logo
Chevy engineers just drove the Silverado EV a record 1,059 miles on one charge (but don't expect to get that far)

Chevy engineers just drove the Silverado EV a record 1,059 miles on one charge (but don't expect to get that far)

Fast Companya day ago
Over seven days in July, a rotating crew of GM workers drove a Chevrolet Silverado EV Work Truck for 1,059.2 miles on a single charge.
That's higher than the Guinness World Record for longest distance driven by an EV on one charge—749 miles, set earlier in July by Lucid Air Grand Touring. It's also significantly more than the Silverado EV's EPA-estimated range of 493 miles.
But the feat required some driving conditions customers likely wouldn't want to replicate themselves, like not using the AC at all during the summer heat, and driving at speeds of just 25 miles per hour. [Photo: GM]
'Range anxiety' has become a common concern for EV drivers and potential EV customers who fear getting stranded with a dead battery far from a charging site. Automakers and engineers continue to make battery developments to improve EV range, but how many miles you get out of a charge also depends on a whole bunch of other factors—like the weather, the weight in the vehicle, if you're driving uphill, if you're using air conditioning, and even your driving style, like if you're accelerating quickly or slamming on the breaks.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.
Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day
Privacy Policy
| Fast Company Newsletters
GM engineers knew they would have to control for all those variables. They didn't make any changes to the software of the battery for this test, but they did make hardware changes, including lowering the position of the windshield wiper to reduce drag, inflating the tires to their highest acceptable pressure to lower rolling resistance, and removing the spare tire to make the vehicle lighter.
Engineers also optimized the truck's wheel alignment, put a tonneau cover over the truck bed, and turned off climate control inside the vehicle (if a driver has the AC on while it's extremely hot outside, an EV range can be up to 50% less than under optimal conditions). They also chose to do the test during a warmer time of year, because EV batteries can struggle in the cold.
Workers who got behind the wheel took careful considerations around their driving behavior, too, mapping out routes that traveled on slower roads rather than highways and driving just 20 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour 'where safe to do so,' says Jon Doremus, an engineering manager at Chevrolet who led the project. (Before July 2025, the Guinness world record for longest journey by an electric car on a single charge was 649 miles, also set by Lucid; Chevrolet didn't involve Guinness World Records in this project.)
The rotating crew of Silverado drivers were also mindful of how hard they were breaking and accelerating. 'One of the terms that the engineers used was 'drive like there is an egg between your foot and the gas pedal,' so very, very gently accelerating and very gently decelerating,' Doremus says. For the majority of the driving time, there was just one person in the truck, which reduced weight.
The project spanned seven days and included trips around GM's Milford Proving Ground and Detroit's Belle Isle. In total, about 40 different GM workers drove during the test; the team made a sign-up sheet available to anyone from the company to participate. 'We knew this was going to mean a lot of hours driving in a truck that didn't have AC, so you need to take shifts and have a lot of people rotating out to not get fatigued,' Doremus says. (Drivers could crack the windows up to 2 inches, and there was also a battery-operated fan in the truck.)
Forgoing air conditioning in July, avoiding highways, and traveling light (for an electric truck that has a towing capacity of 10,000 pounds) may not be choices that the average Chevy customer also decides to make. GM engineers know that.
'I don't expect people are going to do these things on their daily vehicles, but that's not to say there's not a lot to learn and pick from this to get a better range,' Doremus says. He says the experiment shows just how many factors people can control to try to get more out of their EVs, and what important role driving behavior plays. 'If you do want to get better range out of your vehicles and you're willing to sacrifice some of your commute time, maybe it makes sense to take a local highway instead of the interstate and go 45 to 50 instead of 70 to 75 [miles per hour],' he adds.
It's also not the first GM engineering test that doesn't exactly mimic the standard, day-to-day driving experience. 'Do we expect the average customer to go out to Yuma [Arizona], where it's 120 degrees [Fahrenheit] right now, tow a trailer at max payload and go up and down the steepest grades we can find?' Doremus says. 'Probably not, but we do it, because we want to make sure the truck can do that in case somebody ever does get in that situation.'
Workers who participated included some who were super familiar with the Silverado EV—but also those who hadn't ever driven an electric truck before. For the latter, Doremus says the exercise quelled some range anxiety. 'They realized that there's a lot within my control to maximize this, this range,' he says. 'Yeah, on paper, I may only be able to go 493 miles, but if I got into a situation where I needed to stretch my range as much as possible, there's a lot of things that I can do to drive efficiently.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

General Motors, Hyundai ink first joint deal to develop five vehicles amid rising competition
General Motors, Hyundai ink first joint deal to develop five vehicles amid rising competition

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

General Motors, Hyundai ink first joint deal to develop five vehicles amid rising competition

(Reuters) -General Motors and Hyundai Motor announced on Wednesday their first agreement to jointly develop five vehicles. Four of the vehicles — a compact SUV, a car, a pickup, and a mid-size pickup — are targeted at Central and South American markets and will support both internal combustion and hybrid powertrains. The two global automakers will also co-develop an electric commercial van for the North American markets. Reuters in March reported that the two automakers were nearing a deal to share two commercial electric vans. Global automakers face stiff competition from Chinese EV makers and a trade war impacting imports of crucial parts, including rare earth materials, which has pushed production costs higher. Chinese automakers have put out several high-tech, low-cost models, affecting demand for EVs from legacy automakers including GM. Hyundai's presence in China — the world's largest auto market — is minimal but it faces growing pressure from Chinese auto exports globally. The Korean automaker is leaning on its U.S. sales while its China sales decline. Unlike GM, Hyundai has little presence in the lucrative U.S. commercial vehicle and truck market. Collaborating with Hyundai on vans could help GM reduce development costs on those models, especially considering its decades-old Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana vehicles. At full production scale, the companies expect to roll out up to 800,000 vehicles annually. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

All These Passwords Are ‘Instantly' Hacked—Change Yours Now
All These Passwords Are ‘Instantly' Hacked—Change Yours Now

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

All These Passwords Are ‘Instantly' Hacked—Change Yours Now

There are plenty of lists of horror passwords. Those that are too short or too simple or too easily guessed. Chances are your passwords are reused in whole or part, that they have leaked or been stolen, and that they're on plenty of dangerous lists. The team at Hive Systems have complied a chart to color-code the passwords you should use and those you should not. It's a perfect illustration as to why length matters, why numbers alone are a nightmare, and why all those prompts push you to include numbers, upper and lower case letters, and symbols. You'll note which passwords are 'instantly' hacked and which take minutes, hours, days or even years to crack. If you have lurking in the dangerous purple or red zones, you'll need to go change those right away. But also bear in mind that, per Microsoft's warning, 'the password era is ending.' Maybe none of this matters anymore. Wherever you can, add passkeys to your accounts. These replace usernames, passwords and two-factor authentication (2FA) with a sign-in linked to your hardware device, essentially unlocked with a PIN, fingerprint or Face ID. That means there's no password or code to steal, bypass or trick you into sharing. Absent a passkey, you need to ensure 2FA is enabled and it's not SMS-based. An authenticator app on your phone is fine. If you do that, then your password is no longer an access key to your account, it's a trigger for a 2FA code check. And if you use an app instead of a texted code, then you'll prevent most bypasses or 2FA attacks. But as Microsoft also warns, even if you set up passkeys, your password is still dangerous if it remains as a backup access means into your account. And so it's strongly advised to ensure that your passwords are long and unique and complex, that you use a standalone password manager to keep them safe, and you avoid SMS for 2FA. Hive Systems ran its testing using a black box approach, essentially starting from scratch to brute force an attack. In reality that's not what happens. Attackers have head-starts through breaches, common password lists and other techniques. Albeit if your password is in that 'instantly' zone, you can't get much faster than that. 'Password reuse, short character lengths, and weak complexity remain some of the easiest ways attackers gain access to systems,' Hive Systems warns. 'The 2025 Hive Systems Password Table is a proven tool to communicate risk clearly and spark action. Use it to change habits, strengthen defenses, and support better security hygiene.'

New Models From OpenAI, Anthropic, Google – All At The Same Time
New Models From OpenAI, Anthropic, Google – All At The Same Time

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

New Models From OpenAI, Anthropic, Google – All At The Same Time

It's Christmas in August – at least, for those tech-wonks who are interested in new model releases. Today's news is a very full stocking of brand new LLM editions from three of the biggies – OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. I'll go over these one by one, discussing what these most recent model iterations bring to the table. OpenAI OSS Models First, the tech community is getting an eye on OpenAI OSS 120b and OSS 20b, the first open-weight systems from this company since ChatGPT 2. Now, coverage from Computerworld and elsewhere points out that, although these models have Apache licenses, they are not fully open source in the conventional way, ,but partly open: the weights are open source, while the training data is not. Powered by one 80GB GPU chip, the larger OSS models, according to the above report, 'achieves parity' with the o4-mini model vis a vis reasoning power. The smaller one can run on smartphones and other edge devices. The models come quantized with MXFP4, a low-precision data type for accelerating matrix multiplications. Let Them Work Another interesting aspect of the new OSS models has to do with chain of thought, something that has revolutionized inference, while raising questions about comparative methodology. Basically, we want the LLMs to be accurate, but engineers have found that, in many cases, restricting or overly guiding systems causes them to 'hide' CoT. So OpenAI has chosen not to optimize the models in this way. 'OpenAI is intentionally leaving Chain of Thought (CoTs) unfiltered during training to preserve their usefulness for monitoring, based on the concern that optimization could cause models to hide their real reasoning,' writes Roger Montti at Search Engine Journal. 'This, however, could result in hallucinations.' Montti cites the following model card report from OpenAI: 'In our recent research, we found that monitoring a reasoning model's chain of thought can be helpful for detecting misbehavior. We further found that models could learn to hide their thinking while still misbehaving if their CoTs were directly pressured against having 'bad thoughts.'…In accord with these concerns, we decided not to put any direct optimization pressure on the CoT for either of our two open-weight models. We hope that this gives developers the opportunity to implement CoT monitoring systems in their projects and enables the research community to further study CoT monitorability.' So, the models are allowed to have these 'bad thoughts' in aid of, I suppose, transparency. OpenAI is then honest about the higher chance for hallucinations, so that users know that this trade-off has been made. Claude Opus 4.1 Here's how spokespersons rolled out the announcement of this new model Aug. 5: 'Today we're releasing Claude Opus 4.1, an upgrade to Claude Opus 4 on agentic tasks, real-world coding, and reasoning. We plan to release substantially larger improvements to our models in the coming weeks. Opus 4.1 is now available to paid Claude users and in Claude Code. It's also on our API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI. Pricing is the same as Opus 4.' What's under the hood? The new Opus 4.1 model ups SWE-Bench Verified marks, and boosts agentic research skills. A breakdown of capabilities shows a 2-point increase in SWE-based agentic coding (72.5% - 74.5%) and improvement in graduate-level reasoning with GPQA Diamond (79.6% - 80.9%) over Opus 4, and slight increases in visual reasoning and agentic tool use. For a model set that pioneered human-like user capabilities, this continues to push the envelope. As for strategy: 'The release comes as Anthropic has achieved spectacular growth, with annual recurring revenue jumping five-fold from $1 billion to $5 billion in just seven months, according to industry data,' writes Michael Nunez at VentureBeat. 'However, the company's meteoric rise has created a dangerous dependency: nearly half of its $3.1 billion in API revenue stems from just two customers — coding assistant Cursor and Microsoft's GitHub Copilot — generating $1.4 billion combined. … The upgrade represents Anthropic's latest move to fortify its position before OpenAI launches GPT-5, expected to challenge Claude's coding supremacy. Some industry watchers questioned whether the timing suggests urgency rather than readiness.' Regardless, this is big news in and of itself, including for the millions of users who rely on Claude for business process engineering or anything else. Genie 3 This is the latest in the series of Genie models coming out of Google's DeepMind lab that create controlled environments. In other words, this is a gaming world model. Proponents of the new model cite longer-term memory over Genie 2's limit of about 10 seconds, as well as better visual fidelity and real-time responses. 'DeepMind claims that the new system can generate entire worlds that you can interact with consistently for several minutes in up to 720p resolution,' reports Joshua Hawkins at BGR. 'Additionally, the company says that the system will be able to respond to what it calls 'promptable world events' with real-time latency. Based on what the videos show off, it seems like Google has taken a major step forward in creating entire video game worlds using AI.' 'Genie 3 is the first real-time interactive general-purpose world model,' said DeepMind's Shlomi Fruchter in a press statement according to a TechCrunch piece suggesting that the lab considers Genie 3 to be a 'stepping stone to AGI,' a big claim in these interesting times. 'It goes beyond narrow world models that existed before. It's not specific to any particular environment. It can generate both photo-realistic and imaginary worlds, and everything in between.' All of these new models are getting their first rafts of public users today! It's enough to make your head spin, especially if you're responsible for any kind of implementation. What do you choose? To be fair, there is some amount of specialization involved. But many professionals closest to the industry would tell you it's the speed of innovation that's challenging: given the track record of most companies, by the time you get something worked into business operations, it's likely to already be obsolete! Stay tuned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store