
Pharma exports from Ireland doubled 'to avoid Trump tax bills'
Around half a year's supply of medicines, worth $ 42 billion, were shipped to the US from Ireland and stockpiled in advance of the US president's sweeping 'Liberation Day' charges.
Mr Trump has repeatedly declared that he intends to target Ireland's pharma industry, a key driver of our corporation tax receipts. US President Donald Trump. Pic: Doug Mills-Pool/Getty Images
One economist described the export figures as 'gargantuan' and aimed solely at avoiding tax.
'They knew the tariffs were coming and they massively ramped up shipments to get in ahead of the tariffs, it's as plain and simple as that,' said Dan O'Brien, chief economist with the Institute of International and European Affairs in Dublin.
'It's incredible numbers. Basically, it means the pharma sector has ramped up production and is shipping everything it possibly can before potential tariffs hit.'
In his April 2 announcement, Mr Trump imposed a 25% tariff on the EU, which has since been paused for 90 days, but pharmaceuticals were excluded.
However, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Tánaiste and Trade Minister Simon Harris in advance of this that sector-specific tariffs would follow, which has left the Government and the industry bracing for a major shock. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Pic:)
Last month, Mr Trump said tariffs on pharmaceutical goods would come in the 'not too distant future'.
'We don't make our own drugs, our own pharmaceuticals – we don't make our own drugs anymore. The drug companies are in Ireland, in lots of other places, like China. And all I have to do is impose a tariff. The more, the faster they move here,' he said.
Data released by the United States Census Bureau, the American equivalent to the Central Statistics Office (CSO), this week explicitly highlighted the increase in the deficit between the US and Ireland between February and March.
The deficit with Ireland increased $ 15.3 billion to $29.3 billion in March. Exports increased $ 0.1 billion to $ 1.4 billion and imports increased $ 15.5 billion to $ 30.7 billion,' the bureau said.
Some $ 14 billion of the $ 15.5 billion in February related to pharmaceutical goods, while $ 28 billion of the $ 30.7 billion in March related to pharmaceutical goods being exported into the United States from Ireland. That's $ 42 billion of pharmaceuticals over February and March. Pharma exports from Ireland to the US multiplied in February and March as firms rushed to avoid Donald Trump's huge tariffs. Pic: Getty Images
Economist Mr O'Brien said the impact on the Irish Exchequer would likely be that these companies would send their taxes to Revenue 'earlier than expected' and 'bring forward the booking of profits'.
He said it would 'lead to a bump in corporation tax, followed by a fall back'.
Mr O'Brien warned that it 'could also lead to some reduction in staff levels, if they have really ramped up production' but that this was unlikely due to the highly technical nature of these jobs, but said it remained a risk.
Economist with the Council on Foreign Relations, Brad Setser, who reviews the data on an ongoing basis, said the numbers were 'crazy'.
He said the figures had occurred because the US and EU pharmaceutical companies decided to avoid any tax ahead of the tariffs. Mr Setser said that pharmaceutical companies in Ireland were exporting around € 5 billion a month to the US last year, but March's figure was an increase by a factor of five.
'It would suggest several firms have moved supply for much of the year into the United States,' he remarked.
He said if the figure were annualised, it would represent half a percentage point of the United States' GDP.
'If anyone was in any doubt, companies were moving at least a half year's supply into the United States [ahead of tariffs].'
'There is no doubt that Ireland is the global centre of tax avoidance by American pharmaceutical firms and Singapore is a distant second,' he added.
'The tariffs are a frontal blow to Irish pharmaceutical tax avoidance,' he added.
An Irish Pharmaceutical Healthcare Association spokeswoman said it is not in a position to comment on the figures.
Enterprise Minister Peter Burke previously said that an increase in exports in January was 'not specifically' due to stockpiling by pharmaceutical companies.
Speaking last month, he said: 'You'd be very much aware that our pharma exports are very complex. We do know the amount we export. About 84% of those products are incomplete, and that poses a very significant challenge.'
The Government has moved to support the pharmaceutical sector in recent months. In April, a number of large pharmaceutical companies warned about the EU's lack of competitiveness in the sector.
The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) conducted a survey of its members last month on the matter, to which 18 replied
It identified as much as 85% of capital expenditure investments (approximately € 50.6 billion) and as much as 50% of R&D expenditure (approximately € 52.6 billion) potentially at risk across the EU.
The CEOs called for immediate action on achieving a competitive EU market that attracts, values and rewards innovation in line with other economies at the forefront of patient care.
They also called for a strengthening, rather than weakening, of Europe's intellectual property provisions.
They also said that the EU should adopt a 'world-leading' regulatory framework, conducive to innovation, and that it should ensure 'policy coherence' across 'environmental and chemical legislation' to secure a resilient manufacturing and supply chain of medicines in Europe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
29 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
The cards are stacked against Ukraine — and against Europe
The most revealing moment in US president Donald Trump's White House meeting with European leaders came during a 'hot mic' moment when Trump was overheard discussing his relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin. 'I think he [Putin] wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds,' he whispered to French president Emmanuel Macron. The idea that Putin is beholden to Trump, that some sense of personal magnetism or obligation to the American president is pushing him towards a deal that will end the conflict in Ukraine is indeed crazy. Putin has earned his reputation as a cold and vicious thug, solely interested in his own goals and unmoved by sentiment. Yet Trump has often spoken of his admiration for Putin. The latter has repeatedly broken Trump's red lines on Ukraine, refusing to agree to a preliminary ceasefire before talks, and even escalating Russia's military offensive in the immediate aftermath of calls with the US president. Trump has threatened to impose more sanctions, but ultimately always backed down. Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as 'fantastic'. Picture: AP /Julia Demaree Nikhinson Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as "fantastic", even though he had threatened to impose sanctions if Putin did not offer concessions as a starting point to ending the war in Ukraine — none were forthcoming. The bromance is decidedly lopsided. Trump also has an outsized view of Russia's strength, telling journalists that only his intervention had prevented the Russian military from achieving victory in Ukraine. This overlooks Ukrainian successes in pushing back the Russian offensive in 2022 and the more than one million casualties, killed and wounded, inflicted on the Russian military since the start of the war. Russia, with an ageing population, a rusting and hydrocarbons-dependent economy, is not the Soviet Union of the Cold War. Despite his failed meeting with North Korea's president Kim Jong Un in Hanoi during his first term and the backlash following his fawning over Putin in Helsinki in 2018 when he accepted Putin's word over that of the FBI regarding interference in US elections, Trump still believes he can get a quick summit win on Ukraine. The search for moments of "great television" — as Trump's described his upbraiding of Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their meeting in February — is an important motivation. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. Picture: AP /Mstyslav Chernov The problem for Europe and Ukraine is that there is a serious risk a trilateral summit between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy will descend into a two versus one pile-on. Trump's hostility towards Ukraine's president stretches back to his failed attempts to get the Ukrainian government to implicate the Biden family in a corruption scandal during Trump's first term in office. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. On Monday, European leaders took their turns to praise Trump in Washington DC. This is viewed as a necessary tribute to keep the United States engaged on Ukraine's side of the war, supplying vital intelligence, communications and air defence systems. Europe can ramp up a lot of military assistance to Ukraine, but there are capability gaps that European militaries cannot hope to fill for some years yet. Paying homage to a capricious president may work in the short-term but if, as now seems likely, Trump turns on Zelenskyy and demands that he cede the remaining parts of the Donbas region controlled by Ukraine in the interests of "peace", then the inability of Europe to prevent such a stitch-up will call these tactics of obeisance into question. Allowing Washington, or Beijing, to believe Europe can be belittled, and then ignored with little consequence — whether on trade or Ukraine — could seriously backfire. Trump officials, like his envoy Steve Witkoff, say such concessions are a necessary precondition before putting in place "robust security guarantees" that will ensure a durable peace. Prior to the invasions of 2014 and 2022, Ukraine already had such assurances under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994; Russia as a signatory guaranteed Ukraine's independence and committed to never use military force against Kyiv. Ukraine, for its part, gave up all nuclear weapons systems which had previously been stationed in the country during the Cold War. It is still unclear what new guarantees the Trump administration believes would be sufficient to deter future Russian aggression. It is difficult to envisage a diplomatic breakthrough in the coming weeks. Putin's participation in talks are likely a gambit, a means for Moscow to try to shift blame to Ukraine as a spoiler of peace. Witkoff has shown his ineptitude and bias in recent months; he was unable to name the five Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea — annexed or partly occupied by Russia. Witkoff also previously called Ukraine 'a false country'. Before any security guarantees are discussed, top of Trump's agenda will be transfers of land to satisfy Putin. President Zelenskyy cannot give up land which Russia does not occupy — even if he will be pressed to do so by Trump. Given the documented accounts of the mass abduction of children, rape, torture and murder in territories seized by the Russian military to date, the abandonment of more than 250,000 Ukrainians (more than the population of Cork City) living in unoccupied Donetsk to Russian control would be an unimaginable cruelty. Ukraine is struggling to get enough troops to the frontline. An angry Trump cajoling and then threatening Zelenskyy to give Putin what he cannot, will further demoralise Ukrainians — or so Putin hopes — at a time when Russia has gained considerable territory during its summer offensive in Donetsk. Trump has form, having presided over a disastrous deal with the Taliban in 2020, the Doha Agreement, that excluded the then Afghan government, and helped spur the Taliban to victory the following year. The best hope may be that Trump, notoriously inattentive, will simply move on and leave diplomacy on the Ukraine war to others. Dr Edward Burke is a lecturer in war studies at University College Dublin

Irish Times
29 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Protesters call on Central Bank not to renew Israel bonds
Protesters have urged the Central Bank of Ireland not to proceed with the approval for the sale of Israel bonds in advance of an upcoming renewal date. About 100 demonstrators gathered outside the Central Bank in Dublin on Tuesday to demand an end to the authority's role in approving Israel bonds for sale in the EU, for the Government to include services in the Occupied Territories Bill and to pass that legislation. The bank is the designated authority in relation to the sale of Israel bonds in the EU, and has determined the securities meet the standards of the union's prospectus regulations. Israel bonds have been advertised as supporting the country's economy and, more recently, websites promoting the securities emphasise their role in supporting Israel's military operations in Gaza. READ MORE Protesters and Opposition parties have called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. They say the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza, while Ireland has an obligation under the Genocide Convention to use all means likely to have a deterrent effect on those suspected of preparing genocide. The Central Bank has said regulations require it to approve prospectuses that meet standards of completeness, consistency and comprehensibility. The Israel bond prospectus is up for renewal on September 2nd. The Oireachtas Joint Committee on Finance has recommended that the bank carry out an immediate review before renewing approval of the bonds. David Landy of Jews for Palestine and Academics for Palestine outside the Central Bank in Dublin. Photograph: Niall Carson/PA Wire Meanwhile, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon has launched legal proceedings against the Central Bank over claims that investors in Israeli bonds could be legally complicit in genocide in Gaza. It is alleged that the Central Bank's failure to ban the marketing, distribution and sale of Israel bonds exposes investors to risks that have not been disclosed to them. [ Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend Opens in new window ] Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign chairwoman Zoe Lawlor said: 'The Government has to end the direct involvement of the Central Bank in apartheid Israel's sale of genocide-funding bonds. 'The Central Bank is an organ of this State, and its complicity in genocide makes Ireland complicit.' David Landy of Jews for Palestine, and Academics for Palestine, said: 'We are asking the Central Bank to do the absolute minimum required of it under law – to end the sale of Israeli war bonds, to finally end this direct Irish participation in Israeli genocide.' Sinn Féin's foreign affairs spokesman said the Irish Government 'must use every lever at its disposal' to show leadership on Gaza. Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire said: 'Clearly, ending the facilitation of Israeli war bonds is one of those.' He added: 'The people of Gaza and of Palestine need us to act.'


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
US broadens reach of steel and aluminum tariffs
The United States has broadened the reach of its steel and aluminum tariffs, the Commerce Department said, impacting hundreds more products that contain both metals such as child seats, tableware and heavy equipment. The Bureau of Industry and Security said in a recent notice that it was adding 407 product types to a list of items considered steel and aluminum "derivative products". This means a 50% tariff on both metals, imposed by President Donald Trump earlier in the year, will apply to their steel and aluminum content. The widened scope took effect yesterday, and the notice detailing the changes has been published in the Federal Register. "Today's action covers wind turbines and their parts and components, mobile cranes, bulldozers and other heavy equipment, railcars, furniture, compressors and pumps, and hundreds of other products," said the Commerce Department in a statement. The move "shuts down avenues for circumvention," Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Jeffrey Kessler said, reiterating the aim of boosting US steel and aluminum industries. Since returning to the presidency, Mr Trump has imposed a 10% tariff on almost all US trading partners, alongside varying steeper levels on dozens of economies such as the European Union and Japan. Certain sectors have been spared from these countrywide tariff levels but instead were targeted under different authorities by even higher duties. In the case of steel and aluminum, Mr Trump initially unveiled a 25% tariff on imports of both metals before doubling this to 50% in June. Though the impact of Mr Trump's tariffs on consumer prices has been limited so far, economists warn that their full effects are yet to be seen. For now, some businesses have coped by bringing forward purchases of products they expected will encounter tariffs. Others have passed on additional costs to their consumers, or absorbed a part of the fresh tariff burden. But analysts note that importers and retailers will unlikely be able to eat these costs indefinitely, and could eventually raise more consumer prices. Some economists argue that the inflation hit will be one-off, but others are wary of more persistent effects. The latest US Commerce Department additions came after a window for the public to submit product inclusion requests.