UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taleban rule over US objections
The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two - the United States and close ally Israel - opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade.
Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government. Germany's UN Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's "near-total erasure' of the rights of women and girls.
The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten. US minister-counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards "the Taleban's failure with more engagement and more resources." He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies "in accordance with the expectations of the international community.'
"For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,' he said. "It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.' Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the US permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
30 minutes ago
- Arab Times
The exploitation of the Palestinian cause must end
THE horrific scenes of starvation, mass killing, and systematic destruction in Gaza are unbearable. Any rational person should have considered the consequences of the so-called 'Operation Al-Aqsa Flood' on October 7, 2023 before it was launched. It is difficult to comprehend how anyone who has experienced Israeli brutality could carry out such an action. Since 1948, the Palestinian cause has been the main source of losses because Arab approaches were illogical and based on ill-considered reactions. Therefore, after the United Nations issued the resolution to partition Palestine, neither the Arabs nor the Palestinians realized that the world after World War II was no longer the same as before. There were new considerations that needed to be addressed consciously, especially since Europe was trying to wash away the shame of Nazism by fulfilling the Balfour Declaration, while the Arabs lived in a different reality. However, the Arabs fought three wars that ended in defeat, while the fourth - the October 1973 War - was, as the late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat (may God have mercy on him) said, 'a war to stir stagnant waters to bring all parties to the negotiating table.' Thus began the Egyptian-Israeli peace process, which was based on Palestinian autonomy as a prelude to an independent state. But what was the outcome? The Arabs were divided between those who accused Sadat of treason and those who supported his efforts. Nevertheless, the loudest voices prevailed, leading to the relocation of the Arab League from Cairo to Tunisia. Most Arab countries, along with several Palestinian organizations, boycotted Egypt. These organizations raised the slogan of liberation, though their true goals were different. Some Palestinian groups attempted to pressure the Arab states, while the suffering of refugees worsened and those remaining in Palestine endured oppression, killings, and displacement. At the same time, the Iranian revolution added salt to the wound by adopting the slogan 'Liberating Jerusalem,' which Tehran used as a Trojan horse to expand its influence in Arab countries through groups it established, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq, and Palestinian factions like Islamic Jihad and Hamas. None of these groups served the Palestinian cause or the Palestinian people. As a result, we have witnessed many battles, particularly in the Gaza Strip, all of which were launched by organizations whose leaders live in luxury hotels abroad, seemingly profiting from the blood of the Gazan people. If these groups, which control Gaza's decisions, had agreed to join the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), contributed to unifying the Palestinian vision, accepted the 2007 elections, and joined the Palestinian Authority, they would have spared much suffering, not only for the people of Gaza but for all Palestinians. Backed by the international community, Israel is now attempting to annex the West Bank, having destroyed the Gaza Strip and killed more than 53,000 civilians, most of them children. A word of truth must be spoken - the advocates of the Palestinian cause have cloaked themselves in the guise of docile lambs, but in reality, they are foxes working to satisfy their own interests. The world does not care about the ongoing killing and starvation of the people of Gaza because it will not accept groups labeled as terrorists leading a de facto authority in Gaza or in all of Palestine. That is why Hamas and Islamic Jihad must accept the Palestinian Authority if they want to end the tragedy and stop the hunger and killing. The best evidence of this is the statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, 'The world agrees that what Hamas is doing is disgusting, and we must treat them like monsters.' Finally, both Islamic Jihad and Hamas, which have seized power through deception and brainwashing since 2007, must be held accountable. They must be sued for destroying the Palestinian cause while their leaders hoard funds under the pretext of 'liberating Palestine.'
Kuwait Times
2 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
UN tech chief seeks ‘global approach' on AI regulation
GENEVA: The world urgently needs to find a global approach on regulating artificial intelligence, the United Nations' top tech chief said this week, warning that fragmentation could deepen risks and inequalities. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, head of the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) agency, told AFP she hoped that AI 'can actually benefit humanity'. But as concerns mount over the risks posed by the fast-moving technology — including fears of mass job losses, the spread of deepfakes and disinformation, and society's fabric fraying — she insisted that regulation was key. 'There's an urgency to try to get... the right framework in place,' she said, stressing the need for 'a global approach'. Her comments came after US President Donald Trump this week unveiled an aggressive, low-regulation strategy aimed at ensuring the United States stays ahead of China on AI. Among more than 90 proposals, Trump's plan calls for sweeping deregulation, with the administration promising to 'remove red tape and onerous regulation' that could hinder private sector AI development. Asked if she had concerns about an approach that urges less, not more, regulation of AI technologies, Bogdan-Martin refrained from commenting, saying she was 'still trying to digest' the US plan. 'I think there are different approaches,' she said. 'We have the EU approach. We have the Chinese approach. Now we're seeing the US approach. I think what's needed is for those approaches to dialogue,' she said. At the same time, she highlighted that '85 percent of countries don't yet have AI policies or strategies'. A consistent theme among those strategies that do exist is the focus on innovation, capacity building and infrastructure investments, Bogdan-Martin said. 'But where I think the debate still needs to happen at a global level is trying to figure out how much regulation, how little regulation, is needed,' she said. Bogdan-Martin, who grew up in New Jersey and has spent most of her more than three-decade career at the ITU, insisted the Geneva-based telecoms agency that sets standards for new technologies was well-placed to help facilitate much-needed dialogue on the issue. 'The need for a global approach I think is critical,' she said, cautioning that 'fragmented approaches will not help serve and reach all'. As countries and companies sprint to cement their dominance in the booming sector, there are concerns that precautions could be thrown to the wind—and that those who lose the race or do not have the capacity to participate will be left behind. The ITU chief hailed 'mind-blowing' advances within artificial intelligence, with the potential to improve everything from education to agriculture to health care—but insisted the benefits must be shared. Without a concerted effort, there is a risk that AI will end up standing for 'advancing inequalities', she warned, cautioning against deepening an already dire digital divide worldwide. 'We have 2.6 billion people that have no access to the internet, which means they have no access to artificial intelligence', Bogdan-Martin pointed out. 'We have to tackle those divides if we're actually going to have something that is beneficial to all of humanity.' Bogdan-Martin, the first woman to serve as ITU secretary-general in the organization's nearly 160-year history, also stressed the need to get more women into the digital space. 'We have a huge gap,' she said. 'We definitely don't have enough women... in artificial intelligence.' The 58-year-old mother of four said it was 'a big honor' to be the first woman in her position, to be 'breaking the glass ceiling (and) paving the path for future generations'. But she acknowledged there was a lot of pressure, 'not just to achieve, but to almost overachieve'. Bogdan-Martin, who is being backed by the Trump administration to stand for re-election when her four-year mandate ends next year, said she was eager to stay on for a second term. 'There is a lot to do.' – AFP
Kuwait Times
2 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Trump, EU chief seek deal in transatlantic trade standoff
Lutnick says Aug 1 deadline is firm, rules out extensions TURNBERRY, UK: US President Donald Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen were set for make-or-break talks in Scotland Sunday, aimed at ending a months-long transatlantic trade standoff, as negotiations went down to the wire. Trump has said he sees a one-in-two chance of a deal with the European Union, which faces an across-the-board US levy of 30 percent unless it strikes a trade pact by August 1 - with Washington warning Sunday there would be 'no extensions.' Von der Leyen's European Commission, negotiating on behalf of EU countries, is pushing hard for a deal to salvage a trading relationship worth an annual $1.9 trillion in goods and services. According to an EU diplomat briefed ahead of the meeting, set for 4:30 pm (1530 GMT), the contours of a deal are in place after talks went late into Saturday night - but key issues still need settling. And of course the final word lies with Trump. 'A political deal is on the table - but it needs the sign-off from Trump, who wants to negotiate this down to the very last moment,' the diplomat told AFP. The proposal, they said, involves a baseline levy of around 15 percent on EU exports to the United States - the level secured by Japan - with carve-outs for critical sectors including aircraft and spirits, though not for wine. Any deal will need to be approved by EU member states - whose ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated by the commission Sunday morning, and would meet again after any accord. According to the EU diplomat, the 27 countries broadly endorsed the deal as envisaged - while recalling their negotiating red lines. The Trump-von der Leyen meeting was taking place in Turnberry on Scotland's southwestern coast, where the president owns a luxury golf resort. He was out on the course for much of the weekend. The 79-year-old Trump said Friday he hoped to strike 'the biggest deal of them all' with the EU. 'I think we have a good 50-50 chance,' the president said, citing sticking points on 'maybe 20 different things'. The EU is focused on getting a deal to avoid sweeping tariffs that would further harm its sluggish economy - while holding out retaliation as a last resort. Under the proposal described to AFP, the EU would commit to ramp up purchases of US liquefied natural gas, along with other investment pledges. Pharmaceuticals - a key export for Ireland - would also face a 15-percent levy, as would semi-conductors. The EU also appears to have secured a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the United States before tariffs would apply, the diplomat said. Hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House, the EU is currently subject to a 25-percent levy on cars, 50 percent on steel and aluminum, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 percent, which Washington threatens to hike to 30 percent in a no-deal scenario. It was unclear how the proposed deal would impact tariff levels on the auto industry, crucial for France and Germany, with carmakers already reeling from the levies imposed so far. While 15 percent would be much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods - averaging 4.8 percent - it would mirror the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 percent. Should talks fail, EU states have greenlit counter tariffs on $109 billion (93 billion euros) of US goods including aircraft and cars to take effect in stages from August 7. Brussels is also drawing up a list of US services to potentially target. Beyond that, countries like France say Brussels should not be afraid to deploy a so-called trade 'bazooka' - EU legislation designed to counter coercion that can involve restricting access to its market and public contracts. But such a step would mark a major escalation with Washington. Trump has embarked on a campaign to reshape US trade with the world, and has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not reach a pact with Washington by August 1. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday the August 1 deadline was firm and there will be 'no extensions, no more grace periods.' Polls suggest however the American public is unconvinced by the White House strategy, with a recent Gallup survey showing his approval rating at 37 percent -- down 10 points from January. Having promised '90 deals in 90 days,' Trump's administration has so far unveiled five, including with Britain, Japan and the Philippines. — AFP
