Why the Golden Globe Foundation remains committed to supporting journalists
May 3 marks World Press Freedom Day, a day perhaps of greater significance this year when journalists around the globe are under more fire than ever.
With jobs, sources of funding, and editorial independence all being cut and under threat, every bit of support matters, including that of the Golden Globe Foundation, which includes support of journalism and free speech among its charitable priorities. The foundation, which was established in 2023 following the sale of the Golden Globes and the dissolution of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, has funded over $60 million over the last 30 years, including 83 grants last year to organizations including Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, International Women's Media Foundation, Los Angeles Press Club, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, ProPublica, Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Journalism students have also received grants and scholarships, like those at Cal State Los Angeles (pictured above).
More from GoldDerby
For the first time in 9 years, the Critics Choice Awards will take place before the Golden Globes
2026 Golden Globes ceremony date revealed
'A Minecraft Movie' surprised everyone with record-breaking box office. Could awards be next?
"The Golden Globe Foundation champions freedom of the press and expression, recognizing them as essential pillars to our democracy," says Henry Arnaud, president of the Golden Globe Foundation. "We're committed to supporting the vital role journalists play in safeguarding our communities, disseminating important information, uncovering truths and holding power to account, often at great personal risk.'
The scope of the grants, which are funded partly by the licensing fees from the awards show, is wide, from film restoration to film schools to institutions that help and support the press. 'We try to see where the impact is going to go the furthest,' says Miriam Spritzer, a member of the board which disperses the grants. But for her, the cause is personal. 'We're all international journalists; we're all foreign correspondents to outlets outside of the U.S.' she says. 'And I think as journalists, one of the common beliefs [among us] is that freedom of press and the First Amendment are very important. It was a sentiment that a lot of [members] had that we should be helping our colleagues and our industry in a way that was to support freedom of press and to support journalists so that they are able to do what they're supposed to do.'
Italian journalist Silvio Bizio, who has been on the committee dispensing grants since the HFPA era, has seen first-hand the impact the donations can make. 'I have personally known so many students and aspiring journalists whose lives have really been helped tremendously or changed by the amount of scholarships and support that we've given them,' she says. Bizio recounts meeting a student from India who was granted a scholarship to the University of Southern California. 'She was just overjoyed at the idea of being there,' she recalls. 'She said never in a million years in her wildest dreams as she thought that she could have ended up in Los Angeles.'
Another GGF grantee is the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, a 25-year-old independent non-profit organization which works with investigative reporters from around the world on breaking global stories. Gerard Ryle, who heads the ICIJ, credits the annual $100,000 grant from the GGF for literally allowing them to keep the lights on — the organization has a building in D.C. that serves as a home base for working reporters. 'We don't just bring journalists the story,' he says, 'we build the technology and tools that allow them to work.' He points to the Panama Papers and the Pandora Papers as examples of projects they led where millions of pages of documents could be parsed by journalists around the world. A more recent example was a story about dissidents around the world being targeted by China, which was shared with The Guardian, The Washington Post, and Le Monde. 'The essential role that I think investigative reporting plays is really telling the world something's wrong so that the world can help make it right. So our role is really to expose abuses, foster transparency, and contribute to trust building but most importantly of course it's holding power to account.'
But funding, like that provided by the GGF, is increasingly rare, says Ryle — especially support that comes with no demands of editorial control. 'We're very careful not to take any funding where someone's telling us what to do,' he says. 'We're suffering because we used to get funding from the U.S. government through the State Department, and we've just lost that.'
The need for rigorous journalistic training is more important than ever, says Bizio, pointing to the recent Los Angeles wildfires, where local reporters delivered critical safety news to Los Angelenos. 'I was glued to the TV, watching them brave fires right in front of them, and I was thinking, thank goodness that they exist,' she recalls. 'If it wasn't for them, we wouldn't know what's going on. it's so important the role of journalists in today's world. So I hope they can continue to exist and have the access and the means to make it to survive as journalists.'
But the risk has never been more profound than now, in the current political climate. 'There has been a natural reaction that a lot of people are concerned about freedom of press and the security of journalists,' says Spritzer. 'The job of the journalist is to go and ask the hard questions and kind of be of almost like a watchdog to power. I think that that's becoming harder and harder throughout the world to actually have a say, to have an impact, to be able to even have the access to ask the hard questions.'
International journalists report fearing the fallout not just from the administration's anti-press stance but also the anti-immigration stance as well. 'There is a difference between being a citizen and someone with a visa,' says Spritzer. 'My lawyer explained to me that as a foreigner with a work visa, you have a privilege, not a right. It's different from when you when you're an American citizen. And I remember that that was a big insight for me.'
International journalists are sharing advice on social media sites about whether or not to leave the country, what to store on their phones, or whether to even be on social media at all. 'Journalists are not getting back into the country,' says one reporter, who asked not to be named. 'A couple of people I know, when they went through immigration, were being asked to hand over their phones. And if there was anything negative about [President Donald] Trump, they were detained.' She's now thinking twice, she says, about covering the upcoming Cannes Film Festival, over fears about being let back into the U.S.
But beyond just the privilege of festival travel, some international journalists interviewed by Gold Derby said they'd think twice about writing about a film critical of the president, like last year's The Apprentice. 'I think it would definitely impact my decision on whether to write about it and how I'd write about it,' said one journalist. 'It just wouldn't be worth me writing the story.'
For Ryle, the main concern is media literacy, which has never been more critical. 'We have to teach the upcoming generation the difference between real and not real,' he says. 'You've got to fund the journalism, but you've got to fund the people that are educating the future generation.'
What advice do you give to journalists that are coming into the field now?
Says Spritzer: 'Brace yourself.'
Note: Golden Globes producer Dick Clark Productions is owned by Penske Media Eldridge, a joint venture between Eldridge and Penske Media Corporation, which owns Gold Derby.
Best of GoldDerby
Streamy Awards 2023: Everything to know about 13th annual event
Click here to read the full article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
42 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump admin from deporting Mahmoud Khalil using Rubio power
A federal judge in New Jersey blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil on foreign policy grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil under a provision of federal law that allows the deportation of any foreign citizen whose 'presence or activities' in the U.S. is determined to 'have serious adverse foreign policy consequences' and is chilling Khalil's First Amendment free speech rights. In a 14-page order, Farbiarz said the rarely used statute Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked against the former Columbia graduate student is likely unconstitutional. He also ruled that the activist and legal U.S. resident who has been in immigration custody in Louisiana since March can't be detained further on that basis. The judge said it was unlikely the Trump administration could justify detaining Khalil via another rationale it tacked on after his arrest in Manhattan: that when he applied for a green card, he failed to disclose all his past employment and membership in certain organizations. Immigrants are almost never detained for those sorts of omissions, the judge noted, finding it likelier that Rubio's determination was the basis for Khalil's ongoing detention. However, the judge's ruling did not foreclose Khalil's continued detention on alternative grounds, emphasizing that he had only definitively rejected Rubio's determination and that his decision had 'no impact' on other aspects of the effort to deport Khalil. Farbiarz, a Biden appointee, put his ruling on hold until Friday morning to allow the Trump administration to appeal. A lawyer for Khalil, Baher Azmy, said in an email that he believes Farbiarz's order means Khalil should be released from custody by Friday morning unless an appellate court intervenes. "We are relieved that the Court determined that both his detention and his removal based on the ridiculous, overbroad Rubio determination would be unconstitutional,' Azmy said, 'and that he is suffering severe ongoing harms [from] the government's grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine.' The departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. While Khalil has remained detained, others who have been similarly swept up as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian academics have been released. In early May, a Vermont federal judge ordered the release of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Tufts University Ph.D. student. A few days later, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the release of a Georgetown researcher, Badar Khan Suri. Like Khalil, both Ozturk and Suri had been detained in March.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Italy forges on with world's largest suspension bridge
Italy hopes to begin constructing the world's largest suspension bridge connecting Sicily to the Italian mainland this summer amid widespread scepticism that it will ever be built. The 13.5-billion-euro ($15.3-billion) project would carry trains and six lanes of traffic, allowing cars to cross the Strait of Messina in 15 minutes. Giorgia Meloni's hard-right government hopes to boost the economy of the impoverished region, although critics say there are better ways to do this -- and many believe that after decades of false starts, the bridge will never actually happen. The choppy waters between the eastern tip of Sicily and the western edge of the region of Calabria are legendary as the place where monsters Scylla and Charybdis terrified sailors in Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey". These days the challenges are more prosaic, from winds of more than 100 kilometres an hour (62 mph) to the real risk of earthquakes in a region that lies across two tectonic plates. The government says the bridge will be at the cutting edge of engineering, with the section suspended between its two pillars stretching 3.3 kilometres, the longest in the world. But critics point to a long history of public works announced, financed and never completed in Italy, whether due to corruption or political instability, resulting in enormous losses for taxpayers. "The public does not trust this political class and these projects that become endless construction sites," said Luigi Storniolo, a member of protest group No Ponte (No Bridge). Infrastructure Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, one of the main champions of the project, insists it will be a game-changer for the local economy. "The bridge will be a catalyst for development," he said on a recent visit to Reggio di Calabria, the city where the bridge will begin. - 'A senseless project' - The government hopes to boost trade in Sicily, which currently suffers from an "insularity cost" of around 6.5 billion euros a year, according to regional authorities. Meloni's ministers are expected to give their final approval to the project -- which Rome will fund -- later this month, and Salvini insists construction will begin this summer. But work had already been announced for the summer of 2024, before being postponed -- a common theme in the history of the bridge, the idea of which dates back to the unification of Italy at the end of the 19th century. The first law for the project was passed in 1971. Since then, successive governments have either revived it or cancelled it. In 2012, the idea appeared to be definitely abandoned amid the eurozone debt crisis, only for Meloni's government, which took office in 2022, to return to it once again. Salvini has repeatedly stated that the bridge would create 120,000 jobs in Calabria and Sicily, which have the fourth and the 13th highest unemployment rates respectively in the EU for young people under 29. However, the left-wing CGIL trade union estimates around 2,300 workers a year will be hired during the project, and critics say the jobs created will be offset by long-term losses from the closure of ferries. - Mafia risk - The project has sparked local protests, with critics warning of the impact on a protected marine zone and an important bird migratory route. Storniolo told AFP it was a "senseless project" which used up valuable funds when "our regions already suffer from many problems... healthcare, schools, and infrastructure." The Italian Court of Auditors has also criticised the extent of the debt-laden Italian state's investment in this one project in its assessment of the 2024 budget. "They want to make an entire territory believe that its only hope is this bridge -- but then the bridge never arrives," protester Storniolo added. There is also the question of mafia infiltration. The attorney general of Messina recently warned of the risk that organised crime would benefit from the project, noting that "the power of the mafia is hidden... behind public contracts". The government has proposed placing companies relating to the project under control of an anti-mafia structure reporting to the interior ministry. But Italian President Sergio Mattarella blocked this, saying it should only be used for one-off events such as earthquakes or the Olympics. Salvini argued that the bridge can help tackle the mafia, saying: "You do not fight the mafia... with conferences and protests, but by creating jobs and giving hope to young people." str-gab/ar/ide/fg