UK's Royal Ballet and Opera cancels Tel Aviv ‘Tosca' after staff protest over stance on Gaza
For the latest updates, follow us on Instagram @arabnews.lifestyle
Company chief executive officer Alex Beard confirmed the decision in an internal message in which he acknowledged the letter and told staff: 'We have made the decision that our new production of 'Tosca' will not be going to Israel.'
A total of 182 members of the Royal Opera and Ballet, including dancers, musicians, singers and technical staff, signed the open letter on Friday denouncing the 'recent actions and decisions taken by the RBO in the context of the ongoing genocide in Gaza.'
In particular, they condemned the recent hiring out of the organization's 'Turandot' production to the Israeli Opera for performances that took place last month, The Guardian newspaper reported on Monday.
'The decision cannot be viewed as neutral,' they wrote. 'It is a deliberate alignment, materially and symbolically, with a government currently engaged in crimes against humanity.
'The venue itself, the Israeli Opera, publicly offers free tickets to soldiers of the Israeli Defense Forces 'in recognition of their work,' as stated on their website.
'The RBO is clearly making a strong political statement by allowing its production and intellectual property to be presented in a space that openly rewards and legitimizes the very forces responsible for the daily killings of civilians in Gaza.'
The letter demanded that the organization 'withholds our productions from institutions that legitimise and economically support a state engaged in the mass killing of civilians,' and rejects 'any current or future performances in Israel.'
It also offered support for performer Daniel Perry, who raised a Palestinian flag on stage during a curtain call on July 19 in what the letter described as 'an act of courage and moral clarity.' It accused the RBO's director of opera, Oliver Mears, of reacting aggressively.
'We witnessed (Mears) attempting to forcibly snatch the flag from the performer, displaying visible anger and aggression in front of the entire audience,' the letter said.
'Far from being a neutral administrative intervention, (his) act was itself a loud political statement. It sent a clear message that any visible solidarity with Palestine would be met with hostility.'
Perry has stated that Mears subsequently told him he would 'never work for the Opera House ever again.'
The employees who signed the letter also highlighted what they described as a 'deafening' double standard, noting the organization's open support for Ukraine following the invasion by Russia in 2022, adding: 'We understood then that silence was unacceptable. Why is it different now?'
In response, Beard said: 'I am appalled by the crisis in Gaza and recognize the deep emotional impact this has had across our community and wider society. On this issue, we acknowledge and respect the full range of views held by our staff, artists and audiences.
'The events at the curtain call on July 19 were without precedent. We have reflected carefully and reviewed our internal protocols. We always endeavor to act with integrity and compassion. We want our stage to remain a space for shared cultural appreciation, free from individual political statements.'
The RBO's support for Ukraine was 'aligned with the global consensus at the time,' he added, but global geopolitics had become more complex and so the organization's stance had changed to ensure its actions reflected its 'purpose and values.'
The Israeli Opera removed details of the production of 'Tosca' from its website but has not commented on the cancellation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
21 minutes ago
- Arab News
How Israel's Netanyahu created a monster in Gaza — which came back to bite him
LONDON: Politics often gives rise to unexpected partnerships, which might at first glance seem illogical — even outright irrational. But for those who broker them, there is usually some inherent logic. In the case of the partnership between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, however, they can also be twisted and destructive. The relationship between Netanyahu and Hamas, which began long before the Oct. 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war in Gaza, is a prime example of a complete misreading by the Israeli prime minister of the true intentions of this fundamentalist organization, which would have tragic repercussions for both peoples. What brings Netanyahu and Hamas together is that neither appear to have any interest in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a compromise that could lead to a two-state solution. For the longest-serving Israeli prime minister in the country's history, averting an end to the conflict based on ending the occupation and agreeing to a two-state solution is his life's mission. James Dorsey of the Middle East Institute believes Netanyahu has developed a symbiotic relationship with the hardliners on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian divide as a tool for sabotaging any progress toward a peace process — let alone a successful conclusion. One telling instance came soon after Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996 and Israel unexpectedly dropped the request made by his predecessor, Shimon Peres, for Hamas political bureau member Mousa Abu Marzouk to be extradited from the US, where he was a resident, against the advice of the security establishment. This enabled a major Hamas figure to continue his advocacy for armed resistance freely from outside Gaza after his deportation to Jordan. One might think that a right-wing leader, at a time when other Hamas leaders were in Israeli jails, including its founder, Sheikh Ahmad Yasin, would be keen to put someone with Abu Marzouk's history behind bars. That is unless Netanyahu already saw the potential in Hamas, with its total resistance to Israel's existence, of keeping him in power, allowing him to become increasingly authoritarian, and leaving the two-state solution as an eternally hypothetical option. In the symbiotic relationship between the two, Netanyahu needed Hamas and Hamas needed Netanyahu, because they justified each other's existence in convincing their respective constituencies that they are each other's antidote. Preserving the relevance of Hamas in Palestinian politics and the conflict with Israel have become key instruments in Netanyahu's strategy of preventing Palestine from becoming a state, mainly by maintaining divisions within Palestinian society. The victory of Hamas in the 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council election against the governing Fatah movement played into the hands of Netanyahu. He further relished the violent split in Gaza a year later between Fatah and Hamas, which left Fatah, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, in control of the West Bank and Hamas in control of Gaza. With the Palestinian polity divided politically and territorially, and bad blood between the two factions, Netanyahu saw more than ever the opportunity to divide and conquer. He is not the only one in Israeli politics to harbor this Machiavellian approach. Bezalel Smotrich, now Israel's finance minister and one of the most extreme representatives of the settlers' movement in the cabinet, told the Knesset Channel in 2015: 'Hamas is an asset and Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) is a burden.' Speaking to Israeli media outlet Makor Rison in 2019, one of Netanyahu's closest advisers, Jonathan Urich, praised the Israeli prime minister for succeeding 'in achieving severance' between Gaza and the West Bank and 'effectively smashed the vision of the Palestinian state in those two regions.' One of the ploys to keep the Palestinian political system divided and paralyzed, many times with the unfortunate helping hand of Palestinian factions themselves, is to make it impossible to conduct free and fair elections. Such elections would offer the victor both domestic and international legitimacy, allowing them to advocate with enhanced credibility for an end to Israeli occupation. On the rare occasion that holding elections seemed to be possible, as was the case in the spring of 2021, Israel created obstacles, such as ignoring the EU's request to access the Palestinian occupied territories to observe the elections, in violation of the Oslo accords, and refusing to allow for East Jerusalemites to vote, knowing that without their participation, no Palestinian leader would agree to hold elections. Elections, therefore, have not been held for nearly 20 years. This democratic deficit is constantly exacerbated, allowing Israel under Netanyahu to maintain that neither the leadership of Gaza or the West Bank are legitimate or credible entities with which to conduct peace negotiations, and question why it should negotiate with one faction while the other might reject any agreement anyway. It is hardly an honest argument for an Israeli prime minister who has undermined every attempt at reconciliation between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. Worse for him and Israel, it served to maintain the apparent status quo, which imploded in the deadliest day in Israel's history on Oct. 7, 2023. In Netanyahu's world, it is impossible to separate between what serves him personally and his political creed. Still, the leitmotif of opposing the two-state solution goes back to the Oslo accords. His name is closely associated with incitement against the agreement and those who signed it. It propelled him to his first term as prime minister and five subsequent terms. When he expressed support for a two-state solution, it was for tactical reasons, under US pressure, or because he tried to form a coalition with more centrist elements in Israeli politics, but without conviction or the intention to ever make it happen. When he returned to power in 2009, Netanyahu was more determined than ever to weaken the Palestinian Authority and its president, Abbas, with measures such as downgrading the cooperation between the Israeli and Palestinian security forces in their fight against Hamas. Years later, in 2018, when Abbas decided to entirely halt the transfer of money to Gaza, leaving the Hamas-led government teetering on the brink of collapse, Netanyahu was the one who came to its rescue, with the ill-advised idea of encouraging a flow of cash from Qatar, literally in suitcases, into the hands of Hamas. It was alleged that $30 million passed through the Rafah crossing into Hamas coffers every month until October 2023. In addition, under the current Netanyahu government, Israel sanctioned more work permits than it had ever allowed prior to Hamas winning power. While it improved the dire economic situation in Gaza, it provided Hamas with the resources to build tunnels and purchase weapons. It has gradually transpired that Netanyahu was warned by security chiefs in the months leading up to the Oct. 7 attack that Hamas was preparing for another round of violence with Israel. At that point, however, he was too invested in the paradigm that Hamas had been pacified and had no interest in rattling the Israeli cage that might risk its hold on power. A future independent state commission of enquiry into the Oct. 7 attack will have to address the folly of Netanyahu in propping up Hamas and how it enabled this major security lapse to occur.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Govt urged to bring relatives of Afghans to UK after data breach
LONDON: A group of more than 50 charities and lawyers has urged the UK government to let Afghans granted asylum bring their families with them after their identities were revealed in a data breach. The leak in February 2022 saw the details of more than 100,000 Afghans who worked with the British accidentally shared online by a Ministry of Defence employee. They included people who had worked as interpreters for the British Army, and others who applied for asylum under the UK's Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy. The leak was hidden by the government through a legal mechanism called a superinjunction, making reporting it in the press illegal. The superinjunction was lifted by a court last month. ARAP and the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme do not allow applicants to sponsor relatives to come to the UK. The group of charities, including Asylum Aid and modern slavery charity Kalayaan, wrote to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper asking her 'to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality' and help take the relatives of those whose identities were leaked out of Afghanistan. 'The UK government has a moral responsibility to the Afghan people who continue to suffer, including now as a result of the data leak and have no choice but to seek safety elsewhere. 'The 2022 data breach directly exposed Afghans still in the country to a risk of reprisals they were not even aware of, and the High Court, in lifting the superinjunction, recognised that its imposition may have increased the risks these people face.' The signatories added: 'Poor decision-making could yet again have exposed Afghans to serious harm, with many of these people having clear UK family ties.' They said: 'It is essential that those who were resettled under ARAP and ACRS are able to live in safety and are given a fair opportunity to reunite with their families.' Some routes are open to resettled Afghans to reunite in the UK with relatives, but the signatories said these involve 'extremely costly application fees and require copious, specific documentation.' Wendy Chamberlain MP, the Liberal Democrat chair of the all-parliamentary group for Afghan women, told The Independent: 'There is already anecdotal evidence of reprisals on family members by the Taliban — the Home Office has no time to waste if the government wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality. 'The Home Office desperately needs to take a pragmatic and compassionate approach to allowing Afghans resettled in the UK to be reunited safely with their families. 'It is clear that these schemes have been seriously mis-handled, culminating in the recent exposure of the 2022 data leak.' James Tullett, CEO of the charity Ramfel, said: 'The government has acknowledged that the people they have resettled need protection, and yet this offer of support comes with the heavy price of separation from family. 'Allowing Afghan families to reunite won't solve all the problems associated with the data leak, but it will make a monumental difference for the affected families.'
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Ex-British Army head urged Palestine Action crackdown at behest of US company: Report
LONDON: The former head of the British Army and a House of Lords peer, Richard Dannatt, urged government ministers to crack down on Palestine Action at the behest of a US arms company that employs him as an adviser, The Guardian reported on Tuesday. He wrote privately to two Home Office ministers, requesting that they confront the 'threat' posed by the activist group, the newspaper reported. It came after Palestine Action in 2022 targeted a factory operated by Teledyne, a US multinational that sells military technologies, and which has employed Dannatt as a paid adviser since the year of the demonstration. Four of the group's activists broke into the Welsh factory to protest the sale of arms to Israel. Two years ago, they were convicted of conspiring to damage the factory. Palestine Action was listed as a terrorist organization in the UK last month after it carried out a demonstration on a British airbase, damaging Royal Air Force aircraft. A court case that involved one of the four activists involved in the 2022 protest heard allegations that Dannatt was 'seeking to influence' the criminal investigation into Palestine Action. According to court information, the chief police officer leading the probe told Teledyne executives: 'It would not be wise to have a member of the House of Lords poking around in a live criminal case.' Dannatt said the allegations were 'baseless' and he was unaware of the exchanges mentioned in court. Separately, the life peer is under investigation over two sets of allegations relating to alleged lobbying, which Parliament expressly forbids. Ten days after the 2022 factory protest, Sgt. Alex Stuart of Dyfed-Powys police, head of the resultant criminal investigation, sent an email to four of his superiors. He had already spoken to the factory's general manager, who had told him that a senior US-based Teledyne executive had 'spoken to Lord Richard Dannatt about Palestine Action.' Stuart wrote: 'Lord Dannatt was chief of the army general staff. He's now a life peer. He has an invested interest (sic) in this aspect of UK trade and investment, particularly military projects. 'Essentially, there have been an indication that he wants this case to be explained, and he wants to have some input on it. 'They haven't explained exactly what he wants, however I have told them that it would not be wise to have a member of the House of Lords poking around in a live criminal case.' Later that year, Dannatt held an online call with the factory's general manager and a senior member of Teledyne. He told The Guardian that the multinational had 'contacted me to seek my assistance in raising concerns by the company to the government with regard to attacks on their premises. 'They briefed me on the Palestine Action attacks, and I then agreed to write to the home secretary.' The former army chief sent a letter to then-Home Secretary Suella Braverman, which declared his advisory role 'at the outset.' In the letter, he said: 'The threat from Palestine Action has more widespread implications for security and the economy within the UK. 'The slow pace at which the British legal system has been working to take action against those involved in the trespass and criminal damage resulting from such 'direct action' has served to embolden Palestine Action and their continued recruitment drive for individuals who are prepared to commit arrestable offences.' Last year, he again contacted the government to address new 'attacks' on Teledyne facilities in the UK. Company officials had again requested that he raise their concerns to the British government, he told The Guardian. In a letter to Security Minister Dan Jarvis, Dannatt said he would be 'very grateful to receive assurance from the current government that the threat posed by Palestine Action continues to be fully recognized by our security services and that appropriate action is being taken.'
