1993 Oldsmobile Silhouette: a Wacky Minivan with a Hollywood Past
The Oldsmobile version found some unexpected fame in 1995's .
This example has low mileage and an all-California history, and the auction ends on Monday, February 3.
"I ordered a Cadillac."
"Oh, well, you got the Cadillac of minivans."
And just like that, an Oldsmobile Silhouette became the unlikely transportation of John Travolta's Chili Palmer in Get Shorty, a lighthearted mid-Nineties comedy that sees a mafioso romping through Hollywood, breaking all the rules (and a nose or two). It's great fun, and the Oldsmobile is always either in view or just offscreen, as much of a character as Danny DeVito's slightly clueless movie star or the wonderfully scenery-chewing performance by Dennis Farina.This 1993 Oldsmobile Silhouette in gorgeous Medium Garnet is up for sale on Bring a Trailer (which, like Car and Driver, is part of Hearst Autos). It's got just 69K miles on the odometer and has a sunny California history since new.
Also known as the Dustbuster van (because, well, look at it), this Oldsmobile was one of a trio of three GM products that was aimed at ending Chrysler's dominance of the minivan segment. The previous Chevy Astro and GMC Safari hadn't quite done the job, and so GM's design department tasked Pontiac with coming up with an exciting concept.Boy, did they. The Trans Sport concept van was first shown at the 1986 Chicago auto show, and it featured futuristic styling—with rear gullwing doors, decades before the Tesla Model X. There was even an integrated onboard Nintendo system. Of course, the production version was a lot more conventional.
As usual, GM spread the product among its brands, giving each version slightly different flavors. The Chevy Lumina APV was the workhorse. The Pontiac Trans Sport was the sporty one. And the Olds Silhouette, that was the luxury offering.Guess which version didn't sell very well. Part of the joke in Get Shorty is that a Silhouette is exactly something you'd find in a rental lot, because plenty of them went to fleet sales. Those vans were chewed up and scrapped, but this example has remained in the same family since new, and it shows like it's been cared for.Under that aerodynamic hood is a 3.8-liter V-6 that was good for 170 horsepower and 225 pound-feet of torque. It has had some recent service including replacement of the water pump and serpentine belt, and it passed California emissions testing last year.
With leather, air conditioning, cruise control, and plenty of power features, this is one loaded-up minivan. Sixteen-inch alloy wheels add a further element of bling. A sliding-door Escalade? Perhaps not quite, but it's still a very tidy example.
The auction ends on February 3.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
Chevy engineers just drove the Silverado EV a record 1,059 miles on one charge (but don't expect to get that far)
Over seven days in July, a rotating crew of GM workers drove a Chevrolet Silverado EV Work Truck for 1,059.2 miles on a single charge. That's higher than the Guinness World Record for longest distance driven by an EV on one charge—749 miles, set earlier in July by Lucid Air Grand Touring. It's also significantly more than the Silverado EV's EPA-estimated range of 493 miles. But the feat required some driving conditions customers likely wouldn't want to replicate themselves, like not using the AC at all during the summer heat, and driving at speeds of just 25 miles per hour. [Photo: GM] 'Range anxiety' has become a common concern for EV drivers and potential EV customers who fear getting stranded with a dead battery far from a charging site. Automakers and engineers continue to make battery developments to improve EV range, but how many miles you get out of a charge also depends on a whole bunch of other factors—like the weather, the weight in the vehicle, if you're driving uphill, if you're using air conditioning, and even your driving style, like if you're accelerating quickly or slamming on the breaks. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters GM engineers knew they would have to control for all those variables. They didn't make any changes to the software of the battery for this test, but they did make hardware changes, including lowering the position of the windshield wiper to reduce drag, inflating the tires to their highest acceptable pressure to lower rolling resistance, and removing the spare tire to make the vehicle lighter. Engineers also optimized the truck's wheel alignment, put a tonneau cover over the truck bed, and turned off climate control inside the vehicle (if a driver has the AC on while it's extremely hot outside, an EV range can be up to 50% less than under optimal conditions). They also chose to do the test during a warmer time of year, because EV batteries can struggle in the cold. Workers who got behind the wheel took careful considerations around their driving behavior, too, mapping out routes that traveled on slower roads rather than highways and driving just 20 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour 'where safe to do so,' says Jon Doremus, an engineering manager at Chevrolet who led the project. (Before July 2025, the Guinness world record for longest journey by an electric car on a single charge was 649 miles, also set by Lucid; Chevrolet didn't involve Guinness World Records in this project.) The rotating crew of Silverado drivers were also mindful of how hard they were breaking and accelerating. 'One of the terms that the engineers used was 'drive like there is an egg between your foot and the gas pedal,' so very, very gently accelerating and very gently decelerating,' Doremus says. For the majority of the driving time, there was just one person in the truck, which reduced weight. The project spanned seven days and included trips around GM's Milford Proving Ground and Detroit's Belle Isle. In total, about 40 different GM workers drove during the test; the team made a sign-up sheet available to anyone from the company to participate. 'We knew this was going to mean a lot of hours driving in a truck that didn't have AC, so you need to take shifts and have a lot of people rotating out to not get fatigued,' Doremus says. (Drivers could crack the windows up to 2 inches, and there was also a battery-operated fan in the truck.) Forgoing air conditioning in July, avoiding highways, and traveling light (for an electric truck that has a towing capacity of 10,000 pounds) may not be choices that the average Chevy customer also decides to make. GM engineers know that. 'I don't expect people are going to do these things on their daily vehicles, but that's not to say there's not a lot to learn and pick from this to get a better range,' Doremus says. He says the experiment shows just how many factors people can control to try to get more out of their EVs, and what important role driving behavior plays. 'If you do want to get better range out of your vehicles and you're willing to sacrifice some of your commute time, maybe it makes sense to take a local highway instead of the interstate and go 45 to 50 instead of 70 to 75 [miles per hour],' he adds. It's also not the first GM engineering test that doesn't exactly mimic the standard, day-to-day driving experience. 'Do we expect the average customer to go out to Yuma [Arizona], where it's 120 degrees [Fahrenheit] right now, tow a trailer at max payload and go up and down the steepest grades we can find?' Doremus says. 'Probably not, but we do it, because we want to make sure the truck can do that in case somebody ever does get in that situation.' Workers who participated included some who were super familiar with the Silverado EV—but also those who hadn't ever driven an electric truck before. For the latter, Doremus says the exercise quelled some range anxiety. 'They realized that there's a lot within my control to maximize this, this range,' he says. 'Yeah, on paper, I may only be able to go 493 miles, but if I got into a situation where I needed to stretch my range as much as possible, there's a lot of things that I can do to drive efficiently.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
US market avoids tariff impacts as outlook improves
Sales Summary According to preliminary estimates, US Light Vehicle (LV) sales grew by 7.3% YoY in July, to 1.39 million units. July 2025 had one additional selling day as compared to July 2024, meaning that sales were up by 4.1% YoY on a selling day-adjusted basis. The daily selling rate was measured at 53.6k units/day in July, up from 52.7k units/day in June. The annualized selling rate was estimated at 16.6 million units/year in July, up from 15.2 million units/year in June. Retail sales were estimated at 1.19 million units, up by 10.8% YoY, while fleet sales were thought to total 206k units, down by 4.5% YoY. OEM Analysis GM was once again the bestselling OEM in the market, with total sales of 237k units, and a market share of 17.0%. Despite a seemingly impressive monthly volume, GM's market share has now declined for three straight months. Toyota Group ranked second in July sales, on 218k units, for a 15.6% share, with the group's sales jumping by 19.9% YoY. Ford Group was in third place, on 182k units, but after a stellar Q2, the OEM's share fell back to a modest 13.1% in July. At a brand level, Toyota outsold Ford, by 187k units to 176k units. While it has been typical in recent times for Toyota to sell higher volumes than Ford, the reverse had been the case in June. Chevrolet was third, on 153k units. Model Analysis Despite a slightly quiet month for Ford overall, the F-150 was the nation's bestselling model once again in July, on 44.2k units – the F-150 has now held the top spot for four consecutive months. The Toyota RAV4 was in second on 39.8k units, while the Chevrolet Silverado came in third on 35.4k units. The ranking of the top three models was unchanged from June. The Chevrolet Equinox sold 31.8k units in July, its highest volume since March. Segment Analysis According to initial estimates, Compact Non-Premium SUV's market share was 21.5% in July, the segment's highest share since March. To some extent, however, this performance was upstaged by Midsize Non-Premium SUV, which achieved a market share of 17.2%, up by 2.0 pp on June's result, and the highest for the segment since May 2022. The segment was boosted by robust volumes from models such as the Toyota 4Runner and Hyundai Palisade. After two stronger months in May and June, the Large Pickup segment saw its market share ease back to 13.8% in July. David Oakley, Manager, Americas Sales Forecasts, GlobalData, said: 'There was little sign of tariffs negatively impacting the market in July. Automakers have made a point of absorbing the higher costs they are seeing, and some have even extended offers that were previously due to expire at the beginning of the July. Therefore, from the consumer's point-of-view, there was perhaps little to dissuade buyers from making purchases as normal. At the present time, OEMs are still vying for market share, rather than being overly concerned with protecting inventory. We should also bear in mind that for the majority of the month of July, the landscape regarding tariff rates in the longer-term was highly unclear. Automakers have therefore largely tried to maintain a business-as-usual approach, while mostly avoiding knee-jerk reactions in the face of uncertainty. The announcement that the tax credits available for Electric Vehicles (EVs) will be discontinued from September 30th appeared to notably boost sales of some EVs in July, an effect that we would expect to continue as we move through the next two months and the deadline looms larger'. Forecast Updates While OEMs have thus far largely adopted a 'holding pattern' approach to tariff uncertainty, this is not necessarily a strategy they can maintain indefinitely. Several automakers reported either outright financial losses in Q2, or large reductions in profitability due to the cost of absorbing tariffs. Recent trade deals with various countries have given greater clarity to the industry, as it appears that the benchmark rate will be 15% for countries outside of North America. Although the Trump administration raised tariffs on some Canadian goods to 35%, vehicles compliant with the USMCA trade agreement – which covers the vast majority of models sourced from Canada – will still be subject to 25% tariffs on the non-US content of the vehicle, and the same applies to Mexico. Nevertheless, the prospect remains of some vehicles sourced from the US's neighbors potentially incurring higher tariffs than a model imported from Japan, for example. In the longer-term, this seems unlikely to be sustained, but negotiations with Mexico, and particularly Canada, have been difficult. With an earlier-than-expected lowering of tariff rates, we now see US sales at around 15.7 million units in 2025, still down from almost 16.0 million units in 2024, but a considerably better outlook than would have been the case had the original tariffs remained in place without mitigation. This article was first published on GlobalData's dedicated research platform, the . "US market avoids tariff impacts as outlook improves – GlobalData" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Are Wall Street Analysts Predicting General Motors Stock Will Climb or Sink?
Detroit-based General Motors Company (GM) designs, builds, and sells trucks, crossovers, cars, and automobile parts, and also provides software-enabled services and subscriptions. With a market cap of $50 billion, General Motors operates through GM North America, GM International, Cruise, and GM Financial segments. The auto maker notably outperformed the broader market over the past year, but underperformed in 2025. GM stock has surged 21.1% over the past 52 weeks and dipped 1.4% in 2025, compared to the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 14.5% gains over the past year and 6.1% returns on a YTD basis. More News from Barchart Find Winning Momentum Trades With This Moving Average Stock Screener Tariffs, Earnings and Other Can't Miss Items this Week This Blue-Chip Dividend Stock Is Stuck in the Tariff Crosshairs. Can Cost Cuts Save the Day? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Narrowing the focus, GM has also outperformed the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLY) 18.2% gains over the past 52 weeks and a 3.7% drop in 2025. General Motors' stock prices plunged 8.1% following the release of its Q2 results on Jul. 22. While the company observed improvements in used vehicle and service revenues, and an increase in leased vehicle income and finance charges, its vehicle, parts, and accessories sales remained under pressure. This resulted in a 1.8% year-over-year drop in overall topline to $47.1 billion. However, this figure surpassed the Street's expectations by a notable margin. Meanwhile, its adjusted net income plunged 29.8% year-over-year to $2.5 billion, but adjusted EPS of $2.53 beat the consensus estimates by 5.9%. Following the initial drop, GM stock prices surged 8.7% in the subsequent trading session. For the full fiscal 2025, ending in December, analysts expect GM to report an adjusted EPS of $9.41, down 11.2% year-over-year. On a positive note, the company has a solid earnings surprise history. It has surpassed the Street's bottom-line estimates in each of the past four quarters. The stock has a consensus 'Moderate Buy' rating overall. Of the 28 analysts covering the stock, opinions include 11 'Strong Buys,' two 'Moderate Buys,' 12 'Holds,' and three 'Strong Sells.' This configuration is slightly more bullish than a month ago, when only 10 analysts gave 'Strong Buy' recommendations and one suggested a 'Moderate Buy' rating. On Jul. 22, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained an 'Outperform' rating on GM and set a price target of $55. GM's mean price target of $55.73 suggests a 6.1% upside potential. Meanwhile, the Street-high target of $80 represents a staggering 52.3% premium to current price levels. On the date of publication, Aditya Sarawgi did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
