handling of internal reforms and later revoked federal appointments aligned with Musk's DOGE team. Additionally, federal contracts involving Musk-owned companies like SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company came under review—further escalating the rift. The formal termination of the 'Five Things' policy now cements that rift, signaling the Trump administration's broader rejection of Musk-style micromanagement and automation-driven government models. In the memo issued August 5, the Office of Personnel Management stated that agencies would now 'return to existing oversight mechanisms' that include performance reviews, project evaluations, and internal accountability metrics. 'This directive is no longer in effect,' the OPM memo read. 'We believe agency leadership is fully equipped with the tools necessary to assess team performance without weekly reporting mandates.' The Trump administration's move underscores its confidence in traditional supervisory structures—and a desire to minimize administrative chaos stirred up by Musk's reforms. Musk's exit from government in late May followed a wave of resignations and infighting within DOGE. Critics called the agency 'chaotic' and 'visionless,' while supporters defended Musk's attempts to modernize Washington's outdated systems. Even after his departure, Musk remained vocal on social media, slamming what he called 'deep state resistance' to accountability and claiming that Trump 'betrayed the vision for real change.' Since then, he has focused on expanding his ventures in AI and space exploration, while DOGE has been largely sidelined within the administration. For the more than 2 million federal employees affected by the weekly email directive, the repeal comes as a major relief. The program had added extra hours of unpaid administrative work and opened employees to new levels of scrutiny, according to union leaders. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) had been advocating for the policy to be scrapped, citing unfair labor practices and stress-related issues among staff. With this formal announcement, agencies can now focus on core mission work without the added burden of weekly summary submissions. The unraveling of Elon Musk's influence in Washington politics is now evident. From once being hailed as the face of 'Silicon Valley meets Capitol Hill,' Musk now finds himself on the outside looking in. His bold but divisive ideas—like algorithmic personnel tracking and AI-assisted departmental decision-making—failed to gain lasting traction. What's clear is that President Trump is reasserting control over his administration's direction, refocusing on efficiency through conventional oversight, and stepping back from experiments that stir more dysfunction than results. While innovation remains a key part of Trump's agenda for his second term, the administration has now drawn a clear line between meaningful reform and disruptive overreach. The end of Musk's 'Five Things' email rule symbolizes that shift. By formally terminating the program, the White House is sending a message: government reform must be functional, clear, and supported by institutional leadership—not just dictated by tech billionaires with grand visions. As 2025 moves forward, it's expected that the Trump administration will continue pushing for government modernization, but with greater respect for the realities of federal operations and agency autonomy. Q1: Why did the Trump administration end Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email rule? Because it caused confusion, added workload, and was no longer seen as useful. Q2: What was Elon Musk's government email directive all about? It required federal workers to send weekly emails listing five things they accomplished.
News18
5 minutes ago
- News18
"Country Over Politics" Texas Democrats Hunker Down In Blue States, House Fails To Reach Quorum
Democratic legislators from Texas are still hunkered down in various blue states across the country, as they maintain their quorum break over a new congressional map proposed by state Republicans. Illinois governor JB Pritzker, who has welcomed several fleeing lawmakers, said that Texas Democrats are 'leading the way in choosing courage and country over politics and party'. President Donald Trump said that the Republican party is 'entitled' to the five House seats they could pick up if the Texas map is approved. He also criticized blue states for accepting Texas Democrats. 'You notice, they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered. California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress in California. It's all gerrymandered,' he said. n18oc_world n18oc_crux
India Today
5 minutes ago
- India Today
Gujarat set to implement Uniform Civil Code, report likely in monsoon session
After Uttarakhand, Gujarat is poised to become the second state in the country to implement a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). A key meeting was held on Tuesday between Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel and the UCC Committee, during which the committee's draft report was to sources, the committee has submitted its report during this meeting. The state government will now review the recommendations, suggest any necessary modifications and finalise the report. advertisementOnce complete, the government is expected to table the UCC bill in the upcoming monsoon session of the Gujarat Assembly. Committee chairperson and retired Supreme Court judge Justice Ranjana Desai described the meeting as a formal interaction to discuss the work done so far. She said that the committee has visited every district, interacted with people from all sections of society, and incorporated their feedback into the report on the Uniform Civil Code. She also added that the final report will be officially submitted in the coming days, following which the government will decide on implementation.A spokesperson for the Gujarat government confirmed that the committee had collected public feedback both online and offline and held meetings across communities. The spokesperson said that the discussions focused on those findings on Tuesday. Once the report is officially submitted, the government will decide whether to introduce it in the monsoon is worth noting that the UCC committee was constituted on February 4 by Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel. The five-member panel, led by Justice Ranjana Desai, was initially given a 45-day timeline to submit its report. However, its tenure was extended three times to ensure wider consultations across all segments of society.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Gujarat
