Karnataka high court rules Century Club comes under Right to Information Act due to receipt of land grant
Justice Suraj Govindaraj upheld the Karnataka Information Commission's order in this regard, stating the land grant constitutes substantial state financing. The court dismissed Century Club's petition challenging this decision.
The case originated when advocate S Umapathy requested RTI-mandated records in 2012. The club refused, claiming it wasn't a public authority. Umapathy then approached the Karnataka Information Commission in 2013.
On March 14, 2018, the Information Commission directed the club to provide the requested information.
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
Century Club contested this, arguing it operates on member payments and isn't a public authority under RTI. They maintained the land grant from the Maharaja, their Patron-in-Chief at the relevant time, wasn't a govt largesse. Umapathy countered that the current value of the centrally-located land was substantial, running into crores of rupees.
The court noted the 1913 land grant belonged to the Kingdom of Mysore, with no evidence suggesting it was the Maharaja's personal property. The judge emphasised that the club's entire operations depend on this land adjacent to Cubbon Park.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj concluded that the land's present value would amount to hundreds or thousands of crores, far exceeding member contributions. This substantial state contribution through the Kingdom of Mysore makes RTI provisions applicable to Century Club. The judgement highlighted that the club's recreational, sports, and entertainment activities rely entirely on this granted land, without which its existence would be questionable.
The court rejected Century Club's petition to exempt itself from RTI obligations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
RTI could help you in knowing EPF claim status: How to file an application
If you are struggling with delays or lack of clarity about your Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) account, filing an application under the Right to Information (RTI) could help cut the red tape. Under the RTI Act, 2005, you can request information from the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and receive a response within 30 days. Whether it is a pending claim, incorrect employer contributions, or transfer issues, here's a simple guide to filing an RTI online. What information can you seek? Before filing an application, be clear about the information you need. RTI is designed for seeking factual data, not explanations or opinions. You can request: Status of EPF withdrawal or transfer claims Employer contribution details Updates to your EPF passbook Reasons for delays in claim settlements Filing RTI online The simplest way to file an RTI is through the government's RTI portal: Here's how to do it: Go to the portal and click 'Submit Request'. Read the usage guidelines and tick the checkbox confirming you understand them. Click 'Submit' to proceed. On the online form, under 'Select Ministry/Department', choose Ministry of Labour and Employment. Then, under 'Select Public Authority', select Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). Fill in your details carefully -Your full name, gender, and contact details -RTI is only for Indian citizens -Your query regarding EPFO -Any relevant details like claim IDs to help officials trace your request -Pay the application fee -The standard RTI application fee is Rs 10, payable online via debit card, internet banking, or UPI. -Applicants falling under the Below Poverty Line category are exempt but must upload proof. When to expect a response Once submitted, the Public Information Officer has 30 days to respond. Replies are sent via email or post. Keep a copy of your RTI application and payment receipt for future reference. If there's no response within 30 days, you can file a first appeal through the same portal
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high court rules Century Club comes under Right to Information Act due to receipt of land grant
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court ruled that Century Club, Bengaluru, falls under the Right to Information Act's purview due to its receipt of 7.5 acres of land from the Kingdom of Mysore through the Maharaja in 1913. Justice Suraj Govindaraj upheld the Karnataka Information Commission's order in this regard, stating the land grant constitutes substantial state financing. The court dismissed Century Club's petition challenging this decision. The case originated when advocate S Umapathy requested RTI-mandated records in 2012. The club refused, claiming it wasn't a public authority. Umapathy then approached the Karnataka Information Commission in 2013. On March 14, 2018, the Information Commission directed the club to provide the requested information. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Century Club contested this, arguing it operates on member payments and isn't a public authority under RTI. They maintained the land grant from the Maharaja, their Patron-in-Chief at the relevant time, wasn't a govt largesse. Umapathy countered that the current value of the centrally-located land was substantial, running into crores of rupees. The court noted the 1913 land grant belonged to the Kingdom of Mysore, with no evidence suggesting it was the Maharaja's personal property. The judge emphasised that the club's entire operations depend on this land adjacent to Cubbon Park. Justice Suraj Govindaraj concluded that the land's present value would amount to hundreds or thousands of crores, far exceeding member contributions. This substantial state contribution through the Kingdom of Mysore makes RTI provisions applicable to Century Club. The judgement highlighted that the club's recreational, sports, and entertainment activities rely entirely on this granted land, without which its existence would be questionable. The court rejected Century Club's petition to exempt itself from RTI obligations.
Economic Times
4 days ago
- Economic Times
NSDL nears listing deadline: How does the institutional giant measure up to CDSL's retail surge?
THE ECONOMIC TIMES NSDL is expected to start taking investor orders as early as next week, with the issue size scaled back to 5.01 crore shares from an earlier proposed 5.73 crore. As India's largest depository heads for a SEBI-mandated IPO by July 31, investor focus sharpens on how NSDL compares to its listed peer CDSL, whose stock has surged 44% over the past Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL), the country's oldest and largest depository by value of assets under custody, is nearing its much-anticipated stock market debut, with Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) mandating a listing by the end of while investors await clarity on the final date, comparisons with its nimbler rival Central Depository Services Ltd (CDSL) have come into sharp focus, especially after NSDL's unlisted shares corrected nearly 20% from their 52-week highs, even as CDSL's listed stock rallied 45% over the past 12 months. According to Bloomberg, NSDL is expected to start taking investor orders as early as next week, with the issue size scaled back to 5.01 crore shares from an earlier proposed 5.73 crore. The IPO, which may raise up to $500 million, will be an entirely offer-for-sale (OFS) issue from shareholders including IDBI Bank, the National Stock Exchange of India, and State Bank of India. NSDL will not receive any proceeds from the IPO. 'The NSDL–CDSL divergence is a textbook case of differing business models and market positioning,' said Bhavik Joshi, Business Head at INVasset PMS. 'NSDL's core strength lies in its institutional dominance — with over 89% of India's demat asset value under custody, and deep integration with mutual funds, insurance firms, and government securities.' Joshi said, 'It also holds a strong presence in the unlisted and pre-IPO ecosystem, which is poised for regulatory tailwinds as private market infrastructure evolves.'CDSL, by contrast, has emerged as a retail powerhouse, especially during the recent bull run. 'CDSL has emerged as the poster child for India's retail financialization. Its nimble tech stack, competitive pricing, and rapid onboarding have led to a dominant share of retail demat accounts,' said Joshi. 'Investors must distinguish between depth and breadth… CDSL, though more retail-centric and cyclical, may offer stronger operating leverage in upcycles.' NSDL leads across several institutional metrics. As of December 31, 2024, it had 64,535 issuers, more than double CDSL's 31,557. It also had 63,542 DP Service Centres (DPSCs), compared to 17,883 for CDSL. NSDL continues to dominate in the unlisted space as well, with 53,169 unlisted companies on its platform, versus 21,295 for contrast, CDSL's strength lies in the number of demat accounts held, 14.65 crore as of December 2024, far outpacing NSDL's 3.88 crore. While CDSL holds more accounts, NSDL's custody value per account is significantly higher, averaging Rs 1.25 crore per account versus Rs 5 lakh for the unlisted market, NSDL shares have fallen from Rs 1,275 to around Rs 1,025 in recent weeks. 'The correction in NSDL's unlisted share price ahead of its IPO reflects recalibration rather than structural weakness,' said Joshi. 'It is not uncommon for pre-IPO valuations to adjust in response to listed peer benchmarks, changing market risk appetite, and revised growth expectations.''In NSDL's case, the re-pricing seems driven by three forces: softening investor expectations post-listing euphoria in CDSL, macro-level de-rating in tech-led financial infrastructure names, and the absence of a fresh primary capital infusion to signal near-term growth acceleration,' Joshi he believes the long-term outlook remains solid. 'If the IPO is priced conservatively relative to CDSL's current valuations, the drawdown may serve to reset expectations — not undermine fundamentals.'The IPO being entirely an OFS has also prompted questions about promoter intent. 'An IPO structured entirely as an Offer for Sale (OFS) naturally raises questions about promoter conviction and reinvestment intent,' Joshi said. 'While this doesn't inherently signal a lack of faith, it does alter the narrative.''NSDL is a cash-generating business with a long runway of regulatory and ecosystem-driven tailwinds. Its growth does not necessarily hinge on capital infusion,' he noted. However, in the absence of new capital, 'the spotlight shifts to governance quality, operating leverage, and dividend policy.' NSDL has already informed shareholders that all pre-IPO equity shares will be locked in starting July 18, in line with Sebi norms. MUFG Intime India has been appointed as registrar, and ICICI Securities, Axis Capital, HSBC Holdings, and IDBI Capital are lead managers to the issue. CDSL's meteoric rise has raised concerns about whether valuations have overshot fundamentals. 'CDSL's rally over the past year mirrors the broader surge in retail market activity, a secular rise in demat account openings, and expanding use-cases for depositories across asset classes,' said he cautioned, 'A large part of CDSL's revenues remains market-linked — from corporate actions, transactions, and float income — all of which are susceptible to market cycles.''If the current rally is pricing in uninterrupted volume growth, record IPO flows, and a persistently bullish retail environment, then there is risk of overextension,' he said. Still, long-term structural drivers remain intact, including SEBI's push for dematerialisation and broader digital beyond the listing, the medium-term growth opportunity for both depositories lies in expanding into new asset classes.'The next phase of growth for depositories lies beyond equity markets,' said Joshi. 'Medium-term opportunities include dematerialisation of insurance policies, educational certificates, sovereign gold bonds, and even tokenised assets.'CDSL is likely to benefit more from the ongoing expansion of the retail investor base, thanks to its quicker onboarding processes, wider integration with partners, and flexible tech architecture. NSDL, on the other hand, is better positioned to lead on the institutional front, particularly in managing complex asset classes and large-scale recordkeeping, owing to its long-standing relationships and institutional expertise, according to Joshi. Also read | NSDL IPO set to open soon: Unlisted share price down 20% from peak. Here are 7 things to watch out for 'While CDSL has the retail velocity and brand recall, NSDL brings depth, trust, and compliance strength,' Joshi said. 'The growth runway is large enough for both to scale — but the market will reward whoever leads the transition from compliance infrastructure to financial infrastructure utility.' (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
