
Marketers Get More Responsibility, Clout And AI
This is the published version of Forbes' CMO newsletter, which offers the latest news for chief marketing officers and other messaging-focused leaders. Click here to get it delivered to your inbox every Wednesday.
Marketers are getting both more responsibility and more clout , according to the most recent edition of the CMO Survey, conducted under the direction of Christine Moorman, a senior professor of business administration at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business. On a 14-point scale, with 0 representing no change, 7 representing significant expansion and -7 representing significant weakening, the marketers who responded to the survey ranked the expansion of their role at 3.2, and their increased influence at 2.9.
With more power and influence comes more scrutiny. Marketing leaders said that demonstrating impact on financial outcomes is their primary challenge. And in the last two years, marketers have seen at least a 10% increase on the pressure coming from CEOs (61% opposed to 51% in 2023) and CFOs (63% opposed to 52% in 2023). The study reveals that marketing leaders find their traditional emphasis on defending market position and investing in talent and capabilities is at odds with traditional C-suite objectives of innovation, growth and profitability.
But CMOs are getting more done through the use of AI, which the survey found powers 17.2% of all marketing efforts—a 100% increase from 2022. Such integration is expected to increase to 44.2% within three years. Generative AI for all uses has also surged 116% in the last year, and the technology is now used in over 15.1% of all marketing activities. Survey respondents say AI has led to an 8.6% improvement in sales productivity, 8.5% increase in customer satisfaction and a 10.8% reduction in costs.
The AI boom—which is coming somewhat late to the marketing world—is well-timed, as 43.5% of leaders reported that overall marketing spending is down, and nearly half said they are less optimistic about the U.S. economy than they were last quarter. The study showed that overall marketing budgets are still slowly increasing, but rates are lower—3.3% higher over the last 12 months. As tariffs, inflation and an overall economic slowdown roil consumer spending and marketing spend grows at a snail's pace, AI could prove a good assistant to ensure that brands and messages are still able to stay top of mind for consumers.
Tuesday was President Donald Trump's 100th day of his second term, and the branding that his administration has put on the United States has negatively impacted tourism. Through insults to foreign countries and leaders, a global trade war, and prolonged detentions of both foreign tourists and legal U.S. residents with foreign citizenship—often for minor reasons—the U.S. is quickly shedding its once-welcoming image. And in the months leading up to the summer travel season, the negative branding is beginning to show. A survey of Canadians done by travel market research firm Longwoods International shows that 6 in 10 Canadians are unlikely to travel to the U.S. in the next year because of the Trump Administration's policies and political statements, Forbes' Suzanne Rowan Kelleher writes. More than a third of the people surveyed actually intended to travel to the U.S., but have now changed those plans. Only 42% believed the U.S. welcomes visitors from Canada, and just 38% said they think the U.S. 'values international visitors.'
This change in perception is likely already impacting the economy, and it could be felt more acutely in the coming months. Canadians were the top international visitors to the U.S. last year, with 20.4 million people spending $20.5 billion here. But it isn't just Canadians who are now staying away. The number of international visitors in March was down 14% year-over-year, Kelleher writes. There were 17% fewer visitors from Western Europe—after the U.K. and Germany put out travel warnings about potential border detentions for tourists. Every region of the world saw fewer people visiting the U.S. last month, except for the Middle East, which increased by more than a fifth, and Eastern Europe, which posted a slight increase.
While fewer international visitors are coming to the U.S., domestic travelers are also planning to stay home. Fears of a recession are causing many people to cut back on their travel plans. With fewer summertime flights being booked, Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan has said that the airline sector is already in a recession, writes Forbes senior contributor Alex Ledsom. Other major airlines have pulled their guidance for the year in the wake of softening demand—and the possibility of deeper and more prolonged economic pain. Last week, American Airlines was the latest to withdraw its guidance for the year, Kelleher wrote. 'We're taking a very cautious, even a negative, approach to growth as we take a look out to the rest of the year,' CEO Robert Isom said on the earnings call.
Last week, Meta's oversight board urged the company to bring greater transparency, consistency and fairness to content moderation on its platforms. At the beginning of this year, the social media giant changed its policies on content moderation, abandoning third-party fact checking and softening its hateful conduct policies. The company said the changes, which were announced January 7, would improve free speech and reduce censorship.
The board issued decisions for 11 different cases that deal with gender identity, apartheid, anti-immigrant speech, riots, and speech against people with disabilities. They wrote that Meta needs to live up to its public commitment to uphold the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and assess how its policies are impacting LGBTQ individuals, as well as minors, racial minorities and immigrants.
Meta's policy change was controversial from the start, explicitly saying that 'allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality' would be allowed. The policy mirrors the community-based 'fact checking' on Elon Musk's X—which has seen its user engagement numbers drop and political polarization skyrocket after the centibillionaire bought the platform in 2022. Analysts said Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg made the change to appease then-incoming President Trump, who has railed against moderation of hateful, inciting and false speech on social media platforms. Meta told Forbes it will respond to the recommendations within 60 days.
Photo Illustration by Algi Febri Sugita/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Meta, which also has an AI division, launched a standalone app this week featuring an AI chatbot and a 'discover' feed that allows users to see how others are using it. The app gives users access to many AI functions, including image generation, editing and a voice mode that allows it to be interacted with while using other apps. It also interacts with Meta's Ray-Ban glasses. While most competitors in the AI chatbot space released their own apps long ago, Meta isn't exactly late in development. Its AI assistant has lived in its social networking apps for about a year, and the standalone app can draw from users' Facebook and Instagram accounts for more personalized interactions.
A new way to bring an artist's vibe to AI music creation—without treading on their copyright—is also getting attention this week. Jen, which is headed by music tech veteran Shara Senderoff and advised by Grammy winner Imogen Heap, launched StyleFilters to allow users to bring a particular artist's style to their AI-created music, writes Forbes senior contributor David Bloom. StyleFilters lets Jen users choose artists' songs and the level of influence they want it to have in their creation. The artists who license their songs receive 70% of the resulting revenues.
Illustration by Cecilia Runxi Zhang for Forbes; Photos by Getty Images: LAW Ho Ming; Michael A. McCoy/Stringer
In the last three months, one of the personal brands that has fallen the farthest is that of Elon Musk. Public perception of the world's richest man was already drifting into the fringe at the beginning of last year as he launched the ostentatious—and largely unsuccessful—Tesla Cybertruck, waged a highly public battle for a massive $50 billion pay package that was invalidated by a Delaware judge, and turned the social media platform formerly known as Twitter into a den of inflammatory conservative speech. But then came his mega-support for Trump's candidacy and his high-profile role as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency—which led to his highly unpopular chainsawing of the federal government workforce.
All of this came to roost in Tesla's most recent earnings report last week. Income plummeted 71%, buffeted by a 20% drop in automotive revenues and 9% decline in sales. Musk told investors that he'd soon be stepping back from the federal government to return to Tesla, but that's unlikely to solve the EV maker's problems, writes Forbes' Alan Ohnsman. Musk's personal brand has been partially responsible for Tesla's downfall. A Washington Post-ABC News poll last week found that 57% of people disapprove of Musk's job in the Trump Administration, and a March YouGov/Yahoo News survey found that two-thirds of Americans would not consider buying or leasing a Tesla, with most citing Musk as the reason.
Sue Benson, CEO and founder of U.K.-based marketing firm The Behaviours Agency, told Ohnsman that Tesla is now at the same type of inflection point as Volkswagen amid the 2015 emissions scandal, which led to a major loss of confidence in its brand. 'Except this time, it's not about the product. It's about the person,' Benson said. 'It's too late to separate man and brand. And in the meantime, it's lost its EV advantage.'
Other car makers have picked up the EV baton first run by Tesla. In the last few years, several electric models have become available in the U.S. from General Motors, Hyundai, Kia, Honda and Rivian, as well as BYD in China. Tesla currently sells 43% of all EVs, down from 75% three years ago.
How can Tesla get its sales and market share back? It's highly tricky from a product standpoint, writes Ohnsman. On the earnings call, Tesla said it's working on refreshed and less-expensive versions of its Y and 3 models—not exactly a winning long-term strategy, analysts say. Tesla's new initiatives aren't in the consumer EV realm, with the company focusing energy on autonomous Cybercabs and humanoid robots—two areas that aren't likely to become profit centers in the near future. Meanwhile, Trump's tariffs will negatively impact Tesla's batteries, which rely on cells made in China, making it even harder for the company to post a profit.
In today's highly polarized society, it's important for brands to connect with customers through social well-being and retain their trust. Here are ways to determine the right paths to bring your brand to the correct place to resonate with your customers' emotions—but not alienate them.
Being a great leader means continuing to work on yourself through professional development and training. Here's why leadership training is never complete, and should be seen as a power move.
Video-sharing behemoth YouTube celebrated its 20th anniversary last week. As of then, how many videos had been uploaded to the site?
A. About 15 billion
B. About 20 billion
C. About 50 billion
D. About 100 billion
See if you got the answer right here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
12 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
TPresident Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people . The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. A Black job applicant who alleged that gas station chain Sheetz disproportionately screened out Black, Native American, Alaskan Native and multiracial applicants moved to continue his case June 5 after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission abandoned it. EEOC filed a class-action lawsuit in April 2024 alleging that Sheetz maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for past criminal convictions and rejected those with such records. This practice violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, EEOC said in a press release, because it had a disparate impact on applicants of certain racial backgrounds. However, the agency moved to have the case dismissed last week because it determined that the disparate-impact claims would conflict with President Donald Trump's April 23 executive order directing agencies to cease enforcement of such claims. EEOC asked the court to defer dismissal of its claims by 60 days to allow the commission to notify class members so that they could obtain private representation. The legality of Trump's executive order on disparate-impact claims proved contentious, with one of EEOC's own administrative judges calling the order 'highly illegal.' But the June 5 filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is one of the first examples in which the order has been put into practice. Trump said the end of disparate-impact liability enforcement was necessary because it inhibited businesses from hiring applicants on the basis of merit and skill. He also said that disparate-impact liability is unconstitutional and 'threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.' The push to end disparate-impact liability is one of the goals stated by the conservative Heritage Foundation in its 'Project 2025' presidential transition document. The organization wrote that the concept should be thrown out because under disparate-impact theory, 'discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities.' That logic has been met with resistance by former Democratic officials of the U.S. Department of Labor and EEOC, who said in May that disparate-impact liability is explicitly outlawed under Title VII and has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The former officials cautioned employers that they should avoid following Trump's executive order so they do not violate federal laws. 'Disparate impact liability is a necessary element of advancing equal opportunity for all, consistent with America's national commitment to equal justice,' the officials wrote. In a press release, plaintiff-side firm Outten & Golden, which is partly representing the job applicant in the Sheetz case, said EEOC had spent nearly a decade investigating the claims at issue and had found a basis to allege evidence of systemic discrimination. 'Our client has a right to be judged on his qualifications, and not to be denied a livelihood by policies that exclude people with stale convictions that are unrelated to the job,' said Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center and a co-representative for the plaintiff, said in the press release. 'When the government steps back, we step in. We will not allow political interference to wipe out hard-won legal protections.' A similar dynamic played out following EEOC's abandonment of several lawsuits it filed on behalf of transgender workers alleging discrimination following an executive order from Trump. Advocacy groups have since filed to intervene on behalf of plaintiffs in those cases. Recommended Reading Shell Oil did not discriminate in hiring decision, 5th Cir. says


Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Musk says Tesla's robotaxi service to ‘tentatively' launch in Austin on June 22
Last month, Musk told CNBC that the taxis will be remotely monitored at first and 'geofenced' to certain areas of the city deemed the safest to navigate. He said he expected to initially run 10 or so taxis, increase that number rapidly and start offering the service in Los Angeles, San Antonio, San Francisco and other cities. Advertisement Musk has been promising fully autonomous, self-driving vehicles 'next year' for a decade, but the pressure is on now as Tesla actually begins to operate a self-driving taxi service. Sales of Tesla's electric vehicles have sagged due to increased competition, the retooling of its most popular car, the Model Y, and the fallout from Musk's turn to politics. The Austin rollout also comes after Musk had a public blowup with President Donald Trump over the administration's tax bill. Some analysts have expressed concern that Trump could retaliate by encouraging federal safety regulators to to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis.