logo
Saudi-born businessman to take $24m battle with Lebanese bank to UK court

Saudi-born businessman to take $24m battle with Lebanese bank to UK court

The National06-05-2025
A Saudi-born businessman has won the right for his battle for a Lebanese bank to give him a payment of $24 million to be heard by a court in the UK. Sheikh Mohammed Omar Kassem Alesayi asked Bank Audi to transfer the money, held in eight accounts, to an account he held with the UBP private bank in Geneva in 2022 but the bank has refused. The request came during Lebanon's banking crisis, which began in 2019, and has resulted in banks refusing to make international transfers. Bank Audi has argued that almost all Lebanese banks have limited access to foreign currency which has significantly curtailed their normal operations. Sheikh Alesayi, who was born in Saudi Arabia but is now a UK citizen, started proceedings against the bank in the English courts, seeking an order that the bank carry out the transfer. His claim is based on decisions of the High Court in London that customers of Lebanese banks are entitled to international transfers based on the law of Lebanon, provided there is a sufficient balance. Under UK law, a consumer living in the UK can bring a claim in an English court against a business that pursues commercial activities in the UK or directs such activities there. Bank Audi denied that it directs commercial activities to the UK and argues the High Court has no jurisdiction over the dispute. The bank also argued that Sheikh Alesayi was not domiciled in Britain when he first opened his account in 1994. But Sheikh Alesayi argued that he should be considered as being domiciled in Britain since 2016, when he opened an account with the UBP, and was by that time living full-time in London. As part of his claim, he told the High Court he has long-standing connections to the UK, dating to the 1970s. His father bought eight properties in the upmarket St John's Wood area of London and gave them to Sheikh Alesayi and his five siblings. From about 1990, he said he established a second home at the property and began regularly attending Regent's Park Mosque. The court was told that he bought a Bentley and had it delivered to the penthouse and also employed a chauffeur, which is indicative of permanent residency. Sheikh Alesayi was granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 1 Investor in 2018. He was granted Settlement Status with Indefinite Leave to Remain in 2021 and then in 2023 he was granted British citizenship. In his ruling, Judge Adam Constable said that 'Sheikh Alesayi has a good arguable case that he was domiciled in London from around 2012 onwards' and that the High Court has jurisdiction in the dispute. Lebanese banks imposed arbitrary restrictions on their clients in 2019 after the state failed to honour its bond commitments and the economy went into a tailspin. The Covid-19 pandemic forced the economic crisis to historic proportions. The possibility of Lebanese depositors soon gaining access up to $93 billion stuck in the country's banks is slim to none, financial analysts say, despite assurances from the Lebanese economy minister. The economic collapse was blamed on decades of financial mismanagement and corruption by Lebanon's ruling elite. Former central bank governor Riad Salameh has also been accused of helping to embezzle hundreds of millions of dollars from the central bank. A subsidiary of Bank Audi, Banque Audi (Suisse) SA, is one of several banks suspected of sheltering the money allegedly embezzled by Mr Salameh. A Swiss financial regulator last year found that Banque Audi (Suisse) 'breached its obligations in the prevention of money laundering' and 'seriously violated financial market law'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Consumer stocks rally drives UK's FTSE 100 to record close
Consumer stocks rally drives UK's FTSE 100 to record close

Khaleej Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Khaleej Times

Consumer stocks rally drives UK's FTSE 100 to record close

Britain's FTSE 100 clinched a fresh record close on Wednesday with consumer-related stocks leading the gains, while investors digested an inflation report that diminished hopes for a near-term Bank of England rate cut. The blue-chip index FTSE 100 closed 1% higher, breaching the intraday record levels it touched on Friday. Meanwhile, the more domestically focused FTSE midcap index posted a modest rise of 0.2%. Both the benchmark indexes erased earlier losses made in the session. Official data revealed the UK's consumer price inflation hit its highest in 18 months in July when it increased to 3.8% in the fastest annual rise for a Group of Seven economy and approaching the BoE's forecast of a 4% peak in September. The data further tempered the already low expectations of a rate cut by the British central bank, with traders now betting on a quarter-point reduction in March next year. Earlier this month, markets had anticipated a cut before the end of 2025. The inflation report's interest rate implications led to a 0.2% dip in homebuilders on concerns about mortgage affordability. The aerospace and defence index came under pressure for a second consecutive day, falling 1.7% after marking its largest single-day decline since early April on Tuesday. Consumer stocks drove the gains on the FTSE 100, with Unilever, Reckitt and Tesco rising between 1.2% and 3.2%. The healthcare sector was up 1.8%. Financials added to the advances, with banks and non-life insurers advancing 1.4% and 1.7%, respectively. Utilities saw a 1.9% increase, with water provider United Utilities gaining 3.5% after Barclays upgraded its stock rating to "Overweight" from "Equal Weight." Among individual movers, Ithaca Energy jumped 10.4% to the highest in nearly three years after the oil and gas company lifted its 2025 production forecast. Medical equipment maker Convatec rose 5.6% and posted its best day since March this year, after it announced $300 million share buyback programme.

Court ruling over UK migrant hotel throws policy into disarray and threatens chaos for thousands
Court ruling over UK migrant hotel throws policy into disarray and threatens chaos for thousands

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

Court ruling over UK migrant hotel throws policy into disarray and threatens chaos for thousands

A senior British minister has admitted that a key court ruling closing an asylum seekers ' hotel will affect migrant accommodation across the country. The Labour government's policy on housing people in modest hotels has been thrown into disarray after the High Court in London ruled on Tuesday that a controversial premises in Epping, Essex must close due to violent protests and allegations of sexual assault by an asylum seeker. Security Minister Dan Jarvis was asked whether the ruling was a 'major concern' for the UK Home Office, potentially affecting the government's ability to house asylum seekers across Britain. 'We're looking very carefully at the judgment that has been made, clearly we are considering the wider ramifications of it,' he said. 'In this specific case we'll have to look at how those people can be accommodated in an alternative way.' The Bell Hotel in Epping has become a focal point for anti-immigration demonstrations, with protesters waving St George's and Union flags, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl last month. With police and counter-demonstrators involved, Epping Forest District Council took the hotel to court, claiming that housing asylum seekers at The Bell was a 'clear breach of planning permission' because it had effectively become a hostel rather than a hotel. The judge stated that while lawful protests cannot veto the Home Office's use of hotel accommodation, there was evidence of harm in Epping that had to be prevented and the alleged migrant offences had contributed to this risk. The estimated 140 migrants, who mostly crossed the English Channel by boat, will have to leave the premises by September 12. Protest hotels The serious threat to the government, which has 32,000 asylum seekers in more than 200 hotels, is that other local authorities will take similar action to remove migrants. Home Office lawyers warned that this could act as a catalyst for further violent protests, with several injunction applications already being made by local authorities. Local councils will now have to show evidence of potential harm at other migrant hotels if they wish to have them closed. The right-wing Conservative and Reform parties have already indicated that local councils they control will go to court to shut asylum hotels. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right Reform party, has called for demonstrations to pressure local authorities to remove immigrants. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels and put pressure on local councils to go to court to get the illegal immigrants out,' he wrote in The Daily Telegraph. 'Because now we know that together we can win.' Mr Jarvis argued that Labour had inherited 'a massive asylum backlog' built up by the Conservatives' failed Rwanda deportation policy which had neglected processing of migrants while focusing on its 'Stop the Boats' campaign. He claimed the government had increased asylum decision-making by 116 per cent, returning more than 35,000 people who had no right to be in Britain. Despite improving diplomatic relations with France to prevent small boat crossings, the number of migrants crossing the English Channel passed 50,000 just after a year of Labour being in office, a record for that time span.

UK court ruling throws migrant hotel policy into disarray
UK court ruling throws migrant hotel policy into disarray

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

UK court ruling throws migrant hotel policy into disarray

A senior British minister has admitted that a key court ruling closing an asylum seekers ' hotel will affect migrant accommodation across the country. The Labour government's policy on housing people in modest hotels has been thrown into disarray after the High Court in London ruled on Tuesday that a controversial premises in Epping, Essex must close due to violent protests and allegations of sexual assault by an asylum seeker. Security Minister Dan Jarvis was asked whether the ruling was a 'major concern' for the UK Home Office, potentially affecting the government's ability to house asylum seekers across Britain. 'We're looking very carefully at the judgment that has been made, clearly we are considering the wider ramifications of it,' he said. 'In this specific case we'll have to look at how those people can be accommodated in an alternative way.' The Bell Hotel in Epping has become a focal point for anti-immigration demonstrations, with protesters waving St George's and Union flags, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl last month. With police and counter-demonstrators involved, Epping Forest District Council took the hotel to court, claiming that housing asylum seekers at The Bell was a 'clear breach of planning permission' because it had effectively become a hostel rather than a hotel. The judge stated that while lawful protests cannot veto the Home Office's use of hotel accommodation, there was evidence of harm in Epping that had to be prevented and the alleged migrant offences had contributed to this risk. The estimated 140 migrants, who mostly crossed the English Channel by boat, will have to leave the premises by September 12. Protest hotels The serious threat to the government, which has 32,000 asylum seekers in more than 200 hotels, is that other local authorities will take similar action to remove migrants. Home Office lawyers warned that this could act as a catalyst for further violent protests, with several injunction applications already being made by local authorities. Local councils will now have to show evidence of potential harm at other migrant hotels if they wish to have them closed. The right-wing Conservative and Reform parties have already indicated that local councils they control will go to court to shut asylum hotels. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right Reform party, has called for demonstrations to pressure local authorities to remove immigrants. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels and put pressure on local councils to go to court to get the illegal immigrants out,' he wrote in The Daily Telegraph. 'Because now we know that together we can win.' Mr Jarvis argued that Labour had inherited 'a massive asylum backlog' built up by the Conservatives' failed Rwanda deportation policy which had neglected processing of migrants while focusing on its 'Stop the Boats' campaign. He claimed the government had increased asylum decision-making by 116 per cent, returning more than 35,000 people who had no right to be in Britain. Despite improving diplomatic relations with France to prevent small boat crossings, the number of migrants crossing the English Channel passed 50,000 just after a year of Labour being in office, a record for that time span.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store